Intraoperative cell salvage during radical cystectomy does not affect long-term survival

Current role of intraoperative cell salvage techniques in the management of renal tumors with level III and IV inferior vena cava thrombus extension

Background

En bloc removal of the kidney with tumor thrombus excision in a multidisciplinary team remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus extension. In order to minimize the hemodynamic impact of the surgical blood loss, intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) techniques can decrease the need for allogeneic blood and prevent blood transfusion related complications.

Objective

In this article, we evaluated the safety of IOCS during radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass with or without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Design and method

In this retrospective comparative multicenter analysis, clinical characteristics of 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with or without IOCS between 2012 and 2022 in three referral care units were collected into a database. The need for an allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) was also recorded, defined as any transfusion that occurred either intraoperatively or during the hospital stay.

Results

The need for ABT in the cell saver arm was significantly smaller due to the reinfusion of rescued blood (p < 0.015). In multivariate analysis, no cell saver usage was an independent predictor for complications ⩾3 Clavien 3a [odds ratio (OR) 18.71, 95% CI 1.056-331.703, p = 0.046]. No usage of IOCS was an independent predictor for a lower risk of death (OR 0.277, 95% CI 0.062-0.825, p = 0.024). During follow-up, patients who received salvaged blood did not experience an increased risk for developing local recurrence or distant metastases.

Conclusion

Transfusion of autologous blood is safe and can be using during nephrectomy and thrombectomy for advanced RCC.

Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature

Background

Allogeneic blood transfusions in oncologic surgery are associated with increased recurrence and mortality. Adverse effects on outcome could be reduced or avoided by using intraoperative autologous blood cell salvage (IOCS). However, there are concerns regarding the safety of the autologous IOCS blood. Previous meta-analyses from 2012 and 2020 did not identify increased risk of cancer recurrence after using autologous IOCS blood. The objective of this review was to reassess a greater number of IOCS-treated patients to present an updated and more robust analysis of the current literature.

Methods

This systematic review includes full-text articles listed in PubMed, Cochrane, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. We analyzed publications that discussed cell salvage or autotransfusion combined with the following outcomes: cancer recurrence, mortality, survival, allogeneic transfusion rate and requirements, length of hospital stay (LOS). To rate the strength of evidence, a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) of the underlying evidence was applied.

Results

In the updated meta-analysis, 7 further observational studies were added to the original 27 observational studies included in the former 2020 analysis. Studies compared either unfiltered (n = 2,311) or filtered (n = 850) IOCS (total n = 3,161) versus non-IOCS use (n = 5,342). Control patients were either treated with autologous predonated blood (n = 484), with allogeneic transfusion (n = 4,113), or did not receive a blood transfusion (n = 745). However, the current literature still contains only observational studies on these topics, and the strength of evidence remains low. The risk of cancer recurrence was reduced in recipients of autologous salvaged blood with or without LDF (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.90) compared to nontransfused patients or patients with allogeneic transfusion. There was no difference in mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.71-1.27) and LOS (mean difference -0.07 days, 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.48) between patients treated with IOCS blood or those in whom IOCS was not used. Due to high heterogeneity, transfusion rates or volumes could not be analyzed.

Conclusion

Randomized controlled trials comparing mortality and cancer recurrence rate of IOCS with or without LDF filtration versus allogeneic blood transfusion were not found. Outcome was similar or better in patients receiving IOCS during cancer surgery compared to patients with allogeneic blood transfusion or nontransfused patients.

[Safety of cell salvage in tumor surgery : Systematic review with meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic blood transfusion is avoidable in many oncological interventions by the use of cell salvage or mechanical autotransfusion (MAT). As irradiation is elaborate and expensive, the safety of leucocyte depletion filters (LDF) for autologous blood from the surgical field might be a more acceptable alternative for the prevention of cancer recurrences. A previous meta-analysis could not identify an increased risk of cancer recurrence. The aim of this review article is to provide an update of a previous meta-analysis from 2012 as well as a safety analysis of cell salvage with LDF due to the improved data situation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This systematic review included all studies in PubMed, Cochrane, Cochrane Reviews and Web of Science on cell salvage or autotransfusion combined with outcomes, e.g. cancer recurrence, mortality, survival, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay (LOS) after the use of MAT without irradiation and with or without LDF. The grades of recommendations (GRADE) assessment of underlying evidence was applied.

RESULTS

A total of seven new observational studies and seven meta-analyses were found that compared unfiltered or filtered cell salvage with autologous predeposition, allogeneic transfusion or without any transfusion. No randomized controlled trials have been completed. A total of 27 observational and cohort studies were included in a meta-analysis. The evidence level was low. The risk of cancer recurrence in recipients of autologous salvaged blood with or without LDF was reduced (odds ratio, OR 0.71, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.58-0.86) as compared to non-transfused subjects, allogeneic or predeposited autologous transfusion. The transfusion rate could not be assessed due to the substantial selection bias and large heterogeneity. Cell salvage does not change mortality and LOS. Leucocyte depletion studies reported a removal rate of cancer cells in the range of 99.6-99.9%.

CONCLUSION

Randomized controlled trials on a comparison of MAT and allogeneic blood transfusion as well as LDF and irradiation would be desirable but are not available. From observational trials and more than 6300 subjects and various tumors, cell salvage in cancer surgery with or without LDF appears to be sufficiently safe. The efficacy of leucocyte depletion of autologous salvaged blood is equivalent to irradiation. Unavailability of radiation is not a contraindication for cell salvage use in cancer surgery. By usage of leucocyte depleted salvaged autologous blood, the risks of allogeneic transfusion can be avoided.

Blood transfusions may adversely affect survival outcomes of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Despite common use in clinical practice, the impact of blood transfusions on prognosis among patients with lung cancer remains unclear. The purpose of the current study is to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of blood transfusions on survival outcomes of lung cancer patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid MEDLINE for publications illustrating the association between blood transfusions and prognosis among people with lung cancer from inception to November 2019. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the outcomes of interest. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using the random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² test. Publication bias was explored via funnel plot and trim-and-fill analyses.

Results

We included 23 cohort studies with 12,175 patients (3,027 cases and 9,148 controls) for meta-analysis. Among these records, 22 studies investigated the effect of perioperative transfusions, while one examined that of transfusions during chemotherapy. Two studies suggested the possible dose-dependent effect in accordance with the number of transfused units. In pooled analyses, blood transfusions deleteriously influenced both OS (HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.14–1.61, P<0.001, I²=0%) and DFS (HR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.15–1.86, P=0.001, I²=0%) of people with lung cancer. No evidence of significant publication bias was detected in funnel plot and trim-and-fill analyses (OS: HR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.07–1.49, P=0.006; DFS: HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.08–1.69, P=0.008).

Conclusions

Blood transfusions were associated with decreased survival of patients with lung cancer.

Safety, efficacy and cost of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

We aim to examine the safety and efficacy of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy at two institutions during 01/01/18-31/12/19. Patients were grouped by ICS use. Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates, and biochemical recurrence (prostate specific antigen >0.2 mg/mL). Secondary outcomes were use of adjuvant therapies, Clavien-Dindo complications and transfusion-related cost (allogeneic transfusion + ICS setup + ICS reinfusion).

RESULTS

In total, 168 men were enrolled. Patients were grouped based on whether they received no blood conservation technique (126 men) or ICS (42 men). Groups were similar in median age, pre- and post-operative haemoglobin and length of stay. They also had similar post-operative tumour Gleason score, TNM-stage and positive surgical margin rates. Compared with controls, the ICS group had shorter follow up (336 vs. 225 days; P=0.003). The groups had similar rates of biochemical recurrence (17% vs. 14%; P=0.90), adjuvant therapy use (30% vs. 29%; P=0.85) and complications (14% vs. 19% patients; P=0.46). There was no metastatic progression or cancer-specific mortality in either group. Although a similar proportion of patients received allogenic transfusion (2.4% vs. 4.8%; P=0.33) and units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) (9 vs. 5 units), transfusion-related costs were higher amongst the ICS group (AUD $11,422 vs. $43,227).

CONCLUSIONS

ICS use in radical prostatectomy was not associated with altered rates of allogeneic transfusion, complications, biochemical recurrence or adjuvant or salvage therapies. Transfusion related costs were higher in the ICS group.

Clinical Utility of Autologous Salvaged Blood: a Review

INTRODUCTION

Autologous salvaged blood, commonly referred to as "cell saver" or "cell salvage" blood, is an important method of blood conservation. Understanding the mechanism of action and summarizing the existing evidence regarding the safety, efficiency, and the relative costs of cell salvage may help educate clinicians on how and when to best utilize autotransfusion.

METHODS

This review focuses on issues concerning the quality of red blood cells (RBC), efficiency, and the cost effectiveness relative to autotransfusion. The key considerations of safe use and clinical applicability are described along with the challenges for wider dissemination.

RESULTS

Cell salvage can reduce requirements for allogeneic transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Autologous salvaged RBCs provide high-quality transfusion, since the cells have not been subjected to the adverse effects of storage as occurs with banked blood. The risks for RBC alloimmunization and transfusion-related infectious diseases are also avoided. With a careful selection of cases, salvaged blood can be more cost effective than donor blood. Cell salvage may have a role in cardiac, major vascular, orthopedic, transplant, and trauma surgeries. However, there remain theoretical safety concerns in cases with bacterial contamination or in cancer surgery.

CONCLUSION

In addition to other methods of blood conservation used in patient blood management programs, autologous salvaged blood adds value and is cost effective for appropriate surgical cases. Evidence suggests that autologous salvaged blood may be of higher quality and confer a cost reduction compared with the allogeneic banked blood, when used appropriately.

The Safety and Short-term Outcomes of Leukocyte Depleted Autologous Transfusions During Radical Cystectomy

OBJECTIVE

To examine long- and short-term outcomes using cell salvage with a commercially available leukocyte depletion filter following radical cystectomy in an oncologic population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-seven patients, 87 of whom received a cell salvage transfusion, were retrospectively identified from chart review. Ninety-day outcomes as well as long-term mortality and cancer recurrence data were collected. Chi-square, Student's t, or Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate. Multivariable regressions of survival were performed with a Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Those who received a cell salvage transfusion did not show any differences in rate of cancer recurrence (23%) vs those who did not receive a cell salvage transfusion (24%; P = .85). There were also no differences noted in mortality rates between the 2 populations (12% vs 17%; P = .36). Furthermore, no differences were noted in postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, 90-day culture positive infections or readmissions (P >.05).

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences in short-term or long-term patient outcomes between those who did and did not receive an intraoperative cell salvage transfusion. Cell salvage transfusions with a leukocyte depletion filter are safe and effective methods to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusions while controlling for the theoretical risk of metastatic spread.

The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of intra-operative cell salvage on outcomes in open nephrectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing open nephrectomy for suspected malignancy from 1 October 2013 to 1 October 2017. Patients were grouped and compared based on whether they received intra-operative cell salvage (ICS). Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates (ATRs), and if histology confirmed cancer, disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications and transfusion-related cost.

RESULTS

Forty patients underwent open nephrectomy for suspected malignancy during the enrolment period. Sixteen patients received ICS while 24 did not (standard group). Compared with the standard group, ICS patients had similar median age (63.5 vs. 61.0 years; p = 0.83) but fewer females (19% vs. 58%; p = 0.013). The groups were similar in pre-operative and discharge haemoglobin, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of hospital stay and proportion with thoracoabdominal surgical approach. The ICS group had a smaller proportion undergoing partial nephrectomy (19% vs. 54%; p = 0.025) and shorter median follow-up (278 vs. 827 days; p = 0.0005). Histology was malignant for 14 ICS and 15 standard patients. The ICS group had more frequent ≥T2 disease (79% vs. 27%; p = 0.005). There were no positive margins. Both groups had similar ATRs (6% vs. 4%; p = 0.96), complication rates (19% vs. 29%; p = 0.46) and recurrence rates (18% vs. 7%; p = 0.40). Transfusion costs were higher amongst ICS patients (AUD $878.18 vs. $49.65 per patient).

CONCLUSION

ICS appears safe, with low rates of recurrence and complication. Both groups had low ATRs, and therefore cost benefit for ICS was not seen.

Approaches to Bloodless Surgery for Oncology Patients

Providing optimal care to surgical oncology patients who cannot be transfused for religious or other reasons can be challenging. However, with careful planning, using a combination of blood-conserving methods, these "bloodless" patients have clinical outcomes that are similar to other patients who can be transfused. Bloodless surgery can be accomplished safely for most patients, including those undergoing technically challenging oncologic surgery. This article reviews best practices used in a bloodless program during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, with the aim of achieving optimal outcomes when transfusion is not an option for surgical oncology patients.

Survival analysis of intraoperative blood salvage for patients with malignancy disease: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood salvage as a blood-saving strategy has been widely used in surgery. Considering its theoretic risk of malignant tumor cells being reinfused and the corresponding blood metastases, the safety of intraoperative blood salvage in cancer surgery remains controversial.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE to November 2017. We included only studies comparing intraoperative blood salvage with allogeneic blood transfusion.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 9 studies with 4354 patients with 1346 patients in the intraoperative blood salvage group and 3008 patients in the allogeneic blood transfusion group. There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.58), 5-year disease-free survival outcome (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.35), or 5-year recurrence rate (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71-1.05) between the 2 study groups. Subgroup analysis also showed no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival outcome (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57-1.67) of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with malignant disease, intraoperative blood salvage did not increase the tumor recurrence rate and had comparable survival outcomes with allogeneic blood transfusion.

Korean clinical practice guideline for perioperative red blood cell transfusion from Korean Society of Anesthesiologists

Background

Considering the functional role of red blood cells (RBC) in maintaining oxygen supply to tissues, RBC transfusion can be a life-saving intervention in situations of severe bleeding or anemia. RBC transfusion is often inevitable to address intraoperative massive bleeding; it is a key component in safe perioperative patient management. Unlike general medical resources, packed RBCs (pRBCs) have limited availability because their supply relies entirely on voluntary donations. Additionally, excessive utilization of pRBCs may aggravate prognosis or increase the risk of developing infectious diseases. Appropriate perioperative RBC transfusion is, therefore, crucial for the management of patient safety and medical resource conservation. These concerns motivated us to develop the present clinical practice guideline for evidence-based efficient and safe perioperative RBC transfusion management considering the current clinical landscape.

Methods

This guideline was obtained after the revision and refinement of exemplary clinical practice guidelines developed in advanced countries. This was followed by rigorous evidence-based reassessment considering the healthcare environment of the country.

Results

This guideline covers all important aspects of perioperative RBC transfusion, such as preoperative anemia management, appropriate RBC storage period, and leukoreduction (removal of white blood cells using filters), reversal of perioperative bleeding tendency, strategies for perioperative RBC transfusion, appropriate blood management protocols, efforts to reduce blood transfusion requirements, and patient monitoring during a perioperative transfusion.

Conclusions

This guideline will aid decisions related to RBC transfusion in healthcare settings and minimize patient risk associated with unnecessary pRBC transfusion.

Current Status of the Use of Salvaged Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumour Surgery

To review the current status of salvaged blood transfusion (SBT) in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS), with regard to its safety and efficacy, contraindications, and adverse effects. We also aimed to establish that the safety and adverse event profile of SBT is comparable and at least equal to that of allogeneic blood transfusion. MEDLINE and Scopus were used to search for relevant articles, based on keywords such as "cancer surgery," "salvaged blood," and "circulating tumor cells." We found 159 articles, of which 55 were relevant; 20 of those were excluded because they used other blood conservation techniques in addition to cell salvage. Five articles were manually selected from reference lists. In total, 40 articles were reviewed. There is sufficient evidence of the clinical safety of using salvaged blood in oncological surgery. SBT decreases the risk of postoperative infections and tumour recurrence. However, there are some limitations regarding its clinical applications, as it cannot be employed in cases of sepsis. In this review, we established that earlier studies supported the use of salvaged blood from a cell saver in conjunction with a leukocyte depletion filter (LDF). Furthermore, we highlight the recent emergence of sufficient evidence supporting the use of intraoperative cell salvage without an LDF in MSTS.

Intra-operative cell salvage in urological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systematically the safety and efficacy of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in urology.

METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library to August 2017 was performed using methods pre-published on PROSPERO. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. Eligible titles were comparative studies published in English that used ICS in urology. Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates (ATRs) and tumour recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications and cost.

RESULTS

Fourteen observational studies were identified, with a total of 4 536 patients. ICS was compared with no the blood conservation technique (seven studies), preoperative autologous donation (PAD; five studies) or both (two studies). Cohorts underwent open prostatectomy (11 studies), open cystectomy (two studies) or open partial nephrectomy (one study). Meta-analysis was possible only for ATRs within prostatectomy studies. In this setting, ICS reduced ATR compared with no the blood conservation technique (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.76) but not PAD (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39-1.31). In the non-prostatectomy setting, ATRs amongst patients who underwent ICS were significantly higher or similar in one and two studies, respectively. Tumour recurrence was found to be significantly less common (two studies), similar (eight studies) or not measured (four studies). All six studies reporting complications found no difference in their ICS cohorts. Regarding cost, one study from 1995 found ICS more expensive than PAD, while two more recent studies found ICS to be cheaper than no blood conservation technique. As a result of inter-study heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not possible for recurrence, complications or cost.

CONCLUSION

Low-level evidence exists that, compared with other blood conservation techniques, ICS reduces ATR and cost while not affecting complications. It does not appear to increase tumour recurrence post-prostatectomy, although follow-up durations were short. Small study sizes and short follow-ups mean conclusions cannot be drawn with regard to recurrence after nephrectomy or cystectomy. Randomized trials with long-term follow-up evaluating ICS in urology are required.

The impact of intra-operative cell salvage during open radical prostatectomy

Background

To examine the effect of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) in open radical prostatectomy.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy for malignancy at our institution between 10/04/2013 and 10/04/2017 were enrolled. Patients were grouped and compared based on whether they received ICS. Primary outcomes were allogeneic transfusion rates, and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were complications and transfusion-related cost.

Results

Fifty-nine men were enrolled; 30 used no blood conservation technique, while 29 employed ICS. There were no significant differences between groups in age, pre- or post-operative haemoglobin, Charlson comorbidity index, operation duration or length of stay. Tumour characteristics were also similar between groups, including pre-operative prostate specific antigen, post-operative Gleason score, T-stage, nodal status and rates of margin positivity. Compared with controls, the ICS group had longer follow up (945 vs. 989 days; P=0.0016). The control and ICS groups were not significantly different in rates of tumour recurrence (6 vs. 3 patients; P=0.30) or complications (10 vs. 5 patients; P=0.16). While the proportion of patients receiving allogenic transfusion was similar (9 vs. 6 patients; P=0.41), fewer red blood products transfused (40 vs. 12 units) meant transfusion related costs were lower in ICS patients (AUD $47,666 vs. $37,429).

Conclusions

ICS reduced transfusion related costs, without affecting allogeneic transfusion rates, tumour recurrence or complication rates. These findings extend the literature supporting ICS in oncological surgery. Prospective randomised studies are needed to confirm the existing level III evidence.

Metastatic efficiency of tumour cells can be impaired by intraoperative cell salvage process: truth or conjecture?

The use of salvaged blood in oncological surgery has been a matter of controversy over the years. This is due to the concern of systemic dissemination of reinfused tumour cells. Recent literature, across disciplines, has shed considerable light on its safety in terms of tumour recurrence, progression and overall survival rates. This clinical safety demonstrates the apparent metastatic inefficiency of reinfused tumour cells. The proof of this concept comes from various studies that have shown that salvaged blood has no tumour cells, or has a significantly lower count as compared to the patient's original circulatory tumour load. Recently, we took a step further and found that the tumour cells in the salvaged blood lose the capacity to replicate. In this review, we revisited the safety of salvaged blood from the point of view of metastatic potential. We have presented basic and applied science evidence regarding the innocuous nature of tumour cells that have been subjected to the cell salvage process. The understanding of the metastatic efficiency or the lack of it in tumour cells subjected to salvage process is key to allay the concerns conventionally associated with the use of salvaged blood in tumour surgery. Based on the available literature, we surmise that the prevalent apprehensions on the usage of salvaged blood are ill-founded and further substantiate why tumour cells in the salvaged blood could be regarded as cells with non-metastatic potential.

The use of intraoperative cell salvage in urologic oncology

Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has been used in urologic surgery for over 20 years to manage intraoperative blood loss and effectively minimize the need for allogenic blood transfusion. Concerns about viability of transfused erythrocytes and potential dissemination of malignant cells have been addressed in the urologic literature. We present a comprehensive review of the use of IOCS in urologic oncologic surgery. IOCS has been shown to preserve the integrity of erythrocytes during processing and effectively provides cell filtration to mitigate the risk of tumor dissemination. Its use is associated with reduction in the overall need for allogenic blood transfusion, which clinically reduces the risk of hypersensitivity reactions and disease transmission, and may have important implications on overall oncologic outcomes. In the context of a variety of urologic malignancies, including prostate, urothelial, and renal cancer, the use of IOCS appears to be safe, without risk of tumor spread leading to metastatic disease or differences in cancer-specific and overall survival. IOCS has been shown to be an effective intraoperative blood management strategy that appears safe for use in urologic oncology surgery. The ability to reduce the need for additional allogenic blood transfusion may have significant impact on immune-mediated oncologic outcomes.

Short-term Outcomes of Intraoperative Cell Saver Transfusion During Open Partial Nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transfusion using the Cell Saver system is associated with inferior outcomes in patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

All patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon (BJD) from August 2008 to April 2015 were retrospectively identified. Operations were grouped and compared according to whether they included a transfusion using the Cell Saver intraoperative cell salvage system.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine open partial nephrectomies in 67 patients were identified. Thirty-three procedures (48%) included a Cell Saver transfusion. Most tumors were clear cell renal cell carcinoma (62%) and stage T1a (68%). There were no significant differences between groups for any measured clinical or pathologic characteristics. Operations including a Cell Saver transfusion were longer (141 vs 108 minutes, P <.001), had significantly greater blood loss (600 vs 200 mL, P <.001), and had longer median renal ischemia times (15 vs 10 minutes, P = .03). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rate (21% vs 17%, P = .83) or median length of hospital stay (3 vs 3 days, P = .09). At a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range: 8-42 months), 1 patient in the non-Cell Saver transfusion group had cancer recurrence. There was no metastatic progression or cancer-specific mortality in either group.

CONCLUSION

Cell Saver transfusion during open partial nephrectomy was not associated with inferior outcomes with short-term follow-up, and no patients developed metastatic disease.

Are we ready for the use of intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of using intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) in combination with leucocyte depletion filter (LDF) in eliminating tumour cells from blood salvaged during metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). This is with the view to pave the path for use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS and musculoskeletal oncological surgery.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients with known primary epithelial tumour, who were offered surgery for metastatic spine disease at our university hospital, were recruited. Blood samples were collected at three different stages during surgery: from operative field prior to IOCS processing, after IOCS processing and after IOCS-LDF processing. Three separate samples (5 ml each) were taken at each stage. Samples were examined by cell block technique using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibodies to identify tumour cells of epithelial origin in the samples.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients, ten were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria leaving 50 patients. Malignant tumour cells were detected in the samples from operative field prior to IOCS processing in 24 patients and in the samples from the transfusion bag post-IOCS processing in 4 patients. No viable malignant cells were detectable in any of the blood samples after passage through both IOCS and LDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support the notion that IOCS-LDF combination works effectively in eliminating tumour cells from salvaged blood so this technique can possibly be applied in MSTS and even musculoskeletal oncological surgery. This concept can then be extended to other oncological surgeries in general with further appropriate clinical studies.

Flow cytometric evaluation of the safety of intraoperative salvaged blood filtered with leucocyte depletion filter in spine tumour surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has not been widely adopted in oncological surgery due to the hypothetical concern of reinfusion of malignant cells. We evaluated the feasibility of IOCS in combination with leucocyte depletion filter (LDF) in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS).

METHODS

Patients with known primary epithelial tumour, operated for metastatic spinal disease, were recruited. Blood samples were collected at five different stages during surgery: 2 stages from patient vein during induction and at the time of maximum tumour manipulation, 3 stages from the operative blood prior to IOCS processing, after IOCS processing, and after IOCS-LDF processing. Of the samples taken at each stage, 5 ml were analyzed for tumour cells using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Of 12 patients recruited, only 11 could be finally analyzed. Flow cytometry analysis of their samples showed that 8 of 11 patients had tumour cells in the unfiltered salvaged blood. In filtered salvaged blood, the tumour cell count was zero in the majority of samples (8/11 patients), whereas three patients' samples had a few tumour cells. The mean difference between the tumour cell quantity in the samples from the patient vein and filtered salvaged blood was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

IOCS-LDF was shown to be effective in removing tumour cells from the blood salvaged during MSTS. If there were any tumour cells found, the quantity was significantly less than that in the patient's circulation. The results of this study reiterates the conclusions of our previous published work where we showed that IOCS-LDF treated blood in MSTS is safe for transfusion.

Blood loss in spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease: a meta-analysis

There is currently no consensus about the mean volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012. Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss. We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760 patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (> 5500 ml), the resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger's test, which did not show any small-study effects (p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 90%; p < 0.001). Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to autotransfusion in these patients.

Blood loss, predictors of bleeding, transfusion practice and strategies of blood cell salvaging during liver transplantation

Blood loss during liver transplantation (OLTx) is a common consequence of pre-existing abnormalities of the hemostatic system, portal hypertension with multiple collateral vessels, portal vein thrombosis, previous abdominal surgery, splenomegaly, and poor “functional” recovery of the new liver. The intrinsic coagulopathic features of end stage cirrhosis along with surgical technical difficulties make transfusion-free liver transplantation a major challenge, and, despite the improvements in understanding of intraoperative coagulation profiles and strategies to control blood loss, the requirements for blood or blood products remains high. The impact of blood transfusion has been shown to be significant and independent of other well-known predictors of posttransplant-outcome. Negative effects on immunomodulation and an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality have been repeatedly demonstrated. Isovolemic hemodilution, the extensive utilization of thromboelastogram and the use of autotransfusion devices are among the commonly adopted procedures to limit the amount of blood transfusion. The use of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous blood transfusion should still be considered an important method to reduce the need for allogenic blood and the associated complications. In this article we report on the common preoperative and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss, intraoperative transfusion practices, anesthesiologic and surgical strategies to prevent blood loss, and on intraoperative blood salvaging techniques and autologous blood transfusion. Even though the advances in surgical technique and anesthetic management, as well as a better understanding of the risk factors, have resulted in a steady decrease in intraoperative bleeding, most patients still bleed extensively. Blood transfusion therapy is still a critical feature during OLTx and various studies have shown a large variability in the use of blood products among different centers and even among individual anesthesiologists within the same center. Unfortunately, despite the large number of OLTx performed each year, there is still paucity of large randomized, multicentre, and controlled studies which indicate how to prevent bleeding, the transfusion needs and thresholds, and the “evidence based” perioperative strategies to reduce the amount of transfusion.

Should intraoperative cell-salvaged blood be used in patients with suspected or known malignancy?

PURPOSE

Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is used as an alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in an attempt to avoid or minimize the risks associated with allogeneic blood. Intraoperative cell salvage is generally avoided in surgeries where malignancy is confirmed or suspected due to concern for potential metastasis or cancer recurrence. The application of post-processing methods for ICS is hypothesized to eliminate this potential risk. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine the in vitro experimental evidence as it pertains to the removal of tumour cells from ICS blood and to review the clinical studies where ICS blood has been used in patients with malignancy.

SOURCE

A search of the English literature for relevant articles published from 1973 to 2012 was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Bibliographies were cross-referenced to locate further studies.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Leukoreduction filters are an effective method for removal of malignant cells from ICS blood. Small non-randomized clinical studies to date do not show evidence of an increased rate of metastasis or cancer recurrence. Although a theoretical risk of disease recurrence persists, the decision to use autologous ICS blood must be weighed against the known risks of allogeneic blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion of autologous blood harvested via ICS should be considered a viable option for reduction or avoidance of allogeneic product during many oncologic surgeries and may be a lifesaving option for those patients who refuse allogeneic blood products.

Towards bloodless cystectomy: a 10-year experience of intra-operative cell salvage during radical cystectomy

Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Guidance from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the use of intraoperative cell savage (ICS) has been in place for over 3 years and recommends its routine usage in all patients undergoing radical pelvic urological surgery. The current series describes the contribution of ICS to contemporary blood conservation strategies and the goal of 'bloodless' cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE

•  To describe a 10-year experience of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) during radical cystectomy at a regional cancer centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

•  Between 1(st) January 2001 and 31(st) December 2010, 213 consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer, with an ICS suction device used in theatre. •  Surgery was performed by one of three consultant surgeons using an open technique with lymph node clearance to the iliac bifurcation. Orthotopic bladder substitution was performed in 25% of patients overall. •  ICS data were collected prospectively on an electronic database and the institutional database was then cross-referenced with a complete review of patients' medical records, laboratory results and radiological investigations retrospectively. •  Data collected included patient demographics, haemoglobin levels before and after surgery, the volume of ICS blood collected and re-infused, complications related to ICS usage, the volume of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs) transfused, length of stay and overall patient survival at 3 and 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

•  In all 213 cases described, ICS was used without complication, with no recorded episodes of device failure and no complications related to the use of cell salvage. •  Overall, 91% of patients received ICS blood and 28% of patients avoided any further transfusion products. •  The median (range) follow-up for the cohort was 24 (9-119) months. •  Seventy percent of the transfusion requirement for patients who underwent surgery in 2001 was met using allogeneic RBC transfusion but by 2010, as blood loss markedly reduced, ICS blood was able to provide ∼70% of overall transfusion requirements. As a consequence, the percentage of patients avoiding an allogeneic RBC transfusion significantly increased during the 10-year period, such that 70% of patients avoided allogeneic RBC transfusion in 2010 compared with only 10-20% in the period 2001-2003 •  The overall survival rate at 3 and 5 years was 58% and 49%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

•  In conclusion, the use of ICS during radical cystectomy is safe; it is capable of meeting the majority of or, in some cases, the total blood product requirement for individual patients. As a result, it decreases the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion and hence the associated risks. Current follow-up shows no apparent risk of decreased long-term survival from an oncological perspective. •  The authors advocate routine availability of ICS for all major urological oncology cases.

Intraoperative cell salvage in radical prostatectomy does not appear to increase long-term biochemical recurrence, metastases, or mortality

BACKGROUND

Blood management strategies help to conserve allogeneic red blood cells, a finite resource. Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is an effective method of allogeneic avoidance. However, concerns persist about the safety of ICS in surgical oncology cases, including radical prostatectomy (RP). Previous findings do not support these concerns. We hypothesized that ICS would not increase rates of long-term prostate cancer recurrence characterized by biochemical failure, disease dissemination, or mortality.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing RP by a single urologist over two 3-month periods 1 year apart were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in the first period had preoperative autologous donation (PAD) but not ICS (PAD group), whereas those in the second period had ICS only (ICS group). Variables assessed included patient demographics, prostate-specific antigen levels at surgery and end of follow-up, clinical stage, operative time, surgical margin status, pathologic stage and grade, Gleason score sum, length of hospital stay, biochemical recurrence, metastases, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 116 consecutive patients were analyzed. Of these, 32 patients in the PAD group and 42 patients in the ICS group had follow-up of at least 4.75 years. There was a significantly higher rate of biochemical failure (34.4% vs. 9.5%; p = 0.02) and metastases (12.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.03) in the PAD group versus the ICS group; there was no significant difference in mortality (9.4% vs. 0%; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

ICS appears to be a safe and effective method of allogeneic blood conservation in patients undergoing RP. The findings suggest that there is no increased risk of biochemical failure, disease dissemination, or mortality at 5 years post-RP as a result of ICS use.

Intraoperative red blood cell salvage and autologous transfusion during open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a cost-benefit analysis

INTRODUCTION

Open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) has an average blood loss of over 1,000 ml. This has been reported even from high volume centres of excellence. We have looked at the clinical and financial benefits of using intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) as a method of reducing the autologous blood transfusion requirements for our RRP patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Group A comprised 25 consecutive patients who underwent RRP immediately prior to the acquisition of a cell saver machine. Group B consisted of the next 25 consecutive patients undergoing surgery using the Dideco Electa (Sorin Group, Italy) cell saver machine. Blood transfusion costs for both groups were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative haemoglobin was similar in both groups (11.1 gm/dl in Group A and 11.4 gm/dl in Group B). All Group B patients received autologous blood (average 506 ml, range: 103-1,023 ml). In addition, 5 patients (20%) in Group B received a group total of 16 units (average 0.6 units) of homologous blood. For Group A the total cost of transfusing the 69 units of homologous blood was estimated as £9,315, based on a per blood unit cost of £135. This cost did not include consumables or nursing costs.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that autologous transfusions increased the risk of early biochemical relapse or of disease dissemination. ICS reduced our dependence on donated homologous blood.

The relationship between perioperative blood transfusion and overall mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

The relationship between perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and oncologic outcomes is controversial. In patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer and several other solid malignancies, PBT has been associated with an increased risk of mortality. Yet, the urologic literature has a paucity of data addressing this topic. We sought to evaluate whether PBT affects overall survival following radical cystectomy (RC) for patients with bladder cancer.

METHODS

The medical records of 777 consecutive patients undergoing RC for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder were reviewed. PBT was defined as transfusion of red blood cells during RC or within the postoperative hospitalization. The primary outcome was overall survival. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared using χ(2) tests, and Cox multivariate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 323 patients (41.6%) underwent PBT. In the univariate analysis, PBT was associated with increased overall mortality (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78). Additionally, an independent association was demonstrated in a non-transformed Cox regression model (HR, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) but not in a model utilizing restricted cubic splines (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77-1.38). The c-index was 0.78 for the first model and 0.79 for the second.

CONCLUSIONS

In a traditional multivariate model, mirroring those that have been applied to this question in the general surgery literature, we demonstrated an association between PBT and overall mortality after RC. However, this relationship is not observed in a second statistical model. Given the complex nature of adequately controlling for confounding factors in studies of PBT, a prospective study will be necessary to fully elucidate the independent risks associated with PBT.

Oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy with intraoperative cell salvage

PURPOSE

To evaluate oncologic outcomes following the use of intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) as a blood loss management strategy during open radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all open retropubic RP cases performed by a single surgeon. Patients were identified who received IOCS blood and evaluated for an increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and overall mortality.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 1,862 men, 395 (21.2%) of whom received IOCS blood. At a median follow-up of 47.0 months, men who received IOCS blood were not at an increased risk of BCR (P = 0.323) or all-cause mortality (P = 0.892). IOCS use did not confer an increased risk of BCR within any D'Amico preoperative risk category (low risk, P = 0.592; intermediate risk, P = 0.107; and high risk, P = 0.697).

CONCLUSIONS

IOCS is safe for the management of blood loss during RP. At long-term follow-up, IOCS use was not associated with an increased risk of BCR or death. While it remains preferable to avoid any form of blood transfusion, we advocate for the use of IOCS in place of allogeneic blood. These conclusions are drawn from our study of the largest and longest followed cohort patients who received IOCS blood during RP.

Cost benefits of intraoperative cell salvage in radical cystectomy

Objective:

We have looked into the clinical and financial benefits of using intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) as a method to reduce the amount of autologous blood transfusion (ABT) requirement for our radical cystectomy (RC) patients.

Materials and Methods:

Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing radical cystectomy received cell salvaged blood (ICS), while 15 did not (NCS). The cost of using the cell saver, number of homologous transfusions, survival, and recurrences were recorded and compared using paired t-test and chi-square test between the two groups. A Dideco Electa® (Sorin Group, Electa, Italy) cell saver machine was used for all the patients in the ICS group and leukocyte filters were used on the salvaged blood before the autologous transfusion.

Results:

The mean age was 63 years (53–72 years), 66 years (46–79 years) in ICS and NCS groups, respectively (P = 0.368). All 15 (100%) patients in the NCS group required an allogenic transfusion compared to 9/15 (60%) in the ICS group (P = 0.08). There was a significant reduction in the mean volume of allogenic blood transfused with the use of cell saver. Median follow-up was 23 and 21 months in the ICS and NCS group with 10 and 4 patients alive at last follow-up, respectively. There was a saving of 355 pounds per patient in the ICS group compared to the NCS group.

Conclusion:

Our initial study shows that cell savage is feasible and safe in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. It does not adversely affect the medium term outcome of patients undergoing RC and is also cost effective.

Cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in anaesthesia

The use of intraoperative cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion has become an important method of blood conservation. The main aim of autologous transfusion is to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and its associated complications. Allogeneic blood transfusion has been associated with increased risk of tumour recurrence, postoperative infection, acute lung injury, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative low-output cardiac failure, and increased mortality. We have reviewed the current evidence for cell salvage in modern surgical practice and examined the controversial issues, such as the use of cell salvage in obstetrics, and in patients with malignancy, or intra-abdominal or systemic sepsis. Cell salvage has been demonstrated to be safe and effective at reducing allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in adult elective surgery, with stronger evidence in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. Prolonged use of cell salvage with large-volume autotransfusion may be associated with dilution of clotting factors and thrombocytopenia, and regular laboratory or near-patient monitoring is required, along with appropriate blood product use. Cell salvage should be considered in all cases where significant blood loss (>1000 ml) is expected or possible, where patients refuse allogeneic blood products or they are anaemic. The use of cell salvage in combination with a leucocyte depletion filter appears to be safe in obstetrics and cases of malignancy; however, further trials are required before definitive guidance may be provided. The only absolute contraindication to the use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is patient refusal.

Use of a leucocyte filter to remove tumour cells from intra-operative cell salvage blood

SUMMARY

The intra-operative blood loss of 50 consecutive gynae-oncology patients undergoing surgery for endometrial, cervical or ovarian cancer was cell salvaged and filtered. In each case blood samples were taken from the effluent tumour vein, a central venous line, the cell saver reservoir, the cell salvage re-transfusion bag after processing but before filtration and from the cell salvage re-transfusion bag after processing and filtration. Samples were examined using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibody markers for epithelial cell lines. Viable, nucleated malignant cells were detected in 2/50 central venous samples, 34/50 reservoir samples and 31/50 unfiltered cell salvaged samples. After passage through a Pall RS leucocyte depletion filter no remaining viable, nucleated malignant cells were detected in any sample. The clinical risks of cell salvage in these circumstances should be reviewed in the light of the risks of allogeneic blood transfusion.

Management of Jehovah's Witnesses in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery

It is imperative that surgeons should have some knowledge and understanding of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses to respect the patient's wishes and effectively minimize and manage blood loss. The objective of this review was to provide a management strategy for Jehovah's Witness patients undergoing otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, because there is paucity of information regarding this within our literature. A systematic review of medical literature was conducted. Articles were identified using MEDLINE (1966-2007). The search strategy used Medical Subject Heading terms Jehovah's Witnesses, Beliefs, Ethical and Legal issues, Blood transfusion alternatives, ENT, Head and Neck surgery in Jehovah' witnesses. There is a broad range of nonblood surgical management strategies available in other specialities, making major surgery possible within this population. This review suggests recommendations in elective surgery, trauma, and emergencies.