Pediatric nephrolithiasis: does treatment affect renal growth?

Totally ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Is it safe?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the outcome and feasibility of ultrasonography (US)-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five children with upper urinary tract stones who had undergone US-guided mini-PCNL from June 2017 to June 2020 were enrolled in this study. Patients' demographic information and post-treatment results were retrospectively gathered and analysed. Pyelocaliceal system was punctured in prone position using US guidance, and the tract was dilated using single-shot dilation technique. All steps of renal access were done using only US. Mini-PCNL in all cases was done by using 15 Fr rigid nephroscope. Stones were fragmented with a pneumatic lithotripter and evacuated.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 6.30 ± 3.25 years (range: 1.5-15). The mean stone size was 16.04 ± 3.93 mm (range: 10-30). The mean access time to the stone was 1.50 ± 0.62 min (range: 1-4). The mean operation time was 94.66 ± 3.05 min (range: 90-100 min). The final stone-free rate was 96%. Post-operation fever occurred in 4 (16%) patients who were treated successfully with an antibiotic. No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend US-guided mini-PCNL as a harmless alternative treatment option, in children with renal calculi due to its excellent outcomes and little complications.

Ultrasound-Guided Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is Effective in the Management of Pediatric Upper Ureteral and Renal Stones

Aim: To evaluate the outcome of ultrasound (US)-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in the management of upper ureteral and renal stones in pediatric patients.Methods: We collected data of 112 pediatric patients who were admitted to the xxxx between March 2006 and December 2016 and treated by US-guided MPCNL. Our cohort included upper ureter stones (n = 11), single kidney stones (n = 46), multiple kidney stones (n = 56), and staghorn kidney stones (n = 12).Results: Patients were between 0.5 and 13 years old with stone sizes from 10 to 50 mm. Operation duration ranged from 15 to 195 minutes. On average, the nephrostomy tube could be removed after 3.9 days and patients were discharged after 6.5 days. We found that hemoglobin concentration decreased in 34 patients after surgery by 1 to 37.8 g/L. Using US-guided MPCNL, the initial stone-free rate (SFR) was 86.4% and resulted in a final SFR of 95.2%. However, postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients including > 38.5 °C fever in 17 cases and reactive pleural effusion in one case. Blood transfusion was not required in all cases and no sepsis, kidney loss, ureteral stricture, and adjacent organ injury were observed. Follow-up after an average of 8.5 months showed normal renal function without hydronephrosis. However, recurrence of stones > 4 mm was found in 11 patients.Conclusions: US-guided MPCNL showed an excellent SFR and low complication rate in the management of pediatric patients with upper ureteral and renal stones.

Pediatric urolithiasis: experience from a tertiary referral center

OBJECTIVE

Pediatric urolithiasis can cause significant morbidity and damage to the kidney, or even renal failure. We review our experience of the management of urolithiasis in pediatric patients at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed medical records of all children with urolithiasis who were diagnosed and managed at our center from August 2003 to October 2011. Management was planned according to stone burden and location. We noted and statistically analysed data about age, sex, stone burden, clinical features, management, metabolic abnormalities and recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 325 children with 378 stone sites. Age range was 3-17 (mean 8) years. The male to female ratio was 3:1. Most common presentation was abdominal pain in 257 children (79%), and the most common stone site was kidney in 215 (57%). Twenty-four (7%) children (stone burden ≤3 mm) were managed conservatively, while the rest received some form of intervention. Metabolic workup could be done in 154 (47%) children. A metabolic abnormality was seen in 67 (43%) children, normocalcemic hypercalciuria being the most common. Recurrence of urolithiasis was seen in 78 (24%) children after a mean follow-up of 3.2 (1-6) years, and was more common in those who had a metabolic abnormality or in whom small residual fragments were left in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

Availability of smaller instruments has led to safer use of percutaneous endoscopy and ureteroscopy in children, with results comparable to those in adults and an acceptable complication rate. The presence of a metabolic abnormality is quite common and is a cause of recurrence.

Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis

OBJECTIVE

We compared the frequency of usage and success of minimally invasive approaches in the management of pediatric urolithiasis in our clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from pediatric patients (≤16 years of age) who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) between January 2001 and December 2011 were retrospectively investigated.

RESULTS

In this study, 415 pediatric patients, who were treated for 291 renal, and 124 ureteral stones, were evaluated. The patients were treated with PNL (n=148; 82 boys, 66 girls), URS (n=99; 58 boys, and 41 girls) or ESWL (n=168; 91 boys, and 77 girls). The mean patient ages were 7.3 (1-16), 9.1 (1-16), and 8.8 (1-16) years in the PNL, URS, and ESWL groups, respectively. The stone-free rates after treatment with PNL, URS, and ESWL were 77, 83.8 and 88.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is important that selected therapies are properly planned, and the use of minimally invasive approaches is important in pediatric patients due to potentially high recurrence rates. Currently, ESWL, PNL and URS are performed with high success rates for the treatment of stones, and open surgery is rarely used due to the success obtained with minimally invasive approaches.

Urolithiasis in children: surgical approach

Over the past 3 decades, minimally invasive stone surgery has completely overtaken open surgical approaches to upper tract pediatric urolithiasis. Progressing from least to most minimally invasive, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are the surgical methods of today for kidney and ureteral stones. The choice of treatment modality is individualized in children, considering patient age, stone size, number, location, and anatomic and clinical contributing factors. The purpose of this article is to review these techniques for pediatric upper urinary tract stones and summarize outcomes and complications.

Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is currently a first-line procedure of most upper urinary tract stones <2 cm of size because of established success rates, its minimal invasiveness and long-term safety with minimal complications. Given that alternative surgical and endourological options exist for the management of stone disease and that ESWL failure often results in the need for repeat ESWL or secondary procedures, it is highly desirable to identify variables predicting successful outcomes of ESWL in the pediatric population. Despite numerous reports and growing experience, few prospective studies and guidelines for pediatric ESWL have been completed. Variation in the methods by which study parameters are measured and reported can make it difficult to compare individual studies or make definitive recommendations. There is ongoing work and a need for continuing improvement of imaging protocols in children with renal colic, with a current focus on minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation, perhaps utilizing advancements in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. This report provides a review of the current literature evaluating the patient attributes and stone factors that may be predictive of successful ESWL outcomes along with reviewing the role of pre-operative imaging and considerations for patient safety.

Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management

Children represent about 1% of all patients with urolithiasis, but 100% of these children are considered high risk for recurrent stone formation, and it is crucial for them to receive a therapy that will render them stone free. In addition, a metabolic workup is necessary to ensure a tailored metaphylaxis to prevent or delay recurrence. The appropriate therapy depends on localization, size, and composition of the calculus, as well as on the anatomy of the urinary tract. In specialized centers, the whole range of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureterorenoscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are available for children, with the same efficiency and safety as in adults.

Pediatric stone disease

Urinary stone disease is less common in children than adults. Although many aspects of pediatric stone disease are similar to that of adults, there are unique concerns regarding the presentation, diagnosis, and management of stone disease in children. We present a review of the increasing prevalence of pediatric stone disease, the diagnostic concerns specific to children, recent results from pediatric series regarding the expectant management and surgical treatment of stones, metabolic evaluation, and current research on the genetics of nephrolithiasis.

Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation

OBJECTIVES

To define the sex prevalence of inpatient hospital discharges for pediatric patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract stone disease.

METHODS

The study examined inpatient admissions for pediatric urolithiasis in 2003, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database. We used the International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Clinical Modification codes, to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of renal (592.0) or ureteral (592.1) calculi. Sex prevalence was assessed, and the results were stratified by age group.

RESULTS

In the 2003 Kids' Inpatient Database, the sex distribution among pediatric patients with stone formation varied significantly by age. In the first decade of age, a male predominance was found that had shifted to a female predominance in the second decade. Overall, however, girls in the pediatric population were more commonly affected by stones than were boys.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative sample, the sex distribution of pediatric urolithiasis varied with age, with boys more commonly affected in the first decade of age and girls in the second decade. Although the reason for this unique epidemiologic finding is not readily apparent, additional studies can build on this hypothesis-generating work.

Does the type of lithotripter affect outcomes in children with upper tract urolithiasis?

PURPOSE

To compare the treatment outcome and short-term safety of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Comparative analysis of children undergoing shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) with a Dornier MPL 9000 electrohydraulic lithotripter (EHL) and a Siemens Modularis electromagnetic lithotripter (EML) was performed. All SWL treatments were performed by a single operator under the supervision of an admitting urologist. The demographic features, stone, and treatment-related parameters, including complications, were analyzed for both groups. Stone-free (SF) rates, re-treatment rate, and efficiency quotient (EQ) were calculated and compared for the two groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight children had SWL for renal and proximal ureteral stones. There were 58 children in the EHL group and 40 in the EML group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, type of anesthesia, diagnostic modality, site, side, and size of the stones. Number of shockwaves used with EML was greater than with EHL (P < 0.00). SF rate was 95% and 77% for EHL and EML, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.00). The re-treatment rate was equal in either group. The complication rate was higher with the EHL compared with the EML, although it did not reach statistical significance. Steinstrasse was the most common complication noted. EQ was 66% for the EHL, in comparison with 53% for the EML.

CONCLUSION

The EHL has a better SF and EQ than the EML; however, short-term safety is marginally better with the EML.

[Urolithiasis in children--rational diagnosis, therapy, and metaphylaxis]

With a proportion of 1-5%, children constitute only a small number of all patients with urolithiasis. Nevertheless, pediatric stone disease is an important health care problem because of the high recurrence rate and the threat of progredient renal function impairment with consecutive loss of quality of life. Modern therapies, especially extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), have caused a revolution in the operative treatment spectrum. Open surgery is required for stone removal only rarely, such as for the simultaneous repair of urinary tract anomalies. The minimally invasive modalities of modern stone therapy - mainly ESWL as the treatment of first choice - have led to widespread disregard of stone metaphylaxis. The important principle that says an urinary stone is just a symptom and not the cause of the disease is often forgotten. So it must be noted that despite the high standard of care in Germany, not all problems regarding urinary stone disease are being resolved, particularly in childhood. This article presents the current knowledge of the most important aspects of stone therapy and the methods of treatment in children.