Comparison of Laparoscopic Radical and Partial Nephrectomy: Effects on Long-Term Serum Creatinine

Early and late adverse renal effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Improvements in diagnostics and treatment for paediatric malignancies resulted in a major increase in survival. However, childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at risk of developing adverse effects caused by multimodal treatment for their malignancy. Nephrotoxicity is a known side effect of several treatments, including cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiotherapy and nephrectomy, and can cause glomerular filtration rate (GFR) impairment, proteinuria, tubulopathy, and hypertension. Evidence about the long-term effects of these treatments on renal function remains inconclusive. It is important to know the risk of, and risk factors for, early and late adverse renal effects, so that ultimately treatment and screening protocols can be adjusted. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate existing evidence on the effects of potentially nephrotoxic treatment modalities on the prevalence of renal dysfunction in survivors treated for childhood cancer with a median or mean survival of at least one year after cessation of treatment, where possible in comparison with the general population or CCS treated without potentially nephrotoxic treatment. In addition, to evaluate evidence on associated risk factors, such as follow-up duration, age at time of diagnosis and treatment combinations, as well as the effect of doses.

SEARCH METHODS

On 31 March 2017 we searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase. In addition, we screened reference lists of relevant studies and we searched the congress proceedings of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) and The American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (ASPHO) from 2010 to 2016/2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Except for case reports, case series and studies including fewer than 20 participants, we included studies with all study designs that reported on renal function (one year or longer after cessation of treatment), in CCS treated before the age of 21 years with cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiation involving the kidney region, a nephrectomy, or a combination of two or more of these treatments. When not all treatment modalities were described or the study group of interest was unclear, a study was not eligible for the evaluation of prevalence. We still included it for the assessment of risk factors if it had performed a multivariable analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, 'Risk of bias' assessment and data extraction using standardised data collection forms. We performed analyses according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

Apart from the remaining 37 studies included from the original review, the search resulted in the inclusion of 24 new studies. In total, we included 61 studies; 46 for prevalence, six for both prevalence and risk factors, and nine not meeting the inclusion criteria, but assessing risk factors. The 52 studies evaluating the prevalence of renal dysfunction included 13,327 participants of interest, of whom at least 4499 underwent renal function testing. The prevalence of adverse renal effects ranged from 0% to 84%. This variation may be due to diversity of included malignancies, received treatments, reported outcome measures, follow-up duration and the methodological quality of available evidence.Seven out of 52 studies, including 244 participants, reported the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, which ranged from 2.4% to 32%.Of these 52 studies, 36 studied a decreased (estimated) GFR, including at least 432 CCS, and found it was present in 0% to 73.7% of participants. One eligible study reported an increased risk of glomerular dysfunction after concomitant treatment with aminoglycosides and vancomycin in CCS receiving total body irradiation (TBI). Four non-eligible studies assessing a total cohort of CCS, found nephrectomy and (high-dose (HD)) ifosfamide as risk factors for decreased GFR. The majority also reported cisplatin as a risk factor. In addition, two non-eligible studies showed an association of a longer follow-up period with glomerular dysfunction.Twenty-two out of 52 studies, including 851 participants, studied proteinuria, which was present in 3.5% to 84% of participants. Risk factors, analysed by three non-eligible studies, included HD cisplatin, (HD) ifosfamide, TBI, and a combination of nephrectomy and abdominal radiotherapy. However, studies were contradictory and incomparable.Eleven out of 52 studies assessed hypophosphataemia or tubular phosphate reabsorption (TPR), or both. Prevalence ranged between 0% and 36.8% for hypophosphataemia in 287 participants, and from 0% to 62.5% for impaired TPR in 246 participants. One non-eligible study investigated risk factors for hypophosphataemia, but could not find any association.Four out of 52 studies, including 128 CCS, assessed the prevalence of hypomagnesaemia, which ranged between 13.2% and 28.6%. Both non-eligible studies investigating risk factors identified cisplatin as a risk factor. Carboplatin, nephrectomy and follow-up time were other reported risk factors.The prevalence of hypertension ranged from 0% to 50% in 2464 participants (30/52 studies). Risk factors reported by one eligible study were older age at screening and abdominal radiotherapy. A non-eligible study also found long follow-up time as risk factor. Three non-eligible studies showed that a higher body mass index increased the risk of hypertension. Treatment-related risk factors were abdominal radiotherapy and TBI, but studies were inconsistent.Because of the profound heterogeneity of the studies, it was not possible to perform meta-analyses. Risk of bias was present in all studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of adverse renal effects after treatment with cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiation therapy involving the kidney region, nephrectomy, or any combination of these, ranged from 0% to 84% depending on the study population, received treatment combination, reported outcome measure, follow-up duration and methodological quality. With currently available evidence, it was not possible to draw solid conclusions regarding the prevalence of, and treatment-related risk factors for, specific adverse renal effects. Future studies should focus on adequate study designs and reporting, including large prospective cohort studies with adequate control groups when possible. In addition, these studies should deploy multivariable risk factor analyses to correct for possible confounding. Next to research concerning known nephrotoxic therapies, exploring nephrotoxicity after new therapeutic agents is advised for future studies. Until more evidence becomes available, CCS should preferably be enrolled into long-term follow-up programmes to monitor their renal function and blood pressure.

Ischemia Techniques in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes

CONTEXT

The optimal ischemia technique at partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal masses is yet to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and analyze the current evidence about surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after different ischemia techniques (cold, warm, and zero ischemia) at PN.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A computerized systematic literature search was performed by using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Science Direct. Identification and selection of the studies were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. Outcomes of interest were estimated blood loss (EBL), overall complications, positive surgical margins, local tumor recurrence, and renal function preservation. Meta-analysis and forest-plot diagrams were performed. Overall pooled estimates, together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of the incidence of all parameters were obtained using a random effect model (RE-Model) on the log transformed means (MLN), proportion, or standardized mean change, as deemed appropriate.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

One hundred and fifty-six studies were included. No clinically meaningful differences were found in terms of EBL after cold (mean: 215.5; 95% CI: 154.2-276.8m), warm (mean: 201.8; 95% CI: 175.0-228.7ml), or zero (mean: 261.2; 95% CI: 171.0-351.3ml) ischemia technique. Overall, postoperative complications were recorded in 14.1% (95% CI: 6.7-27.4), 11.1% (95% CI: 10.0-12.3), and 9.7% (95% CI: 7.7-12.2) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Positive surgical margins were recorded in 4.8% (95% CI: 1.9-10.9), 4.0% (95% CI: 3.4-4.8), and 5.6% (95% CI: 3.1-9.8) of patients after cold, warm, and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. Local recurrence was recorded in 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9-5.2) and 3.1% (95% CI: 0.7-11.5) of patients after warm and zero ischemia (p<0.01), respectively. The log₂ of estimated glomerular filtration ratio mean changes were-1.37 (95% CI:-3.42 to 0.68),-1.00 (-2.04 to 0.03), and-0.71 (-1.15 to-0.27) ml/min after cold, warm, and zero ischemia, respectively. Low level of evidence, retrospective nature of most of included studies, a high risk of selection bias, and heterogeneity within included studies limited the overall quality of the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of ischemia technique at PN is still debatable and subject to confounding by several factors, namely, patients' selection criteria, surgical technique used, and percentage of functional parenchyma spared during surgery. These confounders bias available evidence and were addressed by only a small part of available studies. Unfortunately, the overall quality of literature evidences and the high risk of selection bias limit the possibility of any causal interpretation about the relationship between the ischemia technique used and surgical, oncological, or functional outcomes. Thus, none of the available ischemia technique could be recommended over the other.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The present analysis shows that none of the available ischemia techniques, namely, cold, warm, or zero ischemia, is universally superior to the others, and other factors play a role in the surgical outcome.

Clinical significance of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in the early diagnosis of renal function deterioration after radical nephrectomy

Objectives The standard metrics used to monitor the progression of acute kidney injury (AKI) include markers such as serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Moreover, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) expression has been reported to modulate oxidative stress. Methods We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of serum NGAL levels for monitoring renal function after radical nephrectomy (RN). We prospectively collected data from 30 patients who underwent RN. We analyzed serum NGAL and creatinine at 6 time points: preoperative day 1, right after surgery, 6 hours after surgery, postoperative day (POD) 1, POD 3, and POD 5. We compared these measurements according to the eGFR values (classified as chronic kidney disease stage III; CKD III or not) using data obtained 3 months after surgery. Results The mean age was 65.5 years (range, 45–77 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 2:1. At the last follow-up examination, there were 12 patients (40%) with CKD III. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we found that serum creatinine on POD 5 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.887; P = 0.000) and NGAL at 6 hours after LRN (AUC, 0.743, P = 0.026) were significant predictors of CKD III. The development of CKD III after LRN was associated with the serum creatinine level on POD 5 and the NGAL at 6 hours after surgery. Conclusions Compared to serum creatinine, serum NGAL enabled earlier prediction of postoperative CKD III. Therefore, serum NGAL measured 6 hours after surgery could be a useful marker for managing patients after RN.

Outcome Measures Used to Report Kidney Function in Studies Investigating Surgical Management of Kidney Tumours: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Most practice decisions relevant to preserving kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours are driven by observational studies. A wide range of outcome measures are used in these studies, which reduces comparability and increases the risk of reporting bias.

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively and succinctly describe the outcomes used to evaluate kidney function in studies evaluating surgical management of kidney tumours.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Electronic search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies with at least one measure of kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours, published between January 2000 and September 2017. Abstracts were initially screened for eligibility. Full texts of articles were then evaluated in more detail for inclusion. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 312 studies, involving 127905 participants, were included in this review. Most were retrospective (n=274) studies and conducted in a single centre (n=264). Overall, 78 unique outcome measures were identified, which were grouped into six outcome categories. Absolute postoperative kidney function (n=187), relative kidney function (n=181), and postoperative chronic kidney disease (n=131) were most frequently reported. Kidney function was predominantly quantified using estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance (n=255), most using the modification of diet in renal disease equation (n=182). Only 70 studies provided rationale for specific outcome measures used.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in the reporting and quantification of kidney function in studies evaluating patients managed surgically for kidney tumours. A standardised approach to measuring and reporting kidney function will increase the effectiveness of outcomes reported and improve relevance of research findings within a clinical context.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Although we know that the removal of a kidney can reduce kidney function, clinical significance of various approaches is a matter of debate. This article demonstrates significant variability in the way kidney function was reported across all studies of patients with kidney cancer undergoing surgery, indicating a need for standardisation.

Renal Functional Outcomes after Surgery, Ablation, and Active Surveillance of Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Management strategies for localized renal masses suspicious for renal cell carcinoma include radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, thermal ablation, and active surveillance. Given favorable survival outcomes across strategies, renal preservation is often of paramount concern. To inform clinical decision making, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing renal functional outcomes for radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, thermal ablation, and active surveillance.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1997 to May 1, 2015 to identify comparative studies reporting renal functional outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for change in eGFR, incidence of CKD, and AKI.

RESULTS

We found 58 articles reporting on relevant renal functional outcomes. Meta-analyses showed that final eGFR fell 10.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2 lower for radical nephrectomy compared with partial nephrectomy and indicated higher risk of CKD stage 3 or worse (relative risk, 2.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.97 to 3.32) and ESRD for radical nephrectomy compared with partial nephrectomy. Overall risk of AKI was similar for radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy, but studies suggested higher risk for radical nephrectomy among T1a tumors (relative risk, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.66). In general, similar findings of worse renal function for radical nephrectomy compared with thermal ablation and active surveillance were observed. No differences in renal functional outcomes were observed for partial nephrectomy versus thermal ablation. The overall rate of ESRD was low among all management strategies (0.4%-2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal functional implications varied across management strategies for localized renal masses, with worse postoperative renal function for patients undergoing radical nephrectomy compared with other strategies and similar outcomes for partial nephrectomy and thermal ablation. Further attention is needed to quantify the changes in renal function associated with active surveillance and nephron-sparing approaches for patients with preexisting CKD.

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy are the relevant surgical therapy options for localised renal cell carcinoma. However, debate regarding the effects of these surgical approaches continues and it is important to identify and summarise high-quality studies to make surgical treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of partial nephrectomy compared with radical nephrectomy for clinically localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, BIOSIS, LILACS, Scopus, two trial registries and abstracts from three major conferences to 24 February 2017, together with reference lists; and contacted selected experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included a randomised controlled trial comparing partial and radical nephrectomy for participants with small renal masses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author screened all of the titles and abstracts; only citations that were clearly irrelevant were excluded at this stage. Next, two review authors independently assessed full-text reports, identified relevant studies, evaluated the eligibility of the studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The update of the literature search was performed by two independent review authors. We used Review Manager 5 for data synthesis and data analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one randomised controlled trial including 541 participants that compared partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy. The median follow-up was 9.3 years.Based on low quality evidence, we found that time-to-death of any cause was decreased using partial nephrectomy (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18). This corresponds to 79 more deaths (5 more to 173 more) per 1000. Also based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in serious adverse events (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.19 to 22.34). Findings are consistent with 4 more surgery-related deaths (3 fewer to 78 more) per 1000.Based on low quality evidence, we found no difference in time-to-recurrence (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.24). This corresponds to 12 more recurrences (14 fewer to 70 more) per 1000. Due to the nature of reporting, we were unable to analyse overall rates for immediate and long-term adverse events. We found no evidence on haemodialysis or quality of life.Reasons for downgrading related to study limitations (lack of blinding, cross-over), imprecision and indirectness (a substantial proportion of patients were ultimately found not to have a malignant tumour). Based on the finding of a single trial, we were unable to conduct any subgroup or sensitivity analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy may be associated with a decreased time-to-death of any cause. With regards to surgery-related mortality, cancer-specific survival and time-to-recurrence, partial nephrectomy appears to result in little to no difference.

WITHDRAWN: Surgical management of localised renal cell carcinoma

This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a protocol (Krabbe L‐M, Kunath F, Schmidt S, Miernik A, Cleves A, Walther M, Kroeger N. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal masses [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD012045. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012045) for a new review with a narrower scope. It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Retrospective analysis of the predictive factors of renal function loss after uninephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease G3 to G5

Background

The rapid increase in glomerular filtration rate in a normal contralateral kidney after uninephrectomy is well known in living kidney donors but much less well described in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The purpose of this study is to determine the magnitude of this initial compensatory capacity in (CKD) groups 3 to 5 (G3 to G5) patients undergoing uninephrectomy and the clinical factors predicting it. This is a retrospective study of all cases (142) of uninephrectomy in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; with MDRD equation) <60 ml/min/1.73 m², between 2003 and 2010, in two University of Montreal-affiliated teaching hospitals.

Methods

Baseline eGFR, patients’ comorbidities, and surgical characteristics and complications were noted. The change of eGFR after nephrectomy was evaluated; moreover, the expected post-op eGFR, i.e. without compensation by the contralateral kidney following surgery, was estimated in a sub-group of patients who had a preoperative renal scintigraphy and compared to the actual eGFR at hospital discharge.

Results

The mean change of eGFR from baseline to hospital discharge was −5 ± 12 ml/min/1.73 m² (−11 %; 95 % CI −16 to −6 %; P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, baseline eGFR did not influence significantly these results. However, in the multivariate model, radical nephrectomy vs. partial nephrectomy and preoperative hypertension predicted a worse renal outcome. In the sub-group of patients with preoperative renal scintigraphy, the actual eGFR at hospital discharge was also higher than expected from the renal split function (13 ml/min/1.73 m²; 95 % CI 10 to 16; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

After uninephrectomy, the contralateral kidney in patients with CKD G3 to G5 still has a clinically significant initial compensatory capacity. The compensation is statistically smaller if the patient had hypertension or a radical uninephrectomy. This initial compensation is rapid and most probably haemodynamic (hyperfiltration). However, most of the included patients had a CKD G3, limiting the strength of the conclusion for the G4 toG5 patients; the length of observation covers the early postoperative period, i.e. less than 2 weeks, in more than half of the cohort.

"Off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy" laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation: initial experience and perioperative outcomes

PURPOSE

To describe our initial experience of "off-clamp, non-renorrhaphy" laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (OCNR-LPN) with perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2012 and March 2013, 24 consecutive patients underwent OCNR-LPN at our institution. After the renal mass excision, biologic hemostatics such as FLOSEAL™ and TISSEEL™ (both from Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL) were used, and the perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia were sutured for reapproximation.

RESULTS

All 24 consecutive patients underwent OCNR-LPN successfully. The warm ischemic time for all cases was 0 minute. Thirteen patients were noted to have a low (4-6) RENAL nephrometry score (RNS), and 11 patients had a moderate (7-9) RNS. The mean tumor size among this cohort was 2.9 (range, 1.2-6.0) cm, and the mean estimated blood loss was 243 (range, 50-700) mL. The mean hospital stay was 6.9 (range, 5-10) days. The mean percentage of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate change increased by 0.9%. No positive surgical margins were noted, and 2 patients with Grade III complication by the Clavien-Dindo classification were treated by endoscopic or radiological intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

OCNR-LPN with the perirenal fat and Gerota's fascia reapproximation technique is feasible. Our initial experience with OCNR-LPN demonstrates encouraging results of minimal renal function loss and complications.

Current Status of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

<p>Recently, nephron-sparing, minimally invasive surgery of small renal masses has become popular. The most typical surgery is laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). However, due to technical difficulties, the indications for LPN had been limited to small, exophytic, and peripheral tumors. This paper introduces current status of oncological outcomes and technical considerations.</p>

Early and late renal adverse effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancer

BACKGROUND

Great improvements in diagnostics and treatment for malignant disease in childhood have led to a major increase in survival. However, childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at great risk for developing adverse effects caused by multimodal treatment for their malignancy. Nephrotoxicity is one of these known (acute) side effects of several treatments, including cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiotherapy and nephrectomy, and can cause glomerular filtration rate impairment, proteinuria, tubulopathy and hypertension. However, evidence about the long-term effects of these treatments on renal function remains inconclusive. To reduce the number of (long-term) nephrotoxic events in CCS, it is important to know the risk of, and risk factors for, early and late renal adverse effects, so that ultimately treatment and screening protocols can be adjusted.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate existing evidence on the effects of potentially nephrotoxic treatment modalities on the prevalence of and associated risk factors for renal dysfunction in survivors treated for childhood cancer with a median or mean survival of at least one year after cessation of treatment, where possible in comparison with healthy controls or CCS treated without potentially nephrotoxic treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2011), MEDLINE/PubMed (from 1945 to December 2011) and EMBASE/Ovid (from 1980 to December 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA

With the exception of case reports, case series and studies including fewer than 20 participants, we included studies with all study designs that reported on renal function (one year or longer after cessation of treatment) in children and adults who were treated for a paediatric malignancy (aged 18 years or younger at diagnosis) with cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiation including the kidney region and/or a nephrectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction using standardised data collection forms. Analyses were performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

MAIN RESULTS

The search strategy identified 5504 studies, of which 5138 were excluded on the basis of title and/or abstract. The full-text screening of the remaining 366 articles resulted in the inclusion of 57 studies investigating the prevalence of and sometimes also risk factors for early and late renal adverse effects of treatment for childhood cancer. The 57 studies included at least 13,338 participants of interest for this study, of whom at least 6516 underwent renal function testing. The prevalence of renal adverse effects ranged from 0% to 84%. This variation may be due to diversity in included malignancies, prescribed treatments, reported outcome measurements and the methodological quality of available evidence.Chronic kidney disease/renal insufficiency (as defined by the authors of the original studies) was reported in 10 of 57 studies. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease ranged between 0.5% and 70.4% in the 10 studies and between 0.5% and 18.8% in the six studies that specifically investigated Wilms' tumour survivors treated with a unilateral nephrectomy.A decreased (estimated) glomerular filtration rate was present in 0% to 50% of all assessed survivors (32/57 studies). Total body irradiation; concomitant treatment with aminoglycosides, vancomycin, amphotericin B or cyclosporin A; older age at treatment and longer interval from therapy to follow-up were significant risk factors reported in multivariate analyses. Proteinuria was present in 0% to 84% of all survivors (17/57 studies). No study performed multivariate analysis to assess risk factors for proteinuria.Hypophosphataemia was assessed in seven studies. Reported prevalences ranged between 0% and 47.6%, but four of seven studies found a prevalence of 0%. No studies assessed risk factors for hypophosphataemia using multivariate analysis. The prevalence of impairment of tubular phosphate reabsorption was mostly higher (range 0% to 62.5%; 11/57 studies). Higher cumulative ifosfamide dose, concomitant cisplatin treatment, nephrectomy and longer follow-up duration were significant risk factors for impaired tubular phosphate reabsorption in multivariate analyses.Treatment with cisplatin and carboplatin was associated with a significantly lower serum magnesium level in multivariate analysis, and the prevalence of hypomagnesaemia ranged between 0% and 37.5% in the eight studies investigating serum magnesium.Hypertension was investigated in 24 of the 57 studies. Reported prevalences ranged from 0% to 18.2%. A higher body mass index was the only significant risk factor noted in more than one multivariate analysis. Other reported factors that significantly increased the risk of hypertension were use of total body irradiation, abdominal irradiation, acute kidney injury, unrelated or autologous stem cell donor type, growth hormone therapy and older age at screening. Previous infection with hepatitis C significantly decreased the risk of hypertension.Because of the profound heterogeneity of the studies, it was not possible to perform any meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of renal adverse events after treatment with cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, radiation therapy involving the kidney region and/or nephrectomy ranged from 0% to 84%. With currently available evidence, it was not possible to draw any conclusions with regard to prevalence of and risk factors for renal adverse effects. Future studies should focus on adequate study design and reporting and should deploy multivariate risk factor analysis to correct for possible confounding. Until more evidence becomes available, CCS should be enrolled into long-term follow-up programmes to monitor their renal function and blood pressure.

Cost-utility analysis of radical nephrectomy versus partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses: Adjusting for the burden of ensuing chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

We compare the cost-utility of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in the management of small renal masses (SRMs) when the impact of ensuing chronic kidney disease (CKD) disease is considered.

METHODS

We designed a Markov decision analysis model with a 10-year time horizon. Estimates of costs, utilities, complication rates and probabilities of developing CKD were derived from the literature. The base case patient was assumed to be a 65-year-old patient with a <4-cm unilateral renal mass, a normal contralateral kidney and a normal preoperative serum creatinine. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to address the uncertainty associated with the study parameters.

RESULTS

OPN was the least costly strategy at $25 941 USD and generated 7.161 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 10 years. LPN yielded 0.098 additional QALYs at an additional cost of $888 for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $9057 per QALY, well below a commonly cited willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY. LRN was more costly and yielded fewer QALYs than OPN and LPN. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated our model to be robust to changes to key parameters. Age had no effect on preferred strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the preferred treatment strategy for SRMs. In centres where LPN is not available, OPN remains considerably more cost-effective than LRN. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that there is no age at which PN is not preferred to LRN. Our study provides additional evidence to advocate PN for the management of all amenable SRMs.

Partial nephrectomy--contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes

Increased detection of the small renal mass over the last two decades has led to greater utilization of partial nephrectomy techniques. Appreciation of the negative impact of chronic renal impairment has resulted in partial nephrectomy surpassing radical nephrectomy as the preferred treatment for technically feasible lesions. Indeed the management of localized renal tumours has become focused on techniques that maximally preserve nephron quantity and quality, and therefore maximize renal function after surgery. Postoperative renal function is determined primarily by three factors: preoperative renal function, volume of renal mass preserved and surgical renal ischaemia. Minimization of surgical ischaemia is achieved by early unclamping and unclamped (zero ischaemia) techniques. In addition, laparoscopic and robotic approaches to nephron-sparing surgery have significantly reduced the morbidity of the partial nephrectomy procedure compared with the traditional open approach. The contemporary techniques used for partial nephrectomy demonstrate excellent renal functional and oncological outcomes and minimize perioperative complications.

[Combined approach of laparoscopic and open surgery for complex renal lesions]

OBJECTIVE

To develop a combined surgical approach (laparoscopic and open) that allows an increased vascular control and decreased ischemia time, maintaining the advantages of pure laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During the laparoscopic phase, dissection of the kidney and its pedicle is achieved. Then, an open approach is initiated through a mini-laparotomy, with the kidney being brought to the incision, improving the identification and exposition of the tumors. Following tumor identification by ultrasound, exeresis of the lesion is performed with or without vascular clamping.

RESULTS

Through this approach we performed the excision of complex lesions in 6 patients. Mean surgical time was 192 minutes (range 180-210) and mean warm ischemia time was 13 minutes (0-22), with a mean blood loss of 267 mL (100-500). Average pre and postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 51.5 (28-90) and 48.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (19-90), respectively. In one patient, suture repair of the pelvicaliceal system was needed, with no other perioperative morbidities being reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This combined approach is a minimally invasive surgical alternative, reproducible and safe which preserves the virtues of pure LPN. It allows a better control of the vascular pedicle, reducing the risk of hemorrhage and the warm ischemia time. This technique may be either considered in the treatment of renal masses with indication for partial nephrectomy but of complex laparoscopic approach or as a surgical approach in the early learning curve of the LPN.

Changes in renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Purpose

To evaluate alterations in renal function after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumors.

Materials and Methods

From March 2008 to August 2011, we performed 175 cases of laparoscopic kidney resection. Among these, we excluded patients who received perioperative immunotherapy or target therapy and also patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min. A total of 32 patients undergoing LPN and 92 patients undergoing LRN were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed the changes in eGFR (by the modification of diet in renal disease method) at the following time points: preoperative, postoperative 1 week, and postoperative 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

The mean warm ischemia time of the LPN group was 22 minutes (range, 0 to 47 minutes). Mean eGFR values (mL/min/1.73 m²) during postoperative week 1 and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 70.8, 71.5, 76.7, 76.0, and 75.3 in the LPN group and 52.1, 50.6, 52.8, 53.4, and 52.4 in the LRN group, respectively. One year after the operation, 6.3% (2 patients) of LPN patients and 68.5% (63 patients) of LRN patients had progressed to chronic renal insufficiency (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m²).

Conclusions

Renal function recovered slightly after LPN and LRN and was maintained constantly after 3 months. However, renal function showed different patterns of decrease. Despite the concern for warm ischemia, LPN can preserve renal function better than can LRN. LPN should be considered for selected patients to prevent chronic renal insufficiency.

Novel high-intensity focused ultrasound clamp--potential adjunct for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy (PN) can be technically challenging, especially if performed in a minimally invasive manner. Although ultrasound technology has been shown to have therapeutic capabilities, including tissue ablation and hemostasis, it has not gained clinical use in the PN setting. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of a high-intensity ultrasound clamp to create an ablation plane in the kidney providing hemostasis that could potentially aid in laparoscopic PN.

METHODS

A new instrument was created using a laparoscopic Padron endoscopic exposing retractor. Ultrasound elements were engineered on both sides of the retractor to administer high-intensity ultrasound energy between the two sides of the clamp. This high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) clamp was placed 2 to 2.5 cm from the upper and lower poles of 10 porcine kidneys to evaluate its effectiveness at different levels and duration of energy delivery. PN transection was performed through the distal portion of the clamped margin. Kidneys postintervention and after PN were evaluated and blood loss estimated by weighing gauze placed at the defect. Histologic analysis was performed with hematoxylin and eosin and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide staining to evaluate for tissue viability and thermal spread.

RESULTS

Gross parenchymal changes were seen with obvious demarcation between treated and untreated tissue. Increased ultrasound exposure time (10 vs 5 and 2 min), even at lower power settings, was more effective in causing destruction and necrosis of tissue. Transmural ablation was achieved in three of four renal units after 10 minutes of exposure with significantly less blood loss (<2 g vs 30-100 g). Nonviable tissue was confirmed histologically. There was minimal thermal spread outside the clamped margin (1.2-3.2 mm).

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary porcine evaluation, a novel HIFU clamp induced hemostasis and created an ablation plane in the kidney. This technology could serve as a useful adjunct to laparoscopic PN in the future and potentially obviate the need for renal hilar clamping.

Effects of partial nephrectomy on postoperative blood pressure

Purpose

The effects of partial nephrectomy (PN) on postoperative blood pressure (BP) are not known, and PN has the potential to worsen BP. We therefore sought to determine whether PN alters postoperative BP.

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent PN for suspected malignancy at our institution from 2002 to 2008 were included. Data on BP and medication from before and after PN were retrieved from family physicians. BP and number of antihypertensive medications were compared after surgery with preoperative values by use of paired t tests and Chi-squared analyses, respectively.

Results

Of 74 patients undergoing PN and providing consent, 48 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 24 months. For the early postoperative period (1 month to 1 year after surgery), the mean BPs (132.3/77.0 mmHg) were unchanged compared with preoperative values (132.4/78.0 mmHg; p=0.59 systolic BP and p=0.30 diastolic BP). For the later postoperative period (beyond 1 year after surgery), the mean postoperative systolic BP was unchanged from the mean preoperative systolic BP (131.2 mmHg vs. 132.4 mmHg, respectively; p>0.30). However, the corresponding average diastolic BP was lower in the long term (78.0 mmHg versus 76.4 mmHg respectively; p=0.01). No significant difference in the mean number of BP medications prescribed preoperatively, at one year, and beyond one year was identified (p>0.37).

Conclusions

PN does not result in initial or long-term postoperative deterioration in BP.

Management of renal tumors in Von Hippel-Lindau disease by percutaneous CT fluoroscopic guided radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results

We evaluated the feasibility and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in patients with Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. A total of 12 RCCs were treated by RF ablation in 7 patients with VHL disease. RF electrodes were placed under CT fluoroscopic guidance with conscious sedation. Technical success, technical effectiveness (disappearance of tumor enhancement), local tumor progression, complications and change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated. A total of 9 sessions were undertaken. All procedures were performed with a planned protocol with a technical success rate of 100%. Tumor enhancement disappeared in all 12 tumors indicating a technical effectiveness rate of 100%. Local tumor progression was not found in any patient during the mean follow-up of 22 ± 11 months (range 12-46 months). There were no complications related to the RF procedures. The mean eGFR decreased from 65.3 ± 10.9 ml/min (range 48.5-77.5 ml/min) to 60.3 ± 11.3 ml/min (range, 45.8-73.4 ml/min, P < 0.03). The mean percentage decrease in eGFR after the last ablation was 7.6% (range 0-21.6%). Renal RF ablation is a safe and effective treatment for renal tumours that may allow patients with VHL disease to avoid major surgical interventions.

Recent developments in kidney cancer

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnosis and management have undergone significant shifts in the recent past. The increasing rate of diagnosis of small renal masses, often in patients at high risk of morbidity with operative treatment, has led to studies, trials and discoveries in renal mass biopsy, active surveillance and minimally invasive thermal ablation. At the other end of the disease spectrum, targeted systemic therapies for metastatic RCC have supplanted cytokine-based treatment, with significant benefits to progression and survival. Recent reviews and trials have also cemented the role of partial nephrectomy as standard surgical management for most low-stage masses, and the roles of regional lymphadenectomy and adrenalectomy concomitant with nephrectomy have been clarified. This review aims to highlight recent evidence that has emerged in the management of this complicated oncologic issue.

Comparison of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for pT1b Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

Partial nephrectomy (PN) for patients with T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has increasingly become accepted, although its role for patients with T1b RCC remains controversial. We retrospectively evaluated and then compared the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients with pT1b RCC who were treated with PN or radical nephrectomy (RN).

Materials and Methods

A total of 70 patients who were diagnosed with pT1bN0M0 RCC between January 1995 and December 2004 were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS), the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between the groups. Preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) levels were analyzed to assess renal function.

Results

The 5-year OS (92.3% vs. 87.8%, p=0.501), RFS (92.3% vs. 77.8%, p=0.175), and CSS (92.3% vs. 94.5%, p=0.936) of the PN and RN groups were not statistically different. The proportion of patients with decreased renal function was lower in the PN group than in the RN group (PN=0% vs. RN=11.5%). The postoperative change in serum creatinine and the GFR 1 year after nephrectomy was higher in the RN group than in the PN group (PN=0.2±0.2, 12.1±9.1 vs. RN=0.3±0.5, 18.1±12.5), but there was no statistical difference.

Conclusions

There were no statistically significant differences in prognosis or renal function between patients treated with PN and those treated with RN for pT1b RCC. PN may be a useful treatment modality for patients with pT1b RCC.

Surgical management of bilateral synchronous kidney tumors: functional and oncological outcomes

PURPOSE

We evaluated renal functional and oncological outcomes after sequential partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in patients with bilateral synchronous kidney tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 220 patients treated from June 1994 to July 2008 were included in the study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, and overall, cancer specific and recurrence-free survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients underwent sequential partial nephrectomy (134), partial nephrectomy followed by radical nephrectomy (60) or radical nephrectomy followed by partial nephrectomy (26). Final estimated glomerular filtration rate after bilateral surgery was 59, 36 and 35 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) in these 3 groups, respectively (p <0.001). The order in which partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy were conducted did not affect functional outcomes. Overall survival of patients with bilateral cancer was 86% at 5 years and 71% at 10 years, cancer specific survival was 96% at 5 and 10 years, and recurrence-free survival was 73% at 5 years and 44% at 10 years. Overall survival was decreased in patients with tumors larger than 7 cm (p = 0.003). Patients with postoperative stage III or greater chronic kidney disease had decreased overall survival due to noncancer causes (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with sequential surgery for bilateral synchronous kidney tumors have 5 and 10-year oncological outcomes comparable to those of patients with unilateral kidney cancer. Decreased overall survival was significantly associated with tumor size larger than 7 cm and postoperative stage III or greater chronic kidney disease. Nephron sparing surgery should be conducted for all amenable bilateral kidney masses given the negative impact of renal functional decline on overall survival.

The importance of nephron-sparing focal therapy: renal function preservation

Historically, renal cancer has been treated with radical nephrectomy. Consequently, many patients developed renal insufficiency and the health problems associated with this. With the increasing diagnosis of small renal masses, nephron-sparing treatments have been developed to treat these masses adequately, while maximizing renal function. Focal ablative therapy is a means to treat small renal masses in a minimally invasive manner. Yet, there are few studies that have focused on their ability to preserve renal function. In this article, we review the existing literature on the renal function outcomes of patients treated with either radio frequency ablation or cryoablation.

The non-neoplastic kidney in tumor nephrectomy specimens: what can it show and what is important?

Surgical nephrectomy is a procedure that has been performed for nearly 100 years. In the presence of a normal contralateral kidney, such as in a renal transplant donor or child with Wilms tumor, it is a benign procedure without deleterious consequences on the remaining kidney. However, many adults and some children postnephrectomy will develop chronic kidney disease. The non-neoplastic kidney in tumor resections may harbor a large number of developmental and acquired diseases predictive of this outcome or that convey other medically significant information. Examination of the non-neoplastic kidney is a fertile opportunity to identify these unsuspected conditions that may ultimately dictate the subsequent clinical course and influence the medical care provided. This review discusses the consequences of unilateral and partial nephrectomy, and illustrates many conditions that may be encountered in the non-neoplastic cortex with a discussion of their clinical implications.

Surgical management of localised renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical excision remains the core to the management of localised renal cancer and several studies have evaluated the safety and clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and other recently introduced interventions for the localised disease.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and review the evidence from randomised trials comparing different surgical interventions in localised renal cell carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised or quasi randomised trials comparing various surgical interventions in the management of adults with surgically resectable localised renal cancer. RCTs were identified by searching The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2009), MEDLINE (Silver Platter, from 1966 to August 2009), EMBASE via Ovid (from 1980 to August 2009), and a number of other data bases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data from published trials were extracted by two reviewers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised trials were identified meeting the inclusion criteria reporting on the comparison between open radical nephrectomy with laparoscopic approach or new modalities of treatment such as radiofrequency or cryoablation. Three randomised controlled trials compared the different laparoscopic approaches to nephrectomy (transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal) and found no statistical difference in operative or perioperative outcomes between the two treatment groups. There were several non-randomised and retrospective case series reporting various advantages of laparoscopic renal cancer surgery such as less blood loss, early recovery and shorter hospital stay

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The main source of evidence for the current practice of laparoscopic excision of renal cancer is drawn from case series, small retrospective studies and very few small randomised controlled trials. The results and conclusions of these studies must therefore be interpreted with caution.

Estimation and prediction of renal function in patients with renal tumor

PURPOSE

The goals of surgery for renal tumors include the preservation of renal function. When considering surgical options, it is important to accurately assess renal function and the risk of postoperative chronic kidney disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional database was used to identify 359 patients who underwent nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. Creatinine clearance was estimated using 14 previously published models and compared with creatinine clearance measured using a 24-hour urine collection. Models were generated for predicting renal function following nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. All models were validated with an external data set of 245 patients.

RESULTS

Models that accurately estimated creatinine clearance preoperatively and postoperatively were the Cockcroft-Gault model based on actual weight, and the Mawer, Björnsson, Hull and Martin models. In patients with an estimated creatinine clearance between 60 and 89 ml per minute preoperatively the risk of chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance less than 60 ml per minute) after nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy was 58% and 15%, respectively (p <0.001). In patients undergoing nephrectomy age and weight were independent predictors of decreased creatinine clearance. A predictive model based on age and weight was highly accurate when applied to an external population (R = 0.757). A model for predicting renal function after partial nephrectomy based on age and tumor size was highly accurate in the external population (R = 0.848). A Web based tool was developed to estimate current and predict postoperative creatinine clearance (http://www.roswellpark.org/Patient_Care/Specialized_Services/Renal_Function_Estimator).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cockcroft-Gault model based on actual weight is 1 of 5 models that accurately estimates renal function in patients with a kidney tumor. Models were developed and externally validated to predict renal function following nephrectomy.

Choice of operation for clinically localized renal tumor

The cornerstone of treatment for localized renal tumors is surgical excision, which until recently was accomplished primarily through radical nephrectomy. The last 2 decades have seen a rapid evolution in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma, marked by the increased use of nephron-sparing surgery and the application of minimally invasive techniques. A plethora of surgical options now are available. This article discusses the optimal surgical approach to renal tumors in various clinical scenarios. In all these discussions we assume that a proactive approach to treatment is indicated and desired, recognizing that active surveillance is always an additional option to consider in certain subpopulations such as the elderly or infirm.

[Results of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma of more than 4 cm in diameter]

To date, radical nephrectomy (RN) remains the gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) larger than 4 cm. However, from the early 1990's, improvements in surgical techniques have lead to the development of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for small renal tumours of less than 4 cm in diameter. This surgical procedure avoids nephronic waste with an acceptable morbidity and similar oncological outcomes compared to radical surgery. Recent large published series did not show any difference between NSS and RN in terms of oncological safety. Specific and disease-free five-year survival rates (82% to 97.3% and 81% to 97.3%, respectively) have confirmed the safety of NSS. Regarding laparoscopic NSS, the technique is still under evaluation and only mid-term outcomes are available so far. However, these studies are still limited and longer follow-up is needed before any definitive statement can be made. Current guidelines recommend NSS only in case of RCC of less than 4 cm in diameter in elective indications. In daily practice however, surgical teams are pushing back the limit above the threshold of 4 cm. More and more surgeons are either considering anatomical location or technical expected difficulties rather than just the tumour size. NSS leads to higher risk of bleeding, especially in case of tumours larger than 4 cm. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to investigate thoroughly the vascularization of the tumour to avoid such complications with exhaustive and accurate preoperative imaging.