1
|
Woldu SL, Hutchinson RC, Singla N, Hornberger B, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y. Prospective Monitoring and Adapting Strategies for Prevention of Infection Following Transrectal Prostate Procedures. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2018; 5:124-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Solomon L. Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ryan C. Hutchinson
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brad Hornberger
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Claus G. Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rectal Culture-Guided Targeted Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Incidence of Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Men at High Risk for Infections Submitted to Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy - Results of a Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0170319. [PMID: 28122053 PMCID: PMC5266328 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of rectal culture-guided antimicrobial prophylaxis (TAP) in reducing infectious complications (IC) after transrectal-ultrasound prostate biopsy (TRUSPBx) is conflicting. We assessed the prevalence of IC in a cohort of men at high risk for IC submitted to TRUSPBx and treated with either TAP or empirical prophylaxis (EAP). Data from 53 patients at high risk for IC undergoing TRUSPBx were collected. Patients who did not receive a rectal swab (RS) were treated with EAP with fluoroquinolones (FQs). Of those who received the RS, patients with FQ-susceptible organisms received ciprofloxacin while those with FQ-resistant organisms received TAP. Office visits were scheduled to investigate the rate of complication at day 7 and 30 after TRUSPBx. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models detailed the association between clinical parameters and IC rate. Out of 53 men, 17 (32.1%) had RS while 36 (67.9%) did not. All RS cultures were positive for E. Coli and 4 (23.5%) reported FQ-resistant pathogens. Considering risk factors for IC, no difference was found in terms of CCI, rate of diabetes, UTIs or recent antibiotic utilization between groups. Overall, 12 (22.6%) men reported IC, with a greater proportion of them belonging to the group treated with EAP (30.6% vs 5.9%; p = 0.045). Of these, 9 (25.0%) patients, all treated with EAP, developed post biopsy UTIs. E. Coli sustained all UTIs and 7 (77.7%) were FQ resistant. At multivariable analysis, CCI≥1, a history of UTIs/prostatitis and recent antibiotic utilization (all p<0.04) were the most powerful predictors for ICs. In conclusion, we found that compared to EAP, TAP significantly reduces ICs, in men at high risk for post TRUSPBx IC. Patients at risk for IC, especially those with recent antibiotic utilization, CCI≥1 and a history of UTIs/prostatitis before biopsy, could benefit from TAP.
Collapse
|
3
|
Prostate Biopsy-related Infection: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors, Prevention Strategies, and Management Approaches. Urology 2016; 104:11-21. [PMID: 28007492 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A systematic review to identify risk factors for prostate biopsy-related infection, preventative strategies, and optimal management of infectious complications was conducted. Significant risk factors for postbiopsy infection include urogenital infection, antibiotic use, international travel, hospital exposure, bacteriuria, previous transrectal biopsy, and resistance of fecal flora to antibiotic prophylaxis (especially fluoroquinolones). Patients at risk may benefit from an adjusted biopsy protocol comprising transrectal biopsy under targeted prophylaxis, and/or the use of rectal disinfection techniques or using a transperineal approach. Management of biopsy-related infection should be based on individual risk and local resistance profiles with input from multiple specialties.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chamberland RR. Cutting to the Core of the Issue: Emerging Strategies To Reduce Prostate Biopsy-Related Infections. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54:2431-5. [PMID: 27147719 PMCID: PMC5035433 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00144-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 1 million men undergo biopsy in the United States each year to evaluate for prostate cancer (S. Loeb, H. B. Carter, S. I. Berndt, W. Ricker, and E. M. Schaeffer, J Urol 186:1830-1834, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057). In recent years, there has been a rise in infectious complications related to these procedures. This review aims to provide an overview of the guidelines that direct transrectal prostate biopsy, to describe associated infection, and to evaluate the published data driving the current trend toward prebiopsy screening for resistant organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin R Chamberland
- Department of Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker JT, Singla N, Roehrborn CG. Reducing Infectious Complications Following Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review. Rev Urol 2016; 18:73-89. [PMID: 27601966 DOI: 10.3909/riu0713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
A rise in antimicrobial resistant uropathogens has generated a global increase in infections following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx). We performed a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE® and PubMed to comprehensively review strategies to mitigate infections. Of 1664 articles retrieved, 62 were included. The data suggest that augmented prophylaxis and povidone-iodine bowel preparation warrant consideration in regions with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. Transperineal biopsy may be a safer, equally effective alternative to TRUS-Bx in select cases. Recent international travel appears to increase patients' risk for experiencing infections. These findings can aid clinicians in minimizing post-TRUS-Bx infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordon T Walker
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX
| | - Claus G Roehrborn
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lu DD, Raman JD. Strategies for prevention of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy infections. Infect Drug Resist 2016; 9:161-9. [PMID: 27468242 PMCID: PMC4944912 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s96163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in male patients and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in males. To confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer, an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy is necessary to obtain prostate tissue sufficient for histologic analysis by pathologists. Ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy can be accomplished via a transperineal or transrectal approach. The latter biopsy technique involves placing an ultrasound probe into the rectum, visualizing the prostate located just anterior to it, and then obtaining 12-14 biopsies. Each biopsy core requires piercing of the rectal mucosa which can inherently contribute to infection. The increasing infectious risk of prostate needle biopsy requires refinement and re-evaluation of the process in which the technique is performed. Such processes include (but are not limited to) prebiopsy risk stratification, antibiotic prophylaxis, use of rectal preparations, and equipment processing. In the subsequent review, we highlight the current available information on different strategies to reduce the risk of infection following prostate needle biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane D Lu
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loh J, Baker K, Sridharan S, Greer P, Wratten C, Capp A, Gallagher S, Martin J. Infections after fiducial marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy: are we underestimating the risks? Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:38. [PMID: 25890179 PMCID: PMC4333155 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0347-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of gold fiducial markers (FM) for prostate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is standard practice. Published literature suggests low rates of serious infection following this procedure of 0-1.3%, but this may be an underestimate. We aim to report on the infection incidence and severity associated with the use of transrectally implanted intraprostatic gold FM. Methods Three hundred and fifty-nine patients who underwent transrectal FM insertion between January 2012 and December 2013 were assessed retrospectively via a self-reported questionnaire. All had standard oral fluoroquinolone antibiotic prophylaxis. The patients were asked about infective symptoms and the treatment received including antibiotics and/or related hospital admissions. Potential infective events were confirmed through medical records. Results 285 patients (79.4%) completed the questionnaire. 77 (27.0%) patients experienced increased urinary frequency and dysuria, and 33 patients (11.6%) reported episodes of chills and fevers after the procedure. 22 patients (7.7%) reported receiving antibiotics for urinary infection and eight patients (2.8%) reported hospital admission for urosepsis related to the procedure. Conclusion The overall rate of symptomatic infection with FM implantation in this study is 7.7%, with one third requiring hospital admission. This exceeds the reported rates in other FM implantation series, but is in keeping with the larger prostate biopsy literature. Given the higher than expected complication rate, a risk-adaptive approach may be helpful. Where higher accuracy is important such as stereotactic prostate radiotherapy, the benefits of FM may still outweigh the risks. For others, a non-invasive approach for prostate IGRT such as cone-beam CT could be considered. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0347-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Loh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| | - Katie Baker
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia. .,Medical Physics Research Group, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Science & IT, The University of Newcastle & Centre for Clinical Radiation Research, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia.
| | - Chris Wratten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| | - Anne Capp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| | - Sarah Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| | - Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Edith St, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2013; 64:876-92. [PMID: 23787356 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 676] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Accepted: 05/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate biopsy is commonly performed for cancer detection and management. The benefits and risks of prostate biopsy are germane to ongoing debates about prostate cancer screening and treatment. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of complications from prostate biopsy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase, supplemented with additional references. Articles were reviewed for data on the following complications: hematuria, rectal bleeding, hematospermia, infection, pain, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), urinary retention, erectile dysfunction, and mortality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After biopsy, hematuria and hematospermia are common but typically mild and self-limiting. Severe rectal bleeding is uncommon. Despite antimicrobial prophylaxis, infectious complications are increasing over time and are the most common reason for hospitalization after biopsy. Pain may occur at several stages of prostate biopsy and can be mitigated by anesthetic agents and anxiety-reduction techniques. Up to 25% of men have transient LUTS after biopsy, and <2% have frank urinary retention, with slightly higher rates reported after transperineal template biopsy. Biopsy-related mortality is rare. CONCLUSIONS Preparation for biopsy should include antimicrobial prophylaxis and pain management. Prostate biopsy is frequently associated with minor bleeding and urinary symptoms that usually do not require intervention. Infectious complications can be serious, requiring prompt management and continued work into preventative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jeremiah CJ, Spelman DW, Royce PL, Cheng AC. Gentamicin and norfloxacin prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1071/hi12043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Manecksha RP, Nason GJ, Cullen IM, Fennell JP, McEvoy E, McDermott T, Flynn RJ, Grainger R, Thornhill JA. Prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy involving >1100 men. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012:650858. [PMID: 22645441 PMCID: PMC3354450 DOI: 10.1100/2012/650858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 12/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to compare infection rates for two 3-day antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSgbp) and demonstrate local microbiological trends. In 2008, 558 men and, in 2009, 625 men had TRUSgpb. Regimen 1 (2008) comprised 400 mg Ofloxacin immediately before biopsy and 200 mg 12-hourly for 3 days. Regimen 2 (2009) comprised Ofloxacin 200 mg 12-hourly for 3 days commencing 24 hours before biopsy. 20/558 (3.6%) men had febrile episodes with regimen 1 and 10/625 (1.6%) men with regimen 2 (P = 0.03). E. coli was the most frequently isolated organism. Overall, 7/13 (54%) of positive urine cultures were quinolone resistant and (5/13) 40% were multidrug resistant. Overall, 5/9 (56%) patients with septicaemia were quinolone resistant. All patients were sensitive to Meropenem. There was 1 (0.2%) death with regimen 1. Commencing Ofloxacin 24 hours before TRUSgpb reduced the incidence of febrile episodes significantly. We observed the emergence of quinolone and multidrug-resistant E. coli. Meropenem should be considered for unresolving sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rustom P Manecksha
- Department of Urology, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Toren P, Razik R, Trachtenberg J. Catastrophic sepsis and hemorrhage following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 4:E12-4. [PMID: 20174484 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We report 2 cases of catastrophic complications following routine transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The first patient incurred near-fatal septic shock due to multi-resistant Escherichia coli. Due to the severity of his shock, he developed bilateral leg gangrene requiring amputations. The second patient incurred significant hemorrhage eventually requiring an emergent general anesthesia and surgical management to control hemorrhage after other measures failed. While rare events, these reports emphasize the caution needed for physicians who routinely order prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Toren
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Erdal E, Mahmalji W, Fazili Z, Marsh HP, Masood S. Cerebral Abscess after Transrectal Needle Biopsy of the Prostate: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Curr Urol 2011. [DOI: 10.1159/000327482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
13
|
Hadway P, Barrett LK, Waghorn DJ, Hasan K, Bdesha A, Haldar N, Kelleher J. UROSEPSIS AND BACTERAEMIA CAUSED BY ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT ORGANISMS AFTER TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY. BJU Int 2009; 104:1556-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08959.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
14
|
Evidence for Practice. AORN J 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|