Use of customized MIC-KEY gastrostomy button for management of MACE stomal complications

Antegrade Colonic Enema Channels in Pediatric Patients Using Appendix or Cecal Flap: A Comparative Robotic versus Open series

Introduction We present perioperative outcomes of a single center experience with robotic assisted ACE channel creation for the treatment of chronic constipation refractory to medical therapy and compare it to the traditional open surgical approach. We also demonstrate a step-by-step video presentation of the robotic approach for cecal flap ACE performed as part of a dual continence procedure in patients with short length of appendix. Methods A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent ACE channel creation between 2008-2020 was performed. We compared demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables of the open versus robotic approach. Results Among 28 patients, 15 were open and 13 robotic. In order to construct the ACE channel, a cecal flap was utilized in 36%, split appendix in 50%, full length appendix in 11%, and sigmoid colon in 3% of patients. Both approaches showed equivalent estimated blood loss (50 ml [IQR=20-100]), median length of hospital stay (7 vs. 8 days, p=0.7) and median time to return to regular diet (4 vs. 5 days, p=0.5) (table 1). Patients in the open group were more likely to have a history of prior abdominal surgeries than those in the robotic group (80% vs. 38.5%, p=0.02). The risk of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more complications (40% vs. 23.1%, p=0.04) and the rate of ACE channel stenosis (46.7% vs. 7.7%, p=0.02) were significantly higher in the open approach. Channel stenosis was significantly higher in patients with an appendix ACE channel (87.5% vs. 12.5%, p<0.05) compared to those with cecal flap ACE. Conclusions Robotic assisted ACE channel creation is a safe and acceptable alternative with a significantly lower rate of channel stenosis and other Clavien grade 3 complications compared to the traditional open approach. Cecal flaps are also at a lower risk of stomal stenosis than appendix.

Usefulness of the Monti-Malone procedure as a reconstruction of the antegrade continence enema procedure: a case report

Background

The antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedure is effective for severe constipation in patients with spina bifida and can improve quality of life (QOL). The Monti–Malone procedure (MM), which is a method of creating an enema tract from the colon, has been reported as an alternative to the ACE procedure when the appendix cannot be used. We report the usefulness of MM as a reconstruction of the antegrade continence enema procedure.

Case presentation

Our patient was a 22-year-old man with congenital spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery was performed immediately after birth, and preventative appendectomy was carried out during VP shunt repair when 4 months old. At 5 years of age, the ACE procedure using a balloon-button gastrostomy tube was performed for intractable chronic constipation. Simple management was expected, but after 17 years of age, he experienced increased stool leakage around the gastrostomy tube and his QOL declined due to difficulty in managing the ACE. Therefore, reconstruction of the ACE procedure by MM was performed. After reconstruction, the ACE performed well without any complications. The patient is currently satisfied because management of the ACE is easier than before, and his QOL has markedly improved without stool leakage and dermatitis.

Conclusions

MM is less likely to cause complications and is useful as a reconstruction of the ACE procedure.

Prevention and management of complications in various antegrade enema procedures in children: a review of the literature

The antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedures are successful surgical options to achieve bowel cleaning in children with faecal incontinence due to a neuropathy or an anorectal malformation and an intractable constipation. The reversed and orthotopic appendicocecostomy, tubularized ileal conduit and the tubularized cecal flap are frequently applied procedures in the treatment of faecal incontinence (FI). The most common complications are the stoma stenosis, leakage, prolapse, adhesive obstruction and the difficulty in catheterization. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages with different complication rates. The postoperative complications of ACE procedures may reduce patient compliance and quality of life. Most of these complications can be preventable and are easy to manage. This review aimed to discuss the prevention and management strategies for various ACE procedure complications.

Anterograde colonic irrigations by percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy in refractory colorectal functional disorders

PURPOSE

In case reports or small studies, percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy (PEC) has been proposed as an alternative to the Malone intervention to perform antegrade colonic enemas. Our goal was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of PEC in a large group of patients with refractory colorectal functional disorders.

METHODS

From September 2006 to April 2014, all patients undergoing PEC for constipation, fecal incontinence, and incontinence after rectal resection in two expert centers were studied. The PEC procedure consisted in anchoring the caecum to the abdominal wall (caecopexy) and placing a specifically designed tube in the colonic lumen to perform antegrade enemas. The quality of life (GIQLI), constipation (Kess), and incontinence (Cleveland) scores were assessed before PEC and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were included. GIQLI scores were significantly improved in constipation group (n = 43), incontinence group (n = 19), and rectal resection group (n = 10). In the constipation group, Kess score decreased from 25.9 before PEC to 20.6 at 2 years (p = 0.01). In the incontinence and post-rectal resection groups, Cleveland scores decreased from 14.3 before PEC to 2.7 at 6 months (p = 0.01) and to 10.4 at 2 years (p = 0.04). Overall, PEC was considered successful by patients in 58%, 74%, and 90% of cases, in constipation, incontinence, and rectal resection groups, respectively. Chronic pain (52%) at the catheter site was the most frequent complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for antegrade colonic enemas improves significantly the quality of life of patients with colorectal disorder refractory to medical treatment.

Antegrade Enema After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: The Last Chance to Avoid Definitive Colostomy for Refractory Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Fecal Incontinence

BACKGROUND

Total mesorectal excision and preoperative radiotherapy in mid and low rectal cancer allow us to achieve very good oncological results. However, major and refractory low anterior resection syndrome and fecal incontinence alter the quality of life of patients with a long expected life span.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the functional results of patients treated by antegrade enema for refractory low anterior resection syndrome and fecal incontinence after total mesorectal excision.

DESIGN

This is a prospective monocentric study from 2012 to 2016.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy for refractory low anterior resection syndrome and fecal incontinence after total mesorectal excision were prospectively analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed the morbidity of the procedure and compared low anterior resection syndrome score, Wexner score, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index before and after the use of antegrade enema.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients treated by antegrade enema over the study period, 6 (24%) had a low anterior resection, 18 (72%) had a coloanal anastomosis, and 1 (4%) had a perineal colostomy. Postoperatively, the rate of local abscess was 8%, all treated by antibiotics. Low anterior resection syndrome score (33 vs 4, p < 0.001), Wexner score (16 vs 4, p <0.001), and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (73 vs 104, p < 0.001) were all significantly improved after antegrade enema. The 2 main symptoms reported by patients were sweating (28%) and local pain (36%). At the end of the follow-up, 16% (n = 4) catheters were removed, and the rate of definitive colostomy was 12% (n = 3).

LIMITATIONS

The main limitations of this study are the monocentric features and the sample size.

CONCLUSION

Antegrade enema for major and refractory low anterior resection syndrome and fecal incontinence after total mesorectal excision appears to be a promising treatment to avoid definitive colostomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A608.

Laparoscopic Appendicostomy Low-Profile Balloon Button for Antegrade Enemas in Children

INTRODUCTION

The Malone appendicostomy is a continent channel used for antegrade enemas. It requires daily cannulation and is susceptible to stenosis. We use an indwelling low-profile balloon button tube inserted through the appendix into the cecum for antegrade enemas. We hypothesized that this method is effective at managing constipation or fecal incontinence and is associated with a low rate of stenosis.

METHODS

Children who underwent laparoscopic appendicostomy balloon button placement at our institution from January 2011 to April 2017 were identified. The primary outcome was success in managing constipation or fecal continence as measured by the Malone continence scale. Postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-six children underwent the procedure, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one patients (88.5%) underwent the operation for idiopathic constipation, 3 patients (8.6%) for anorectal malformation, and 1 patient (2.9%) for hypermobility. Rate of open conversion was 3%. A full response was obtained in 24 patients (68.6%), partial response in 9 patients (25.7%), and 2 patients failed (5.7%). One patient developed an internal hernia requiring laparotomy and later developed mucosal prolapse. One patient developed a stricture noted at button change. Seven patients (20%) underwent reversal of their appendicostomy tube: 5 due to return of normal bowel function and 2 due to discomfort with flushes.

CONCLUSION

A laparoscopic appendicostomy with a balloon button tube is an effective means of addressing chronic constipation or fecal incontinence. The stenosis rate associated with tube appendicostomy may be lower than those reported for Malone antegrade continence enema procedures.

Triamcinolone injection for treatment of Mitrofanoff stomal stenosis: Optimizing results and reducing cost of care

INTRODUCTION

Stomal stenosis is the most common complication after the creation of a continent catheterizable channel (CCC), but is challenging to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To describe early experience with triamcinolone injection for the treatment of stomal stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who had undergone a triamcinolone injection (40 mg/ml) for the treatment of stomal stenosis at the present institution. The primary outcome of success was defined as a patient-reported or caregiver-reported return to ease with catheterization, and avoidance of stomal revision or indwelling catheter. The cost of care with various techniques for the treatment of stomal stenosis was also assessed by representing the cost as a percentage of charges for a re-operative Monti ileovesicostomy.

RESULTS

A total of 22 injections were performed in 18 CCCs of 17 patients. Demographic and clinical data are provided in the Summary Table. Thirteen CCCs (72%) were successfully treated with a single injection. Three patients (10%) required a total of five repeat injections at a median of 5.1 months between injections (IQR, 4.6-12.4). One patient required a stomal revision at 34.9 months after the initial injection, while one patient also required a Chait cecostomy catheter. The median length of time for ease with catheterization was 11.6 months (IQR, 3.5-18.0) after the initial injection, and 10.4 months (IQR, 4.5-16.0) after any injection. No adverse effects or complications occurred from the injection. There were no variables associated with failure after the initial or any injection on univariate analysis. Represented as a percentage of charges for a reoperative Monti ileovesicostomy, the cost of care was 11.3% for a stomal revision, 5.8% for triamcinolone injection in the operating room, and 0.3% as an office-based procedure.

DISCUSSION

The success rate for triamcinolone injection favorably compared with other options for the treatment of stomal stenosis. It surpassed the reported success rate of stomal dilation and approached that of stomal revision. Other studies have similarly observed a minimal risk of adverse effects and complications from both topical and intralesional corticosteroids. The limitations of the present study included its retrospective design at a single institution. A larger cohort of patients with a longer follow-up is necessary to determine its long-term durability.

CONCLUSIONS

Triamcinolone injection was an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of stomal stenosis in any cutaneous stoma, thereby avoiding the need for a more invasive and costly stomal revision.

Outcomes and satisfaction in pediatric patients with Chait cecostomy tubes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with spina bifida and other spinal dysraphisms commonly suffer from fecal incontinence and constipation, which can be treated with antegrade continence enemas. Currently, information regarding outcomes and satisfaction in children who have Chait cecostomy tubes is lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Chait cecostomy tubes in management of constipation in children with spinal dysraphisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was completed by patients and/or their families during office visits at the University of Iowa or Nationwide Children's Hospital during follow-up pediatric urology office visits. Two study groups completed the questionnaires: 1) Patients with neurogenic bowels who had a cecostomy tube in place (CT) and 2) patients with neurogenic bowels with no cecostomy tube (NCT). The survey used Likert scaled and nonrated questions to assess demographics, bowel continence, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients completed the questionnaire: 53 CT patients and 33 NCT patients. CT patients rated the effectiveness of their cecostomy tube in managing their constipation significantly higher than the NCT group rated the effectiveness of their conventional bowel management methods (p < 0.001). Within the CT group, 48% of patients had complete or near complete continence, 40% had partial fecal incontinence, while only 12% remained incontinent. Of the CT respondents, 88% were overall satisfied with the cecostomy tube (Figure) and 92% would have the cecostomy tube placed again. In addition, hygiene, independence, and social confidence were significantly improved compared with baseline. Complications associated with the Chait tube included granulation tissue that required treatment (60%) and pain with irrigation (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

CT patients reported significantly improved constipation management, fecal continence, and improved quality of life compared with NCT patients. Our pilot study demonstrates that the Chait cecostomy tube is a well-tolerated, effective means for treating constipation and achieving fecal continence with minimal side effects in patients with neurogenic bowels.

Assessment of pediatric Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) complications: Effects of variations in technique

OBJECTIVE

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure is performed for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation who do not respond to medical therapy. The MACE procedure provides antegrade catheter access to the right colon and allows administration of enemas to help evacuate the bowel regularly. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for surgical complications in children who undergo the MACE procedure.

METHOD

Records from 97 pediatric patients who underwent MACE procedure were reviewed retrospectively. Data collected included age, sex, weight (obese/not obese), stomal location, presence of a permanent button/catheter in the stoma, open vs. laparoscopic surgery, and etiology of fecal incontinence/constipation. The complications reviewed included stomal stenosis, leakage, and stomal site infection. The relationships between the independent variables and complications were assessed using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 (68%) patients had at least one complication. Twenty-three (23.7%) patients developed stomal stenosis, and 27 (27.8%) patients had significant stomal leakage. Insertion of a stomal button/catheter device was associated with an increased risk of developing stomal leakage and stomal infection. The presence of a stomal button/catheter was also associated with a decreased risk of stomal stenosis (Figure). The non-intubated, imbricated sub-population, preteen patients (<12 years old) experienced more stomal leakage than teenage patients. In this subgroup, patients with umbilical stomas also experienced more leakage than patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) stomas.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence rates of stomal complications in our study were consistent with previously reported series. In our study, however, stomal leakage had a higher prevalence in comparison with stomal stenosis. This seems to be related to the heterogeneity of the study group, which contained two variants of the MACE procedure; non-imbricated, intubated MACE and imbricated, non-intubated MACE. The use of stomal buttons in conjunction with MACE has previously been reported without changes in complication rates. We found the use of stomal buttons/catheters to be associated with changes in the prevalence of stomal complications. Stomal complications are common in the MACE procedure. The use of a permanent stomal button/catheter is associated with changes in the rates of stomal complications. While many find an umbilical stomal site is more cosmetically appealing, there is an increased risk of leakage with imbricated, non-intubated stomas. In the non-intubated, imbricated sub-population, the MACE procedure results in a higher risk of stomal leakage in preteen patients in comparison with teenage patients.

Outcomes following Malone antegrade continence enema and their surgical revisions

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) channel is an effective means to manage patients with neurogenic bowel; however, complications may occur that may require surgical revision. Specific reports of the outcomes of these interventions are limited. We describe our clinical results following revision of MACE.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing MACE revision for at our institution between 1997 and 2009. Type of MACE (in situ appendicocecostomy (AC = 247), ileocecostomy (IC = 25), cecal flap (CF = 10)) performed was recorded, time from creation to revision, site of revision, and need for repeat surgical revision were recorded.

RESULTS

Of a total of 282 patients that underwent creation of MACE during the study period, 49 patients (17%) required surgical revision. Of these 49 patients, 42 had undergone AC, four had IC and three had CF. Mean time from MACE creation to revision was 19 months. Sixty-eight revision procedures were performed in the 49 patients. Skin level or endoscopic procedures accounted for 52/67 (78%) procedures. Sixteen patients (33%) required more than one revision and three patients (6%) required more than two procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin level revisions accounted for over three-fourths of MACE revisions. In our series, two thirds of patients requiring revision required only a single procedure, but one third required more than one revision.

Quality of life in pediatric patients with unremitting constipation pre and post Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) procedure

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to determine if there is a change in the quality of life in pediatric patients with unremitting functional constipation and/or encopresis after undergoing a MACE procedure.

METHODS

Patients, ages 5 to 18 years with unremitting constipation and a normal evaluation, including anorectal manometry and colonic manometry, who opted to undergo a MACE procedure were contacted to participate in the study. Patients with congenital anorectal malformations as well as spinal cord disorders were excluded from the study. The patient's parent/guardian completed the PedsQL(TM) Generic Core Scales QOL survey prior to the operation, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 15 consecutive patients meeting protocol criteria were recruited within a period of 20 months. The mean age at the MACE procedure was 9.8 years (range 7.0-11.1). 5 patients were female. The mean QOL score pre-MACE was 64.1. At 6 months post-MACE the mean overall QOL score was 90.2, and it was 92.0 at 12 months. All 15 patients at the 6 month follow up had significant improvement in their QOL (p=1.9 × 10(-7)) and all subcategories of QOL were significantly improved as well.

CONCLUSIONS

A MACE procedure is of benefit to otherwise normal pediatric patients who have unremitting functional constipation with failure of medical treatment. Our patients had a significant improvement in all QOL categories and overall QOL.