Expression of hepaCAM and Its Effect on Proliferation of Tumor Cells in Renal Cell Carcinoma

HepaCAM inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in prostate cancer by suppressing nuclear translocation of the androgen receptor via its cytoplasmic domain

Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (HepaCAM) is a tumour suppressor. However, the mechanism of HepaCAM function in prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. In the present study, HepaCAM, androgen receptor (AR) and Ran were analysed in 46 PCa tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. Subsequently, the influence of HepaCAM and its cytoplasmic domain on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and associated proteins was examined using MTT, wound healing, Transwell and western blotting assays, respectively. Furthermore, nuclear translocation of AR and Ran was analysed using immunofluorescence and Western blot assays. The results demonstrated that HepaCAM expression was reduced in PCa, and there was an association between downregulation of HepaCAM and changes in the distribution of AR and Ran. Furthermore, HepaCAM, specifically the cytoplasmic domain, was involved in cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Nuclear translocation of AR was dependent on HepaCAM and its cytoplasmic domain. Additionally, HepaCAM suppression of the nuclear translocation of AR occurred via Ran. The results suggest that HepaCAM and its cytoplasmic domain suppress the nuclear translocation of AR via Ran in PCa. The cytoplasmic domain of HepaCAM may serve as a novel target for therapy in PCa.

HepaCAM inhibits the malignant behavior of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells by downregulating Notch signaling and PF-3084014 (a γ-secretase inhibitor) partly reverses the resistance of refractory prostate cancer to docetaxel and enzalutamide in vitro

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) continues to be a major challenge in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The expression of hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (HepaCAM), a novel tumor suppressor, is frequently downregulated or lost in PCa. Overactivated Notch signaling is involved in the development and progression of PCa, including CRPC. In this study, we found that the activities of Notch signaling were elevated, while HepaCAM expression was decreased in CRPC tissues compared with matched primary prostate cancer (PPC) tissues. In addition, HepaCAM negativity was found to be associated with a worse progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the overexpression of HepaCAM induced by transfection with a HepaCAM overexpression vector (Ad-HepaCAM) exerted antitumor effects by decreasing the proliferation, and suppressing the invasion and migration of bicalutamide-resistant (Bica-R) cells and enzalutamide-resistant (Enza-R) cells. Importantly, we found that the antitumor effects of HepaCAM on the resistant cells were associated with the downregulation of Notch signaling. Moreover, we revealed that PF-3084014 (a γ-secretase inhibitor) re-sensitized Enza-R cells to enzalutamide, and sequential dual-resistant (E+D-R) cells to docetaxel. Additionally, the findings of this study demonstrated that the use of PF-3084014 alone exerted potent antitumor effect on the resistant cells in vitro. On the whole, this study indicates that HepaCAM potentially represents a therapeutic target and PF-3084014 may prove to a promising agent for use in the treatment of refractory PCa.

Interleukin 6 induces cell proliferation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by suppressing hepaCAM via the STAT3-dependent up-regulation of DNMT1 or DNMT3b

Interleukin 6 (IL-6), a tumor promoting cytokine, has been largely implicated in the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (hepaCAM) is a novel tumor suppressor, which is lost or down-regulated in many cancer types including RCC. In the present study, we intensively investigated the connection between IL-6 and hepaCAM in RCC. Our analysis of RCC tissues, adjacent tissues and paired serum samples from RCC patients revealed that IL-6 was elevated in patient serum and RCC tissue, whereas hepaCAM was completely lost or significantly down-regulated. Furthermore, we observed an association between IL-6 increase and hepaCAM decrease in RCC tissue samples. In the section of cytological researches, we found in RCC cell lines that IL-6 was a direct upstream regulator of hepaCAM, and that hepaCAM down-regulation was involved in IL-6-driven cell proliferation. We also demonstrated that IL-6-mediated promoter hypermethylation largely accounted for the hepaCAM loss in RCC, and it was STAT3-dependent. Additionally, our data showed that DNMT1 up-regulation induced by IL-6/STAT3 signaling was indispensable for IL-6-mediated hepaCAM loss in RCC cell lines ACHN and 769-P, while DNMT3b up-regulation was crucial for hepaCAM loss in A498. Our findings provide a novel signal pathway regulating cell proliferation, potentially representing a therapeutic target for RCC.

5-azacytidine inhibits the proliferation of bladder cancer cells via reversal of the aberrant hypermethylation of the hepaCAM gene

Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (hepaCAM), a tumor-suppressor gene, is rarely expressed in bladder carcinoma. However, little is known concerning the mechanisms of low hepaCAM expression in bladder cancer. Abnormal hypermethylation in the promoter plays a crucial role in cancer by silencing tumor-suppressor genes, which is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). In the present study, a total of 31 bladder cancer and 22 adjacent tissues were assessed by immunohistochemistry to detect DNMT3A/3B and hepaCAM expression. Methylation of hepaCAM was determined by methylation‑specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP). The mRNA and protein levels of DNMT3A/3B and hepaCAM were determined by RT-PCR and western blot analysis after treatment with 5-azacytidine (AZAC). Following AZAC treatment, the proliferation of bladder cancer cells was detected by CCK-8 and colony formation assays. Cell cycle distribution was examined by flow cytometry. To further evaluate the tumor‑suppressive roles of AZAC and the involved mechanisms, the anti-tumorigenicity of AZAC was tested in vivo. The expression of DNMT3A/3B protein was markedly increased in the bladder carcinoma tissues (P<0.05), and had a negative linear correlation with hepaCAM expression in the same patients according to Pearson's analysis (r=-0.7176/-0.7127, P<0.05). The MSP results indicated that the hepaCAM gene was hypermethylated in three bladder cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we found that downregulation of DNMT3A/3B expression, after treatment with AZAC, reversed the hypermethylation and expression of hepaCAM in bladder cancer cells. In addition, AZAC inhibited the proliferation of bladder cancer cells and arrested cells at the G0/G1 phase. The in vivo results showed that expression of DNMT3A/3B and hepaCAM as well as tumor growth of nude mice were markedly altered which corresponded with the in vitro results. Due to the ability to reactivate expression of hepaCAM and inhibit growth of bladder cancer cells, AZAC may represent an effective treatment for bladder cancer.

Overexpression of HepaCAM inhibits cell viability and motility through suppressing nucleus translocation of androgen receptor and ERK signaling in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

HepaCAM is suppressed in a variety of human cancers, and involved in cell adhesion, growth, migration, invasion, and survival. However, the expression and function of HepaCAM in prostate cancer are still unknown.

METHODS

HepaCAM expression has been detected by RT-PCR, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry staining in prostate cell lines RWPE-1, LNCap, DU145, PC3, and in 75 human prostate tissue specimens, respectively. Meanwhile, the cell proliferation ability was detected by WST-8 assay. The role of HepaCAM in prostate cancer cell migration and invasion was examined by wound healing and transwell assay. And flow cytometry was used to observe the apoptosis of prostate cancer cells. Then we detected changes of Androgen Receptor translocation and ERK signaling using immunofluorescence staining and western blot after overexpression of HepaCAM.

RESULTS

The HepaCAM expression was significantly down-regulated in prostate cancer tissues and undetected in prostate cancer cells. However, the low HepaCAM expression was not statistically associated with clinicopathological characteristics of prostate cancer. Overexpression of HepaCAM in prostate cancer cells decreased the cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced the cell apoptosis. Meanwhile, HepaCAM prevented the androgen receptor translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and down-regulated the MAPK/ERK signaling.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that HepaCAM acted as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. HepaCAM inhibited cell viability and motility which might be through suppressing the nuclear translocation of Androgen Receptor and down-regulating the ERK signaling. Therefore, it was indicated that HepaCAM may be a potential therapeutic target for prostate cancer.

HepaCAM inhibits clear cell renal carcinoma 786-0 cell proliferation via blocking PKCε translocation from cytoplasm to plasma membrane

Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (HepaCAM) plays a crucial role in tumor progression and has been recognized as a novel tumor suppressor gene. The high protein expression level of protein kinase Cε (PKCε) has been discovered in many tumor types. In the present study, we determined HepaCAM and PKCε protein levels in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissues and analyzed the correlation between them. We observed an inverse relationship in the expression of HepaCAM and PKCε in ccRCC and adjacent normal tissues. In ccRCC tissue, HepaCAM expression was undetectable while PKCε expression was high; the opposite was found in the adjacent normal tissue. Western blot analysis demonstrated that PKCε cytosolic protein levels increased while plasma membrane protein levels decreased without any change in total protein following infection of the ccRCC cell line 786-0 with adenovirus-GFP-HepaCAM (Ad-GFP-HepaCAM). Moreover, the application of Ad-GFP-HepaCAM combined with a PKCε-specific translocation inhibitor (εV1-2) effectively inhibited 786-0 cell growth. Ad-mediated expression of HepaCAM in 786-0 cells reduced the levels of phosphorylated AKT and cyclin D1 and inhibited cell proliferation. In summary, our studies point to interesting connections between HepaCAM and PKCε in tissues and in vitro. HepaCAM may prevent the translocation of PKCε from cytosolic to particulate fractions, resulting in the inhibition of 786-0 cell proliferation. Therapeutic manipulation of these novel protein targets may provide new ways of treating ccRCC.

Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts: chronic white matter oedema due to a defect in brain ion and water homoeostasis

Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts (MLC) is characterised by chronic white matter oedema. The disease has an infantile onset and leads to slow neurological deterioration in most cases, but, surprisingly, some patients recover. The first disease gene, MLC1, identified in 2001, is mutated in 75% of patients. At that time, nothing was known about MLC1 protein function and the pathophysiology of MLC. More recently, HEPACAM (also called GLIALCAM) has been identified as a second disease gene. GlialCAM serves as an escort for MLC1 and the chloride channel CLC2. The defect in MLC1 has been shown to hamper the cell volume regulation of astrocytes. One of the most important consequences involves the potassium siphoning process, which is essential in brain ion and water homoeostasis. An understanding of the mechanisms of white matter oedema in MLC is emerging. Further insight into the specific function of MLC1 is necessary to find treatment targets.

HepaCAM induces G1 phase arrest and promotes c-Myc degradation in human renal cell carcinoma

Hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (hepaCAM) encodes a generally inactive phosphorylated glycoprotein which mediates cancer cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. We have reported that hepaCAM is down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and takes responsibility of cell growth inhibition. However, the precise mechanisms of hepaCAM inhibits cell growth is still unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that re-expression of hepaCAM can cause an accumulation in G0/G1 phase in 786-0 cells. This reaction was accompanied by a substantial reduction of c-Myc expression through using an ectopic hepaCAM expression system. Furthermore, we found a comparable decrease in proliferation and G0/G1 accumulation of 786-0 and RC-2 cells after treatment with a small molecule c-Myc inhibitor, 10058-F4. This indicated that the down regulation of c-Myc was an essential process in controlling growth inhibitory actions of hepaCAM. Nevertheless, re-expression of hepaCAM results in apparent reduction of c-Myc protein with no corresponding reduction of c-Myc mRNA. This suggests that this reaction might take place at a post-transcriptional level rather than transcriptional one. Consistent with these findings, hepaCAM decreased c-Myc stability by increasing the proportion of c-Myc phosphorylation on T58 which can be abrogated by a proteasomal inhibitor (MG132). Thus, our research implies that the decrease in c-Myc protein expression, resulting from ectopic expression of hepaCAM, may contribute to the inhibition of proliferation in these cells.

Expression and clinical significance of hepaCAM and VEGF in urothelial carcinoma

PURPOSE

Investigate the expression of hepatocyte cell adhesion molecule (hepaCAM) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA in 55 cases of urothelial carcinoma to examine the potential relationship between hepaCAM and VEGF in urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

Expression of hepaCAM and VEGF gene was determined by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 55 paired urothelial carcinoma specimens. T24 cells stably expressing hepaCAM gene were established by Lipofectamine 2000. RT-PCR and western blot analysis were used to detect gene and protein expression of hepaCAM and VEGF before and after transfection. MTT test was used to detect the effect of hepaCAM gene on the cell proliferation.

RESULTS

RT-PCR showed that hepaCAM expression level was significantly lower, and VEGF was significantly higher in urothelial carcinoma tissues than in adjacent tissues (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). hepaCAM and VEGF were strongly correlated with tumor stage (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed lower hepaCAM level was associated with higher VEGF level (r = -0.277 P = 0.041). Experiments with T24 cells in vitro demonstrated the expression of VEGF mRNA and protein were significantly decreased after transfection of hepaCAM gene (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). Expression of hepaCAM resulted in a significant inhibition of T24 cells proliferation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a close relationship between hepaCAM and VEGF in urothelial carcinoma. hepaCAM may be defined as a new target for diagnosis and anticancer therapy.