Capromab Pendetide Scanning Has a Potential Role in Optimizing Patient Selection for Salvage Cryosurgical Ablation of the Prostate

Traditional and novel imaging modalities for advanced prostate cancer: A critical review

Accurate detection of metastatic prostate cancer in the setting of preoperative staging as well as posttreatment recurrence is crucial to provide patients with appropriate and timely treatment of their disease. This has traditionally been accomplished with a combination of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan. Recently, more novel imaging techniques have been developed to help improve the detection of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. This review discusses the efficacy of the traditional imaging modalities as well as the novel imaging techniques in detecting metastatic prostate cancer. Articles discussed were gathered through a formal PubMed search.

[What primary care physicians should know about new markers in prostate cancer]

The use of prostate-specific antigen as a diagnostic tool in the screening of prostate cancer is reflected in an increase in the incidence, an increase in diagnosis at initial stages, and an increase in radical therapies, even at the expense of over-treatment in some cases. It is known from the data collected in the literature that not every patient with high prostate-specific antigen needs a biopsy, and that not every patient diagnosed with prostate cancer needs treatment. With the new emerging prostate markers, we will try to improve the specificity of prostate-specific antigen in the grey area (4-10 ng/ml) should be improved. This should avoid unnecessary biopsies. The sensitivity in the detection of significant prostate cancer with low prostate-specific antigen should also be improved in an attempt to reduce the risk of over-treatment. On the other hand, prognostic biomarkers with genomic tests will help to choose the best therapeutic option for the patient.

Indium-111 Capromab Pendetide (ProstaScint(®)) Demonstrates Renal Cell Carcinoma and Aortocaval Nodal Metastases from Prostate Adenocarcinoma

A 62-year-old male with a history of radical prostatectomy for a Gleason 9 (4 + 5) pT3N0Mx prostate cancer presented with rising prostate-specific antigen of 9.0 ng/dl. A contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) revealed an enhancing left upper pole renal mass and aortocaval lymph nodes. Indium (In)-111 Capromab Pendetide (ProstaScint^®) single-photon emission computerized tomography-CT showed abnormal increased uptake in left renal mass and aortocaval lymph nodes with no uptake in the prostate bed or pelvic lymph nodes. He underwent left radical nephrectomy and dissection of aortocaval lymph nodes. Pathology showed renal clear cell carcinoma and metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma involving aortocaval lymph nodes. Our case demonstrates a rare combination of two different malignancies, prostate cancer and clear cell renal cell cancer, showing In-111 ProstaScint^® uptake. Though ProstaScint^® uptake in renal cell carcinoma and in metastatic aortocaval lymph nodes from prostate cancer may be seen in clinical practice, this combination has not been reported previously.

Diagnostic performance of In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT/CT in localized and metastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic performance of In-111 capromab pendetide single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), in the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes via correlation to a gold standard of histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed all In-111 capromab pendetide SPECT/CT acquired at our institution for dedicated histopathology within a 4-month period. Statistical measures of performance were calculated in terms of glandular, seminal vesicle, and lymph node activity. The accuracies of glandular and seminal vesicle activity were then correlated to the indices of risk, including the stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level, as well as the treatment history.

RESULTS

Of the 200 scans meeting the criteria of our study, 197 had prostate gland histopathology, 94 had bilateral seminal vesicle histopathology, and 5 had a total of 43 resected lymph nodes for comparison. The overall accuracies of the scan results were determined to be 77.7% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.539) for the gland, 67.0% (AUC = 0.510) for the seminal vesicles, and 93.0% (AUC = 0.787) for lymph nodes. For glandular activity alone, scan accuracy was found to significantly improve with increasing Gleason score (P < 0.0001), and in a setting prior to treatment (P = 0.0005). No statistically significant differences were found between different scan groups with regards to seminal vesicle activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide substantiating evidence In-111 capromab pendetide can be used to accurately diagnose lymph node metastases from primary cancers of the prostate; however, they also suggest the test may have limited utility in diagnosing tumors within the prostate gland and seminal vesicles.