1
|
Bekku K, Kawada T, Yanagisawa T, Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF. Role of lymphadenectomy during primary surgery for kidney cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:294-301. [PMID: 37014778 PMCID: PMC10256307 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephrectomy (RN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not considered as a standard. The emergence of robot-assisted surgery and effective immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in recent years may change this and lymph node (LN) staging has become easier and has a clinical impact. In this review, we aimed to reconsider the role of LND today. RECENT FINDINGS Although the extent of LND has still not been well established, removal of more LN seems to provide better oncologic outcomes for a select group of patients with high-risk factors such as clinical T3-4. Adjuvant therapy using pembrolizumab has been shown to improve disease free survival if complete resection of metastatic lesions as well as the primary site is obtained in combination. Robot assisted RN for localized RCC has been widespread and the studies regarding LND for RCC has been recently appeared. SUMMARY The staging and surgical benefits and its extent of LND during RN for RCC remains unclear, but it is becoming increasingly important. Technologies that allow an easier LND and adjuvant ICI that improve survival in LN-positive patients are engaging the role of LND, a procedure that was needed, but almost never done, is now indicated sometimes. Now, the goal is to identify the clinical and molecular imaging tools that can help identify with sufficient accuracy who needs a LND and which LNs to remove in a targeted personalized approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostic and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel HV, Srivastava A, Singer EA. To Be or "Node" to Be: Nodal Disease and the Role of Lymphadenectomy in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 8. [PMID: 32582841 DOI: 10.18103/mra.v8i5.2091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Lymph node involvement in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) correlates with poor oncologic outcomes. However, current RCC staging guidelines may not fully reflect the survival impact of lymph node positive disease. Recent data demonstrates that nodal disease has significant impact on survival and modifications to current staging guidelines have been proposed. Lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of surgical intervention for RCC remains controversial. While clinical trial data have demonstrated conflicting evidence for LND, some institutional studies suggests that carefully selected patients at high-risk for recurrence may benefit from LND. Prospectively, clinical trials are examining treating nodal disease and disease at high-risk of recurrence in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting at the time of nephrectomy. These promising trials are poised, if successful, to influence the treatment paradigm for localized RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiren V Patel
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Arnav Srivastava
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The critical role of lymph node dissection in selecting high-risk nonmetastatic renal cancer candidates for adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:293.e25-293.e30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
4
|
Campi R, Sessa F, Di Maida F, Greco I, Mari A, Takáčová T, Cocci A, Fantechi R, Lapini A, Serni S, Carini M, Minervini A. Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Surg 2018; 5:76. [PMID: 30619877 PMCID: PMC6306033 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of lymph node dissection (LND) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. Notably, the conflicting evidence on the benefits and harms of LND is inherently linked to the lack of consensus on both anatomic templates and extent of lymphadenectomy. Herein, we provide a detailed overview of the most commonly dissected templates of LND for RCC, focusing on key anatomic landmarks and patterns of lymphatic drainage. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed without time filters in July 2018 in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. The primary endpoint was to summarize the most commonly dissected templates of LND according to the side of RCC. Results: Overall, 25 studies were selected for qualitative analysis. Of these, most were retrospective. The LND template was heterogeneous across studies. Indications and extent of LND were either not reported or not standardized in most series. The most commonly dissected template for right-sided tumors included hilar, paracaval, and precaval nodes, with few authors extending the dissection to the inter-aortocaval, retrocaval, common iliac or pre/paraaortic nodes. Similarly, the most commonly dissected template for left-sided tumors encompassed the renal hilar, preaortic and paraaortic nodes, with few authors reporting a systematic dissection of inter-aortocaval, retro-aortic, common iliac, or para-caval nodes. Conclusions: In light of the unpredictable renal lymphatic anatomy and the evidence from available prospective mapping studies, the extent of the most commonly dissected templates might be insufficient to catch the overall anatomic pattern of lymphatic drainage from RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isabella Greco
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Tána Takáčová
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Nephrology, HELIOS Dr. Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Andrea Cocci
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Fantechi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Lapini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bensalah K, Albiges L, Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas JM, Gimel P, Hetet JF, Long JA, Nouhaud FX, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2018; 28 Suppl 1:R5-R33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
6
|
Bensalah K, Albiges L, Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Bodin T, Boissier R, Correas JM, Gimel P, Hetet JF, Long JA, Nouhaud FX, Ouzaïd I, Rioux-Leclercq N, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S3-S31. [PMID: 30473002 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bensalah
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-Le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex, France.
| | - L Albiges
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Département d'oncologie génito-urinaire, Gustave-Roussy, 94805, Villejuif cedex, France
| | - J-C Bernhard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Bigot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000, Angers, France
| | - T Bodin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre d'urologie Prado-Louvain, 188, rue du Rouet, 13008, Marseille, France
| | - R Boissier
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU Conception, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - J-M Correas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'imagerie médicale (radiologie), hôpital universitaire Necker-Enfants-malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris, France
| | - P Gimel
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre d'urologie, site Médipôle, 5, avenue Ambroise-Croizat, 66330, Cabestany, France
| | - J-F Hetet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique, clinique Jules-Verne, 2-4, route de Paris, 44314, Nantes, France
| | - J-A Long
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique et de la transplantation rénale, hôpital Michallon, CHU Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700, La Tronche, France
| | - F-X Nouhaud
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - I Ouzaïd
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Clinique urologique, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018, Paris, France
| | - N Rioux-Leclercq
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex 9, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe rein, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhindi B, Wallis CJD, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Farrell A, Kim SP, Karam JA, Capitanio U, Golijanin D, Leibovich BC, Gershman B. The role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2018; 121:684-698. [PMID: 29319926 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate the role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LND) in non-metastatic (M0) and metastatic (M1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We searched Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus from database inception to 29 August 2017 for studies of patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for M0 or M1 RCC. Two investigators independently selected studies for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, Cochrane Collaboration tool and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool. Random effects meta-analysis was performed for all-cause-mortality. The GRADE approach was used to characterize quality of evidence. A total of 51 unique studies were included in the qualitative systematic review. Risk of bias was low in 41/51 (80%) studies. LND was not associated with all-cause mortality in either M0 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.12; I2 = 0%; four studies), M1 (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.29; I2 = 0%; two studies), or pooled M0 and M1 settings (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.09; I2 = 0%; seven studies), with no statistically significant differences according to M stage subgroups (P = 0.50). In the three studies that examined M0 subgroups with a high risk of nodal metastasis, LND was not associated with improved oncological outcomes. Studies on the association of extent of LND with survival reported inconsistent results. Meanwhile, a small proportion of patients with pN1M0 disease demonstrate durable long-term oncological control after surgery, with 10-year cancer-specific survival of 21-31%. Nodal involvement is independently associated with adverse prognosis in both M0 and M1 settings. GRADE quality of evidence was moderate or low for the outcomes examined. Although LND yields independent prognostic information, the existing literature does not support a therapeutic benefit to LND in either M0 or M1 RCC. High-risk M0 patient groups warrant further study, as a subset of patients with isolated nodal metastases experience long-term survival after surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bimal Bhindi
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christopher J D Wallis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Ann Farrell
- Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Simon P Kim
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, University Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dragan Golijanin
- Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urology, Rhode Island Hospital and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shinder BM, Rhee K, Farrell D, Farber NJ, Stein MN, Jang TL, Singer EA. Surgical Management of Advanced and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Front Oncol 2017; 7:107. [PMID: 28620578 PMCID: PMC5449498 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The past decade has seen a rapid proliferation in the number and types of systemic therapies available for renal cell carcinoma. However, surgery remains an integral component of the therapeutic armamentarium for advanced and metastatic kidney cancer. Cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant cytokine-based immunotherapy (predominantly high-dose interleukin 2) has largely given way to systemic-targeted therapies. Metastasectomy also has a role in carefully selected patients. Additionally, neoadjuvant systemic therapy may increase the feasibility of resecting the primary tumor, which may be beneficial for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Several prospective trials examining the role of adjuvant therapy are underway. Lastly, the first immune checkpoint inhibitor was approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in 2015, providing a new treatment mechanism and new opportunities for combining systemic therapy with surgery. This review discusses current and historical literature regarding the surgical management of patients with advanced and mRCC and explores approaches for optimizing patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Shinder
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Kevin Rhee
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Douglas Farrell
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Nicholas J Farber
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Mark N Stein
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Thomas L Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Eric A Singer
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Delacroix SE, Chapin BF, Wood CG. The role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2011; 38:419-28, vi. [PMID: 22045173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the staging and treatment of renal cell carcinoma has long been a topic of debate. The controversy has focused on whether LND is purely an adjunctive staging procedure or has a therapeutic role in the management of this disease. Potential benefits include enhanced staging, better selection for adjuvant therapies/clinical trials, a decrease in recurrence rates, and improved disease-specific and overall survival. This article reviews the available literature on LND in renal cell carcinoma and discusses the potential benefits of aggressive surgical resection in select high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott E Delacroix
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1373, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chapin BF, Delacroix SE, Wood CG. The role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2011; 16:186-94. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-011-0241-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Paparel P, Long JA, Baumert H, Meyer V, Escudier B, Grenier N, Hetet JF, Rioux-Leclercq N, Lang H, Poissonier L, Soulie M, Patard JJ. [Current role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma: review of the literature by the Oncology Committee of the French Association of Urology (CCAFU)]. Prog Urol 2010; 22:313-7. [PMID: 22541899 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2011] [Revised: 01/15/2012] [Accepted: 01/18/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays, most of renal cancers are incidental tumors less than 4 cm. Prevalence of lymph node involvement is low and does not require a systematic lymphadenectomy as described by Robson in the 1960s. Radiologic progress and particularly CT scan describe with high precision lymph node involvement in the initial work-up. In renal cancer with a high risk of recurrence, lymphadenectomy has a pronostic interest and therapeutic role in rare situations where lymph node involvement is isolated. In metastatic patients, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy has to be assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Paparel
- Service de chirurgie urologique, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|