Emergent Stenting After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy: Evaluation of 23 Patients

Effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone administration on early postoperative pain following retrograde intrarenal surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone use on postoperative early pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

Patients who had 10-20 mm solitary kidney stones and underwent RIRS procedures were included in this prospective cohort study between February 2022 and May 2023. Patients who were administered methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively were included in group 1 (n: 31), and the other first 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive methylprednisolone before surgery were included in group 2 (n: 90). Demographic data, features of stone, postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hour, the need for analgesics, changes in serum glucose levels, and the prevalence of postoperative fever were compared.

RESULTS

Age, sex, stone laterality, localization, size, Hounsfield Unit, modified Satava scores, stone-free status, duration of the RIRS procedure, and duration of the ureteral access sheath were found to be similar between groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h were found to be statistically significantly lower in group 1 (p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, and p = .001, respectively). Similarly, postoperative analgesic requirements were found to be significantly lower in group 1 (p = .048) with a similar postoperative fever rate and changes in serum glucose levels between groups.

CONCLUSION

Giving a single dose of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively for the RIRS procedure is safe and effective at preventing early pain and the need for analgesics after the RIRS procedure.

Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis

Introduction

Diagnostic pressure on endoscopy suite can lead to delay in flexible cystoscopic stent removal. We compare the cost and organizational impact of reusable flexible cystoscope versus single-use, flexible cystoscope with a built-in stent grasper (Isiris^®).

Material and methods

Data for the reusable cystoscopic stent removal performed in endoscopy room, group A (period 1) were compared to Isiris disposable stent removal performed in outpatient clinic, group B (period 2). We chose the same calendar months in successive years for these two different groups (9 months each). A micro cost analysis was performed evaluating the impact on costs, complications and organizational benefit.

Results

A total of 72 patients (37, group A; 35, group B) were included with no significant differences in age and gender ratio. The mean procedure time was 14.4 and 2.2 minutes, and the mean stent dwell time was 26.8 and 15.4 days in groups A and B respectively (p <0.001). In group A, 5 patients (14%) developed stent encrustation, of which 3 needed a ureteroscopic removal subsequently. No complication occurred in group B. More staff on average were needed for procedures done in group A, than group B (p <0.001).

The number of patients who had cancer diagnostic wait of >2 weeks for flexible cystoscopy and the mean number of days they waited, reduced from 16 to 3, and 21 days to 3 days respectively between period 1 to period 2. The cost per procedure between group A and group B was £267.2 and £252.62 (p <0.05) if the cost of managing complications was not considered, and £365.40 and £252.62 (p <0.001) if the cost of managing complications was also considered.

Conclusions

Isiris significantly reduced stent dwell time, procedural time and staff needed to carry out the stent removals. It also allowed the procedures to be done in the outpatient setting thereby reducing the organizational pressure on endoscopy related diagnostic procedures.

Transient stent placement versus tubeless procedure after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone extraction (Fast Track Stent study 2): A randomized prospective evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether in pre-stented patients undergoing ureteroscopic stone removal (ureteroscopy retrograde surgery) a tubeless procedure provides a better outcome compared with short-term (6 h) ureteral stenting using an external ureteral catheter.

METHODS

In this single academic center study (Fast Track Stent study 2), carried out between May 2016 and April 2018, 121 patients with renal or ureteral calculi were initially treated with double-J insertion. Before secondary ureteroscopy retrograde surgery, patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: tubeless versus ureteral catheter insertion for 6 h after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery. Exclusion criteria were acute urinary tract infection, solitary kidney or stone diameter >25 mm. Study end-points were stent-related symptoms assessed by a validated questionnaire (ureteral stent symptom questionnaire), administered both before and 4 weeks after surgery. Numerical ureteral stent symptom questionnaire scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U-test. The level of significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Ureteroscopy retrograde surgery procedures carried out by 13 surgeons resulted in >90% stone removal in all patients (n = 121), with a mean operation time of 19.9 versus 18.0 min for ureteral catheter versus tubeless, respectively (P = 0.37). Patient groups did not differ significantly in their ureteral stent symptom questionnaire scores (urinary index P = 0.24; pain index P = 0.35). Patients showed a significant preference for tubeless procedure over ureteral catheter reinsertion (Question GQ P < 0.0001). The reintervention rate was 13.3% for the tubeless procedure (n = 8) and 1.6% for the ureteral catheter group (n = 1), respectively (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term ureteral catheter and no stent insertion after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone extraction in pre-stented patients result in comparable quality of life. However, the reintervention rate is higher for tubeless procedures.

The effect of corticosteroid on postoperative early pain, renal colic and total analgesic consumption after uncomplicated and unstented ureteroscopy: a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of corticosteroid (CS) on early postoperative pain, renal colic and total analgesic consumption after uncomplicated and unstented ureteroscopy (URS).

METHODS

Data of 397 patients who underwent URS and stone fragmentation for symptomatic distal ureteral stone (≤ 15 mm) were retrospectively evaluated. After exclusion, 72 patients who received methylprednisolone (Group I) after non-stenting uncomplicated URS were matched with another 72 patients who did not receive CS (Group II). Cases were matched 1:1 ratio and the matched-pair criteria were age, stone diameter, and duration of surgery.

RESULTS

Both groups were statistically similar in terms of mean age, operative time, stone size and preoperative pain score. However, the mean postoperative pain score was statistically significantly lower in group I than group II on the day of surgery (3.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.012) and postoperative day 1 (2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.02), respectively. Renal colic episode development rate (4.2 vs. 13.2%, p = 0.036), parenteral analgesic requirement rate (18.1 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.001) and total parenteral analgesic consumption per patient (18 vs. 36mg, p = 0.009) were statistically lower in group I than group II on the day of surgery; however, there were no statistically significant differences on postoperative day 1. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of ureteral stenting requirement and late unplanned urgent room visit rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroid after uncomplicated URS can be offered to reduce early postoperative pain, renal colic episode and total analgesic consumption.

Emergency double-J stent insertion following uncomplicated Ureteroscopy: risk-factor analysis and recommendations

PURPOSE

Emergency double-J (DJ) stenting following ″uncomplicated″ ureteroscopic (UURS) stone treatment is both morbid and costly. Our study aims at identifying those patients who are more likely to require such an extra procedure. Handling of this complication will also be highlighted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

319 cases of UURS cases were selected out of 903 patients, who were admitted for URS stone treatment at King Abdullah University Hospital during the period from May, 2003 to December, 2010. Thirty-eight of them (11.9%) had emergency post-URS DJ stenting within 24 hours of discharge. The medical records of all UURS cases were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison in demographic and stone-related variables was made using 2-paired t-test with P < 0.05. Operative findings of 38 stented patients were outlined.

RESULTS

Significant risk factors for emergency stenting were noted in males with larger (> 1.5 cm) and proximal stones (38 stented vs. 281 unstented). Operative risk factors among the 38 patients were: initial procedure time > 45 minutes (42.1%), ureteral wall edema (21.1%), repeated access for stones > 1.5 cm (21.1%), impacted stone (10.5%) and ignored or missed stones/fragments (4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The need for emergency DJ stenting following UURS stone treatment is not uncommon. The routine insertion is impractical and weakly-supported. With risk-factor stratification, selective and individualized DJ stenting policy is recommended.

Ureteroscopic management with laser lithotripsy of renal pelvic stones

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The development of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes has permitted easier access to calculi throughout the urinary tract. We compared the use of semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy for the management of shockwave lithotripsy-refractory, isolated renal pelvic calculi by evaluating stone-free rates, operating room times, and associated complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ureteroscopic stone treatment was attempted in 47 patients with isolated renal pelvic stones between November 2008 and December 2010. The procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Semirigid ureteroscopy was routinely performed in all patients. If the stones were accessible in the renal pelvis with the semirigid ureteroscope (S-URS), they were then treated with the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser through S-URS under direct vision. If the stones were not accessible, flexible ureteroscopy was then performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

In 25 of 47 patients, renal pelvic stones were accessible with S-URS, and the stones were fragmented with the Ho:YAG laser using S-URS. In the remaining 22 patients, the stones were accessed with the flexible ureteroscope (F-URS), and the fragmentation of stones was performed with the Ho:YAG laser using the F-URS. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, grade of hydronephrosis, mean stone size, and stone laterality among the two groups. The mean operative times were 71.90 ± 17.90 minutes in the S-URS group and 93.41 ± 18.56 minutes in the F-URS group (P=0.001). The stone-free rates at postoperative day 1 and at the 1 month follow-up were 72% and 76% in the S-URS group and 81.8% and 86.4% in the F-URS group, respectively (P=0.861 and P=0.368). We found no significant differences among groups with regard to stone-free rates, complication rates, and hospital lengths of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is well known that flexible ureteroscopy permits a detailed caliceal examination and therapeutic interventions, semirigid ureteroscopy is also often another sufficient means of reaching the renal pelvis in selected patients.