1
|
Ianieri MM, Nardone ADC, Pavone M, Benvenga G, Pafundi MP, Campolo F, Foschi N, Greco P, Brutto M, Scambia G. Are ureterolysis for deep endometriosis really all the same? An anatomical classification proposal for ureterolysis: A single-center experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 162:1010-1019. [PMID: 37069787 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ureteral endometriosis has an incidence of 0.1% to 1%. The type of surgery required is either conservative (ureterolysis) or radical treatment, depending on the degree of ureter infiltration. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications is heterogeneous. Thus, the aim of the current study was to propose a classification of ureterolysis based on the anatomical structure of the ureter and differing complication rates with procedures. METHODS A total of 139 ureterolysis procedures were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to the depth of ureterolysis required. Differences were recorded across the three types of ureterolysis in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS The incidence of ureteral fistula was reported in 0.7% of cases, with postoperative ureteral stenosis in 2% of type 2 ureterolysis. In the case of type 3 ureterolysis, after conservative procedures, 52.9% of patients required an ureteroneocystostomy to solve the ureteral stenosis. CONCLUSION The risk of ureteral injury and ureteroneocystostomy after conservative procedures appears to be associated with type 3 ureterolysis, probably due to excessive devascularization, secondary to the incision of adventitia. Obviously, these data should be confirmed through a prospective study of a larger number, but our proposed classification can provide the basis for making data from future studies more comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Maria Ianieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra De Cicco Nardone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Pavone
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Greta Benvenga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Pafundi
- Facility of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - GEMELLI GENERATOR, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Campolo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Nazario Foschi
- Urology Division, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Greco
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariafrancesca Brutto
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Unit of Oncological Gynecology, Women's Children's and Public Health Department, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frumkin N, Schmädecker R, Isermann R, Keckstein J, Ulrich UA. Surgical Treatment of Deep Endometriosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:79-87. [PMID: 36643873 PMCID: PMC9833890 DOI: 10.1055/a-1799-2658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
In deep endometriosis (DE), clusters of endometrium-like cells penetrate more than 5 mm below the peritoneum: The affected organs and tissue structures can eventuate in an alteration of the anatomy with eliminated organ boundaries, which in some cases can pose a real surgical challenge, even for experienced surgeons. A comprehensive description of the different manifestations of the disease can be found in the #Enzian classification. Since the operation is usually the foundation for the successful treatment of DE, what is important are conclusive indications, appropriate preoperative preparation and, above all, appropriate experience on the part of the surgical team. This article aims to provide a review of the surgical options that are currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Frumkin
- 303449Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Endometriosezentrum, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Johannesstift Diakonie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rasmus Schmädecker
- 303449Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Endometriosezentrum, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Johannesstift Diakonie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricarda Isermann
- 303449Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Endometriosezentrum, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Johannesstift Diakonie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Keckstein
- Endometriosezentrum Ordination Dres. Keckstein, Villach, Austria
| | - Uwe Andreas Ulrich
- 303449Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Endometriosezentrum, Martin Luther Krankenhaus, Johannesstift Diakonie, Berlin, Germany,Korrespondenzadresse Prof. Dr. Uwe Andreas Ulrich 303449Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Endometriosezentrum, Martin Luther
Krankenhaus, Johannesstift DiakonieCaspar-Theyß-Str. 27–3114193
BerlinGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rate of recurrent hydronephrosis after laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:133-140. [PMID: 35239003 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06462-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To investigate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in patients with ureteral endometriosis (UE). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the ureter endometriosis with hydronephrosis. SETTING A private hospital that provide primary, secondary and tertiary care. PATIENTS 30 consecutive patients with UE who underwent laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy at our institution between May 2008 and April 2020. INTERVENTIONS Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy, if necessary, hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, cystectomy, partial bladder resection, or partial bowel resection were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The most common chief complaint was pelvic pain (40%). Endometriosis affected only the left ureter in 56.7% of patients, only the right ureter in 33.3%, and both ureters in 6.7%. Involvement of the ipsilateral ovary was confirmed in 64.3%. The most frequent location of UE was 1-3 cm above the UVJ (46.7%). A psoas hitch was performed in 7 patients (23.3%), and the Boari flap was used in 9 patients (30%). Hysterectomy was performed in 12 patients (40%), and 6 of them had a concomitant bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (20%). In addition, 3 patients (10%) underwent partial bowel resection, and 2 patients (6.7%) underwent partial bladder resection. After surgery, 24 of 27 patients (80.0%) were free of sever hydronephrosis after surgery. Hydronephrosis recurred in a single patient (3.3%), but the grade of hydronephrosis improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.001). At 6 months of follow up, 4 patients (13.3%) experienced urinary tract infections and 2 patients (6.7%) reported dysuria. Patients reported a regression of dysmenorrhea symptoms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This study shows that ureteroneocystostomy provides good results in terms of relapses and symptom control in patients with ureteral endometriosis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cunha FLD, Arcoverde FVL, Andres MP, Gomes DC, Bautzer CRD, Abrao MS, Tobias-Machado M. Laparoscopic Treatment of Ureteral Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2020; 28:779-787. [PMID: 33253957 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the literature for the preoperative clinical characteristics, surgical findings, and outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgical treatment of ureteral endometriosis (UE). DATA SOURCES A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Scopus databases. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, studies in English language that assessed UE treated surgically by laparoscopy published between 2008 and 2020 were selected. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS In an initial search, 1313 articles were identified, 193 in PubMed and 1120 in Scopus databases. A total of 1291 articles that did not meet eligibility criteria were excluded. The remaining 22 studies were included in the final qualitative analysis, with a total of 1337 patients. Data on preoperative patient's characteristics, preoperative imaging examinations, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were abstracted by 1 author. The descriptive nature of included studies prevented the performance of meta-analysis. Preoperative symptoms included dysmenorrhea (76.3%), pelvic pain (59.6%), dyspareunia (46.2%), lower urinary tract symptoms (21.3%), and ureteral obstructive symptoms (9.9%). Intraoperative findings showed that UE lesions were left-sided in 55% of the cases, right-sided in 28.9% of the cases, and bilateral in 8.7% of the cases. Ureterolysis alone or before another technique was performed in 69.1% of the cases, ureteral resection followed by ureteroureteral anastomosis in 6%, ureteroneocystostomy after ureteral resection in 21%, and nephrectomy in 0.45% of the patients. Double-J ureteral stent placement was reported in 33.3% of the cases. Concomitant resection of the bladder owing to endometriosis involvement was performed in 15.5% of the cases. The prevalence of ureteral injury was 3.1%. Postoperative complications included ureteral fistula (2.8%), ureteral stenosis (24.2%), persistence/recurrence of UE (3.8%), and reoperation for fistula and/or stricture treatment (3.9%). CONCLUSION UE is associated with common endometriosis pain symptoms and a low rate of lower urinary tract symptoms. The standard surgical technique for UE treatment is not yet a consensus; however, the laparoscopic approach with previous ureterolysis, leaving ureteral resection only for refractory cases, seems to be a safe and effective treatment, with improvement of symptoms and few intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marina Paula Andres
- Gynecologic Division, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia. Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (Drs. Andres and Abrao); Gynecologic Division, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Andres and Abrao)
| | - Daniel Coser Gomes
- Urology Division, Hospital Municipal Dr. José de Carvalho Florence, São José dos Campos (Dr. Gomes)
| | - Carlos Ricardo Doi Bautzer
- Urology Division, Hospital Sirio Libanês (Dr. Bautzer); Urology Division, ABC Medical School, Santo André (Drs. Bautzer and Tobias-Machado)
| | - Mauricio Simoes Abrao
- Gynecologic Division, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia. Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (Drs. Andres and Abrao); Gynecologic Division, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo (Drs. Andres and Abrao).
| | - Marcos Tobias-Machado
- Instituto do Câncer, Dr. Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho (Drs. da Cunha and Tobias-Machado); Urology Division, ABC Medical School, Santo André (Drs. Bautzer and Tobias-Machado); Hospital São Luiz Morumbi, Rede D´Or (Dr. Tobias-Machado), São Paulo
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, Feki A, Grimbizis GF, Hummelshoj L, Nisolle M, Roman H, Saridogan E, Tanos V, Tomassetti C, Ulrich UA, Vermeulen N, De Wilde RL. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa002. [PMID: 32064361 PMCID: PMC7013143 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How should surgery for endometriosis be performed? SUMMARY ANSWER This document provides recommendations covering technical aspects of different methods of surgery for deep endometriosis in women of reproductive age. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis is highly prevalent and often associated with severe symptoms. Yet compared to equally prevalent conditions, it is poorly understood and a challenge to manage. Previously published guidelines have provided recommendations for (surgical) treatment of deep endometriosis, based on the best available evidence, but without technical information and details on how to best perform such treatment in order to be effective and safe. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A working group of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), ESHRE and the World Endometriosis Society (WES) collaborated on writing recommendations on the practical aspects of surgery for treatment of deep endometriosis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS This document focused on surgery for deep endometriosis and is complementary to a previous document in this series focusing on endometrioma surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The document presents general recommendations for surgery for deep endometriosis, starting from preoperative assessments and first steps of surgery. Different approaches for surgical treatment are discussed and are respective of location and extent of disease; uterosacral ligaments and rectovaginal septum with or without involvement of the rectum, urinary tract or extrapelvic endometriosis. In addition, recommendations are provided on the treatment of frozen pelvis and on hysterectomy as a treatment for deep endometriosis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION Owing to the limited evidence available, recommendations are mostly based on clinical expertise. Where available, references of relevant studies were added. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These recommendations complement previous guidelines on management of endometriosis and the recommendations for surgical treatment of ovarian endometrioma. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The meetings of the working group were funded by ESGE, ESHRE and WES. Dr Roman reports personal fees from ETHICON, PLASMASURGICAL, OLYMPUS and NORDIC PHARMA, outside the submitted work; Dr Becker reports grants from Bayer AG, Volition Rx, MDNA Life Sciences and Roche Diagnostics Inc. and other relationships or activities from AbbVie Inc., and Myriad Inc, during the conduct of the study; Dr Tomassetti reports non-financial support from ESHRE, during the conduct of the study; and non-financial support and other were from Lumenis, Gedeon-Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck SA, outside the submitted work. The other authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER na.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joerg Keckstein
- Endometriosis Centre Dres. Keckstein, Richard-Wagner Strasse 18, 9500 Villach, Austria
| | - Christian M Becker
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital Womens Centre, OX3 9DU Oxford, UK
| | - Michel Canis
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, University Clermont Auvergne CHU, Estaing 1 Place Lucie Aubrac, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anis Feki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, HFR Fribourg Hopital cantonal, 1708 Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Grigoris F Grimbizis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Tsimiski 51 Street, 54623 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Michelle Nisolle
- Hôpital de la Citadelle, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Centre, Clinic Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing Institute for Women’s Health, University College Hospital, NW1 2BU London, UK
| | - Vasilios Tanos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaeio Hospital, 2024 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Carla Tomassetti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leuven University Fertility Centre, University Hospital Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uwe A Ulrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martin Luther Hospital, 14193 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- University Hospital for Gynecology, Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goggins ER, Wong M, Lindsey A, Einarsson JI, Cohen SL. Ureteroureteral anastomosis for endometriosis involving the ureter: Case series and literature review. JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND PELVIC PAIN DISORDERS 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2284026519845993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to review operative management of endometriosis involving the ureter. Materials and methods: Retrospective case series of three patients undergoing resection of ureteral endometriosis with ureteroureterostomy for endometriosis involving the ureter by minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons between 2007 and 2018 at a large academic medical center in the Northeastern United States. A literature review was conducted to find cases with a similar approach. Results: Three cases of ureteral endometriosis surgically managed at our institution with ureteroureteral anastomosis were identified. Ureteral endometriosis was identified preoperatively by hydroureteronephrosis on imaging. Intrinsic ureteral endometriosis was confirmed by pathology in two cases; extrinsic endometriosis was grossly visualized in one case. Operative times ranged from 300 to 387 min. Estimated blood loss ranged from 150 to 250 mL. There were no intraoperative complications. A total of 151 cases with a similar approach were described in the literature. Recurrence of obstructive uropathy occurred in 11 cases. Conclusion: Ureteral endometriosis is a rare complication with several management options. Ureterectomy with ureteroureterostomy has been described in the literature and in three cases at our institution with low complication rates and rare stricture formation. This technique can be successful in the management of ureteral endometriosis and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marron Wong
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexis Lindsey
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jon I Einarsson
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah L Cohen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barra F, Scala C, Biscaldi E, Vellone VG, Ceccaroni M, Terrone C, Ferrero S. Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 24:710-730. [PMID: 30165449 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ureter is the second most common site affected by urinary tract endometriosis, after the bladder. Optimal strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of ureteral endometriosis (UE) are not yet well defined. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on fertility and risk of malignant transformation of UE. SEARCH METHODS A systematic literature review, by searching the MEDLINE and PUBMED database until April 2018, was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO CRD42017060065). A total of 67 articles were selected to be included in this review. OUTCOMES The involvement of the ureter by endometriosis is often asymptomatic or leads to non-specific symptoms. When the diagnosis is delayed, UE may lead to persistent hydronephrosis and eventually loss of renal function. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for the assessment of UE; alternatively, magnetic resonance imaging provides an evaluation of ureteral type involvement. The surgical treatment of UE aims to relieve ureteral obstruction and avoid disease recurrence. It includes conservative ureterolysis or radical approaches, such as ureterectomy with end-to-end anastomosis or ureteroneocystostomy performed in relation to the type of ureteral involvement. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes are in line with those observed after surgical treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Current evidence does not support the potential risk of malignant transformation of UE. WIDER IMPLICATIONS In this article, we review available evidence on ureteral endometriosis, providing a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this disease. Diagnosis and management of UE remain a challenge. In relation to the degree of ureteral involvement and the association with other DIE implants, the surgical approach should be planned and carried out in an interdisciplinary collaboration between gynecologist and urologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Barra
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Carolina Scala
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ennio Biscaldi
- Department of Radiology, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Valerio Gaetano Vellone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceccaroni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, 'Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria' Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ceccaroni M, Ceccarello M, Caleffi G, Clarizia R, Scarperi S, Pastorello M, Molinari A, Ruffo G, Cavalleri S. Total Laparoscopic Ureteroneocystostomy for Ureteral Endometriosis: A Single-Center Experience of 160 Consecutive Patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26:78-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Giannini A, Pisaneschi S, Malacarne E, Cela V, Melfi F, Perutelli A, Simoncini T. Robotic Approach to Ureteral Endometriosis: Surgical Features and Perioperative Outcomes. Front Surg 2018; 5:51. [PMID: 30234125 PMCID: PMC6131650 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical treatment of ureteral endometriosis is necessary to relieve urinary symptoms of obstruction and to preserve renal function. Which surgical approach to ureteral endometriosis should be considered the most appropriate is debated, due to the lack of scientific evidence. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility and to describe the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive treatment of deep ureteral endometriosis using robotic assistance, highlighting the technical benefits and the limits of this approach. Method: A case-series including 31 consecutive patients affected by high-stage endometriosis including ureteral endometriosis using robotic assistance in our Department between November 2011 and September 2017. Results: All procedures were successfully completed by robotic technique, resulting in full excision of the parametrial nodules involving the ureter. Mean operating time was 184.8 ± 81 min. Mean hospital stay was 4.02 ± 3 days. Perioperative complications occurred in five patients and 4 out of 5 involved the urinary tract. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the ureter was feasible and allowed complete resection of ureteral nodules in all cases. No intraoperative complications arose, but a non-negligible rate of urinary tract complications was detected. This calls for a careful assessment of the benefits and specific risks associated with the use of robotic surgery for the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the ureter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giannini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Pisaneschi
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Malacarne
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vito Cela
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Franca Melfi
- Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Perutelli
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bolze PA, Paparel P, Golfier F. [Urinary tract involvement by endometriosis. Techniques and outcomes of surgical management: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [PMID: 29526792 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Urinary tract involvement by endometriosis is reported in 1% of endometriosis patients (NP3). Consequences range from pelvic pain for bladder localizations to silent kidney loss in case of chronic ureteral obstruction (NP3). The feasibility of laparoscopic management was widely proven (NP3) and may reduce hospital stay length (NP4). Radical surgery with partial cystectomy for bladder localizations was shown to significantly and durably reduce pain symptoms with low risk of a severe postoperative complications (NP3). Medical hormonal treatment also shows short-term reduction of pain symptoms (NP4). Transureteral resection of bladder endometriosis nodule is not recommended (grade C) because of a high postoperative recurrence rate (NP4). Given a high risk of silent kidney loss, it is recommended that patients with ureteral involvement by endometriosis are managed by a multidisciplinary team considering urinary and potential extra-urinary localizations of endometriosis (grade C). No recommendation can be made on which technique to prefer between conservative (ureterolysis) or radical surgical techniques or on benefit and length of ureteral stents in case of ureteral involvement. Surgical management of bladder and ureteral localizations of endometriosis do not seem to be associated with altered or improved postoperative fertility (NP4). Since late postoperative ureteral anastomosis stenosis were reported with silent kidney loss, repeated postoperative imaging monitoring is justified (expert opinion).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-A Bolze
- Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, hôpitaux universitaires de Lyon, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, service de chirurgie gynécologique et oncologique - obstétrique, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | - P Paparel
- Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, hôpitaux universitaires de Lyon, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, service de chirurgie urologique, 165, chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite
| | - F Golfier
- Université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, hôpitaux universitaires de Lyon, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, service de chirurgie gynécologique et oncologique - obstétrique, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang JZ, Guo HL, Li JB, Chen SQ. Management of ureteral endometriosis with hydronephrosis: Experience from a tertiary medical center. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2017; 43:1555-1562. [PMID: 28707816 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Zhi Huang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Hong-Ling Guo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Jin-Bo Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Shu-Qin Chen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Morbidity and functional long-term follow-up of patients with surgical treatment of urinary tract endometriosis]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 45:327-334. [PMID: 28552755 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess postoperative complications, improvement of pain symptoms and residual urinary functional symptoms after surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis affecting ureter or bladder. METHODS Retrospective study of complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and urinary functional symptoms (Urinary Symptom Profile questionnaire [USP]) of patients surgically treated between 2007 and 2015 in University Hospitals of Lyon. RESULTS Among 31 patients with endometriosis involving the bladder, 83.9% had a partial cystectomy and 16.1% an extra-mucosal resection. Among patients (n=20) with ureteral involvement, 85% had ureterectomy with ureterocystoneostomy and 15% had only ureterolysis. Grade III postoperative complications occurred in 6% and 0% of patients with bladder or ureteral surgery, respectively and no grade IV or V complications were reported. Mean bladder VAS dropped from 5.3±4.2 to 0.3±0.9 after a follow-up of 42 months (P<0.0001). In patients with ureteral involvement, mean flank VAS dropped from 3.6 to 0.9 after a follow-up of 33 months (P<0.0005). Mean postoperative USP score for dysuria and detrusor overactivity were 1.35/9 and 2.48/21 in case of bladder involvement, and 1.10/9 and 2.15/21 in case of ureteral involvement. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary surgical management of deep infiltrative endometriosis affecting urinary tract was associated to a low risk of severe postoperative complications and to a long-term significant improvement of pain symptoms without significant residual functional urinary symptoms.
Collapse
|
13
|
Laparoscopic Management of Ureteral Endometriosis and Hydronephrosis Associated With Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24:466-472. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
14
|
Cavaco-Gomes J, Martinho M, Gilabert-Aguilar J, Gilabert-Estélles J. Laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 210:94-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
15
|
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P. Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Impact on Fertility, and Risk of Malignant Transformation. Eur Urol 2016; 71:790-807. [PMID: 28040358 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The bladder is the most common site affected in urinary tract endometriosis. There is controversy regarding the pathogenesis, clinical management (diagnosis and treatment), impact on fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of bladder endometriosis (BE). OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate evidence regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, impact on female fertility, and risk of malignant transformation of BE. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of PubMed/Medline from inception until October 2016 was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO registry (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42016039281). Eighty-seven articles were selected for inclusion in this analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS BE is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle. Ultrasonography is the first-line technique for assessment of BE owing to its accuracy, safety, and cost. Clinical management can be conservative, using hormonal therapies, or surgical. When conservative treatment is preferred, estrogen-progestogen combinations and progestogens should be chosen because of their favorable profile that allows long-term therapy. Surgery should guarantee complete removal of the bladder nodule to minimize recurrence, so transurethral surgery alone should be avoided in favor of segmental bladder resection. There is not a strong rationale for hypothesizing a detrimental impact of BE per se on fertility. Furthermore, current evidence does not support the removal of bladder endometriotic lesions because of the potential risk of malignant transformation since this phenomenon is exceedingly rare. CONCLUSIONS BE is a challenging condition, and the common coexistence of other types of endometriosis means that clinical management of BE should involve collaboration between gynecologists and urologists. PATIENT SUMMARY In this article we review available knowledge on bladder endometriosis. The review provides a useful tool to guide physicians in the management of this complex condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University School of Medicine, IRCCS, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Obstet-Gynecol, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vercellini
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano and Department of Obstet-Gynecol, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ulrich U, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Keckstein J, von Leffern I, Oppelt P, Renner SP, Sillem M, Stummvoll W, De Wilde RL, Schweppe KW. National German Guideline (S2k): Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis: Long Version - AWMF Registry No. 015-045. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2014; 74:1104-1118. [PMID: 26157194 PMCID: PMC4470398 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In this guideline, recommendations and standards for optimum diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis are presented. They are based on the analysis of the available scientific evidence as published in prospective randomized and retrospective studies as well as in systematic reviews. The guideline working group consisted of experts from Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and the Czech Republic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U. Ulrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martin Luther Hospital,
Berlin
| | - O. Buchweitz
- Gynecological Outpatient Surgery Altonaer Straße, Hamburg
| | - R. Greb
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dortmund
| | - J. Keckstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Provincial Hospital,
Villach
| | - I. von Leffern
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albertinen Hospital,
Hamburg
| | - P. Oppelt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Provincial Womenʼs and
Childrenʼs Hospital, Linz
| | - S. P. Renner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Erlangen School
of Medicine
| | - M. Sillem
- Gynecological Practice and Clinic Rosengarten, Mannheim
| | - W. Stummvoll
- Departement of Gynecology, Hospital of the Sisters of Mercy,
Linz
| | - R.-L. De Wilde
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Gynecologic Oncology, Pius
Hospital Oldenburg, University of Oldenburg School of Medicine
| | - K.-W. Schweppe
- Endometriosis Center Ammerland, Ammerland Clinic,
Westerstede
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Laparoscopy for ureteral endometriosis: surgical details, long-term follow-up, and fertility outcomes. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:160-166.e2. [PMID: 24842674 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Revised: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 03/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
18
|
Ulrich U, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Keckstein J, von Leffern I, Oppelt P, Renner SP, Sillem M, Stummvoll W, Schweppe KW. Interdisciplinary S2k Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis: Short Version - AWMF Registry No. 015-045, August 2013. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73:890-898. [PMID: 24771938 PMCID: PMC3975317 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- U Ulrich
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin
| | | | - R Greb
- Kinderwunschzentrum Dortmund, Dortmund
| | - J Keckstein
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Landeskrankenhaus, Villach
| | - I von Leffern
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - P Oppelt
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Landesfrauen- und Kinderklinik, Linz
| | - S P Renner
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - M Sillem
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim
| | - W Stummvoll
- vormals Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern, Linz
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Castaneda CV, Shapiro EY, Ahn JJ, Van Batavia JP, Silva MV, Tan Y, Gupta M. Endoscopic Management of Intraluminal Ureteral Endometriosis. Urology 2013; 82:307-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2013] [Revised: 03/06/2013] [Accepted: 04/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|