Management of Bladder Cancer After Renal Transplantation

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is safe and effective in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients with immunomodulating conditions

INTRODUCTION

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the most effective therapy available to treat high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. However, for patients with immunomodulating conditions BCG is a relative contraindication due to efficacy and safety concerns. To our knowledge, no population-level study evaluating the efficacy and safety profile of BCG for immunomodulated patients exists.

METHODS

NMIBC patients aged 66 years or older were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) - Medicare database from 1975-2013. All patients completed adequate BCG (at least 5 plus 2 treatments completed within 12 months of diagnosis). Two groups were defined: an immunomodulated population identified by immunomodulating conditions such as solid-organ transplantation, HIV, and autoimmune conditions, and an immunocompetent group. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival defined as progression to systemic chemotherapy, checkpoint inhibitors, radical or partial cystectomy, metastasis, or cancer-specific death. A safety analysis was performed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

In a total of 4,277 patients with NMIBC who completed adequate BCG, 606 (14.2%) were immunomodulated. The immunomodulated group was older at diagnosis (P < 0.001), more likely to be female (P < 0.001), more likely to live in a metropolitan area (P < 0.001), and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores (P < 0.001). There were no differences in progression to chemotherapy (P = 0.17), checkpoint inhibitors (P > 0.99), radical cystectomy (P = 0.40), partial cystectomy (P = 0.93), metastasis (P = 0.19), cancer-specific death (P = 0.18) or 5-year total bladder cancer progression (P = 0.30) between the groups. For the safety analysis, rates of disseminated BCG were similar between immunomodulated and immunocompetent patients (0.7% vs. <1.8%, P = 0.51). On multivariable analysis 5-year total bladder cancer progression (HR 1.07 [CI 0.88-1.30]) was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Rates of bladder cancer progression and disseminated BCG complications 5-years after BCG therapy were similar regardless of immunomodulation status. These findings suggest that BCG intravesical therapy can be offered to immunomodulated patients with high-risk NMIBC although theoretical infectious complication risks remain.

Characteristics and Outcomes of De Novo Genitourinary Malignancy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients at the University of Minnesota

BACKGROUND

Studies examining outcomes of genitourinary malignancy (GU) in the solid organ transplant (SOT) population predominantly focus on renal transplant recipients and consist of relatively small cohorts. We aimed to expand knowledge of the characteristics and outcomes of de novo GU malignancies in all patients with SOT at a large tertiary center.

METHODS

The SOT database was queried for recipients with de novo bladder, renal cell, and prostate malignancy, and a retrospective chart review was performed. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariate modeling of predictive factors in the development of GU malignancy.

RESULTS

Solid organ transplant recipients with de novo bladder malignancy comprised 64.3% with high grade and 38.1% with advanced stage (≥T2) disease at initial diagnosis. Only 3.7% of patients with de novo renal cell carcinoma presented with metastatic disease, and 13.6% with localized disease developed recurrences. The most common stage in de novo prostate cancer patients was pT3 (52.2%). Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% CI) for 5-year overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 44.12% (31.13-62.52) and 80.80% (68.85-94.81) for bladder, 78.90% (68.93-90.30) and 96.61% (92.10-100.00) for renal cell, and 81.18% (72.01-91.51) and 96.16% (90.95-100.00) for prostate cancer, respectively. Age at transplant and time from transplant to cancer diagnosis were predictive of de novo bladder cancer OS (P = .042 and .021, respectively).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center cohort examined for GU malignancy after SOT. Bladder and renal cell cancer had worse OS but similar CSS as historical rates for nontransplant patients. De novo prostate cancer had similar CSS.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with de novo urothelial carcinoma: thirty years of experience from a single center

BACKGROUND

De novo urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a leading cause of death after kidney transplant (KT). The efficacy of various treatments, apart from surgery, and the prognosis for patients with urothelial carcinoma after kidney transplantation remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the efficacy of chemotherapy with gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) or gemcitabine + carboplatin (GCa), bladder infusion chemotherapy, and immunosuppression therapy for de novo UC in kidney transplantation recipients at different sites and T stages. We evaluated the prognosis and compared the difference using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 97 kidney transplantation recipients with de novo UC, 51 (52.6%) were diagnosed with upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC), 17 (17.5%) with bladder carcinoma (BC), and 29 (29.9%) with both UTUC and BC. The five-year survival rates for BC, UTUC, and BC + UTUC with ≤ T1 stage were 100%, 88.2%, and 57.7%, respectively, while the survival rates for UTUC, BC + UTUC with ≥ T2 stage were 90.2% and 48.2%. Cyclosporine A significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in UTUC with ≤ T1 stage (p = 0.017). Rapamycin significantly improved PFS in UTUC with ≥ T2 stage (p = 0.026). Bladder infusion chemotherapy and GC/GCa chemotherapy had no significant effect on each T stage and site. Patients with UTUC + BC had the poorest overall survival (OS) compared with those with BC and UTUC.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of UC in different sites varies. GC/GCa chemotherapy and bladder infusion chemotherapy appear to have no effect on prognosis. Rapamycin can delay the progression of advanced UTUC.

Systematic review on oncologic outcomes on adjuvant endovesical treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in patients with solid organ transplant

PURPOSE

Urothelial carcinoma has a higher incidence in renal transplanted patients according to several registries (relative risk × 3), and the global prognosis is inferior to the general population. The potential impact of immunosuppressive therapy on the feasibility, efficacy, and complications of endovesical treatment, especially Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, has a low level of evidence. We performed a systematic review that aimed to assess the morbidity and oncological outcomes of adjuvant endovesical treatment in solid organ transplanted patients.

METHODS

Medline was searched up to December 2021 for all relevant publications reporting oncologic outcomes of endovesical treatment in solid organ transplanted patients with NMIBC. Data were synthesized in light of methodological and clinical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-three retrospective studies enrolling 238 patients were included: 206 (96%) kidney transplants, 5 (2%) liver transplants, and 2 (1%) heart transplants. Concerning staging: 25% were pTa, 62% were pT1, and 22% were CIS. 140/238 (59%) patients did not receive adjuvant treatment, 50/238 (21%) received mitomycin C, 4/238 (2%) received epirubicin, and 46/238 (19%) received BCG. Disease-free survival reached 35% with TURBT only vs. 47% with endovesical treatment (Chi-square test p = 0.08 OR 1.2 [0.98-1.53]). The complication rate of endovesical treatment was 12% and was all minor (Clavien-Dindo I).

CONCLUSION

In solid organ transplanted patients under immunosuppressive treatment, both endovesical chemotherapy and BCG are safe, but the level of evidence concerning efficacy in comparison with the general population is low. According to these results, adjuvant treatment should be proposed for NMIC in transplanted patients as in the general population.

Conservative Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Patient

Introduction. Solid organ transplant increases the risk for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Although a common tumor, urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder in patients with kidney-pancreas transplants is scarcely reported. Case Presentation. A 65-year-old male with history of type 1 diabetes and a 14-year status post deceased donor pancreas-kidney transplant presented with 3 weeks of gross hematuria. CT scan showed multiple bladder masses. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) showed papillary UCC. 5 months later, the patient reported new-onset gross hematuria. TURBT showed MIBC. The patient elected for bladder-preserving TMT. On cystoscopy there was no gross evidence of carcinoma at 3.5 years of follow up. Discussion. Currently, no specific management guidelines target this population with MIBC. The first-line treatment for MIBC is radical cystectomy (RC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients that are medically unfit or unwilling to undergo RC, trimodal therapy (TMT) is an alternative. TMT for bladder cancer consists of complete tumor resection with chemotherapy and radiation. This report demonstrates a unique case of a patient with kidney-pancreas transplant diagnosed with MIBC treated with TMT that has no evidence of gross tumorigenesis at 3.5 years after diagnosis. Our findings suggest that trimodal therapy should be considered for treatment of MIBC in patients with kidney-pancreatic transplants to preserve the donated allografts.

Risk factors, management, and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; however guidelines have not been established on the management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review using PubMed was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement to identify studies concerning the prevalence and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were also reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies, published between 1996 and 2018, reporting primary data on bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were identified. Marked heterogeneity in bladder cancer prevalence, time to diagnosis, non-muscle invasive/muscle-invasive bladder cancer prevalence, and survival was noted. Four studies, published between 2003 and 2017, reporting primary data on bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after kidney transplantation were identified. Disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between BCG studies (75-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinogen exposure that led to ESRD, BKV, HPV, immunosuppressive agents, and the immunosuppressed state likely contribute to the increased risk of bladder cancer after renal transplantation. Non-muscle invasive disease should be treated with transurethral resection. BCG can be safely used in transplant recipients and likely improves the disease course. Muscle-invasive disease should be treated with radical cystectomy, with special consideration to the dissection and urinary diversion choice. Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be safely used in regionally advanced bladder cancer with potential benefit. mTOR inhibitors may reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer, and immunosuppression medications should be reduced if malignancy develops.

Risk factors, management, and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; however guidelines have not been established on the management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review using PubMed was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement to identify studies concerning the prevalence and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were also reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies, published between 1996 and 2018, reporting primary data on bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were identified. Marked heterogeneity in bladder cancer prevalence, time to diagnosis, non-muscle invasive/muscle-invasive bladder cancer prevalence, and survival was noted. Four studies, published between 2003 and 2017, reporting primary data on bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after kidney transplantation were identified. Disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between BCG studies (75-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinogen exposure that led to ESRD, BKV, HPV, immunosuppressive agents, and the immunosuppressed state likely contribute to the increased risk of bladder cancer after renal transplantation. Non-muscle invasive disease should be treated with transurethral resection. BCG can be safely used in transplant recipients and likely improves the disease course. Muscle-invasive disease should be treated with radical cystectomy, with special consideration to the dissection and urinary diversion choice. Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be safely used in regionally advanced bladder cancer with potential benefit. mTOR inhibitors may reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer, and immunosuppression medications should be reduced if malignancy develops.

[Urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates: The French guidelines from CTAFU]

OBJECTIVE

To propose surgical recommendations for urothelial carcinoma management in kidney transplant recipients and candidates.

METHOD

A review of the literature (Medline) following a systematic approcah was conducted by the CTAFU regarding the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and treatment of urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates for renal transplantation. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence.

RESULTS

Urothelial carcinomas occur in the renal transplant recipient population with a 3-fold increased incidence as compared with general population. While major risk factors for urothelial carcinomas are similar to those in the general population, aristolochic acid nephropathy and BK virus infection are more frequent risk factors in renal transplant recipients. As compared with general population, NMIBC in the renal transplant recipients are associated with earlier and higher recurrence rate. The safety and efficacy of adjuvant intravesical therapies have been reported in retrospective series. Treatment for localized MIBC in renal transplant recipients is based on radical cystectomy. In the candidate for a kidney transplant with a history of urothelial tumor, it is imperative to perform follow-up cystoscopies according to the recommended frequency, depending on the risk of recurrence and progression of NMIBC and to maintain this follow-up at least every six months up to transplantation whatever the level of risk of recurrence and progression. Based on current data, the present recommendations propose guidelines for waiting period before active wait-listing renal transplant candidates with a history of urothelial carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The french recommendations from CTAFU should contribute to improve the management of urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant patients and renal transplant candidates by integrating both oncologic objectives and access to transplantation.

Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Diversion for Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid and Squamous Variants After Renal Transplantation

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the incidence of malignancies, especially urological malignancies, increases after renal transplantation due to long-term immunosuppressive treatments. We report a case of radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion in a 39-year-old female patient who developed invasive bladder carcinoma with extravesical extension three years after renal transplantation. Radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion surgery are feasible options for patients who developed invasive bladder cancer after renal transplantation and are effective methods for the protection of renal functions in the short-term follow-up period.

Disseminated Mycobacterium bovis infection post-kidney transplant following remote intravesical BCG therapy for bladder cancer

Intravesical Bacillus Camlette-Guérin (BCG) is the treatment of choice for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, and has been used successfully for over 40 years. A rare and potentially fatal complication of intravesical BCG therapy is BCG-induced sepsis. We report a rare case in which a patient with end-stage renal disease secondary to chronic granulomatous interstitial nephritis underwent remote, pre-transplant intravesical BCG treatment for high-grade non-invasive papillary bladder carcinoma. The patient subsequently received a deceased donor kidney transplant 5 years after BCG therapy, with thymoglobulin induction therapy and standard triple maintenance immunosuppression. Two years post-transplant, he developed BCG-induced sepsis confirmed by cultures from urine, blood, and left native kidney biopsy. He died from disseminated BCG-induced sepsis and failure of his renal allograft. This case highlights the potential adverse reactions associated with intravesical BCG therapy that may occur years after bladder cancer therapy is completed, and should heighten physician awareness for BCG-related infections during pre-transplant assessment and post-transplant care of solid organ transplants recipients.

Urologic malignancies in kidney transplantation

With advances in immunosuppression, graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation have improved considerably. As a result, long-term complications of transplantation, such as urologic malignancies, have become increasingly important. Kidney transplant recipients, for example, have a 7-fold risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 3-fold risk of urothelial carcinoma (UC) compared with the general population. While extrapolation of data from the general population suggest that routine cancer screening in transplant recipients would allow for earlier diagnosis and management of these potentially lethal malignancies, currently there is no consensus for posttransplantation RCC or UC screening as supporting data are limited. Further understanding of risk factors, presentation, optimal management of, and screening for urologic malignancies in kidney transplant patients is warranted, and as such, this review will focus on the incidence, surveillance, and treatment of urologic malignancies in kidney transplant recipients.

Treatment options and predictive factors for recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in bladder cancer after renal transplantation: A multi-institutional analysis

OBJECTIVES

Bladder cancer (BC) in the transplanted population can represent a challenge owing to the immunosuppressed state of patients and the higher rate of comorbidities. The objective was to analyze the treatment of BC after renal transplant (RT), focusing on the mode of presentation, diagnosis, treatment options and predictive factors for recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted an observational prospective study with a retrospective analysis of 88 patients with BC after RT at 10 European centers. Clinical and oncologic data were collected, and indications and results of adjuvant treatment reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,000 RTs were performed. Diagnosis of BC occurred at a median of 73 months after RT. Median follow-up was 126 months. Seventy-one patients (81.6%) had non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, of whom 29 (40.8%) received adjuvant treatment; of these, six (20.6%) received bacillus Calmette-Guérin and 20 (68.9%) mitomycin C. At univariate analysis, patients who received bacillus Calmette-Guérin had a significantly lower recurrence rate (P=.043). At multivariate analysis, a switch from immunosuppression to mTOR inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (HR 0.24, 95% CI: 0.053-0.997, P=.049) while presence of multiple tumors increased it (HR 6.31, 95% CI: 1.78-22.3, P=.004). Globally, 26 patients (29.88%) underwent cystectomy. No major complications were recorded. Overall mortality (OM) was 32.2% (28 patients); the cancer-specific mortality was 13.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin significantly reduces the risk of recurrence, as does switch to mTOR inhibitors. Multiple tumors increase the risk.

Paraganglioma of the bladder in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report

Renal transplantation has been associated with a significantly increased risk of developing cancer, including bladder neoplasia, with urothelial carcinoma being the most frequent type of bladder cancer. Bladder paraganglioma, also referred to as extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma, is a rare but severe condition that may cause a severe hypertensive crisis during handling and mobilization of the tumor. We herein present the case of a 67-year-old kidney transplant recipient with a bladder polyp consistent with paraganglioma of the bladder. During bladder polyp resection, the patient developed severe hypertension, which resolved with appropriate treatment. The histological analysis of the resected bladder polyp was consistent with extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma, or paraganglioma, and the patient finally underwent partial cystectomy, with no reported postoperative recurrence. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a case of paraganglioma of the bladder in a kidney tranplant recipient. Total or partial bladder cystectomy is considered to be an effective treatment for this type of bladder tumor. Screening for mutations of the succinate dehydrogenase subunit B gene may also be recommended.

Robotic Anterior Pelvic Exenteration for Bladder Cancer in Patient With Previous Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

To demonstrate the feasibility of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration with intracoporeal ileal conduit for bladder cancer in a patient with previous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Technical considerations included avoiding injury to transplant graft, minimizing devascularization of transplant ureter, intracorporeal mobilization of bowel with pancreas graft, and positioning of ileal conduit. Surgical approach required multidisciplinary approach for surgical planning and medical management.

CONCLUSION

The patient's preoperative serum creatinine was 1.22 ng/mL and was unchanged at 1.21 ng/mL 1 month following surgery. Total robotic console time was 4 hours and 21 minutes and estimated blood loss is 30 cc. There were no intraoperative complications. Final pathology demonstrated pT1N0 high-grade multifocal micropappilary urothelial cell carcinoma with carcinoma in situ, and all surgical margins were negative. Robotic anterior pelvic exenteration with intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer in patient with previous kidney-pancreas transplantation is a challenging but a feasible surgical technique that requires a multidisciplinary team and a low threshold to convert to open surgery.

[Urological follow-up and development of cancer after renal transplantation]

BACKGROUND

The number of renal transplant recipients is rising, as well as graft and recipient survival. The mainstay of urological follow-up is to ensure urine transport and voiding function; also, the diagnosis and treatment of urological malignancies following renal transplantats is growing in importance. As urological malignancies are one of the three most common tumors following renal transplantation (RT), meticulous and regular urological evaluation is a central part of follow-up care after RT.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Urological evaluation following RT must ensure correct urine transport and voiding function. Transplant ureter strictures, relevant ureteral reflux and voiding dysfuntion (e.g., neurologic dysfunction, benign prostate hypeplasia) must be excluded or treated. Urinary tract infection (UTI), which can be life threatening in the immunosuppressed transplant recipient, must be diagnosed and treated consequently and for an adequate period of time. Prophylaxis of UTIs is indicated in patients with recurrent symptomatic UTI as well as in the initial 6 months following renal transplantation. Asymptomatic bacteriuria must not necessarily be treated. The incidence of urological malignancies like renal cell carcinoma, urothelial cancer of the bladder, and penile carcinoma is increased following RT, while the incidence of prostate and testis cancer is the same as in the nontransplant population. Surgical and nonsurgical treatment options do not differ from the normal population. Adaptation, cessation, or switching of the immunosuppressive regimen in case of urologic malignancy must be decided on the individual recipient basis.

Bladder cancer in renal allograft recipients: risk factors and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased cancer risk owing to immunosuppression and oncogenic viral infections. We report on the incidence and types of bladder cancer in kidney transplant recipients in Ireland, describing possible additional risk factors and outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

We identified kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer between January 1, 1994, and July 31, 2012, by integrating data from the Irish National Cancer Registry and National Renal Transplant Registry. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and examined patient and tumor characteristics and 1-year survival rate.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer during the study period, representing 0.48% of kidney transplant recipients. The SIR was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4-4.2; P < .001). The mean interval between transplantation and diagnosis of bladder tumor was 8.6 years and mean age at time of diagnosis was 55.7 years. Sixty percent of patients were male. The tumor types were transitional cell carcinoma (9 patients), squamous cell carcinoma (3 patients), adenocarcinoma (1 patient), carcinoma in situ (1 patient), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1 patient). Beside immunosuppression, risk factors associated with bladder cancer were urogenital disease (6 patients), cyclophosphamide exposure (2 patients), BK nephropathy (1 patient), analgesic nephropathy (1 patient), and extensive smoking (1 patient). Eight patients underwent radical cystectomy for invasive tumors, with resection of other pelvic organs in 7 patients. Mortality rate within the first year was 40%.

CONCLUSION

Bladder cancer occurred more commonly in kidney transplant recipients with a predominance of aggressive tumors and a high mortality. In patients with preexisting risk factors such as urologic abnormalities and cyclophosphamide exposure careful assessment before transplantation and vigilant monitoring posttransplantation with a low threshold for cystoscopy may improve outcomes.

Laparoscopic Bilateral Nephro-Ureterectomy Approach for Complete Urinary Tract Extirpation for the Treatment of Multifocal Urothelial Carcinoma in a Kidney Transplant Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Urothelial carcinoma of the transitional epithelium is the most common malignancy in the Thai kidney transplant population.

METHODS

We report our experience in managing simultaneous upper and lower urinary tract urothelial cancer in a post-kidney transplant recipient through the use of laparoscopic bilateral nephron-ureterectomy and anterior pelvic exenteration with the use of a Studer orthotopic neobladder. A 35-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease underwent living related kidney transplantation in 2009. She presented with gross hematuria 5 years later. Enhanced computer tomography revealed diffuse bladder wall thickening with an intravesical polypoid soft tissue mass at the right ureterovesical junction extending to the right distal ureter. Hydronephrosis of the left native kidney without any demonstrable cause of obstruction was also noted. On trans-urethral resection, the pathological finding was high-grade, non-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

The operation was successfully performed without intra- or post-operative complications. The patient could ambulate independently on post-operative day 2. The kidney graft function did not change from her pre-operative baseline. At 6 months' follow-up, the patient had no tumor recurrence, returned to normal activities, and was able to void spontaneously without any need of intermittent catheterization.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic bilateral nephron-ureterectomy for complete urinary tract extirpation is feasible, safe, and associated with low morbidity. This technique avoids a large abdominal midline incision or a bilateral flank incision for nephron-ureterectomy and is a good alternative surgical technique in post-kidney transplant patients who require complete urinary tract extirpation.

Haematuria in postrenal transplant patients

Haematuria has a prevalence of 12% in the postrenal transplant patient population. It heralds potentially dangerous causes which could threaten graft loss. It is important to consider causes in light of the unique, urological, and immunological standpoints of these patients. We review the literature on common causes of haematuria in postrenal transplant patients and suggest the salient approach to the evaluation of this condition. A major cause of haematuria is urinary tract infections. There should be a higher index of suspicion for mycobacterial, fungal, and viral infection in this group of immunosuppressed patients. Measures recommended in the prevention of urinary tract infections include early removal of foreign bodies as well as prophylactic antibiotics during the early transplant phase. Another common cause of haematuria is that of malignancies, in particular, renal cell carcinomas. When surgically managing cancer in the setting of a renal transplant, one has to be mindful of the limited retropubic space and the need to protect the anastomoses. Other causes include graft rejections, recurrences of primary disease, and calculus formation. It is important to perform a comprehensive evaluation with the aid of an experienced multidisciplinary transplant team.

Urological Consequences following Renal Transplantation: A Review of the Literature

Renal transplant (RT) represents the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) but harbours a wide range of possible complications and therapeutic challenges of urological competence. Dialysis years and clinical medical background of these patients are risk factors for sexual dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). On the contrary, RT itself may have a number of possible surgical complications such as ureteral stenosis and urinary leakage, while immunosuppressive treatment is a known risk factor for de-novo malignancies.

The present review describes the main urologic problems of RT patients and their up-to-date treatment options according to the most recently available literature evidences.

[De novo urologic tumors in kidney transplant patients]

CONTEXT

The ability of a transplant recipient to accept a graft depends on the ability of immunosuppressive drugs to regulate the immune system. Such treatments have been associated with tumor promotion and progression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review was carried out. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed database. The searching criterion was "urological tumors in kidney transplant recipients". The most important issues regarding incidence, urological tumor-specific features, and relevant ones about the treatment are summarized.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

In renal transplant, 15% of all tumors are urological neoplasias; furthermore, they are the leading neoplastic cause of death. In transplant population the incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), transitional cell bladder carcinoma (TCBC), testicular carcinoma (TC) and prostate cancer are increased 15, 3, 3 and 2 times respectively. Treatments used in transplant patients are similar to those employed in the general population:radical nephrectomy for the native kidney and conservative surgery for the graft are indicated for RCC. Radical prostatectomy is technically feasible for localized PC.Regarding to transitional cell carcinoma BCG or MMC is not contraindicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of cancer has increased among transplant population. These tumors can be managed following the same criteria than in general population. Because in this population the prognosis is worse for the immunosuppression, closer monitoring is required.