Endoscopic Correction of VUR Using Vantris as a New Non-biodegradable Tissue Augmenting Substance: Three Years of Prospective Follow-up

The correlation between ureteric orifice morphology and primary vesicoureteral reflux grade and the impact on the effectiveness of endoscopic reflux correction

INTRODUCTION

Early diagnosis and treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) are essential for preserving renal function.

OBJECTIVES

The study explored whether preoperative cystoscopic grading of refluxing ureteric orifices (UO) correlated with their shape in an institution with non-performance of hydrodistention of the UO in the diagnosis and grading of VUR. We also assessed the relationship between the UO shape and VUR grade with the effectiveness of endoscopic correction of primary VUR in children.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients ≤15 years treated for primary VUR. The reflux grade was based on the results of preoperative voiding cystourethrography as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with 77 renal refluxing units (RRU) underwent endoscopic treatment with Deflux®. VUR was bilateral in 51 % of patients. VUR was mild in 13 %, moderate in 53 %, and severe in 34 % of cases. The patients with mild and moderate VUR had stadium-shaped UOs in 60 % and 54 % RRUs, respectively. Horseshoe-shaped UOs constituted 42 % of UOs in patients with severe VUR, followed by 31 % of golf-hole UOs. The reflux resolution rate after the first endoscopic injection was 84 %. The preoperative VUR grade correlated with UOs shape (p < 0.001). No significant correlation between UOs configuration and the outcome of endoscopic treatment was seen (p = 0.452). The preoperative VUR grade negatively correlated with a favorable endoscopic treatment (p = 0.043).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our data indicate ureteral orifice shapes are closely related to preoperative VUR grade. There was no correlation between the UO configuration and the success rate of endoscopic treatment of VUR, in contrast to the significant negative correlation between the VUR grade and the success rate of endoscopic treatment.

Conflicting views of physicians and surgeons concerning pediatric urinary tract infection: a comparative review

BACKGROUND

A first febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in children, and pathways of management have evolved over time.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent to which pediatricians and surgeons differ in their investigation and management of a first febrile UTI, and to evaluate the justifications for any divergence of approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted for papers addressing investigation and/or management following a first febrile UTI in children published between 2011 and 2021. Searches were conducted on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. To be eligible for inclusion, a paper was required to provide recommendations on one or more of the following: ultrasound (US) and voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), the need for continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and surgery when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was detected. The authorship required at least one pediatrician or surgeon. Authorship was categorized as medical, surgical, or combined.

RESULTS

Pediatricians advocated less imaging and intervention and were more inclined to adopt a "watchful-waiting" approach, confident that any significant abnormality, grades IV-V VUR in particular, should be detected following a second febrile UTI. In contrast, surgeons were more likely to recommend imaging to detect VUR (p<0.00001), and antibiotic prophylaxis (p<0.001) and/or surgical correction (p=0.004) if it was detected, concerned that any delay in diagnosis and treatment could place the child at risk of kidney damage. Papers with combined authorship displayed intermediate results.

CONCLUSION

There are two distinct directions in the literature regarding the investigation of an uncomplicated first febrile UTI in a child. In general, when presented with a first febrile UTI in a child, physicians recommend fewer investigations and less treatment, in contrast to surgeons who advocate extensive investigation and aggressive intervention in the event that imaging detects an abnormality. This has the potential to confuse the carers of affected children.

A systematic review & meta-analysis comparing outcomes of endoscopic treatment of primary vesico ureteric reflux in children with polyacrylate poly alcohol copolymer versus dextranomer hyaluranic acid

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are conflicting reports on the efficacy of bulking agents for vesico ureteric reflux (VUR). In this meta-analysis we have compared the outcomes of endoscopic treatment with polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer hyaluronic acid (DxHA).

METHODS

A systematic review of publications between 2010 and 2020 was conducted covering databases like PUBMED, MEDLINE etc. for (endoscopic treatment) AND (VUR) AND (PPC OR DxHA) AND (recurrence OR complications). PRISMA guidelines were followed and only comparative studies were included. Outcomes were early success defined as absence of VUR in voiding cystourethrogram at 3-months followup, urinary tract infections (UTI) and occurrence of vesico-ureteric-junction obstruction (VUJO). Risk of bias was analysed with Robvis tool and odds-ratios were compared with Revman-3.0.

RESULTS

Among nine studies (heterogeneity; I 2 69-79%) all cleared the risk of bias assessment. There was no significant difference in high grade VUR (p = 0.94) between PPC (40%) and DxHA (43%). Success rate after single injection was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) at 86% (477/555) for PPC vs 69% (474/685) for DxHA. UTI rate between PPC (12%) and DxHA (14.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.54). VUJO rate between PPC (3.9%) and DxHA (0.8%) was also not significantly different (p = 0.47). Significantly lesser volume (p = 0.02) was used for PPC (0.7 ml) compared to DxHA (0.9 ml).

CONCLUSION

Reflux resolution was significantly higher with PPC than DxHA. Postinjection UTI/VUJO incidence was not significantly different between them. Limitation of this meta-analysis was heterogeneity & small number of articles. Further studies should focus on long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Comparison of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA) for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer and Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, Ovid, Cochrane databases, Google scholar have been searched for studies published until January 2022 in any language. Studies that compared the success rate for endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with two bulking agents, namely, "polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer." and "Dextranomer-Hyaluronic Acid" were included for this analysis.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in data synthesis for this meta-analysis. Pooled data with a total of 763 ureters in PPC group and 718 ureters in Dx/HA group indicated that ureters in PPC group were more likely to undergo complete reflux resolution than Dx/HA (OR 3.80, 95% CI: 2.71; 5.31). Among subgroup of patients with high grade reflux, PPC injection had more resolution rate compared to Dx/HA patients (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.19-7.16). In total, 95.81% of the PPC group and 86.52% of the Dx/HA group experienced success after the third injection. However a concerning complication of endoscopic treatment which is ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO) was more prevalent in PPC group. So the possible benefits arising from endoscopic treatment with PPC could be offset by the costs of re-implantation surgery or stenting in the case of UVJO.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that PPC injection for vesicoureteral reflux treatment was associated with a higher success rate, but concerningly, UVJO incidence was higher in the PPC group which might negate the possible benefits of PPC injection However, due to the lack of studies with long-term follow-up, we couldn't reach a definitive conclusion about the superiority of one of the bulking agents over the other.

Endoscopic Correction of Reflux Utilizing Polyacrylate Polyalcohol Bulking Copolymer (Vantris) as a Tissue Augmenting Substance: Lessons Learned Over the 10 Years of Experience

Objectives: To prove the hypothesis that modifying the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) technique (STING procedure) and sharpening its contraindications, lead to increased success rate and decline in the complication rate. Materials and Methods: All patients that underwent endoscopic correction of VUR utilizing Vantris were divided into two groups according to procedure date; before 2015 and 2015-2019. Indication for treatment included persistent high-grade VUR or breakthrough infections. Contraindications included voiding dysfunction, active infection and since 2015 suspicion for obstructive/refluxing ureterovesical junction (UVJ) presented by "beak" sign on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Follow-up regiment included ultrasound and VCUG at predetermined intervals. Results: The first group included 215 (158 girls and 57 boys) children with mean age of 4.8 ± 2.8 years who underwent endoscopic correction between 2009 and 2015 and the second group included 42 children (28 girls and 14 boys) with mean age of 3.9 ± 2.1 years who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2019. In the first group, VUR was unilateral in 74 patients and bilateral in 132 comprising 338 renal refluxing units. In the second group, VUR was unilateral in 14 patients and bilateral in 30 comprising 74 RRUs. In the first group reflux was corrected in 317 (94.9%) RRUs after a single injection, after the second in 7 (2.1%) RRUs. In seven (2.1%) RRUs, reflux downgraded to Grade I-II. Three RRUs (0.9%) failed endoscopic correction and required ureteral reimplantation. Nine (2.7%) RRUs developed UVJ obstruction. In the second group reflux was corrected in 61 (82.4%) RRUs after a single injection, after the second in 12 (16.2%) RRUs. In one (1.4%) RRU, endoscopic correction failed and required ureteral reimplantation. None of the patients developed UVJ obstruction. Reflux correction has led to the significant decrease of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) in both groups. Conclusions: Our data indicate that endoscopic injection utilizing Vantris is safe and long durable procedure. Although utilizing the proper technique and contraindication criteria, the rates of post procedural VUJ obstruction is null.

Comparison of Subureteral Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid and Lich-Gregoir Ureteral Reimplantation in the Treatment of Pediatric Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: The gold standard of surgical intervention of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is open ureteral reimplantation with high success and low complication rates. However, in recent years, endoscopic injection, dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA), has become an effective therapy for VUR. It is noted that limited prospective randomized trials compare the different surgical techniques of especially endoscopic injection versus open procedures. We aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic injection of Dx/HA and Lich-Gregoir open technique of ureteral reimplantation for grades III and IV primary VUR in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2018, 60 pediatric patients with grades III and IV primary VUR were included in a prospective randomized trial. Thirty cases with 45 refluxing ureters managed by endoscopic injection of Dx/HA comprised group A. Open Lich-Gregoir technique used in the other 30 cases with 48 refluxing ureters composed of group B. Renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrography, and renal scintigraphy were used for follow-up. The surgical success rate, cost-effectiveness, and occurrence of complications were evaluated and compared in both groups. Results: Sixty pediatric patients with 93 refluxing ureters (41 females and 19 males) were included in the trial. The mean follow-up for all patients was 17.7 ± 7.1 months. Overall reflux resolution was 80% (36/45) of the ureters in group A after a single injection and 93.75% (45/48) of the ureters in group B. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant concerning clinical or anatomical preoperative factors and surgical success rate. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operative time and hospital stay. Conclusion: This comparative study demonstrated a high success rate of open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir) procedure over the endoscopic injection of Dx/HA therapy to manage primary VUR grades III-IV. Clinical Trial Number: NCT04798443.

Evolving surgical management of pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: is open ureteral reimplantation still the 'Gold Standard'?

Vesicoureteral reflux, the retrograde flow of urine from the bladder into the upper urinary tract, is one of the most common urologic diagnoses in the pediatric population. Once detected, therapeutic options for urinary reflux are diverse, ranging from observation with or without continuous low-dose prophylactic antibiotics to a variety of operative interventions. While a standardized algorithm is lacking, it is generally accepted that management be tailored to individual patients based on various factors including age, likelihood of spontaneous resolution, risk of subsequent urinary tract infections with renal parenchymal injury, and parental preference. Anti-reflux surgery may be necessary in children with persistent reflux, renal scarring or recurrent pyelonephritis after optimization of bladder and bowel habits. Open, laparoscopic/robot-assisted and endoscopic approaches are all successful in correcting reflux and have been shown to reduce the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections.

Risk factors for obstructive complications after endoscopic correction of vesico-ureteral reflux using polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer

Use of polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) after endoscopic correction (EC) of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is highly effective but is associated with a higher risk of obstructive complications (OC) compared with other implants. We undertook a STROBE compliant retrospective investigation and studied the OC risk factors to increase the practical safety of PPC.Overall, 798 patients (464 [58.1%] girls and 334 [41.9%]) boys) from 5 hospitals in whom PPC was routinely used were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were subdivided into 2 groups. Group I consisted of 754 (94.5%) children (449 [59.5%] girls and 305 [40.5%] boys) without OC. Median age was 41 months [Q1: 18.0; Q3: 81.0]. Group II comprised 44 (5.5%) patients (29 [65.9%] boys and 15 [34.1%] girls) experiencing OC, and their median age was 21.5 months [Q1: 12.0; Q3: 43.0]. Clinical and renal ultrasound examinations were carried out 1 day and 1 month after EC, and then every 6 months after EC. At the follow-up examination approximately 6 months after EC, voiding cysto-urethrography (VCUG) was performed. All patients with OC underwent diuretic renography.OC occurred in 44 (5.5%) of 798 children, in some cases as late as 60 months after endoscopic injection of the bulking agent PPC for correction of VUR. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age (P < .001), higher grade of VUR (P < .001), male gender (P < .001), second injection (P = .003), and EC injection using hydrodistension implantation technique (HIT; P < .001) represented significant risk factors. At multivariate analysis, only male gender (P = .0078), younger age (P = .0044), HIT technique (P < .0001), and second injection (P = .04) represented significant risk factors for the occurrence of OC.We identified young age, male gender, high reflux grade, HIT technique, and second endoscopic injections as factors associated with the risk of OC after EC of VUR using PPC as a bulking agent. Thus, patients who have undergone EC with PPC must be monitored sonographically for occurrence of OC for at least 60 months after the intervention.

The promise of regenerative medicine in the treatment of urogenital disorders

Polymers and scaffolds are the most significant tools in regenerative medicine. Urogenital disorders are an important group of diseases that greatly affect the patient's life expectancy and quality. Reconstruction of urogenital defects is one of the current challenges in regenerative medicine. Regenerative medicine, as well as tissue engineering, may offer suitable approaches, while the tools needed are appropriate materials and cells. Autologous urothelial cells obtained from biopsy, bone marrow-derived stem cells, adipose stem cells and urine-derived stem cells that expressed mesenchymal cell markers are the cells that mainly used. In addition, two main types of biomaterials mainly exist; synthetic polymers and composite scaffolds that are biodegradable polymers with controllable properties and naturally derived biomaterials such as extracellular matrix components and acellular tissue matrices. In this review, we present and evaluate the most appropriate and suitable scaffolds (naturally derived and synthetic polymers) and cells applied in urogenital reconstruction.

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris): 5-years of prospective follow-up

Introduction

The endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children is a currently well accepted therapy in many pediatric urology centers. Polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC), namely Vantris^®, is one of the tissue-augmenting substances used for endoscopic reflux therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results with PPC in children.

Material and methods

From 2012 to 2016, 125 children (73 girls and 52 boys) aged 0.6–17.9 years (mean 4.9 ±3.58) were treated with PPC. VUR was unilateral in 64 and bilateral in 61 patients, comprising 197 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 72, III in 50, IV in 33 and V in 42. Of these primary reflux was present in 132 RRUs and 65 were complex cases. Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) was done 3 months after procedure.

Results

Follow-up was completed in 89.6% of patients (112 children), and 89.8% of RRUs (177 out of 197). Reflux resolved in 86.4% of RRUs after single injection, in 99.4% after second and in 100% after the third. The only significant, but serious complication observed was late ureteral obstruction after PPC injection correcting high grade reflux, which required ureteral re-implantation. This complication was found in 9 out of 112 children (8%), and in 11 out of 177 RRUs (6.2%), 1.1 -2.9 years (mean 2 ±0.7) after the PPC injection. The longest follow-up reaches 4.5 years.

Conclusions

Our data show that the PPC injection is an effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with high success rate. However, because of the possibility of late ureteral obstruction, which requires ureteroneocystostomy, long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Comparison of histopathological characteristics of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid after injection beneath the bladder mucosa layer: a rabbit model

OBJECTIVES

To compare short- and long-term local tissue reaction of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (DHA) in rabbits.

METHODS

Eight healthy New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. In group I (control group), DHA was injected just beneath the mucosal layer of the bladder wall, while PPC was injected in group II. Subcutaneous injection of both bulking agents was also performed in nude mice. Histological evaluations with leukocyte common antibody (LCA), CD68, CD31, and CD34 were conducted on biopsies 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and MTT assay were also performed for these two bulking agents.

RESULTS

SEM images revealed larger particle size of PPC. LCA and CD68 staining was significantly higher in group II as compared with group I in both short- and long-term follow-ups. However, in groups I and II, expression of CD31 (101 ± 0.5 vs. 92 ± 0.25, p > 0.05) and CD34 (115 ± 0.75 vs. 103 ± 0.5, p > 0.05) was not significantly different in long-term follow-up. Remarkably, severe fibrosis was observed in group II as compared to mild fibrosis in group I one month after injection. The results of in vivo application of these bulking agents in nude mice were in accordance with the results obtained from rabbit model. MTT assay revealed that cell proliferation was significantly higher in the presence of DHA as compared with PPC.

CONCLUSION

Severe inflammation and fibrosis in PPC may be due to continued foreign body reaction, presence of alcohol polymers, or larger particle sizes.

Endoscopic treatment of grades IV and V vesicoureteral reflux with two bulking substances: Dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer in children

PURPOSE

We aimed at evaluating the efficacy and complications of two bulking substances: dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer(Dx/Ha;Dexell®) versus polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer(PPC;Vantris®) in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grades (grades IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux(VUR).

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of high grade VUR (January 2009-August 2015) were retrospectively investigated. Patients with high grade VUR caused by posterior urethral valve, duplex system, paraureteral diverticula and neurogenic bladder were excluded. Classical subureteric injection method (STING) was used. Seventy-three children (45 girls and 28 boys) who had 88 refluxing renal units (RRUs) with grades IV-V VUR (n=64/n=24) underwent endoscopic treatment using Dx/Ha (n=63 RRUs) and PPC (n=25 RRUs).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients in Dx/Ha and PPC groups were 6 (3) and 6 (3.75) year (p=0.81), and volumes of these substances given were 1.3 (1) and 1 (0.5) mL (p=0.003), respectively. Overall, for the first endoscopic injection, success rate of grades IV-V VUR per RRU was 53.9% with Dx/Ha, compared to 80% in PPC-injected group, (p=0.024). Late ureterovesical junction obstruction developed only in one patient in PPC-injected group. No ureteral obstruction was observed in Dx/Ha-injected group.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic injection of PPC resulted in significantly higher success rate, compared to Dx/Ha in subureteric injection treatment of children with high grade VUR. However, the development of late ureterovesical junction obstruction should also be taken into account in PPC injection.

The comparison of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymers in endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux

BACKGROUND

Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha;Dexell®) and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC;Vantris®) are the popular tissue-augmenting substances using for the endoscopic injections of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare Dx/Ha and PPC in terms of effectiveness, injection techniques and complications with special emphasis on vesicoureteral junction obstruction (VUJO).

METHODS

A total of 95 patients who underwent endoscopic VUR treatment between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1: Patients underwent endoscopic treatment with PPC (n=50 patients, 70 renal refluxing units) group 2: Patients underwent endoscopic treatment with Dx/Ha (n=45 patients, 74 renal refluxing units).

RESULTS

The overall resolution rates based on the number of renal refluxing units studied was 88.6% and 70.3% in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Resolution rates were significantly better in group 1 compared to group 2. VUJO requiring ureteral reimplantation or stent insertion developed in 7 patients in group 1. No VUJO was observed in group 2. VUJO in group 1 was markedly higher than that in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment of VUR with PPC promises better resolution rates but higher VUJO rates compared to Dx/Ha.

Comparison of results of endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using two bulking substances: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) versus polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris)

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children offers minimally invasive management and is widely used as a first-line procedure for all grades of reflux. However, there is debate about which tissue-augmenting substance is the best to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two bulking substances, Deflux (Dx/HA) and Vantris (PPC), for endoscopic treatment of VUR in children.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2012, 65 children (50 girls and 15 boys) aged 1.45-9.9 years (mean 4.85 ± 2.52) underwent endoscopic correction of VUR using Deflux. VUR was unilateral in 31 patients and bilateral in 34 patients, comprising 108 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 52, III in 47, IV in 7, and V in 2. From 2012, 68 children (43 girls and 25 boys) aged 0.6-17.9 years (mean 4.89 ± 3.46) were treated with Vantris. VUR was unilateral in 33 and bilateral in 35 patients, comprising 109 RRUs grades: II in 48, III in 29, IV in 13, and V in 19. Voiding cystourethrogram was done 3 months after procedure.

RESULTS

All patients completed follow-up (summary Table). With Deflux, reflux resolved in almost 93% of RRUs after two procedures (in 63% after first injection), with Vantris, VUR was corrected in the same percentage after one procedure.

DISCUSSION

The success rate with Deflux ranges between 68% and 92% (only 50-70% after single injection). The reported possibility of reflux recurrence after successful Deflux treatment, and the need for repeated injection led to introduction of the new substance Vantris. The results of a multi-centre survey published in 2014 showed that reflux is corrected in more than 90% of cases after single PPC injection. Our results with PPC confirm a high level of reflux resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that Vantris injection is a safe and effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with good clinical outcome, and provides a higher and almost complete level of reflux resolution after first injection compared with Deflux.

The outcomes of two different bulking agents (dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer) in the treatment of primary vesico-ureteral reflux

PURPOSE

Subureteral injection of bulking agents in the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is widely accepted therapy with high success rates. Although the grade of vesicoureteric reflux and experience of surgeon is the mainstay of this success, the characteristics of augmenting substances may have an effect particularly in the long term. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) with two different bulking agents: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) and Polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total 80 patients (49 girls and 31 boys) aged 1-12 years (mean age 5.3 years) underwent endoscopic subureteral injection for correction of VUR last six years. The patients were assigned to two groups: subureteral injections of Dx/HA (45 patients and 57 ureters) and PPC (35 patients and 45 ureters). VUR was grade II in 27 ureters, grade III in 35, grade IV in 22 and grade V in 18 ureters.

RESULTS

VUR was resolved in 38 (66.6%) of 57 ureters and this equates to VUR correction in 33 (73.3%) of the 45 patients in Dx/HA group. In PPC group, overall success rate was 88.8% (of 40 in 45 ureters). Thus, Thus, this equates to VUR correction in 31 (88.5%) of the 35 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our short term data show that two different bulking agent injections provide a high level of reflux resolution and this study revealed that success rate of PPC was significantly higher than Dx/HA with less material.

The use of polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer hydrogel in the endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

It is still under discussion which is the best tissue augmenting substance for the endoscopic treatment of children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). We describe our preliminary experience (September 2009-November 2011) with polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer hydrogel (PPCH).

METHODS

This is an observational, descriptive, prospective study which included 81 female and male patients (age 1-14 years) diagnosed with unilateral (n=45) and bilateral (n=36) primary VUR comprising a total of 117 refluxing renal units (RRU). Complex cases were excluded from the study. All patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated and those who met the inclusion criteria were treated endoscopically with a single subureteral injection of PPCH by a single surgeon. 11 patients (13.5%) had a pathological 99mTc-DMSA before treatment. The volume of injected product was measured in all cases. Results were considered successful if 6months postinjection, conventional voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) revealed VUR was cured (Grade 0). Follow-up ranged from 7 to 32months.

RESULTS

The overall resolution rate based on the number of RRUs studied was 92.3% (108/117). The mean injected volume of PPCH per patient was 0.6ml. One patient with obstructive anuria required vesicoureteral reimplantation. Other complications were persistent, self-limiting hematuria (n=2); lumbar pain (n=4) and urinary tract infection with normal VCUG (n=4).

CONCLUSIONS

Our short term data show PPCH provides a high level of reflux resolution in selected patients. Long term follow-up is required.

Evaluation of new Deflux administration techniques: intraureteric HIT and Double HIT for the endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is one of the most common urologic diagnoses affecting children, and optimal treatment requires an individualized approach that considers potential risks. Management options include observation with or without continuous antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical correction via endoscopic, open or laparoscopic/robotic approaches. Endoscopic correction of VUR is an outpatient procedure associated with decreased morbidity compared with ureteral reimplantation. The concept of ureteral hydrodistention and intraluminal submucosal injection (Hydrodistention Implantation Technique [HIT]) has led to improved success rates in eliminating VUR compared with the subureteral transurethral injection technique. Further modifications now include use of proximal and distal intraluminal injections (Double HIT) that result in coaptation of both the ureteral tunnel and orifice. Endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer, via the HIT and Double HIT, has emerged as a highly successful, minimally invasive alternative to open surgical correction, with minimal associated morbidity.

Endoscopic correction of complex cases of vesicoureteral reflux utilizing Vantris as a new non-biodegradable tissue-augmenting substance

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of Vantris as a new non-biodegradable tissue-augmenting substance in children with complex cases of VUR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over the last 4 years, 37 children (28 female and 9 male) with a mean age of 5.8 ± 3.1 years (mean ± SD) underwent endoscopic correction of complex VUR. A total of 38 renal refluxing units (RRU) was treated as 5 had persistent reflux after open surgery, 16 had duplication, 4 had Hutch diverticulum, 6 had small poorly functioning kidneys (less than 20% of relative renal function) with grade V VUR, 2 had ureterocele after puncture, 3 had persistent stump reflux, 1 had prune belly syndrome, and 1 had urogenital sinus. VUR was Grade I in 2, Grade II in 9, Grade III in 11, Grade IV in 10, and Grade V in 6 RRU, respectively.

RESULTS

The reflux was corrected in 34 (89.4%) RRU after a single injection, after second injection in 2 (5.3%) RRU. In 2 (5.3%) RRU, VUR downgraded to Grade I (1RRU) and Grade II (1RRU) and they were taken off antibiotic prophylaxis. VCUG was performed in 11 (73.3%) of 15 children who completed 1 year and in 3 (33.3%) of 9 who completed 3 years of follow up as a part of the routine protocol. None showed VUR recurrence. US demonstrated normal appearance of kidneys in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that Vantris injection provides a high level of reflux resolution in complex cases of VUR.