1
|
Mate K, Nedjim S, Bellucci S, Boucault C, Ghaffar N, Constantini T, Marvanykovi F, Vestris PG, Sadreux Y, Laguerre M, Stempfer G, Blanchet P, Istvan B, Brureau L. Prostate biopsy approach and complication rates. Oncol Lett 2023; 26:375. [PMID: 37559580 PMCID: PMC10407705 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate biopsy is the gold standard to confirm prostate cancer. In addition to standard 12-core biopsies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsies have recently been introduced to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. The present study aimed to compare the complications after standard transrectal ultrasound-guided and standard plus targeted (MRI-guided) prostate biopsies, to study the impact of the number of biopsy cores on complication rates, and to compare complication rates after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies with those following transperineal prostate biopsies from the literature. A prospective study was performed, which included 135 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies between April 1 and June 30, 2022, at the Urology Department of the University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre (Pointe à Pitre, Guadeloupe). A total of 51 patients were excluded because of missing information concerning their post-biopsy surveillance. The median age at the time of biopsy was 69 years, median prostate-specific antigen value was 8.9 ng/ml, median prostate volume was 57.5 ml, and median number of cores was 15. A total of 35 of the 84 included patients (41.7%) had a standard biopsy only and 49 (58.3%) had targeted (MRI-guided) plus standard biopsies. A total of 53 patients (63.1%) experienced early side effects, whereas only 24 patients (28.6%) experienced late side effects. Three patients (3.6%) required hospitalization for post-biopsy complications. Early side effects, especially hematuria and hematospermia, occurred significantly more frequently in the targeted plus standard group, with more cores taken, with no significant difference concerning late side effects or infectious complications between the standard and standard plus targeted groups. The admission rate for sepsis after transperineal biopsy has been reported to vary between 0 and 1%, whereas the present study had an admission rate of 2.29% using the transrectal approach. Further studies are required to analyze the complications requiring hospitalization after transrectal and transperineal biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Mate
- Department of Urology, Péterfy Sándor Utcai Hospital-Clinic and Trauma Centre, Budapest 1076, Hungary
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Saleh Nedjim
- Department of Urology, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca 50169, Morocco
| | - Simon Bellucci
- Department of Urology, Free University of Brussels, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cesar Boucault
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Nael Ghaffar
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Tracy Constantini
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Fanni Marvanykovi
- Department of Urology, Péterfy Sándor Utcai Hospital-Clinic and Trauma Centre, Budapest 1076, Hungary
| | - Pierre-Gilles Vestris
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Yvanne Sadreux
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Melanie Laguerre
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Gautier Stempfer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
- University of Antilles, Pointe-à-Pitre 97157, Guadeloupe, France
- IRSET-Research Institute for Environmental and Occupational Health-INSERM-National Institute of Health and Medical Research 1085, Pointe-à-Pitre 97110, Guadeloupe, France
| | - Buzogany Istvan
- Department of Urology, Péterfy Sándor Utcai Hospital-Clinic and Trauma Centre, Budapest 1076, Hungary
| | - Laurent Brureau
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Pointe à Pitre, Les Abymes 97159, Guadeloupe, France
- University of Antilles, Pointe-à-Pitre 97157, Guadeloupe, France
- IRSET-Research Institute for Environmental and Occupational Health-INSERM-National Institute of Health and Medical Research 1085, Pointe-à-Pitre 97110, Guadeloupe, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Michael ZD, Kotamarti S, Deivasigamani S, Seguier D, Polascik TJ. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Utility of Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy: A 13-year Experience. Urology 2023; 177:115-121. [PMID: 37105359 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess Duke's experience on the utility of transperineal template mapping biopsy (TTMB) for re-evaluating patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen after prior negative biopsy, with pre-existing prostate cancer (PCa) already on active surveillance (AS), or considering focal therapy (FT). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed Duke patients undergoing TTMB. Functional outcomes were evaluated using International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Complications within 30 days were recorded. Nonparametric statistical analyses compared functional measures from baseline to 2 and 6 weeks post-TTMB. RESULTS From 8/2009 to 1/2021, 218 patients underwent TTMB, with 57-month median follow-up. Complication rate was 17.4%, with the majority Clavien I. Overall PCa detection was 72.9%, with clinically significant PCa in 53.2%; for those without prior PCa diagnosis (n = 117), overall detection was 64.1% with clinically significant PCa in 49.5%. Of those on AS at TTMB (n = 86), 36 (41.8%) had Gleason upgrading. TTMB changed management for 59 (68.6%) patients, with 38 (44.2%) proceeding to whole-gland therapy and 21 (24.4%) electing FT. Regarding functional outcomes, IPSS were insignificantly different from baseline at 6 weeks (P = NS). Overall functional score impacts were minimal across subgroups; in groups with significant declines in IIEF-5, median score drops were ≤1 point and caused minimal/no movement in IIEF-5 scoring category. CONCLUSION In this cohort, TTMB offered enhanced cancer detection with overall minimal impact to functional outcomes. We conclude from this comprehensive assessment that TTMB provides value to rule out PCa, prevent overtreatment of those that can remain on AS, evaluate FT candidacy, and identify those needing whole-gland management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe D Michael
- Department of Urology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Denis Seguier
- Department of Urology, Lille University, Lille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsieh PF, Chang TY, Lin WC, Chang H, Chang CH, Huang CP, Yang CR, Chen WC, Chang YH, Wang YD, Huang WC, Wu HC. A comparative study of transperineal software-assisted magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate. BMC Urol 2022; 22:72. [PMID: 35488246 PMCID: PMC9052657 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01011-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advantages and disadvantages of transperineal and transrectal biopsies remain controversial in the era of prostate targeted biopsy. In this study, we compared the cancer detection and complication rates of transperineal magnetic resonance/ultrasound (MR/US) fusion biopsy and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate. METHODS This was a comparative study of two prospectively collected cohorts. Men with clinically suspected prostate cancer and prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score ≥ 3 lesions on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were enrolled. They underwent either transperineal software fusion biopsy or transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy. The detection rates of any prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC, defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) and the complication rates between both groups were analysed. RESULTS Ninety-two and 85 patients underwent transperineal software fusion and transrectal cognitive fusion biopsies, respectively. The detection rate for any prostate cancer was similar between both groups (60.8% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.659). In terms of csPC detection, transperineal fusion biopsy outperformed transrectal fusion biopsy (52.2% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.036). In multivariate regression analysis, age, PI-RADS score > 3, and transperineal route were significant predictors of csPC. Meanwhile, transperineal biopsy resulted in a higher rate of urinary retention than transrectal biopsy (18.5% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.009). No serious infectious complications were noted, although a patient developed sepsis after transrectal biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Transperineal software fusion biopsy provided a higher csPC detection rate than transrectal cognitive fusion biopsy and carried minimal risk for infectious complications in patients with MRI-visible prostate lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Fan Hsieh
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - Tian-You Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ching Lin
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.,Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Han Chang
- Department of Pathology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Rei Yang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Huei Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Yu-De Wang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chin Huang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan.
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2, Yu-Der Rd, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan. .,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan. .,Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Beigang, Yunlin, 651012, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Basourakos SP, Alshak MN, Lewicki PJ, Cheng E, Tzeng M, DeRosa AP, Allaway MJ, Ross AE, Schaeffer EM, Patel HD, Hu JC, Gorin MA. Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 37:53-63. [PMID: 35243391 PMCID: PMC8883190 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Objective Evidence acquisition Evidence synthesis Conclusions Patient summary
Collapse
|
5
|
Crump RT, Remmers S, Van Hemelrijck M, Helleman J, Nieboer D, Roobol MJ, Venderbos LDF, Trock B, Ehdaie B, Carroll P, Filson C, Logothetis C, Morgan T, Klotz L, Pickles T, Hyndman E, Moore C, Gnanapragasam V, Van Hemelrijck M, Dasgupta P, Bangma C, Roobol M, Villers A, Robert G, Semjonow A, Rannikko A, Valdagni R, Perry A, Hugosson J, Rubio-Briones J, Bjartell A, Hefermehl L, Shiong LL, Frydenberg M, Sugimoto M, Chung BH, van der Kwast T, Hulsen T, de Jonge C, van Hooft P, Kattan M, Xinge J, Muir K, Lophatananon A, Fahey M, Steyerberg E, Nieboer D, Zhang L, Steyerberg E, Nieboer D, Beckmann K, Denton B, Hayen A, Boutros P, Guo W, Benfante N, Cowan J, Patil D, Park L, Ferrante S, Mamedov A, LaPointe V, Crump T, Stavrinides V, Kimberly-Duffell J, Santaolalla A, Nieboer D, Olivier J, France B, Rancati T, Ahlgren H, Mascarós J, Löfgren A, Lehmann K, Lin CH, Cusick T, Hirama H, Lee KS, Jenster G, Auvinen A, Bjartell A, Haider M, van Bochove K, Buzza M, Kouspou M, Paich K, Bangma C, Roobol M, Helleman J. Using the Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort to measure the effect of active surveillance on patient-reported urinary and sexual function-a retrospective study in low-risk prostate cancer patients. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2719-2727. [PMID: 34295757 PMCID: PMC8261406 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is intended to overcome potential side-effects of definitive treatment. Frequent prostate biopsies during AS may, however, impact erectile (EF) and urinary function (UF). The objective of this study was to test the influence of prostate biopsies on patient-reported EF and UF using multicenter data from the largest to-date AS-database. METHODS In this retrospective study, data analyses were performed using the Movember GAP3 database (v3.2), containing data from 21,169 AS participants from 27 AS-cohorts worldwide. Participants were included in the study if they had at least one follow-up prostate biopsy and completed at least one patient reported outcome measure (PROM) related to EF [Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)/five item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5)] or UF [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)] during follow-up. The longitudinal effect of the number of biopsies on either SHIM/IIEF-5 or IPSS were analyzed using linear mixed models to adjust for clustering at patient-level. Analyses were stratified by center; covariates included age and Gleason Grade group at diagnosis, and time on AS. RESULTS A total of 696 participants completed the SHIM/IIEF-5 3,175 times, with a median follow-up of 36 months [interquartile range (IQR) 20-55 months]. A total of 845 participants completed the IPSS 4,061 times, with a median follow-up of 35 months (IQR 19-56 months). The intraclass correlation (ICC) was 0.74 for the SHIM/IIEF-5 and 0.68 for the IPSS, indicating substantial differences between participants' PROMs. Limited heterogeneity between cohorts in the estimated effect of the number of biopsies on either PROM were observed. A significant association was observed between the number of biopsies and the SHIM/IIEF-5 score, but not for the IPSS score. Every biopsy was associated with a decrease in the SHIM/IIEF-5 score of an average 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47-0.88) points. CONCLUSIONS Repeated prostate biopsy as part of an AS protocol for men with low-risk PCa does not have a significant association with self-reported UF but does impact self-reported sexual function. Further research is, however, needed to understand whether the effect on sexual function implies a negative clinical impact on their quality of life and is meaningful from a patient's perspective. In the meantime, clinicians and patients should anticipate a potential decline in erectile function and hence consider incorporating the risk of this harm into their discussion about opting for AS and also when deciding on the stringency of follow-up biopsy schedules with long-term AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- King’s College London, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), London, UK
| | - Jozien Helleman
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Erectile Function Post Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology 2021; 155:1-8. [PMID: 33524434 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
To determine the effect of prostate biopsy on erectile function we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis up to August 2020. Mean difference of International Index of Erectile Function-5 compared to baseline scores were pooled at 1, 3 and 6-months using a random effect model. Of 47 full text articles identified, 7 were included in the meta-analysis. A significant reduction in mean IIEF5 of 4.61 (0.32-8.91, P= .04) was found at 1-month post biopsy. This resolved with non-significant differences at 3- and 6-months post procedure. Patients should be counselled regarding the transient effect on erectile function post biopsy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sze C, Tsivian E, Tay KJ, Schulman AA, Davis LG, Gupta RT, Polascik TJ. Anterior gland focal cryoablation: proof-of-concept primary prostate cancer treatment in select men with localized anterior cancers detected by multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Urol 2019; 19:127. [PMID: 31805908 PMCID: PMC6896720 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0562-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Due to their location away from the nerve bundles, anterior prostate cancers (APC) represent a rational target for image-guided cryoablation. This report describes the feasibility and short-term outcomes of anterior focal cryosurgery. Methods A retrospective review between 2012 and 2016 of patients with clinically localized APC treated with anterior gland cryoablation was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to report: age, PSA, prostate volume, prostate cancer grade group (PGG), median time to follow-up, and changes in functional status measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score. Results A total of 17 patients underwent anterior focal cryoablation with a median follow-up of 15 months. Median age and PSA at diagnosis were 67 years and 8.7 ng/mL. Pre-operative PGG1 was identified in 12 (71%) men and PGG2 in 5 (29%) men. Median (IQR) lesion volume was 2 mL(0.86, 3.1). Preoperative median IIEF-5 and IPSS scores were 19.5 and 5, and decreased to 19 and 4, post-operatively. All patients remained continent with no change in sexual function. All post-procedure targeted biopsies of the treated cancers were negative. Conclusion Our pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of treating APCs with image-guided targeted focal cryoablation as a good balance between short-term oncologic control and near complete preservation of genitourinary function. Further follow-up is necessary to examine the potential benefits long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Sze
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA. .,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2804, Yellow Zone, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.,Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ariel A Schulman
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leah G Davis
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center and the Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang GL, Kang CH, Lee WC, Chiang PH. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study. BMC Urol 2019; 19:101. [PMID: 31660936 PMCID: PMC6816188 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0539-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate biopsy remains the gold standard approach to verify prostate cancer diagnosis. Transrectal (TR) biopsy is a regular modality, while transperineal (TP) biopsy is an alternative for the patients who display persistently high levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and thus have to undergo repeat biopsy. This study aimed to compare the cancer detection rates between TR and TP approaches and assess the post-bioptic complications of the two procedures. Besides, the feasibility of performing TP biopsies under local anesthesia was also evaluated. Methods A total of 238 outpatient visits meeting the criteria for prostate cancer biopsy were enrolled for this study. They were divided into two groups: the TP group (n = 130) consists of patients destined to undergo local anesthetic TP biopsy; and the TR group (n = 108) contained those who received TR biopsy as comparison. Age, PSA level, digital rectal exam (DRE) finding, prostate volume, and biopsy core number were used as the parameters of the multivariable analyses. The comparable items included cancer detection rate, complication rate, admission rate and visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results The cancer detection rates between TP and TR groups were quite comparable (45% v.s. 49%) (p = 0.492). However, the TP group, as compared to the TR group, had significantly lower incidence of infection-related complications (except epididymitis and prostatitis) that commonly occur after biopsies. None of the patients in the TP group were hospitalized due to the post-bioptic complications, whereas there was still a minor portion of those in the TR group (7.4%) requiring hospitalization after biopsy. Medians (25–75% quartiles) of visual analog scale (VAS) were 3 [3, 4] and 4 [3–5] respectively for the TP and TR procedures under local anesthesia, but no statistical significance existed between them (p = 0.085). Conclusions Patients receiving TP biopsy are less likely to manifest infection-related complications. Therefore, TP biopsy is a more feasible local anesthetic approach for prostate cancer detection if there are concerns for infectious complications and/or the risk of general anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan-Lin Huang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No.123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Chih-Hsiung Kang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No.123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wei-Ching Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No.123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Po-Hui Chiang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No.123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brown LC, Ahmed HU, Faria R, El-Shater Bosaily A, Gabe R, Kaplan RS, Parmar M, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Bott S, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Ghei M, Henderson A, Persad R, Rosario DJ, Shergill I, Winkler M, Soares M, Spackman E, Sculpher M, Emberton M. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. Health Technol Assess 2019; 22:1-176. [PMID: 30040065 DOI: 10.3310/hta22390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men with suspected prostate cancer usually undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. TRUS-guided biopsy can cause side effects and has relatively poor diagnostic accuracy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) used as a triage test might allow men to avoid unnecessary TRUS-guided biopsy and improve diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVES To (1) assess the ability of mpMRI to identify men who can safely avoid unnecessary biopsy, (2) assess the ability of the mpMRI-based pathway to improve the rate of detection of clinically significant (CS) cancer compared with TRUS-guided biopsy and (3) estimate the cost-effectiveness of a mpMRI-based diagnostic pathway. DESIGN A validating paired-cohort study and an economic evaluation using a decision-analytic model. SETTING Eleven NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS Men at risk of prostate cancer undergoing a first prostate biopsy. INTERVENTIONS Participants underwent three tests: (1) mpMRI (the index test), (2) TRUS-guided biopsy (the current standard) and (3) template prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy (the reference test). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, TRUS-guided biopsy and TPM-biopsy measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) using primary and secondary definitions of CS cancer. The percentage of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was used to identify men who might be able to avoid biopsy. RESULTS Diagnostic study - a total of 740 men were registered and 576 underwent all three tests. According to TPM-biopsy, the prevalence of any cancer was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67% to 75%]. The prevalence of CS cancer according to the primary definition (a Gleason score of ≥ 4 + 3 and/or cancer core length of ≥ 6 mm) was 40% (95% CI 36% to 44%). For CS cancer, TRUS-guided biopsy showed a sensitivity of 48% (95% CI 42% to 55%), specificity of 96% (95% CI 94% to 98%), PPV of 90% (95% CI 83% to 94%) and NPV of 74% (95% CI 69% to 78%). The sensitivity of mpMRI was 93% (95% CI 88% to 96%), specificity was 41% (95% CI 36% to 46%), PPV was 51% (95% CI 46% to 56%) and NPV was 89% (95% CI 83% to 94%). A negative mpMRI scan was recorded for 158 men (27%). Of these, 17 were found to have CS cancer on TPM-biopsy. Economic evaluation - the most cost-effective strategy involved testing all men with mpMRI, followed by MRI-guided TRUS-guided biopsy in those patients with suspected CS cancer, followed by rebiopsy if CS cancer was not detected. This strategy is cost-effective at the TRUS-guided biopsy definition 2 (any Gleason pattern of ≥ 4 and/or cancer core length of ≥ 4 mm), mpMRI definition 2 (lesion volume of ≥ 0.2 ml and/or Gleason score of ≥ 3 + 4) and cut-off point 2 (likely to be benign) and detects 95% (95% CI 92% to 98%) of CS cancers. The main drivers of cost-effectiveness were the unit costs of tests, the improvement in sensitivity of MRI-guided TRUS-guided biopsy compared with blind TRUS-guided biopsy and the longer-term costs and outcomes of men with cancer. LIMITATIONS The PROstate Magnetic resonance Imaging Study (PROMIS) was carried out in a selected group and excluded men with a prostate volume of > 100 ml, who are less likely to have cancer. The limitations in the economic modelling arise from the limited evidence on the long-term outcomes of men with prostate cancer and on the sensitivity of MRI-targeted repeat biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating mpMRI into the diagnostic pathway as an initial test prior to prostate biopsy may (1) reduce the proportion of men having unnecessary biopsies, (2) improve the detection of CS prostate cancer and (3) increase the cost-effectiveness of the prostate cancer diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. The PROMIS data set will be used for future research; this is likely to include modelling prognostic factors for CS cancer, optimising MRI scan sequencing and biomarker or translational research analyses using the blood and urine samples collected. Better-quality evidence on long-term outcomes in prostate cancer under the various management strategies is required to better assess cost-effectiveness. The value-of-information analysis should be developed further to assess new research to commission. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16082556 and NCT01292291. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This project was also supported and partially funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London (UCL) Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL and by The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research Biomedical Research Centre and was co-ordinated by the Medical Research Council's Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (grant code MC_UU_12023/28). It was sponsored by UCL. Funding for the additional collection of blood and urine samples for translational research was provided by Prostate Cancer UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Clare Brown
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rita Faria
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Richard S Kaplan
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahesh Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Katie Ward
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Parker
- Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | | | | | | | - Maneesh Ghei
- Department of Urology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Rajendra Persad
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Marta Soares
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Eldon Spackman
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boehm K, Siegel FP, Schneidewind L, Kranz J, Spachmann P, Frank T, Huck N, Imkamp F, Pelzer A. Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsies: Contemporary Practice Patterns in Germany. Front Surg 2018; 5:2. [PMID: 29417048 PMCID: PMC5787537 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prostate biopsy (pbx) is the most common outpatient procedure in urology. Complications are urinary tract infections, including hospitalization and sepsis. Recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis (apx) are scarce, and healthcare data are not available. The study addressed the following endpoints: the duration and spectrum of antimicrobial prophylaxis in transrectal and transperineal pbx in the hospital and the practice setting. Methods A questionnaire compiled data about age, gender, board certification, and place of work. Information about the frequency of pbx, duration and type of apx, usage of disinfecting lubricant, and urine or rectal swab cultures was collected. The study refers to German urologists. Results Overall 478 urologists answered the questionnaire. 15.5% (74) of respondents were residents. 50.8% (243) of urologists work in a practice; the rest in a hospital. Only 4.8% do not perform pbx. Transrectal pbx are performed a median of two times a week. The majority (446, 98%) prescribe an apx, mostly fluoroquinolones (407, 89.5%). In total, 10.1% (46) of the participants use a single-shot-apx. apx has a median duration of 4 days. One-third uses a disinfecting lubricant. Urine and rectal swab cultures are analyzed by 45.5% (207) and 24.4% (111), respectively. Conclusion Most urologists prescribe an extended apx for both transrectal and transperineal pbx. Perineal pbx is still a deviation from everyday practice and not an established alternative to transrectal pbx. Urologists are aware of the increasing fluoroquinolone-resistance and are adapting with rectal swab and urine cultures. Further studies need to evaluate alternatives to 5-day apx and results should be addressed in our guidelines. This is of importance in light of the increasing resistance rates and fluoroquinolone side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Boehm
- Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Mainz, Germany
| | - Fabian P Siegel
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Klinik für Urologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Laila Schneidewind
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik für Innere Medizin C, Hämatologie/Onkologie, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jennifer Kranz
- St.-Antonius Hospital, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Philipp Spachmann
- Caritas Krankenhaus St. Josef, Klinik für Urologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Frank
- Klinikum Rosenheim, Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Nina Huck
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Klinik für Urologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Imkamp
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Urologie und urologische Onkologie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexandre Pelzer
- Department of Urology, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang T, Zhang L, Chen Y, Cai Y, Jiang H, Ding Q. The predictive efficacy of hypoechoic lesion in ultrasound for prostate cancer in Chinese people: five-year experience in a moderated 10-core transperineal prostate biopsy procedure. Oncotarget 2017; 8:79433-79440. [PMID: 29108322 PMCID: PMC5668055 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We aim to investigate the predictive efficacy of hypoechoic lesion for prostate cancer at different levels of serum PSA in the procedure of transrectal ultrasound guided 10-core trans-perineal prostate biopsy (TP-PBx). In this study, we collected clinical parameters involving age, digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA, prostate volume, pathological diagnosis, Gleason score, novel Gleason group, and numbers of positive cores from 856 patients who had elevated level of PSA above 4 ng/ml or susceptible nodule of prostate gland in DRE received the moderated 10-core TP-PBx procedure. There were 481 cases (56.2%) with no visible lesion of hypoechoic nodule in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and 375 cases (43.8%) with the hypoechoic lesion. The total cancer detection rate is 45.56%. The predictive efficacy of hypoechoic lesion for prostate cancer varies among different PSA intervals. For PSA groups of 0-4, 4-10, 10-20, 20-100, > 100 ng/ml, the Youden's indexes are 0.3483, 0.3506, 0.3941, 0.2795 and 0.8667, respectively. Besides, the visible lesions are inclined to be detected in patients with higher Gleason score. We concluded that the hypoechoic lesions in TRUS could improve the predictive accuracy for diagnosing prostate cancer and present different predictive efficacy in the respective PSA intervals. Besides, it was probably associated with more aggressive clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Yang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Limin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Huashan North Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixin Chen
- Department of Ultrasonography, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yehua Cai
- Department of Ultrasonography, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haowen Jiang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Ding
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tay KJ, Scheltema MJ, Ahmed HU, Barret E, Coleman JA, Dominguez-Escrig J, Ghai S, Huang J, Jones JS, Klotz LH, Robertson CN, Sanchez-Salas R, Scionti S, Sivaraman A, de la Rosette J, Polascik TJ. Patient selection for prostate focal therapy in the era of active surveillance: an International Delphi Consensus Project. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 20:294-299. [PMID: 28349978 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Revised: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole-gland extirpation or irradiation is considered the gold standard for curative oncological treatment for localized prostate cancer, but is often associated with sexual and urinary impairment that adversely affects quality of life. This has led to increased interest in developing therapies with effective cancer control but less morbidity. We aimed to provide details of physician consensus on patient selection for prostate focal therapy (FT) in the era of contemporary prostate cancer management. METHODS We undertook a four-stage Delphi consensus project among a panel of 47 international experts in prostate FT. Data on three main domains (role of biopsy/imaging, disease and patient factors) were collected in three iterative rounds of online questionnaires and feedback. Consensus was defined as agreement in ⩾80% of physicians. Finally, an in-person meeting was attended by a core group of 16 experts to review the data and formulate the consensus statement. RESULTS Consensus was obtained in 16 of 18 subdomains. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a standard imaging tool for patient selection for FT. In the presence of an mpMRI-suspicious lesion, histological confirmation is necessary prior to FT. In addition, systematic biopsy remains necessary to assess mpMRI-negative areas. However, adequate criteria for systematic biopsy remains indeterminate. FT can be recommended in D'Amico low-/intermediate-risk cancer including Gleason 4+3. Gleason 3+4 cancer, where localized, discrete and of favorable size represents the ideal case for FT. Tumor foci <1.5 ml on mpMRI or <20% of the prostate are suitable for FT, or up to 3 ml or 25% if localized to one hemi-gland. Gleason 3+3 at one core 1mm is acceptable in the untreated area. Preservation of sexual function is an important goal, but lack of erectile function should not exclude a patient from FT. CONCLUSIONS This consensus provides a contemporary insight into expert opinion of patient selection for FT of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Tay
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - M J Scheltema
- Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College of London, London, UK
| | - E Barret
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - J A Coleman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - S Ghai
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Huang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J S Jones
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - L H Klotz
- Sunnybrook Medical Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C N Robertson
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - R Sanchez-Salas
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - S Scionti
- Saratosa Prostate Cancer Center, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - A Sivaraman
- L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - J de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T J Polascik
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tay KJ, Schulman AA, Sze C, Tsivian E, Polascik TJ. New advances in focal therapy for early stage prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017. [PMID: 28635336 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1345630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate focal therapy offers men the opportunity to achieve oncological control while preserving sexual and urinary function. The prerequisites for successful focal therapy are to accurately identify, localize and completely ablate the clinically significant cancer(s) within the prostate. We aim to evaluate the evidence for current and upcoming technologies that could shape the future of prostate cancer focal therapy in the next five years. Areas covered: Current literature on advances in patient selection using imaging, biopsy and biomarkers, ablation techniques and adjuvant treatments for focal therapy are summarized. A literature search of major databases was performed using the search terms 'focal therapy', 'focal ablation', 'partial ablation', 'targeted ablation', 'image guided therapy' and 'prostate cancer'. Expert commentary: Advanced radiological tools such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS), prostate-specific-membrane-antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) represent a revolution in the ability to understand cancer function and biology. Advances in ablative technologies now provide a menu of modalities that can be rationalized based on lesion location, size and perhaps in the near future, pre-determined resistance to therapy. However, these need to be carefully studied to establish their safety and efficacy parameters. Adjuvant strategies to enhance focal ablation are under development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kae Jack Tay
- a Department of Urology , Singapore General Hospital, SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center , Singapore.,b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Ariel A Schulman
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Christina Sze
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- b Division of Urology, Department of Surgery , Duke University Medical Center , Durham , NC , USA.,c Duke Cancer Institute , Durham , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- L Schneidewind
- Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsivian M, Gupta RT, Tsivian E, Qi P, Mendez MH, Abern MR, Tay KJ, Polascik TJ. Assessing clinically significant prostate cancer: Diagnostic properties of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to three-dimensional transperineal template mapping histopathology. Int J Urol 2016; 24:137-143. [PMID: 27859637 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic properties of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection, localization and characterization of prostate cancer using three-dimensional transperineal template mapping biopsy histopathology as the comparator. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by three-dimensional transperineal template mapping biopsy was carried out. For imaging and pathology data, the prostate was divided in octants with the urethra being the midline. The index test properties were calculated using the biopsy histopathology as the reference test with the following end-points: any cancer, any Gleason ≥7, any Gleason ≥7 or cancer length of ≥4 mm and any Gleason ≥7 or 6 mm in any given core. The latter two definitions correspond to 0.2 and 0.5 mL of cancer volume, respectively. Diagnostic properties including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS A total of 50 patients were included in the study. A median of 55 (interquartile range 42-63) biopsy cores were obtained per patient. Of 400 prostate octants evaluated, 28.5% had prostate cancer on mapping biopsy, whereas 23% of octants were considered suspicious for cancer on imaging. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging negative predictive values for Gleason ≥7 and clinically significant cancers were 84-100%. Similarly, specificity ranged between 79% and 85%. Sensitivity and positive predictive value remained moderate for all the reference test definitions. CONCLUSIONS Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is a useful minimally-invasive tool for detection, localization and characterization of prostate cancer. This imaging modality has high negative predictive value and specificity, and therefore it could be used to reliably rule out clinically significant cancer, obviating the multicore mapping biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matvey Tsivian
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rajan T Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Efrat Tsivian
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter Qi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa H Mendez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael R Abern
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R, Schaeffer E, Schiavina R, Taneja S, Weidner W, Loeb S. Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy. Eur Urol 2016; 71:353-365. [PMID: 27543165 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 303] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate biopsy (PB) represents the gold standard method to confirm the presence of cancer. In addition to traditional random or systematic approaches, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided technique has been introduced recently. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of complications after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, transperineal, and MRI-guided PB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a systematic literature search of Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases up to October 2015, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Complications and mortality following random, systematic, and image-guided PBs were reviewed. Eighty-five references were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most frequent complication after PB was minor and self-limiting bleeding (hematuria and hematospermia), regardless of the biopsy approach. Occurrence of rectal bleeding was comparable for traditional TRUS-guided and image-guided PBs. Almost 25% of patients experienced lower urinary tract symptoms, but only a few had urinary retention, with higher rates after a transperineal approach. Temporary erectile dysfunction was not negligible, with a return to baseline after 1-6 mo. The incidence of infective complications is increasing, with higher rates among men with medical comorbidities and older age. Transperineal and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy may reduce the risk of severe infectious complications. Mortality after PB is uncommon, regardless of biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS Complications after PB are frequent but often self-limiting. The incidence of hospitalization due to severe infections is continuously increasing. The patient's general health status, risk factors, and likelihood of antimicrobial resistance should be carefully appraised before scheduling a PB. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the variety and incidence of complications after prostate biopsy. Even if frequent, complications seldom represent a problem for the patient. The most troublesome complications are infections. To minimize this risk, the patient's medical condition should be carefully evaluated before biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Borghesi
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Hashim Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Nam
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Edward Schaeffer
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences Doctorate, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Samir Taneja
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wolfgang Weidner
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Clinic of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Targeted Anterior Gland Focal Therapy—a Novel Treatment Option for a Better Defined Disease. Curr Urol Rep 2016; 17:69. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-016-0628-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
18
|
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: can we modernize contemporary protocols to improve patient selection and outcomes in the focal therapy era? Curr Opin Urol 2016; 25:185-90. [PMID: 25768694 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the absence of whole gland treatment for prostate cancer, both active surveillance and focal therapy share the common need of requiring a more thorough, detailed and precise analysis of the biological threats within the prostatic parenchyma if one chooses to monitor or selectively eradicate only specific neoplastic targets. In addition, focal therapy utilizes active surveillance post-treatment to monitor the untreated sectors of the prostate. We aim to evaluate the current modalities available to modernize active surveillance protocols in order to distinguish patients who may be safely observed from those who require intervention. RECENT FINDINGS Traditional active surveillance protocols by today's standards are rudimentary given the rapidly evolving technologies now available to clinicians. There is growing evidence for the adoption and use of multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy to identify and localize prostate cancers of higher stage and grade. In addition, serum markers and prostate tissue DNA, RNA and methylation markers provide novel information that extends beyond Gleason grade to better characterize and define prostate cancer prognosis. Current active surveillance protocols should incorporate these modalities to improve patient stratification to surveillance, focal or whole gland interventions. SUMMARY Active surveillance protocols should be modernized to include cancer localization modalities and molecular prognostic markers to improve tumour characterization and better stratify men to surveillance, focal or radical intervention.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abdulmajed MI, Hughes D, Shergill IS. The role of transperineal template biopsies of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a review. Expert Rev Med Devices 2014; 12:175-82. [PMID: 25496525 DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2015.990376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of prostate cancer has shown a significant increase, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis. Current practice considers histological diagnosis a necessity in the majority of the cases. The limitations of transrectal biopsies led to the development of the promising transperineal prostatic biopsies. The latter offers a safer approach by avoiding the rectum, utilizing brachytherapy template grid to detect anterior zone disease and provides accurate prostatic mapping by systematically sampling the whole gland. It also helps to direct biopsies based on images obtained from previous prostate scanning and identify those eligible for focal therapy to direct focal treatment accurately. The current literature provides enough reassurance that transperineal template biopsies are effective, efficient and superior to the traditional and inaccurate transrectal biopsies. The absence of consensus on the technical aspect of template biopsies is a drawback, yet it highlights the need to develop robust guidelines to standardize the procedure.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sivaraman A, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Ahallal Y, Rozet F, Galiano M, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X. Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate. Int J Urol 2014; 22:146-51. [PMID: 25421717 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer has eluded clinicians for decades. With our current understanding of prostate cancer, urologists should devise and confidently present the available treatment options – active surveillance/radical treatment/focal therapy to these patients. The diagnostic modalities used for prostate cancer have the dual problem of false negativity and overdiagnosis. Various modifications in the prostate biopsy techniques have increased the accuracy of cancer detection, but we are still far from an ideal diagnostic technique. Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate is an exhaustive biopsy technique that has been improvised over the past decade, and has shown superior results to other available modalities. We have carried out a PubMed search on the available experiences on this diagnostic modality, and along with our own experiences, we present a brief review on transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Sivaraman
- Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Monsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kuru TH, Saeb-Parsy K, Cantiani A, Frey J, Lombardo R, Serrao E, Gaziev G, Koo B, Roethke M, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Doble A, Hadaschik B, Kastner C. Evolution of repeat prostate biopsy strategies incorporating transperineal and MRI–TRUS fusion techniques. World J Urol 2014; 32:945-50. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1334-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
22
|
Onik G, Barrie K, Miessau M, Bostwick D, Vaughan D, Brady J, Budd W. Long-Term Results of Optimized Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Average 10-Year Follow-Up in 70 Patients. JOURNAL OF MEN'S HEALTH 2014. [DOI: 10.1089/jomh.2014.0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
23
|
Abstract
Transperineal prostate biopsy is re-emerging after decades of being an underused alternative to transrectal biopsy guided by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Factors driving this change include possible improved cancer detection rates, improved sampling of the anteroapical regions of the prostate, a reduced risk of false negative results and a reduced risk of underestimating disease volume and grade. The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance and patients with diabetes mellitus who are at high risk of sepsis also favours transperineal biopsy as a sterile alternative to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Factors limiting its use include increased time, training and financial constraints as well as the need for high-grade anaesthesia. Furthermore, the necessary equipment for transperineal biopsy is not widely available. However, the expansion of transperineal biopsy has been propagated by the increase in multiparametric MRI-guided biopsies, which often use the transperineal approach. Used with MRI imaging, transperineal biopsy has led to improvements in cancer detection rates, more-accurate grading of cancer severity and reduced risk of diagnosing clinically insignificant disease. Targeted biopsy under MRI guidance can reduce the number of cores required, reducing the risk of complications from needle biopsy.
Collapse
|