Pre-emptive penile ring block with sucrose analgesia reduces pain response to neonatal circumcision

Pain control in neonatal male circumcision: A best evidence review

OBJECTIVE

Routine male infant circumcision (RMIC) is a common procedure that inadvertently causes significant but preventable pain. In this best evidence review, we examine the available pain management options and their effectiveness for RMIC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Medline (OVID) and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials investigating pain control for RMIC. Only trials that included newborns younger than 45 days of age were included. The articles generated in the initial search were screened independently by two of the authors. A third reviewer settled any discrepancies about the inclusion. Then, trials were categorized based on the type of intervention: topical anesthetics, oral sucrose, oral acetaminophen, nerve blocks, caudal blocks, circumcision device, non-pharmacological adjuncts, and multiple combinations.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were found to address pain preventative measures in RMIC. As single agent, nerve blocks outperformed topical anesthetics and oral sucrose, as the latter two proved to be insufficient for proper pain control. Additionally, dorsal penile nerve block and ring blocks have a reasonable safety profile. The use of caudal blocks in RMIC was uncommon. Oral sucrose in association with swaddling or music are helpful and can be easily combined with other methods of pain management. Moreover, oral acetaminophen given perioperatively helps the patient recover. Ultimately, pain control should rely on a combination of anesthetics, analgesics, and kinesthetic methods to be administered before, during, and after the procedure for optimal outcome.

CONCLUSION

RMIC is a painful procedure in need of proper pain control. Different interventions and agents have various abilities in controlling pain; however, developing a protocol centered around multimodal pain control proves to be the most effective.

Management of pain in newborn circumcision: a systematic review

Male circumcision (MC) is one of the most common surgical procedures performed on neonates. In the last decades, there have been consistent advances in the understanding of pain mechanisms in newborns, and analgesia has become a fundamental part of neonatal care. MC is still often performed with inappropriate analgesic methods, and there is still great variability among the various centers about surgical and anesthethic techniques to do it. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings in the literature about pain management and analgesia during newborn MC. We performed a systematic review of neonatal MC studies published in the last 20 years. The most effective technique appeared to be the combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of analgesia.Conclusion: Combining local anesthesia with non-pharmacological analgesic strategies appears to be effective preventing procedural pain during MC. However, a standardized protocol for analgesia during MC is yet to be determined. Sensorial saturation appeared to help when used in conjunction with the local anesthesia techniques. What is Known: • Male circumcision is a painful procedure and it is frequently performed with inappropriate analgesic methods. • A gold standard practice in analgesia during male circumcision is still lacking and there is a great variability in the modus operandi between centers. What is New: • The combination of RB + EMLA + sucrose appears to be an analgesic strategy superior to other approaches. • We advocate for the integration of sensorial saturation during male circumcision in order to improve the efficacy of current analgesic practices.

Avoidance of general anesthesia for circumcision in infants under 6 months of age using a modified Plastibell technique

PURPOSE

There is currently no gold standard for the type of analgesia or preferred circumcision technique in infants requiring circumcision after 1 month of age. Our study presents a modified Plastibell circumcision technique, which offers excellent surgical outcomes, and can be performed under local anesthesia until 6 months of age, thereby avoiding the risks of general anesthesia in delayed circumcision.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of 508 consecutive male infants between 1 and 6 months of age, from one institution, who all underwent circumcision under local anesthesia, performed by the same pediatric surgeon, from 2013 to 2018. The study parameters included postoperative complications such as re-operation for control of hemorrhage, wound infection, circumcision revision, and urethral meatotomy.

RESULTS

There were no re-operations for control of hemorrhage, no wound infections, and no circumcision revisions. One patient developed urethral meatal stenosis requiring urethral meatotomy.

CONCLUSION

Our modified Plastibell circumcision technique under local anesthesia is a safe and reproducible alternative for infants between 1 and 6 months of age, whose parents desire circumcision and wish to avoid general anesthesia.

A Guide to Pain Assessment and Management in the Neonate

Newborn infants experience acute pain with various medical procedures. Evidence demonstrates that controlling pain in the newborn period is beneficial, improving physiologic, behavioral, and hormonal outcomes. Multiple validated scoring systems exist to assess pain in a neonate; however, there is no standardized or universal approach for pain management. Healthcare facilities should establish a neonatal pain control program. The first step is to minimize the total number of painful iatrogenic events when possible. If a procedure cannot be avoided, a tiered approach to manage pain using environmental, non-pharmacologic, and pharmacologic modalities is recommended. This systematic approach should decrease acute neonatal pain, poor outcomes, and provider and parent dissatisfaction.