The Tunica Vaginalis Flap as an Adjunct to Epispadias Repair: A Preliminary Report

Application of Tunica Vaginalis Flap for Epispadias Repair in the Epispadias-Exstrophy Complex

OBJECTIVE

To describe long-term outcomes and experience with the tunica vaginalis flap (TVF) as a tissue augment for complex epispadias repair.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed for patients who underwent epispadias repair with TVF from 2010 to 2021. Evaluation of patient characteristics between those who developed dehiscence or UCF and those who did not was performed via Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 47 male patients were identified, of whom, 1 (2.1%) had cloacal exstrophy, 38 (80.9%) had classic bladder exstrophy or a variant, and 8 (17.0%) had epispadias as their primary exstrophy-epispadias complex diagnosis. The median age at epispadias repair was 13 months (IQR 11 - 19). The overall rate of fistula or dehiscence development was 19.1% (9 patients), of whom, 7 developed urethrocutaneous fistulae, 1 dehiscence, and 1 both. Notably, 0 of the 5 patients who had undergone prior epispadias repair and 0 of the 8 patients with a diagnosis of isolated epispadias developed a UCF or dehiscence after repair with TVF. Differences in age at repair, primary EEC diagnosis, prior epispadias repair, pre-repair testosterone, fibrin sealant utilization, closure layers, stent removal time, and bladder capacity at repair were not statistically significant (P>.05) CONCLUSION: Our expanded evaluation indicates that utilization of the tunica vaginalis as an adjunct to epispadias repair may provide durable protection against fistula development in EEC patients who have undergone prior epispadias repair and in primary repair of patients with isolated epispadias.

Epispadias repair with tunica vaginalis flap

INTRODUCTION

Primary epispadias is a rare congenital malformation that afflicts about 1 in 80,000 children. The surgical repair, originally described by Cantwell over 100 years ago, is fundamentally sound and incorporates several important steps to achieve an optimal result.

METHODS

A 9-month-old male with penopubic epispadias presented for surgical repair. Pre-operative imaging included a normal renal ultrasound and voiding cystourethrogram that demonstrated a moderate-sized bladder, partially competent bladder neck, and no vesicoureteral reflux. A modified Cantwell-Ransley approach to the repair was performed without complete disassembly of the penis. Established surgical principles of identification of laterally placed neurovascular bundles, preservation of the ventral mesentery to the urethral plate, mobilization of the urethral plate off the corporal bodies with ventral relocation, and dorsal medial rotation of the corporal bodies are demonstrated in this video.

RESULTS

This procedure was performed as an outpatient. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course. The #6-French urethral stent was removed on postoperative day 10.

CONCLUSIONS

This video demonstrates a modified Cantwell-Ransley technique for epispadias repair, which employs a tunica vaginalis flap to reinforce the urethral repair. The adherence to surgical principles described by Cantwell in the late 1800s for children with primary epispadias continues to lead optimal surgical outcomes.

Results of Epispadias Repair Using the Modified Cantwell-Ransley Technique

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate our results of epispadias repair with a modified Cantwell-Ransley (MCR) technique.

METHODS

A retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved chart review of all patients who underwent an MCR epispadias repair was conducted between 1998 and 2015. Procedures were performed at birth or after the age of 8 months as part of the modern staged repair of exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC) in patients with bladder exstrophy treated since birth, at presentation for older patients, and after the age of 6 months in isolated epispadias patients. Twenty-two children underwent MCR epispadias repair in our institute during the study period. Sixteen of them had EEC and 6 had isolated epispadias. Four patients underwent exstrophy and epispadias repair at the same session. Twelve children underwent epispadias repair as a second stage of modern staged repair at a mean age of 21 months (range 8-60). The procedures involved dissection of the corporeal bodies and urethral plate from the penile base to the tip of the penile glans.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (range 0.5-18), there were no complications in the isolated epispadias group and 4 complications in the bladder exstrophy group: urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 1), residual dorsal curvature (n = 1), and excess of penile skin (n = 2). The meatal location was orthotopic in all cases. All of the complications were successfully addressed in a single subsequent surgical session.

CONCLUSION

MCR technique continues to be a reliable, reproducible option for epispadias repair in EEC patients and in cases of isolated epispadias.