1
|
Conservative Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Patient. Case Rep Transplant 2022; 2022:5373414. [PMID: 35677063 PMCID: PMC9168198 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5373414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Solid organ transplant increases the risk for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Although a common tumor, urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder in patients with kidney-pancreas transplants is scarcely reported. Case Presentation. A 65-year-old male with history of type 1 diabetes and a 14-year status post deceased donor pancreas-kidney transplant presented with 3 weeks of gross hematuria. CT scan showed multiple bladder masses. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) showed papillary UCC. 5 months later, the patient reported new-onset gross hematuria. TURBT showed MIBC. The patient elected for bladder-preserving TMT. On cystoscopy there was no gross evidence of carcinoma at 3.5 years of follow up. Discussion. Currently, no specific management guidelines target this population with MIBC. The first-line treatment for MIBC is radical cystectomy (RC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients that are medically unfit or unwilling to undergo RC, trimodal therapy (TMT) is an alternative. TMT for bladder cancer consists of complete tumor resection with chemotherapy and radiation. This report demonstrates a unique case of a patient with kidney-pancreas transplant diagnosed with MIBC treated with TMT that has no evidence of gross tumorigenesis at 3.5 years after diagnosis. Our findings suggest that trimodal therapy should be considered for treatment of MIBC in patients with kidney-pancreatic transplants to preserve the donated allografts.
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian Z, Meng L, Wang X, Diao T, Hu M, Wang M, Liu M, Wang J. Young age increases the risk of lymph-node metastasis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:851. [PMID: 32887577 PMCID: PMC7650299 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of positive lymph nodes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (MIBC) can be used to guide treatment recommendations. However, little is known about the effect of age on lymph node positivity (LN+). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of age on LN+ in MIBC. METHODS We analyzed patients with stage T2-T4 bladder urothelial carcinoma who had not received preoperative radiotherapy, had at least one lymph node examined, and underwent cystectomy between 1998 and 2015. The Cochran-Armitage trend test and logistic univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the effect of age on LN+ in all T stages. RESULTS In total, 15,624 patients with MIBC were identified, including 747 patients aged ≤50 years (4.78%), 2614 patients aged 50-59 years (16.73%), 4914 patients aged 60-69 years (31.45%), 5225 patients aged 70-79 years old (33.44%), and 2124 patients aged > 80 years (13.59%). In T2-T4 staging, LN+ was negatively correlated with age. After adjustment for several covariates, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age was an independent risk factor for LN+. CONCLUSIONS In this large SEER analysis, Young patients with MIBC have a higher risk of lymph node metastasis. This finding is worthy of further study and may eventually affect the treatment decisions of young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zijian Tian
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lingfeng Meng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Tongxiang Diao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Maolin Hu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Miao Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Jianye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China. .,Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin T, Zhang Q, Yuan A, Wang B, Zhang F, Ding Y, Cao W, Chen W, Guo H. Synergy of Tumor Microenvironment Remodeling and Autophagy Inhibition to Sensitize Radiation for Bladder Cancer Treatment. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:7683-7696. [PMID: 32685013 PMCID: PMC7359086 DOI: 10.7150/thno.45358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor hypoxia, acidosis, and excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) were the main characteristics of the bladder tumor microenvironment (TME), and abnormal TME led to autophagy activation, which facilitated cancer cell proliferation. The therapeutic efficacy of autophagy inhibitors might also be impeded by abnormal TME. To address these issues, we proposed a new strategy that utilized manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanoparticles to optimize the abnormal TME and revitalize autophagy inhibitors, and both oxygenation and autophagy inhibition may sensitize the tumor cells to radiation therapy. Methods: By taking advantage of the strong affinity between negatively charged MnO2 and positively charged chloroquine (CQ), the nanoparticles were fabricated by integrating MnO2 and CQ in human serum albumin (HSA)-based nanoplatform (HSA-MnO2-CQ NPs). Results: HSA-MnO2-CQ NPs NPs efficiently generated O2 and increased pH in vitro after reaction with H+/H2O2 and then released the encapsulated CQ in a H+/H2O2 concentration-dependent manner. The NPs restored the autophagy-inhibiting activity of chloroquine in acidic conditions by increasing its intracellular uptake, and markedly blocked hypoxia-induced autophagic flux. In vivo studies showed the NPs improved pharmacokinetic behavior of chloroquine and effectively accumulated in tumor tissues. The NPs exhibited significantly decreased tumor hypoxia areas and increased tumor pH, and had remarkable autophagy inhibition efficacy on bladder tumors. Finally, a significant anti-tumor effect achieved by the enhanced autophagy inhibition and radiation sensitization. Conclusions: HSA-MnO2-CQ NPs synergistically regulated the abnormal TME and inhibited autophagic flux, and effectively sensitized radiation therapy to treat bladder cancers.
Collapse
|
4
|
Han J, Gu X, Li Y, Wu Q. Mechanisms of BCG in the treatment of bladder cancer-current understanding and the prospect. Biomed Pharmacother 2020; 129:110393. [PMID: 32559616 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 30 years' successful application of Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) to the clinical treatment of bladder cancer has proved it one of the most promising immunotherapies for cancer. However, the applications and achievements have failed to uncover the mechanism of BCG works on bladder cancer fully. Clinically, the administration of BCG on patients results in no effect, or apparent resistance, and even severe adverse reactions, which are inexplicable. At present, the widely confirmed and accepted immunity mechanism of BCG fall in the processes of the absorption after the instillation of BCG, the internalization of BCG, cytokine release induced by a series of signal transduction pathways, and the effect stage of innate and acquired immune responses. Nonetheless, the limited ascertainments of the mechanism of BCG action cannot fully explain the clinical phenomenon caused by BCG. Therefore, the other mechanisms of BCG action have remained the research hotspot aiming to explore more targeted treatments or to initiate new therapeutic methods avoiding harm. By summarizing the recent research achievements of the mechanism of BCG works on bladder cancer, this review aims to provide clues for researchers to quest more valuable ideas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiansong Han
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
| | - Xinquan Gu
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China.
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
| | - Qiaoli Wu
- Tianjin Cerebral Vascular and Neural Degenerative Disease Key Laboratory, Tianjin Neurosurgery Institute, Tianjin Huan Hu Hospital, Tianjin 300350, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Merten R, Ott O, Haderlein M, Bertz S, Hartmann A, Wullich B, Keck B, Kühn R, Rödel CM, Weiss C, Gall C, Uter W, Fietkau R. Long-Term Experience of Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Deep Regional Hyperthermia for Organ Preservation in High-Risk Bladder Cancer (Ta, Tis, T1, T2). Oncologist 2019; 24:e1341-e1350. [PMID: 31292267 PMCID: PMC6975936 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This article reports on the different treatments for bladder cancer and related effects on frequency of bladder preservation, disease‐free survival, and overall survival, with a focus on the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia of high‐risk bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (RCT) combined with regional deep hyperthermia (RHT) of high‐risk bladder cancer after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR‐BT). Materials and methods. Between 1982 and 2016, 369 patients with pTa, pTis, pT1, and pT2 cN0–1 cM0 bladder cancer were treated with a multimodal treatment after TUR‐BT. All patients received radiotherapy (RT) of the bladder and regional lymph nodes. RCT was administered to 215 patients, RCT + RHT was administered to 79 patients, and RT was used in 75 patients. Treatment response was evaluated 4–6 weeks after treatment with TUR‐BT. Results. Complete response (CR) overall was 83% (290/351), and in treatment groups was RT 68% (45/66), RCT 86% (178/208), and RCT + RHT 87% (67/77). CR was significantly improved by concurrent RCT compared with RT (odds ratio [OR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–5.12; p = .037), less influenced by hyperthermia (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.88–8.00; p = .092). Overall survival (OS) after RCT was superior to RT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.50–0.99; p = .045). Five‐year OS from unadjusted Kaplan‐Meier estimates was RCT 64% versus RT 45%. Additional RHT increased 5‐year OS to 87% (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.58; p = .0001). RCT + RHT compared with RCT showed a significantly better bladder‐preservation rate (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.56; p = .006). Median follow‐up was 71 months. The median number of RHT sessions was five. Conclusion. The multimodal treatment consisted of a maximal TUR‐BT followed by RT; concomitant platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with RHT in patients with high‐grade bladder cancer improves local control, bladder‐preservation rate, and OS. It offers a promising alternative to surgical therapies like radical cystectomy. Implications for Practice. Radical cystectomy with appropriate lymph node dissection has long represented the standard of care for muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in medically fit patients, despite many centers reporting excellent long‐term results for bladder preserving strategies. This retrospective analysis compares different therapeutic modalities in bladder‐preservation therapy. The results of this study show that multimodal treatment consisting of maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by radiotherapy, concomitant platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia in patients with Ta, Tis, T1–2 bladder carcinomas improves local control, bladder‐preservation rate, and survival. More importantly, these findings offer a promising alternative to surgical therapies like radical cystectomy. The authors hope that, in the future, closer collaboration between urologists and radiotherapists will further improve treatments and therapies for the benefit of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Merten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Oliver Ott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simone Bertz
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Bastian Keck
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Reinhard Kühn
- Department of Urology, Martha Maria Medical Center, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Claus Michael Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christian Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Christine Gall
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Murali-Krishnan S, Pang KH, Greco F, Fiori C, Catto JW, Vavassori VL, Esperto F. Bladder-sparing treatment in MIBC: where do we stand? MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:101-112. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
7
|
Borchert A, Rogers CG. Urologic Pathology: Key Parameters from a Urologist's Perspective. Surg Pathol Clin 2018; 11:893-901. [PMID: 30447847 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2018.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer represent the 3 most common urologic malignancies, and form a heterogenous group of disease processes, with a wide range of pathologic features. As a urologist, a strong understanding of the pathologic features of urologic malignancies is essential to prognosticate and counsel patients and to determine the most effective course of treatment. This review discusses the pathologic features of prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer, and examines how detailed pathologic reporting is critical to today's practicing urologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Borchert
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 W Grand Boulevard, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mathes J, Rausch S, Todenhöfer T, Stenzl A. Trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:1219-1229. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1535314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Mathes
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Büchser D, Zapatero A, Rogado J, Talaya M, Martín de Vidales C, Arellano R, Bocardo G, Cruz Conde A, Pérez L, Murillo MT. Long-term Outcomes and Patterns of Failure Following Trimodality Treatment With Bladder Preservation for Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology 2018; 124:183-190. [PMID: 30266376 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report long-term results on survival, toxicity, and patterns of failure of 3 different organ-sparing strategies for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a monoinstitutional prospective analysis of 3 consecutive bladder-sparing protocols combining maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (mTURBT), radiotherapy (RT), and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Protocol 1 consisted of neoadjuvant methotrexate-cisplatin-vinblastine followed by endoscopic re-evaluation and consolidative RT 60 Gy in complete responders. Protocol 2 involved altered-fractionation RT 64.8 Gy and concurrent weekly cisplatin with re-evaluation after 40.8 Gy. Protocol 3 consisted of RT 64.8 Gy with concomitant weekly cisplatin. Nonresponders underwent radical cystectomy. Probabilities for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier product limited estimates. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to detect potential risk factors for OS, CSS, and MFS. RESULTS The 10-year bladder preservation rate was 79%. The 10-year OS, CSS, and MFS rates were 43.2%, 76.3% and 79.2%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the different treatment protocols. On multivariate analysis, mTURBT of the bladder and the complete response after induction therapy were independent correlates of improved OS and of MFS. The development of invasive bladder recurrence was independently associated with worse CSS and MFS. CONCLUSION Ten-year results indicate that bladder-sparing treatment is a successful approach for muscle invasive bladder cancer in selected patients. The mTURBT of the bladder tumor and complete response after induction therapy remain the most relevant predictive factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Büchser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacobo Rogado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marisol Talaya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ramón Arellano
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Bocardo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Cruz Conde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leopoldo Pérez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María T Murillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cahn DB, Handorf EA, Ghiraldi EM, Ristau BT, Geynisman DM, Churilla TM, Horwitz EM, Sobczak ML, Chen DYT, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC. Contemporary use trends and survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder-preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 2017; 123:4337-4345. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David B. Cahn
- Department of Urology; Einstein Healthcare Network; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth A. Handorf
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Eric M. Ghiraldi
- Department of Urology; Einstein Healthcare Network; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Benjamin T. Ristau
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel M. Geynisman
- Department of Hematology/Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas M. Churilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Eric M. Horwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Mark L. Sobczak
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - David Y. T. Chen
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Rosalia Viterbo
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Richard E. Greenberg
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Robert G. Uzzo
- Department of Urology; Einstein Healthcare Network; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Marc C. Smaldone
- Division of Urologic Oncology; Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Low Grade Lymphoma Mimicking Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: When Do We Need Further Histologic Staging? Case Rep Oncol Med 2016; 2016:8125898. [PMID: 27994899 PMCID: PMC5138476 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8125898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2016] [Revised: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder often present with metastases to regional lymph nodes, with lymphadenopathy on physical examination or radiographic imaging. Case Presentation. We present the case of a 73-year-old Caucasian man with presumed metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder to regional pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. He underwent systemic chemotherapy for treatment of urothelial carcinoma and was discovered on restaging to have findings suggestive of disease progression but ultimately was found to have a concurrent secondary malignancy. Conclusion. Our case suggests that in patients with urothelial carcinoma, the concurrent presentation of regional lymphadenopathy may not be metastatic urothelial carcinoma and may warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rose TL, Deal AM, Ladoire S, Créhange G, Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, Bellmunt J, Wimalasingham A, Wong YN, Harshman LC, Chowdhury S, Niegisch G, Liontos M, Yu EY, Pal SK, Chen RC, Wang AZ, Nielsen ME, Smith AB, Milowsky MI. Patterns of Bladder Preservation Therapy Utilization for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2:405-413. [PMID: 28035321 PMCID: PMC5181658 DOI: 10.3233/blc-160072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background: Trimodality bladder preservation therapy (BPT) in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes a maximal transurethral resection followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC) in appropriately selected patients, or as a treatment option in non-cystectomy candidates. Several chemotherapy regimens can be used in BPT, but little is known about current practice patterns. Objective: To describe utilization patterns of BPT and associated survival outcomes in MIBC. Methods: Data were collected from the Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC), a database of 3,024 consecutive patients from 29 international academic centers from 2005 to 2013. Patients with clinical T2-T4aN0M0 urothelial cancer of the bladder were included. Results: 265 patients received BPT. Compared with the 1,447 patients who received RC, BPT patients were older, had poorer performance status, and had more comorbidities (p < 0.01 for all). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for patients treated with curative radiation doses in BPT and patients treated with RC (41 vs 46 months, p = 0.33, respectively). 45% of BPT patients received concurrent chemotherapy with radiation. The most common regimens included cisplatin alone (23%), carboplatin alone (22%), gemcitabine alone (10%), paclitaxel alone (9%), and 5-FU+mitomycin (5%). There were no significant differences in survival among chemotherapy regimens. Only 10 patients (4% of BPT patients) underwent salvage cystectomy. Conclusions: In clinical practice, BPT patients have similar survival to RC patients when treated with curative radiotherapy doses. Choice of concurrent chemotherapy regimen varied widely with no clear standard. Salvage cystectomy is rarely performed. Continued research is needed on the comparative effectiveness among BPT and RC, and among chemotherapy regimens in BPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L. Rose
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Allison M. Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Georges François Leclerc Center, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Georges François Leclerc Center, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Akhila Wimalasingham
- Barts Cancer Institute ECMC, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Yu-Ning Wong
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lauren C. Harshman
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Guenter Niegisch
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Evan Y. Yu
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sumanta K. Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrew Z. Wang
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew E. Nielsen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angela B. Smith
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - the Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract (RISC) Investigators
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Georges François Leclerc Center, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Barts Cancer Institute ECMC, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trust, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|