Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy and Lymph Node Dissection in Modified Supine Position

Intraperitoneal laparoscopic single-site lymph node dissection in modified supine position during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy

Technique modifications that aim to improve ergonomics of the surgical procedure without repositioning the upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients remain a challenge to urologists. We offer a novel technique to perform intraperitoneal laparoscopic single-site radical nephroureterectomy and pelvic lymph nodes dissection/retroperitoneal lymph nodes dissection in a supine position. Our novel technique is feasible and offers a significant improvement in operative efficiency, particularly in patients with locally advanced disease.

A Modified and Practical Surgical Technique for Pure Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy in a Single Position and Research Outcomes

Purpose: To explore the surgical techniques and clinical value of pure transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) plus bladder cuff excision (BCE) conducted without changing the patient's position in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods: From August 2018 to July 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 66 patients who underwent LNU + BCE in a single position. Then, their demographic characteristics, perioperative and pathological outcomes, and postoperative follow-up data were evaluated. Results: All 66 operations in this group were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time was 125 ± 47 minutes, whereas the estimated blood loss was 10 (10, 15) mL. The median postoperative drainage time was 4 (3.8, 6.0) days, the time to catheter extraction after the operation was 4.5 (3.0, 6.0) days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 6 (5, 7) days. Pathological results showed urothelial carcinoma in 65 cases, including 56 high-grade and 9 low-grade cases. Lymph node metastasis was found in 8 cases of high-grade urothelial carcinoma. All the surgical margins were negative. The median follow-up was 16.5 (11.0-25.6) months, and there was neither tumor recurrence nor distant metastasis. Conclusions: Pure transperitoneal LNU + BCE in a single position is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for UTUC and is worthy of clinical application and promotion. It takes advantage of a programmed procedure, short operation time, less blood loss, less trauma, and quick recovery after the operation. However, multicenter randomized controlled studies with large samples are needed to further confirm these findings. Trial Registration: The study was registered at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No. 22/054-3255) and the registration date is August 2018.

Prospective Clinical Trial of the Oncologic Outcomes and Safety of Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection at Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Purpose

To determine the safety and feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended lymph node dissection (LND) at the time of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Materials and Methods

Between May 2018 and March 2019, 39 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) received extraperitoneal laparoscopic RNU and concomitant extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended LND. All patients were followed for at least 90 days. Perioperative and pathological data including nodal status and perioperative complications were collected.

Results

Among all 39 patients, 12 patients had pT1, 6 had pT2, 20 had pT3 disease, and 1 had T4 disease. The median (range) lymph node count was 10 (5–22), with 8 patients having pathologically proven lymph node metastasis. The median (range) operating time was 225 (165–430) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 200 (60–800) ml. The median postoperative hemoglobin loss was 1.6 (0–4.2) g/dl. The median (range) postoperative hospital stays were 6 (3–26) days. Overall, 7 patients experienced minor (Clavien Grade I–II) postoperative complications with five patients having Clavien Grade I complications and two patients having Clavien Grade II complications. No major complication (Clavien grade III–IV) occurred. With a median follow-up of 38 months, a total of 8 patients (20.5%) developed local or distant recurrence and no regional LNs where extended LND were performed had recurrence.

Conclusions

The present prospective study demonstrated that extraperitoneal laparoscopic extended LND during extraperitoneal laparoscopic RNU for UTUC is a feasible and safe procedure which provides minimal invasion, rapid recovery, and potentially lower risk of regional LN recurrence. Larger prospective clinical trials with survival endpoints are needed to further determine its potential therapeutic benefits.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 03544437 www.clinicaltrials.gov

Supine extraperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy without patient repositioning

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel technique allowing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy, in a complete supine position, without patient repositioning.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and October 2018, 20 consecutive patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma underwent supine extraperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. The patients were placed in the complete supine position. A 4-cm pararectal skin incision was made and the extraperitoneal space was developed. We used a unique port placement that permits complete access for nephroureterectomy, bladder cuff excision and concomitant lymphadenectomy. Operative parameters and pathological data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 70 years (range 49-88 years), the mean operative time was 234 min (range 175-293 min) and the mean estimated blood loss was 67 mL (range 50-200 mL). There were no intraoperative complications, and no patients required transfusion or open conversion. The median number of removed lymph nodes was 10; only one patient had node metastasis. The total operative time and time for nephroureterectomy were significantly longer in the first 10 patients (first group) than in the second 10 patients (second group). Times required for bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel technique, which enables completion of the entire procedure of nephrouretectomy with bladder cuff excision and lymphadenectomy in the supine position without patient repositioning, is safe and minimizes operative time while maintaining oncological efficacy. We believe this approach might become a standard option for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Management of the Distal Ureter in Radical Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Introduction: Management of the distal ureter during laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is controversial. The aim of this review was to determine whether this affects oncological outcomes. Methods: A literature review was conducted searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in June 2019. Studies reporting outcomes of LNU in UTUC using either open, laparoscopic, or endoscopic approaches to excise the distal ureter were identified. All eligible studies underwent critical appraisal and were excluded if not of sufficient quality. Cumulative analysis of the results was performed. Results: Nine studies with a total of 383 patients (168 open, 159 laparoscopic, and 56 endoscopic excision of distal ureter) were eligible for inclusion. Study design and outcome reporting were variable between studies. Mean age of patients was comparable (67.7 years versus 65.0 years versus 66.6 years). Mean follow-up duration was comparable between open and laparoscopic groups (46.2 months versus 45.5 months) but reduced in the endoscopic group (33.4 months). The open group had a higher proportion of high grade/G3 tumors and pT2-4 tumors when compared to the laparoscopic and endoscopic groups (P < .001 and P = .002). The open group had a higher rate of intravesical recurrence and the laparoscopic group had a higher rate of distant metastases (P < .001). Conclusion: This review has identified differences in oncological outcomes between different techniques of managing the distal ureter in LNU for UTUC. However, the poor reporting of potentially confounding factors does not enable any one technique to be recommended as superior and requires further research.

Pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical standardized seeable (PRESS) excision of distal ureter and bladder cuff in radical nephroureterectomy: step-by-step technique

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been raised regarding the management of bladder cuff with these minimally invasive approaches. The aim of this study was to describe a modified radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with pure retroperitoneoscopic extravesical standardized seeable (PRESS) bladder cuff excision (BCE) and to assess its outcomes based on a novel concept of intraoperative "trifecta."

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma underwent retroperitoneoscopic RNU from August 2017 to August 2019. A modified RNU with PRESS BCE and lymph node dissection (LND) was performed. Descriptive analysis of patients' characteristics, surgical technique, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up data was performed. BCE trifecta was defined as en-bloc excision, mucosa-to-mucosa reliable closure and no urine spillage.

RESULTS

In 23 out of 24 cases (95.8%) the procedure was successfully completed. One patient was converted to open distal ureterectomy with a Gibson incision due to peritoneum rupture during dissection of the distal ureter. BCE trifecta was achieved in 95.7% (22/23) cases of all patients finished with PRESS technique. Median OT was 260 min (IQR: 220-305) with median EBL of 100 mL (IQR: 100-250). Median OT for distal ureterectomy was 52 min (IQR: 40-69). No positive surgical margin occurred. Median postoperative hospital stay was 6 d (IQR: 5-7). Median follow-up time was 7 mo (IQR: 5-17). One patient (4.3%) experienced bladder recurrence and no patient developed distant metastasis or died of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we demonstrate a standardized retroperitoneoscopic RNU technique that is safe and reproducible, enabling the visual confirmation of complete BCE and facilitating LND. BCE trifecta should be a routine goal in minimally invasive RNU. Prospective comparison with the standard open surgical technique is warranted.

Total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma under a single surgical position

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) under a single surgical position.

METHODS

The medical data of 89 UUTUC patients were collected, who were treated in our institution from Jan 2016 to Jun 2018. The 45 cases that underwent total laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with a single position were allocated in the test group, while the 44 patients who received retroperitoneal laparoscopy combined with hypogastric oblique incision were assigned in the control group. We compared the two groups in perioperative indicators and tumor recurrence rate and analyzed the clinical effect of the new surgical treatment of UUTUC.

RESULTS

All 89 operations for UUTUC were successful and had no conversion to open surgery. No obvious complications occurred during the perioperative period. The test group had significantly shorter average operation time (96.58 ± 8.56 min versus 147.45 ± 9.16 min), less blood loss (39.58 ± 4.15 ml versus 46.50 ± 4.58 ml), earlier ambulation (7.47 ± 1.01 h versus 11.39 ± 1.82 h), and shorter length of stay in hospital (6.98 ± 1.14 days versus 9.89 ± 1.51 days) (P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the test group at 1 h, 12 h, and 24 h after operation were lower compared with those of the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the tumor stage, tumor grade, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, follow-up time, and tumor recurrence rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the traditional surgical methods, the total laparoscopic treatment of UUTUC under a single surgical position had advantages of shorter operation time, less blood loss, and early postoperative ambulation. The new operative method could shorten the length of stay and accelerate recovery of patients, and it is a viable surgical procedure which deserved clinical application and promotion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our trial was approved and has been registered in the ethics committee of the Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (Approval NO.[2015]171) .