The Surgical Management of Bladder Polyps in the Setting of Exstrophy Epispadias Complex

New Insights on the Basic Science of Bladder Exstrophy-epispadias Complex

The exstrophy-epispadias complex is a rare congenital anomaly presenting as a wide spectrum of disorders. The complex nature of this malformation leads to continuous investigations of the basic science concepts behind it. Elucidating these concepts allows one to fully understand the mechanisms behind the disease in order to improve diagnosis, management, and treatment ultimately leading to improvement in patient quality of life. Multiple technological advancements within the last 10 years have been made allowing for new studies to be conducted. Herein, the authors conduct a literature review of studies from 2009 to 2019, considering novel theories regarding the genetics, embryology, bladder, bony pelvis, prostate, and genitalia of patients with bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Delaying reclosure of bladder exstrophy leads to gradual decline in bladder capacity

INTRODUCTION

After unsuccessful repair of bladder exstrophy, when to repeat surgical intervention is unclear. One must balance time required for tissue healing with the damaging effects of an exposed urothelium to the environment.

OBJECTIVE

The authors aim to study whether a relationship exists between bladder growth/capacity and time till eventual successful closure.

STUDY DESIGN

An institutional database of exstrophy-epispadias complex patients was queried for failed exstrophy closure with successful repeat reconstruction, at least three consecutive bladder capacity measurements, and measurements obtained at least three months following successful closure. Patients closed successfully in the neonatal period were used as a comparative group. Linear mixed effects models were used to study the effect of time and age on bladder capacity.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients requiring reclosure and 117 who had successful neonatal closures were included. Two models were created. The first linear mixed effects model found that for a given age, the bladder capacity declined approximately 9.6 mL per year (p = 0.016). The second model found that when time to successful closure was grouped by quartiles, compared to neonates, those in the fourth quartile had significantly decreased bladder capacity of 28.8 cc (p = 0.042). An interaction model comparing neonates and those requiring reclosure did not demonstrate a significant change in bladder growth rate (p = 0.098). A model stratified by quartiles similarly did not find any significant impact to bladder growth rate.

DISCUSSION

From the general linear mixed effects models, the authors conclude when compared to neonates, (1) there was an approximate 9.6 cc loss of total bladder capacity per year taken until successful closure, and that (2) those who were delayed the longest had the most significant difference in bladder capacity. This study required stricter inclusion criteria compared to previous publications, and therefore the conclusions that can be drawn regarding bladder growth rates may be more reliable. Future studies will examine the effects of delayed closure on the bladder at the cellular level.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a demonstrable significant impact on overall bladder capacity with increasing delay to successful reclosure. One should be cautious when prolonging reconstruction of the bladder as these data demonstrate a time dependent decline in overall capacity.

The inadequate bladder template: Its effect on outcomes in classic bladder exstrophy

INTRODUCTION

Newborns with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) may present with a bladder template that is inadequate for closure in the neonatal period (figure). In these cases, a delayed primary closure (DPC) is conducted to permit growth of the bladder template. This study reports the surgical and long-term urinary continence outcomes of poor template CBE patients undergoing DPC and compares them to patients who underwent DPC for reasons unrelated to bladder quality (i.e., prematurity, comorbidities, or a late referral).

METHODS

An institutionally approved, prospectively maintained database of 1330 exstrophy-epispadias complex patients was reviewed for CBE patients who underwent DPC at the authors' institution. A bladder template was considered inadequate for neonatal closure if found to be inelastic, <3 cm in diameter, and/or covered in hamartomatous polyps.

RESULTS

In total, 63 patients (53 male and 10 female) undergoing DPC were identified. Of these, 36 had poor bladder templates (group 1). The remaining 27 patients (group 2) had adequate templates and their bladder closure was delayed for reasons unrelated to bladder quality. At the time of DPC, those in group 1 were relatively than those in group 2 (median of 229 vs. 128 days, p = 0.094). All 36 group 1 patients and 26 (96%) group 2 patients underwent pelvic osteotomy during DPC (p = 0.429). All patients in this study had a successful primary closure. There was little difference in longitudinal bladder capacities between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.518). Also, there was minimal difference in the median number of continence procedures between groups, with both groups having 1 (IQR 1-1) continence procedure (p = 0.880). Eight patients in group 1, and three patients in group 2 underwent a bladder neck transection with urinary diversion. Of the 13 and 16 patients who have undergone a continence procedure in group 1 and 2, respectively, 11 (84.6%) and 13 (81.3%) are continent of urine. The age of first continence procedure was different between groups 1 and 2 at 8.0 years (5.8-9.9 years) and 4.8 (3.5-6.0 years), respectively p = 0.009. The majority of patients in group 1 established continence at a relatively later age when compared to those in group 2, at 11.4 (8.0-14.8) years and 7.9 (2.6-13.2) years of age respectively p = 0.087.

DISCUSSION

In the authors' view, neonatal bladder closure is ideal for CBE patients as it minimizes potential damage to exposed bladder mucosa. However, prior studies indicate that the rate of bladder growth for patients undergoing a delayed primary closure does not differ from patients with a neonatal closure. Results from this study show continued evidence that patients with poor templates who undergo delayed closure have excellent primary closure outcomes, which is critical for further management. Furthermore, this study shows that an inadequate bladder does not affect DPC outcomes or the continence outcomes in DPC patients. However, the inadequate template does affect the type of continence procedure available to a DPC patient, the age of first continence procedure, and the age of continence.

CONCLUSIONS

DPC of the exstrophic bladder has a high rate of success when pelvic osteotomy is utilized as an adjunct. Patients having a DPC for reasons of an inadequate bladder template have comparable rates of bladder growth when compared to DPC of an adequate bladder template. The inadequate bladder template affects the type of continence procedure, with the majority of patients requiring urinary diversion for continence. Patients with an inadequate bladder template have a later age of first continence procedure and a relatively later age of continence, because of an inherently smaller bladder template at birth. The inadequate bladder template patients require a longer period of surveillance to access bladder growth and capacity in preparation of a continence procedure. Furthermore, as the majority of inadequate bladder template patients require a catheterizable channel for continence, the age of continence is also likely influenced by the patient's preparation as they transition from volitional voiding to catheterization.