Clinical and Patient-reported Outcomes of 1-sided Anterior Urethroplasty for Long-segment or Panurethral Strictures

Erectile and Ejaculatory Function Following Anterior Urethroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The degree of change in erectile (EF) and ejaculatory function (EjF) according to validated questionnaires following anterior urethroplasty and different techniques is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the evidence on EF and EjF evaluated via validated questionnaires following anterior urethroplasty.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021229797) of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The PubMed and CENTRAL databases were searched on February 1, 2021, with an updated search performed on December 1, 2021. Studies evaluating EF and/or EjF using validated questionnaires in men aged ≥18 yr following anterior urethroplasty were included.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 29 studies (two randomised and 27 nonrandomised) were included. The questionnaire most commonly used to evaluate EF and EjF was the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ), respectively. The incidence of postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED) was 0-38% and the mean change in EF score according to the IIEF ranged from -4.0 to 2.5. The incidence of postoperative ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) was 7.7-67% and the mean change in EjF score according to the MSHQ-EjD was 0.7-7.0. Meta-analyses revealed a mean difference of -0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.50 to -0.23; p = 0.008) in IIEF-EF score and 1.77 (95% CI 0.61-2.93; p = 0.003) in MSHQ-EjF score following anterior urethroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

EF and EjF may be affected following anterior urethroplasty and men should be counselled appropriately. Owing to the variation in questionnaires and cutoff scores used, EF and EjF outcomes following different urethroplasty techniques are heterogeneous, with limited data from randomised controlled trials. An agreement on questionnaires and cutoff scores should be established to allow consistent reporting. Future research should aim to investigate best approaches for minimising sexual dysfunction.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Surgical repair of the urethra (urethroplasty) used to treat narrowing of the urethra (urethral stricture) may affect erectile and ejaculatory function. Different questionnaires and definitions are used to evaluate sexual function, so it is hard to compare data. The degree of disruption can be affected by different techniques and the severity of disease.

Prospective Assessment of Patient-perceived Short-term Changes in Penile Appearance After Urethroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To define the incidence and associations of patient-reported penile curvature and shortening after urethroplasty. Alterations in penile curvature or length post-urethroplasty are associated with patient dissatisfaction but are poorly described.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2019, 387 patients completed enrollment in a prospective single-centre study assessing patient-reported outcomes pre-operatively and 6-months post-urethroplasty. Primary outcomes of perceived penile shortening and curvature were assessed at 6-months follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings while univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to identify associations between loss of penile length or chordee with other clinical factors.

RESULTS

Of the 387 patients, mean age was 49.5 years with mean stricture length of 4.5 cm. Postoperatively, 12.7% of patients perceived penile curvature (8.0% "somewhat", 4.7% "severe") and 22.8% of patients perceived penile shortening (14.5% "somewhat", 8.3% "a lot"). Multivariate binary logistic regression identified stricture location (P = .02) to be associated with perceived curvature while prior urethroplasty (P = .17), type of urethroplasty (P = .08) and other factors were not. Specifically, penile (O.R. 4.27, 95%CI 1.56-11.68, P = .005) and panurethral (O.R. 10.15, 95%CI 3.46-29.77, P <.001) locations were independently associated with this outcome. In a multivariate model, panurethral strictures (O.R. 4.23, 95%CI 1.10-16.20, P = .04) and hypospadias (O.R. 5.46, 95%CI 1.32-22.70, P = .02) were associated with patient perceived shortening while other factors such as age (P = .19), type of urethroplasty (P = .14) and other etiologies or locations were not.

CONCLUSION

Clinically significant changes in penile appearance are more common post-urethroplasty than generally thought. Stricture location and etiology are important predictors of these patient-perceived changes.

Sexual function after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review

Background

Urethral surgery outcomes are often evaluated by assessing urinary flow and urethral patency. However, sexual consequences may appear after urethroplasty, impairing quality of life and patient’s perception of success.

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between anterior urethral reconstruction and postoperative sexual dysfunction, including the proposed factors predicting sexual outcomes.

Methods

We searched in PubMed database using the terms: “anterior urethroplasty”, bulbar urethroplasty” or “penile urethroplasty”, and “sexual dysfunction”, “erectile function” or “ejaculation”. Articles were independently evaluated for inclusion based on predetermined criteria. Systematic data extraction was followed by a comprehensive summary of evidence.

Results

Thirty-eight studies were included for final analysis. No randomised trial on the topic was found. Urethral surgery might affect different aspects of sexual function: erectile function, ejaculatory function, penile shape and length, and genital sensitivity, leading to severe sexual dysfunction. Patient perception of sexual impairment was related to post-operative satisfaction.

Conclusions

Sexual dysfunction after anterior urethral reconstruction is an important issue that must be appropriately discussed during preoperative patient counselling. Reported outcomes after anterior urethroplasty should include sexual consequences and relevance, evaluated using validated tools.

Long term outcomes of one-stage augmentation anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to summarize and characterize the long-term success of anterior augmentation urethroplasty (AU) in published series. The current literature on AU consists largely of retrospective series reporting intermediate follow-up and incompletely characterize the long term outcomes of AU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed consistent with PRISMA guidelines to characterize long-term outcomes of AU with a minimum upper limit follow-up of 100 months. Penile/preputial skin flaps and graft and oral mucosal graft urethroplasties were included. The primary outcome was stricture-free survival for one-stage AU. Secondary analysis evaluated differences in outcomes based on two failure definitions: the need for intervention versus presence of recurrent stricture on cystoscopy or urethrography. Hazard rates were induced from the reported failure rates of one-stage AU and fixed and random effect models were fitted to the data. Additional subset analysis, removing potential confounders (lichen sclerosus, hypospadias and penile skin graft), was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies met inclusion criteria, and two studies reported separate outcomes for grafts and flaps, and thus were included separately in the analysis. The mean hazard rate across all studies was 0.0044, the corresponding survival rates at 1 year 0.948, 5 years 0.766, 10 years 0.587, and 15 years 0.45. Subset analysis of the 4 select and homogeneous studies noted 1, 5, 10, and 15 years survival rates of 0.97, 0.96, 0.74, and 0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term success rates of augmentation urethroplasty are appear to be worse than previously appreciated and patients should be counseled accordingly. Available at. https://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/pdf/aop/2019-0242RW.pdf.

Evaluation of patient reported outcome measures post urethroplasty: Piloting a “Trifecta” approach

BACKGROUND

Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty is the gold standard treatment for urethral stricture disease. Toowoomba has obtained a fellowship trained urethroplasty surgeon who has been performing urethroplasties for the last two years. Patient reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires allow for a detailed and standardized analysis of success and morbidity post urethroplasty and can be used as a reference point against which urethral surgeons can benchmark their performance.

AIM

To assess whether patient compliance rates improved with the use of an abridged PROM questionnaire.

METHODS

Our database of urethroplasty patients was searched to identify patients who had completed the original PROM. This is routinely requested to be completed at the 3-, 6- and 12-mo mark. All patients are asked to complete the questionnaire and to bring it back to their next appointment. Our original PROM consists of the international prostate symptom score, the sexual health index measure and the Global Response Assessment. An abridged version of the questionnaire was derived focusing on urinary flow, sexual function and overall quality of life and consisted of three questions.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included in our study. Fifty-four patients had been invited to complete the original PROM with an overall compliance rate of 30%. Compliance rates improved to 91% with the introduction of the modified PROM. No correlation between non-compliance and patient factors were found. There was also no significant difference in patient reported quality of life when comparing urinary flow and sexual function.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of PROMs pre- and post-operatively to accurately determine the level of patient satisfaction. We acknowledge the aversion of patients in completing PROMs due to the length of these questionnaires. We propose a simplistic version aimed at the “Trifecta” of urethroplasty comprising of three questions focusing each on urinary flow, sexual function and quality of life. Our modified PROM demonstrated markedly improved compliance rates and can be used as a screening tool to identify patients who might have had a poor outcome and who require a more in-depth assessment.

Comparison between dorsal onlay and one-sided dorsolateral onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in long anterior urethral strictures

OBJECTIVE

To compare dorsal onlay (conventional Barbagli) and one-sided dorsolateral onlay (Kulkarni technique) buccal mucosa substitution urethroplasty techniques for the treatment of long anterior urethral strictures.

METHODS

Demographic data, treatment outcomes and success rates of patients who underwent either conventional Barbagli or Kulkarni urethroplasty for the treatment of an anterior urethral stricture longer than 8 cm between January 2010 and March 2019 in our center were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Demographic parameters of patients who underwent the conventional Barbagli (n = 37) or Kulkarni procedure (n = 31) did not differ. The mean surgical duration and hospital stay were shorter for patients treated with the Kulkarni technique (179.5 ± 30.0 and 3.5 ± 1.2 vs 195.5 ± 28.9 min and 4.4 ± 1.8 days; P = 0.037, P = 0.002). Mean intraoperative blood loss and perioperative complication rates were signficantly lower in patients who underwent the Kulkarni technique than those who underwent the conventional Barbagli technique (164.3 ± 62.9 vs 202.4 ± 78.1 mL; P = 0.033 and 16.1% vs 37.8%; P = 0.046). The mean follow-up time period was 59.8 ± 24.7 and 63.5 ± 26.8 months for Kulkarni and conventional Barbagli techniques, respectively. Success rates based these follow-up time periods were 27 (87.1%) and 26 (70.3%) for the Kulkarni and conventional Barbagli techniques, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Kulkarni technique should be more preferred for the treatment of long anterior urethral strictures over the conventional Barbagli technique based on surgical outcomes and success rates.

The outcomes of Kulkarni's one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty in patients with panurethral stricture: a single centre experience

PURPOSE

To present the results of our one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty series for panurethral strictures.

METHODS

We included the first 35 patients who had one stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty with one side dissection of the urethra which was described by Kulkarni, between January 2015 and June 2018 and had at least 6 months follow-up. From the first case, all data were recorded prospectively and patient age, etiology of the stricture, comorbidities, previous treatments, postoperative maximal flow rate, pre and post-operative erectile function, perioperative and postoperative complications and quality of life questionnaire for this study.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 58.8 and mean stricture length was 13.6 (10-16) cm. Patients had previously 1-17 procedures. Patients had a mean peak flow rate of 25.4 ml/sec at the first postoperative visit. During the follow-up period, six patients had recurrence and managed with urethral dilation (1), direct vision internal urethrotomy (2), meatoplasty (1) and re-urethroplasty (2). The responses to the questions about satisfaction from the surgery showed that 31 (88.6%) patients were satisfied with the surgery, 33 (94.3%) would prefer this procedure again, if needed, and 31 (88.6%) patients recommended this procedure to others. When patients were grouped according to age, recurrence rate was 35.7% in patients older than 65 years and 4.8% in patients ≤ 65 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that Kulkarni's one-stage oral mucosa graft urethroplasty technique has a high success rate. The patient satisfaction is high because of the good functional outcomes and low complication rate.