New Tools to Measure Ejaculatory Latency-Arousal to Ejaculation Time Interval and Erection to Ejaculation Time Interval: A Pilot Study

Validation of holding time, a novel tool to assess control over ejaculation in males: A pilot study

Premature ejaculation (PE) is considered as a disorder of perceived loss of ejaculatory control. However, we cannot objectively estimate ejaculatory control due to the absence of an objective tool to measure it. Hence, we designed a pilot study to validate holding time (HoT), a novel objective tool, hypothesized by us, to measure ejaculatory control in men. The construct validity of this tool to differentiate premature ejaculators from normal ejaculators was also assessed in our sample. The study sample had 10 healthy, sexually active normal ejaculators, and 10 premature ejaculators, who volunteered to participate in the study conducted from May 2020 to April 2021. The mean HoT in normal ejaculators was 120.2 ± 31.7 s and the same in premature ejaculators was 32.9 ± 12.9 s. Both the normal (r = 0.983) as well as premature ejaculators (r = 0.839) had good test-retest reliability. The construct validity of HoT to diagnose PE was good with 90% sensitivity, 91% specificity, 63.8% positive predictive value, and 98.1% negative predictive value to diagnose PE when compared with diagnosis by a standard tool. It could be concluded that HoT successfully measured ejaculatory control in men and differentiated normal ejaculators from the premature ejaculators in the sample studied.

Distribution and relation of arousal to ejaculatory latency time, erection to ejaculation latency time, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time in Indian men: A pilot study

Introduction

Arousal to ejaculation latency time interval (AETI) and erection to ejaculation latency time interval (EETI) are new tools used to measure ejaculatory latency time (ET). Unlike intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT), they are applicable for sexual activities other than penovaginal intercourse and do not require penetration. We assessed the distribution and relation between AETI, EETI, and IELT in Indian men.

Methods

Voluntary participation was sought to recruit subjects reporting premature ejaculation (PE) and normal ejaculation. Those able to record the ETs correctly were then asked to record their ETs for two subsequent sexual events.

Results

A total of 26 subjects (13 - normal and 13 - PE) were able to complete the study. The mean age of the participants was 29.85 ± 4.8 years, with no difference seen between the two groups. The mean AETI, EETI, and IELT were 817 ± 592.016 s, 726 ± 566.346 s, and 582 ± 450.859 s, respectively, in normal subjects. PE subjects had significantly lesser mean ETs, AETI 80.62 ± 24.74 s, EETI 53.46 ± 25.441 s, and IELT 21 ± 14.785 s. Regression analysis found that 131.67 s of AETI and 99.58 s of EETI were equivalent to 60 s of IELT.

Conclusions

AETI and EETI have positively skewed distribution similar to IELT. Premature ejaculators had less difference between AETI and EETI, suggesting that sexual cycle gets completed immediately following arousal in these subjects causing PE.

Defining ejaculatory latencies in heterosexual males using novel tools in all types of sexual encounters in multinational population sample

Research into ejaculatory dysfunction in sexual activities other than penovaginal intercourse is limited due to the absence of well-defined tools to measure ejaculatory latencies in these sexual activities. Our pilot study using Arousal to Ejaculation Time Interval (AETI) and Erection to Ejaculation Time Interval (EETI) as tools to measure ejaculatory latencies in different types of sexual encounters in medical professionals had yielded promising results. Hence, we conducted a similar study using AETI and EETI as tools, measured using stopwatch in healthy, sexually active heterosexual male population in a multinational sample from January 2018 to December 2020. Though mean AETI and EETI differed in different sexual activities, on analysing them across all sexual activities, mean AETI and EETI in normal ejaculators, premature ejaculators and delayed ejaculators were 10.3 ± 5.81 min and 6.8 ± 4.13 min, 4.31 ± 2.98 min and 3.35 ± 3.06 min and 20.9 ± 16.1 min and 16.3 ± 10.6 min respectively. Both AETI and EETI were significantly different from normal to premature as well as normal to delayed ejaculators (p-value < 0.05). It could be concluded that these novel tools can help to measure ejaculatory latencies in sexual activities in heterosexual males.

Advantages and limitations of current premature ejaculation assessment and diagnostic methods: a review

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common male sexual dysfunction worldwide. Characteristic symptoms of PE are unexpected, rapid, complete ejaculation, which negatively impacts the sexual act for both sexual partners. Despite the existence of a definitive PE classification system and various diagnostic tools, diagnosing PE is still challenging due to the limitations associated with the assessment of this condition. Hence, it is necessary to review the diagnostic methods and processes of the physical examination that are currently performed in the medical setting. It is also important to analyze any controversial results of each main PE assessment method and propose novel diagnostic and assessment methods. To date, it is important to verify the accuracy of the PE evaluation method due to the ambiguity of previous definitions and proven invalidity of current examining techniques. Clinical diagnosis is based mainly on the patient history, patient-reported outcome scores, and diagnostic tools. Introduction of intravaginal ejaculatory latency time, penile biothesiometry, and the electrophysiological test provided objective means of evaluating PE. Due to the controversial and inconclusive findings in PE psychogenic and neurogenic etiology, utilizing a single parameter to describe and qualify PE using the aforementioned diagnostic methods provides valuable, but insufficient information for PE diagnosis. There is still a lack of a feasible and plausible means of objective measurement to evaluate the ejaculatory latency and control over ejaculation. Consequently, a comprehensive penile stimulation that simulates sexual intercourse could be useful to record intensity and duration parameters before the ejaculatory threshold, providing a more accurate method of describing and diagnosing PE versus a single chronological observation.

Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation-a novel therapy for premature ejaculation: results of a proof of concept study

Premature Ejaculation (PE) is a very common and disturbing sexual dysfunction in men. Currently available treatment modalities are associated with limited efficacy and low treatment adherence. In this prospective, single-blinded, self-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) for the treatment of (PE). We included 23 patients aged 20-60 (mean: 38.7) with lifelong PE. On the first visit, we delivered either TES or sham treatment to the perineum, based on the enrollment order. For stimulation, we used a commercial neuromuscular electrical stimulation device. The patients were invited for the second visit after at least 7 days for receiving the alternating treatment. During the treatment sessions, the patients were left alone in a privet silent room to masturbate and a stopwatch was used to measure their masturbation ejaculatory latency time (MELT). The patients also filled-out safety questionnaires after each visit and on each of the 3 following days. Of the 20 patients who completed the study, 17 (85%) experienced prolonged MELT under TES compared with the sham treatment. Mean MELT values increased 3.5-folds under TES (p = 0.0009). We demonstrated a significant increase in MELT in lifelong PE patients using TES. This therapeutic option may have the potential to become an on-demand treatment option for PE. Future studies with wireless devices are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment concept during intercourse.