1
|
Tanariyakul M, Saowapa S, Aiumtrakul N, Wannaphut C, Polpichai N, Siladech P. Clinical characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in the transplanted kidney in renal transplant recipients: a systematic scoping review. Proc AMIA Symp 2024; 37:832-838. [PMID: 39165804 PMCID: PMC11332624 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2375705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Renal transplant recipients confront a substantially elevated susceptibility to renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in their native kidneys as opposed to allografts. Methods In this systematic scoping review, exhaustive searches were conducted of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Information was gathered on clinical manifestations, donor demographics, diagnostic intervals, tumor dimensions, histopathological characteristics, and therapeutic outcomes associated with RCC arising in allograft kidneys. Results The searches yielded a corpus of 42 case reports and 11 retrospective cohorts, encompassing a cohort of 274 patients. The majority of cases (75.4%) were clinically latent, discerned primarily through imaging modalities. Symptomatic presentations encompassed manifestations such as hematuria, elevated serum creatinine levels, abdominal discomfort, and graft-related pain. The mean temporal interval between renal transplantation and RCC diagnosis was calculated at 11.6 years, albeit displaying considerable variance. Notably, papillary and clear cell RCC emerged as the prevailing histopathological subtypes. However, the paucity of longitudinal follow-up data represents a notable caveat. Conclusion This investigation underscores the imperative of rigorous posttransplant surveillance regimes owing to the substantial prevalence of asymptomatic RCC instances. Future research should focus on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of screening practices to develop preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasawee Tanariyakul
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Sakditad Saowapa
- Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA
| | - Noppawit Aiumtrakul
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Chalothorn Wannaphut
- Department of Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Natchaya Polpichai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Pharit Siladech
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bodard S, Boudhabhay I, Dariane C, Delavaud C, Guinebert S, Guétat P, Mejean A, Timsit MO, Anglicheau D, Joly D, Hélénon O, Correas JM. Thermoablative Treatment of De Novo Tumor in Kidney Allograft. Transplantation 2024; 108:567-578. [PMID: 37726878 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The overall cancer risk increases in transplant patients, including in kidney allografts. This study aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with kidney allograft malignant tumors who underwent percutaneous thermal ablation. METHODS We included 26 renal allograft tumors, including 7 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCCs), 16 papillary RCCs, 1 clear-cell papillary RCC, and 2 tubulocystic RCCs, treated in 19 ablation sessions. Outcomes of thermal ablation therapy were assessed, including technical success, adverse events, local tumor progression, development of metastases, survival after thermal ablation, and changes in renal function. RESULTS Success rate was achieved in all ablation sessions (primary success rate: 96%; secondary success rate: 100%). No adverse events were observed in grades 3, 4, or 5. The median follow-up period was of 34 mo (15-69 mo). Two patients died during follow-up from a cause independent of renal cancer. The median decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 y after procedure was -4 (interquartile range, -7 to 0) mL/min/1.73 m 2 . One patient returned to dialysis within the year of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous thermal ablation shows convincing results for treating malignant renal graft tumors and should be a useful treatment option. The shorter hospitalization time, the advantage of avoiding a potentially challenging dissection of the transplant, and the excellent preservation of allograft function appear encouraging to extend this indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Bodard
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR 7371, INSERM U 1146, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Paris, France
- École Doctorale Sciences Mécaniques, Acoustique, Électronique & Robotique, Paris, France
- Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Francophone en Onco-Néphrologie, Paris, France
| | - Idris Boudhabhay
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Charles Dariane
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Delavaud
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
| | - Sylvain Guinebert
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Guétat
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Mejean
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Marc-Olivier Timsit
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Service d'Urologie, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Joly
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service de Néphrologie-transplantation rénale adultes, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Hélénon
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Michel Correas
- AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Service d'Imagerie Adulte, Paris, France
- UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS UMR 7371, INSERM U 1146, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crocerossa F, Autorino R, Derweesh I, Carbonara U, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Rubio-Briones J, Roupret M, Breda A, Volpe A, Mir MC. Management of renal cell carcinoma in transplant kidney: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:1-16. [PMID: 36094386 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04881-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After transplantation, approximately 10% of renal cell carcinomas are detected in graft kidneys. These tumors (gRCC) present surgeons with the difficulty of finding a treatment that guarantees both oncological clearance and maintenance of function. We conducted a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis on the oncology, safety and functional outcomes of the available treatments for gRCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science including any study reporting perioperative, functional and survival outcomes for patients undergoing graft nephrectomy (GN), partial nephrectomy (PN) or thermal ablation (TA) for gRCC. Quade's ANCOVA, Spearman Rho and Pearson χ2, Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank and Standard Cox regression and other tests were used to compare treatments. Studies' quality was evaluated using a modified version of Newcastle Ottawa Scale. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A number of 29 studies (357 patients) were included. No differences between TA and PN were found in terms of safety, functional and oncological outcomes for T1a gRCCs. When applied to pT1b gRCC, PN showed no difference in complications, progression or cancer-specific deaths compared to smaller lesions; PN validity for pT2 gRCCs should be considered unverified due to lack of sufficient evidence. The efficacy and safety of PN or TA for multiple gRCC remain controversial. In case of non-functioning, large (T≥2), complicated or metastatic gRCCs, GN appears to be the most reasonable choice. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Studies with large cohorts and longer follow-up are still needed to clarify oncological and functional differences. CONCLUSIONS PN and TA might be offered as a nephron-sparing treatment in patients with T1a gRCC. There is no significant difference between these options and GN in terms of oncological outcomes and complications. PN and TA offer similar functional outcomes and graft preservation. PN for T1b gRCC seems feasible and safe, but its validity should be considered unverified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.,Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | - Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.,Unit of Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Cantiello
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano Oncologia (IVO) Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Department of Urology, GRC5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Urology Department, IMED Hospitals, Valencia, Spain -
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: management of kidney cancer. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1195-1274. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
5
|
Hilton A, Kourounis G, Georgiades F. Irreversible electroporation in renal tumours: A systematic review of safety and early oncological outcomes. Urologia 2022; 89:329-337. [PMID: 35139717 PMCID: PMC9310143 DOI: 10.1177/03915603221077590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We review the safety and early oncological outcomes of irreversible electroporation (IRE), a novel non-thermal ablation technique, in small renal masses (SRMs). Following PROSPERO registration (CRD42020197943), a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases according to PRISMA guidelines was performed. Critical appraisal of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 224 articles screened, 10 met the inclusion criteria. In total, 83 patients were identified. Except for one cohort study (n = 41), the remaining studies were case series of n < 10. Follow up was <12 months in 7/10 articles (range 3–34 months). About 10/10 articles reported safety outcomes. There were no 30-day mortalities. The most frequently reported adverse events were transient haematuria (11/83) and asymptomatic perirenal haematomas (7/83). About 62/63 patients with reported length of stay were discharged within 24 h. No significant long-term changes in renal function were reported. About 7/10 articles reported oncological outcomes. Only one article assessed histopathological outcomes, whilst the remaining studies used cross-sectional imaging modalities to assess efficacy, recurrence or disease progression. About 4/7 patients with histopathology outcomes, showed complete response (CR). About 43/55 patients with radiological outcomes showed CR. No mortalities were reported due to SRMs. These initial findings support IRE as safe and feasible in managing SRMs. However, results from larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate oncological outcomes and compare these with other ablation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidan Hilton
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Georgios Kourounis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
| | - Fanourios Georgiades
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Fanourios Georgiades, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Level 9E, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tillou X, Doerfler A, Szabla N, Verhoest G, Defortescu G, Bessede T, Prudhomme T, Culty T, Bigot P, Bensalah K, Méjean A, Timsit MO. [Renal cell carcinoma of the kidney transplant: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:24-30. [PMID: 33423743 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose recommendations for the management of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) of the renal transplant. METHOD Following a systematic approach, a review of the literature (Medline) was conducted by the CTAFU to evaluate prevalence, diagnosis and management of RCC arousing in the renal transplant. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence. RESULTS Renal cell carcinomas of the renal transplant affect approximately 0.2% of recipients. Mostly asymptomatic, these tumors are mainly diagnosed on a routine imaging of the renal transplant. Predominant pathology is clear cell carcinomas but papillary carcinomas are more frequent than in general population (up to 40-50%). RCC of the renal transplant is often localized, of low stage and low grade. According to tumor characteristics and renal function, preferred treatment is radical (transplantectomy) or nephron sparing through partial nephrectomy (open or minimally invasive approach) or thermoablation after percutaneous biopsy. Although no robust data support a switch of immunosuppressive regimen, some authors suggest to favor the use of mTOR inhibitors. CTAFU does not recommend a mandatory waiting time after transplantectomy for RCC in candidates for a subsequent renal tranplantation when tumor stage<T3 and low ISUP grade. CONCLUSION These French recommendations should contribute to improving the oncological and functional prognosis of renal transplant recipients by improving the management of RCC of the renal transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Tillou
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Caen, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France
| | - A Doerfler
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU Brugmann, place A. Van Gehuchten 4, 1020 Bruxelles, Belgique
| | - N Szabla
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Caen, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France
| | - G Verhoest
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - G Defortescu
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Rouen, 37, boulevard Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - T Bessede
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, université de Paris-Saclay, hôpital de Bicêtre, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - T Prudhomme
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Toulouse, 9, place Lange, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - T Culty
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France
| | - P Bigot
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49100 Angers, France; Comité de cancérologie de l'association française d'urologie (CCAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - K Bensalah
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France; Comité de cancérologie de l'association française d'urologie (CCAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'association française d'urologie (CCAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Inserm, équipe labellisée par la ligue contre le cancer, université de Paris, PARCC, 56, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hôpital Necker, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M-O Timsit
- Comité de transplantation et d'insuffisance rénale chronique de l'association française d'urologie (CTAFU), maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Inserm, équipe labellisée par la ligue contre le cancer, université de Paris, PARCC, 56, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hôpital Necker, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Romagnoli J, Tagliaferri L, Acampora A, Bianchi V, D'Ambrosio V, D'Aviero A, Esposito I, Hohaus S, Iezzi R, Lancellotta V, Maiolo E, Maiorano BA, Paoletti F, Peris K, Posa A, Preziosi F, Rossi E, Scaletta G, Schinzari G, Spagnoletti G, Tanzilli A, Scambia G, Tortora G, Valentini V, Maggiore U, Grandaliano G. Management of the kidney transplant patient with Cancer: Report from a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35:100636. [PMID: 34237586 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2021.100636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer is the second most common cause of mortality and morbidity in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). Immunosuppression can influence the efficacy of cancer treatment and modification of the immunosuppressive regimen may restore anti-neoplastic immune responses improving oncologic prognosis. However, patients and transplant physicians are usually reluctant to modify immunosuppression, fearing rejection and potential graft loss. Due to the lack of extensive and recognised data supporting how to manage the immunosuppressive therapy in KTRs, in the context of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and loco-regional treatments, a Consensus Conference was organised under the auspices of the European Society of Organ Transplantation and the Italian Society of Organ Transplantation. The conference involved a multidisciplinary group of transplant experts in the field across Europe. METHODS The overall process included a) the formulation of 12 specific questions based on the PICO methodology, b) systematic literature review and summary for experts for each question, c) a two-day conference celebration and the collection of experts' agreements. The conference was articulated in three sessions: "Immunosuppressive therapy and immunotherapy", "Systemic therapy", "Integrated Therapy", while the final experts' agreement was collected with a televoting procedure and defined according to the majority criterion. RESULTS Twenty-six European experts attended the conference and expressed their vote. A total of 14 statements were finally elaborated and voted. Strong agreement was found for ten statements, moderate agreement for two, moderate disagreement for one and uncertainty for the last one. CONCLUSIONS The consensus statements provide guidance to transplant physicians caring for kidney transplant recipients with cancer and indicate key aspects that need to be addressed by future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Romagnoli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia; Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - Anna Acampora
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Bianchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Viola D'Ambrosio
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Nefrologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Andrea D'Aviero
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Esposito
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. di Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefan Hohaus
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. di Radiologia diagnostica e interventistica generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Elena Maiolo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Brigida A Maiorano
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Unità di Oncologia, Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| | - Filippo Paoletti
- Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Ketty Peris
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. di Dermatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dermatologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Posa
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. di Radiologia diagnostica e interventistica generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Preziosi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Ernesto Rossi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scaletta
- Dipartimento della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Schinzari
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gionata Spagnoletti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Trapianti di Rene, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia; Dipartimento di Chirurgie Specialistiche, Ch. Epato-Bilio-Pancreatica e Dei Trapianti di Fegato e Rene, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tanzilli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, U.O.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, UO Nefrologia, Azienda-Ospedaliero di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grandaliano
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, U.O.C. Nefrologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Motta G, Ferraresso M, Lamperti L, Di Paolo D, Raison N, Perego M, Favi E. Treatment options for localised renal cell carcinoma of the transplanted kidney. World J Transplant 2020; 10:147-161. [PMID: 32742948 PMCID: PMC7360528 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i6.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, there is no consensus among the transplant community about the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the transplanted kidney. Until recently, graftectomy was universally considered the golden standard, regardless of the characteristics of the neoplasm. Due to the encouraging results observed in native kidneys, conservative options such as nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) (enucleation and partial nephrectomy) and ablative therapy (radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and irreversible electroporation) have been progressively used in carefully selected recipients with early-stage allograft RCC. Available reports show excellent patient survival, optimal oncological outcome, and preserved renal function with acceptable complication rates. Nevertheless, the rarity and the heterogeneity of the disease, the number of options available, and the lack of long-term follow-up data do not allow to adequately define treatment-specific advantages and limitations. The role of active surveillance and immunosuppression management remain also debated. In order to offer a better insight into this difficult topic and to help clinicians choose the best therapy for their patients, we performed and extensive review of the literature. We focused on epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work up, staging strategies, tumour characteristics, treatment modalities, and follow-up protocols. Our research confirms that both NSS and focal ablation represent a valuable alternative to graftectomy for kidney transplant recipients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1aN0M0 RCC. Data on T1bN0M0 lesions are scarce but suggest extra caution. Properly designed multi-centre prospective clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Motta
- Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese 27288, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Lamperti
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Dhanai Di Paolo
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Nicholas Raison
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Marta Perego
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Evaldo Favi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elboraey M, Devcic Z, Lewis AR, Ritchie CA, Frey GT, Paz-Fumagalli R, McKinney JM, Toskich BB. Transchondral access for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Case Rep 2020; 15:531-533. [PMID: 32153694 PMCID: PMC7058858 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Ablative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma is standard of care in selected settings and is endorsed by international societal guidelines. Centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma are difficult to treat due to their proximity to vasculature and central bile ducts. Irreversible electroporation is a nonthermal ablation modality that has been shown to preserve the extracellular matrix and is less likely to damage structures such as bile ducts and is not susceptible to vascular heat sink. Successful irreversible electroporation requires the parallel placement of probes which can be prevented by ribs or the sternum. This case report describes the use of the coaxial bone biopsy system to enable transchondral access and facilitate parallel placement of probes during irreversible electroporation IRE for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zlatko Devcic
- Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Street, Jacksonville 32224, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Favi E, Raison N, Ambrogi F, Delbue S, Clementi MC, Lamperti L, Perego M, Bischeri M, Ferraresso M. Systematic review of ablative therapy for the treatment of renal allograft neoplasms. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:2487-2504. [PMID: 31559284 PMCID: PMC6745334 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, there are no guidelines on the treatment of solid neoplasms in the transplanted kidney. Historically, allograft nephrectomy has been considered the only reasonable option. More recently, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and ablative therapy (AT) have been proposed as alternative procedures in selected cases.
AIM To review outcomes of AT for the treatment of renal allograft tumours.
METHODS We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 Checklist. PubMed was searched in March 2019 without time restrictions for all papers reporting on radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and irreversible electroporation (IRE) of solid tumours of the kidney allograft. Only original manuscripts describing actual cases and edited in English were considered. All relevant articles were accessed in full text. Additional searches included all pertinent references. Selected studies were also assessed for methodological quality using a tool based on a modification of the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Data on recipient characteristics, transplant characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment protocols, and treatment outcomes were extracted and analysed. Given the nature and the quality of the studies available (mostly retrospective case reports and small retrospective uncontrolled case series), a descriptive summary was provided.
RESULTS Twenty-eight relevant studies were selected describing a total of 100 AT procedures in 92 patients. Recipient age at diagnosis ranged from 21 to 71 years whereas time from transplant to diagnosis ranged from 0.1 to 312 mo. Most of the neoplasms were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally during imaging carried out for screening purposes or for other clinical reasons. Preferred diagnostic modality was Doppler-ultrasound scan followed by computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Main tumour types were: papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC. Maximal tumour diameter ranged from 5 to 55 mm. The vast majority of neoplasms were T1a N0 M0 with only 2 lesions staged T1b N0 M0. Neoplasms were managed by RFA (n = 78), CA (n = 15), MWA (n = 3), HIFU (n = 3), and IRE (n = 1). Overall, 3 episodes of primary treatment failure were reported. A single case of recurrence was identified. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 81 mo. No cancer-related deaths were observed. Complication rate was extremely low (mostly < 10%). Graft function remained stable in the majority of recipients. Due to the limited sample size, no clear benefit of a single procedure over the other ones could be demonstrated.
CONCLUSION AT for renal allograft neoplasms represents a promising alternative to radical nephrectomy and NSS in carefully selected patients. Properly designed clinical trials are needed to validate this therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evaldo Favi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Nicholas Raison
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Federico Ambrogi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Serena Delbue
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan 20100, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Clementi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Luca Lamperti
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Marta Perego
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Matteo Bischeri
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan 20122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Favi E, Raiteri M, Paone G, Alfieri CM, Ferraresso M. Microwave Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma of the Transplanted Kidney: Two Cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2019; 42:1653-1657. [PMID: 31388701 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02302-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 07/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Thermal ablative techniques have been increasingly recognized as a valuable alternative to graftectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of small neoplasms arising in the transplanted kidney. However, long-term efficacy and safety data are still lacking. In particular, current experience with microwave ablation is limited to a very recent single-centre series of three cases. We herein report two microwave ablations of renal cell carcinoma of the kidney allograft. The procedures were successfully performed under ultrasound guidance with complete tumour necrosis, no peri-operative complications, and preserved renal function. No recurrences were observed after 3 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evaldo Favi
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mauro Raiteri
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paone
- Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Maria Alfieri
- Nephrology and Dialysis, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- Renal Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza n. 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|