Endoscopic Transvesical Adenomectomy of the Prostate, a New Minimal Invasive Approach for Large Benign Prostate Hyperplasia. A Description of the Technique and the Results of the First 40 Patients

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer after surgical treatment of prostatic obstruction: Impact on urinary morbidity and mitigation strategies

In the past decade, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a valid treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer. Despite the promising results of ultra-hypofractionation in terms of tolerance and disease control, the toxicity profile of SBRT for prostate cancer patients with a history of surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia is still underreported. Here we present an overview of the available data on urinary morbidity for prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT after prior surgical treatments for benign prostate hyperplasia. Technical improvements useful to minimize toxicity and possible treatments for radiation-induced urethritis are discussed.

Surgical Treatments of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Radiotherapy: Impact on Long-Term Genitourinary Toxicity

AIMS

Although the results on acute and late toxicity of ultrahypofractionation are encouraging, data on safety in prostate cancer patients with a medical history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or adenomectomy remain scarce, especially in cases of repeated procedures. The aim of the present study was to report on long-term toxicities after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of prostate cancer patients with previous surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 150 patients treated with SBRT (median dose 36.25 Gy in five fractions) realised from 2014 to 2019 in a single-centre institution, data of 24 men with a history of TURP (n = 19) or adenomectomy (n = 5) were analysed. Repeated TURP was carried out in three patients, with a median time between surgery and SBRT of 54 months. Genitourinary toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scale.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 45 months, 10 of 24 (42%) patients experienced at least one episode of transient haematuria. One patient (4%) with three previous TURP presented a grade 3 acute non-infective cystitis. Late grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities were observed in eight (33%) and four patients (17%) (two treated with adenomectomy, one with multiple TURP and one with a 140 cm³ prostate size), respectively, with no grade ≥4 adverse events. A complete recovery of grade 3 genitourinary toxicities was observed for all patients after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

CONCLUSION

Prostate SBRT is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with a medical history of surgical treatments of benign hyperplasia. Patients with prior adenomectomy or multiple TURP are at higher risk of developing severe genitourinary toxicity and should be carefully evaluated before SBRT treatments.

Endoscopic transvesical adenomectomy of the prostate, a new minimally invasive approach for large benign prostatic hyperplasia. What has our experience taught us?

Introduction

Recent technical advances have made new minimally invasive techniques possible to treat large volume (>80 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The endoscopic transperitoneal adenomectomy of the prostate (ETAP) is a new minimally invasive technique developed in our centre. The aim of this study was to describe the safety, efficacy and to evaluate our learning curve in ETAP.

Material and methods

This was a single-centre study that enrolled eighty-eight consecutive patients with large BPH who underwent ETAP. Pre-, per- and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Statistical analysis compared the first 40 patients submitted to ETAP (Group A) with the subsequent 48 patients (Group B).

Results

There were no significant differences in the surgical procedure between groups. The median operating time was 94 (80-110) minutes and the estimated blood loss 150 (100-300) ml. There were no perioperative blood transfusions nor any conversions to open approach needed. Median hospital stay was 3 (3-5) days and catheter was removed mainly at day 9 (5-11). The median Qmax improved from 8.0 (6.2-9.9) ml/s to 15.0 (11.5-23.0) ml/s postoperatively and the median International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score decreased from 20 (15-24) to 6 (4-11) after the procedure.

Conclusions

ETAP is a secure and feasible minimally invasive technique for treatment of large BPH. The functional outcomes of this technique are consistent and promising.