1
|
Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R. Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:242-252. [PMID: 38680592 PMCID: PMC11053284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of ureteroscopy in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is yet to be fully determined. We aimed to provide an up to date evaluation of its role and the emerging technologies in the field. Methods A literature search of the last two decades (from 24th May, 2001 to 24th May, 2021) was carried out identifying 147 papers for potential inclusion within this narrative review. Results Diagnostic ureteroscopy is undeniably useful in its ability to visualise and biopsy indeterminate lesions, and to risk stratify malignant lesions that may be suitable for kidney sparing surgery. However, an increased risk of intravesical recurrence following nephroureterectomy when a prior diagnostic ureteroscopy has been performed, inadequate sampling at biopsy, complications from the procedure, and difficult ureteric access are all potential drawbacks. Furthermore, whilst generally an accurate diagnostic procedure, it risks missing carcinoma in-situ lesions. Despite this, evidence shows that routine use of ureteroscopy changes the management of patients in a large proportion of cases, preventing unnecessary surgery or facilitating kidney sparing surgery. The overall rate of complications is low, and improved biopsy techniques and the use of tissue biomarkers for improved staging and grading are encouraging. The risks of delays to definitive management and post-ureteroscopy intravesical recurrence do not seem to affect survival, and trials are in progress to determine whether intravesical therapy can mitigate the latter. Further promising techniques are being investigated to improve shortcomings, particularly in relation to improved diagnosis of carcinoma in situ and preoperative staging. Conclusion Ureteroscopy has a role in the diagnosis of upper tract malignancy, though whether it should be used routinely is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Cullum
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henderickx MMEL, Hendriks N, Baard J, Beerlage HP, Boom DT, Bosschieter J, Bouma-Houwert AC, Legemate JD, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Postema AW, Rongen LH, Ronkes BL, Scheltema MJV, van der Sluis TM, Wagstaff PGK, Kamphuis GM. Is It the Load That Breaks You or the Way You Carry It: How Demanding Is Endourology? J Endourol 2023; 37:718-728. [PMID: 37029790 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: Surgical outcomes are dependent on multiple factors. Besides patient-related or procedure-related factors, several surgeon-related factors contribute to surgical outcomes. The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) questionnaire helps to assess the impact of several stressors on the perceived demands of surgeons during surgery. In this study, we evaluate the applicability of the SURG-TLX questionnaire for endourologic procedures and set a first point of reference. Materials and Methods: Between March and August 2022, 15 urologists and urology residents at a tertiary referral center for endourology completed the SURG-TLX questionnaire after endourologic procedures. After data acquisition, all participants were asked to evaluate the applicability of the questionnaire for endourologic procedures. Results: A total of 130 procedures were included between March and August 2022. Situational stress had the lowest median score (3.0/20; interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-7.0) and task complexity the highest (5.0/20; IQR 3.0-8.0). After weighing, the dimensions showed different proportions when compared with the nonweighted scores. Distractions received the highest score (15.0/100; IQR 7.5-32.8), temporal demands (6.0/100; IQR 3.0-12.5), and situational stress the lowest (6.0/100; IQR 2.0-21.0). This was caused by the higher weight that was attributed to distractions (3.4/5), as opposed to task complexity (2.6/5). In the questionnaire regarding applicability of the SURG-TLX, the overall satisfaction (6.0/10; IQR 5.0-7.0) and clarity (6.5/10; IQR 5.0-7.5) were moderate. The user-friendliness and applicability of the questionnaire were rated high (7.0/10; IQR 5.5-8.0 and 7.0/10; IQR 6.0-8.0, respectively) and task load (3.0/10; IQR 2.0-5.0) and time load (2.0/10; IQR 2.0-3.5) low. Conclusion: The SURG-TLX questionnaire is appropriate to assess the different dimensions of workload during endourologic procedures. Furthermore, the perceived workload during endourologic procedures is relatively low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël M E L Henderickx
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nora Hendriks
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne T Boom
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Carolien Bouma-Houwert
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap D Legemate
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud W Postema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieske H Rongen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje L Ronkes
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs J V Scheltema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim M van der Sluis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter G K Wagstaff
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henderickx MMEL, Stoots SJM, de Bruin DM, Wijkstra H, Freund JE, Wiseman O, Ploumidis A, Skolarikos A, Somani BK, Sener TE, Emiliani E, Dragos L, Villa L, Talso M, Daudon M, Traxer O, Kronenberg P, Doizi S, Tailly T, Tefik T, Hendriks N, Beerlage HP, Baard J, Kamphuis GM. How reliable is endoscopic stone recognition? A comparison between visual stone identification and formal stone analysis. J Endourol 2022; 36:1362-1370. [PMID: 35651279 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy and intra-observer agreement of endoscopic stone recognition compared with formal stone analysis. INTRODUCTION Stone analysis is a corner stone in the prevention of stone recurrence. Although X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy are the recommended techniques for reliable formal stone analysis, this is not always possible, and the process takes time and is costly. Endoscopic stone recognition could be an alternative as it would give immediate information on stone composition. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifteen endourologists predicted stone composition based on 100 videos from ureterorenoscopy. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by comparing the prediction from visual assessment with stone analysis by X-ray diffraction. After 30 days, the videos were reviewed again in a random order to assess intra-observer agreement. RESULTS The median diagnostic accuracy for calcium oxalate monohydrate was of 54% in questionnaire 1 (Q1) and 59% in questionnaire 2 (Q2), whereas calcium oxalate dihydrate had a median diagnostic accuracy of 75% in Q1 and 50% in Q2. The diagnostic accuracy for calcium hydroxyphosphate was 10% in Q1 and 13% in Q2. The median diagnostic accuracy for calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate and calcium magnesium phosphate was 0% in both questionnaires. The median diagnostic accuracy for magnesium ammonium phosphate was in 20% in Q1 and 40% in Q2. The median diagnostic accuracy for uric acid was 22% in both questionnaires. Finally, there was a diagnostic accuracy of 60% in Q1 and 80% in Q2 for cystine. The intra-observer agreement ranged between 45-72%. CONCLUSION Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic stone recognition is limited and intra-observer agreement is below the threshold of acceptable agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël M E L Henderickx
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - Simone J M Stoots
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - D Martijn de Bruin
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - Hessel Wijkstra
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands.,Eindhoven University of Technology, 3169, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands;
| | - Jan Erik Freund
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - Oliver Wiseman
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Urology, 14 Herons Close, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CB1 8NS;
| | | | - Andreas Skolarikos
- University of Athens, 2nd Department of Urology, 6 LASKAREOS ST, NEA ZOI PERISTERI, Athens, Greece, 12137;
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- University Hospitals Southampton NHS Trust, Urology, Southampton, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Tarik Emre Sener
- Marmara University School of Medicine, Urology, Fevzi Çakmak Mah. Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Cad. No: 10 Üst Kaynarca / Pendik / İSTANBUL, Istanbul, Turkey, 34890;
| | | | - Laurian Dragos
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 2153, Department of Urology, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;
| | - Luca Villa
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Urology, Via Olgettina, 60, Milan, Italy, 20132;
| | - Michele Talso
- ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 472674, Urology - Ospedale Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy;
| | - Michel Daudon
- Hôpital Tenon, 55705, Department of Urology, Paris, Île-de-France, France.,Sorbonne Universite, 27063, GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Paris, Île-de-France, France;
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Hopital Tenon, 55705, Department of Urology, Paris, Île-de-France, France.,Sorbonne Universite, 27063, GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Paris, Île-de-France, France;
| | - Peter Kronenberg
- Hospital CUF Descobertas, 162265, Department of Urology , Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Steeve Doizi
- Hopital Tenon, 55705, Department of Urology, Paris, Île-de-France, France.,Sorbonne Universite, 27063, GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Paris, Île-de-France, France;
| | | | - Tzevat Tefik
- Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, 64041, Department of Urology, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey;
| | - Nora Hendriks
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - Joyce Baard
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| | - Guido M Kamphuis
- Amsterdam UMC Locatie Meibergdreef, 26066, Department of Urology, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baard J, Cormio L, Cavadas V, Alcaraz A, Shariat SF, de la Rosette J, Laguna MP. Contemporary patterns of presentation, diagnostics and management of upper tract urothelial cancer in 101 centres: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Global upper tract urothelial carcinoma registry. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:354-362. [PMID: 34009177 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To assess patterns of presentation, diagnostics and treatment in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a multicentre registry was launched. Clinical data of UTUC patients were prospectively collected over a 5-year period. RECENT FINDINGS Data from 2380 patients were included from 2014 to 2019 (101 centres in 29 countries). Patients were predominantly male (70.5%) and 53.3% were past or present smokers. The majority of patients (58.1%) were evaluated because of symptoms, mainly macroscopic hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) was the most common performed imaging modality (90.5%). A ureteroscopy (URS) was part of the diagnostic process in 1184 (49.7%) patients and 488 (20.5%) patients were treated endoscopically. In total, 1430 patients (60.1%) were treated by a radical nephroureterectomy, 59% without a prior diagnostic URS. Eighty-two patients (3.4%) underwent a segmental resection, 19 patients (0.8%) were treated by a percutaneous tumour resection. SUMMARY Our data is in line with the known epidemiologic characteristics of UTUC. CT imaging is the preferred imaging modality as also recommended by guidelines. Diagnostic URS gained a stronger position, however, in almost half of patients a definitive treatment decision was made without complete endoscopic information. Only one-third of patients with UTUC are currently treated with kidney sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Vitor Cavadas
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Department of Urology Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Motol Hospital Charles University, Praque, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, I.M. Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria P Laguna
- Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freund JE, Duivenvoorden MJC, Sikma BT, Vernooij RWM, Savci-Heijink CD, Legemate JD, de Reijke TM. The Diagnostic Yield and Concordance of Ureterorenoscopic Biopsies for Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Dutch Nationwide Analysis. J Endourol 2020; 34:907-913. [PMID: 32483982 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and concordance of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) grading between ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections. Materials and Methods: The nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands [PALGA]) was searched for UTUC-positive renal units (RUs) with histopathology excerpts from ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections, matched for laterality and localization of the tumor, from 2011 until 2018. The positive predictive value (concordance) of the biopsy grade with regard to the final grade according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 classification was calculated. Results: A total of 1002 UTUC-positive rental units were included, of which 776 UTUC-positive RUs were graded according to the WHO 2004 classification in the ureterorenoscopic biopsy, the localization-matched surgical resection, or in both. The diagnostic yield of biopsies for a classifying diagnosis was 89% with a sensitivity for UTUC of 84%. In case of UTUC, the diagnostic yield for biopsy-based grading and staging was 97% and 72%, respectively. The concordance of high-grade biopsies with regard to the final histopathology was 97% and 62% for low-grade biopsies. Upgrading to final high grade occurred in 33% of the low-grade biopsies. Downgrading to final low grade occurred in 2% of high-grade biopsies. Conclusions: This is the first study to portray the limitations of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for UTUC in a nationwide cohort. The diagnostic yield of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for a classifying diagnosis is suboptimal, but the diagnostic yield for grading according to the WHO 2004 classification is high. Yet, a worrisome amount of ureterorenoscopic biopsies are upgraded with regard to the surgical resection. Consequently, one-third of patients, who qualify for kidney-sparing treatment according to one of the criteria recommended for risk stratification, might be stratified incorrectly. These findings stress the importance of a timely and stringent ureterorenoscopic follow-up after kidney-sparing surgery and highlight the need for improvements in the diagnostic approach to optimize the risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Erik Freund
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mylène J C Duivenvoorden
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boukje T Sikma
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin W M Vernooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaap D Legemate
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|