Undescended Testis Does Not Affect the Outcome of Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes in azoospermic patients with bilateral orchidopexy

BACKGROUND

Cryptorchidism is considered to be one of the most common causes of non-obstructive azoospermia. There are several surgical techniques to retrieve sperm in these patients. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE) is a recent sperm retrieval technique which is considered to be a safe, non-blind, and feasible method.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by the mTESE method in patients who have undergone orchidopexy due to bilateral cryptorchidism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 56 ex-cryptorchid patients, who underwent mTESE due to post orchidopexy azoospermia, were included. Patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, Klinefelter syndrome, azoospermia factors (AZF) microdeletion, or chromosomal translocation were excluded from the study. Data were obtained from medical files.

RESULTS

SRR in this study was 46%. Patients were divided into two groups of negative (n = 30) and positive (n = 26) based on the sperm extraction outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding the mean age at mTESE, mean age at orchidopexy, testicular size, and serum testosterone concentration. However, testicular location, histological patterns, FSH, and LH level showed to have statistically significant relation with sperm retrieval results. But, according to our logistic regression, none of the included variable in the model including FSH, LH, histopathology, and testis location have a significant effect on the presence of the sperm.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, SRR was significantly higher in patients with scrotal testis and low level of FSH and LH.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing mTESE could be recommended in ex-cryptorchid patients with post orchidopexy NOA. Preoperative testicular biopsy seems to be unnecessary while clinical criteria can perfectly define NOA.

Staged Laboratory Processing of Testicular Tissue in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia May Rescue Retrieving an Existing Sperm: A Case Report and Literature Review

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is the most difficult form of male infertility to manage. It usually requires sperm retrieval from the testis, which is most challenging due to sperm rarity. Here, we describe the recovery of testicular sperms that had been missing and whose original retrieval results were negative. Salvage microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and sperm testing were performed on a 36-year-old male with NOA. Neither in the operation room nor after an inspection in the embryology laboratory were any sperm detected. The obtained tissue was advised to be frozen because the patient data and surgical microscopy predicted a favorable outcome, and the tissue processing was done in an inappropriate environment. About 1 month later, the specimen was thawed, crushed, and re-examined. Successful oocyte fertilization resulted from an effective detection of sperms and their direction to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. This is the first case report that, to the best of our knowledge, describes the stepwise laboratory processing of testicular tissue and its capacity to recover lost sperms in challenging NOA cases and under less-than-ideal working conditions.

Azoospermic Men with a History of Cryptorchidism Treated by Orchiopexy Have Favorable Outcomes after Testicular Sperm Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and pregnancy rate after testicular sperm extraction in men with azoospermia and those with a history of cryptorchidism treated by orchiopexy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SRR and clinical pregnancy rate were investigated. We performed a sub-analysis that included factors such as bilaterality, age, and idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA). The analysis comprised 13 studies from January 1995 to July 2021. The data sources were PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library included "cryptorchidism", "orchidopexy", "azoospermia", and "testicular sperm extraction".

RESULTS

The overall mean SRR was 63.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.6%-68.6%; I²=62.4%), and the overall mean clinical pregnancy rate was 30.1% (95% CI, 22.6%-38.8%; I²=69.9%). The meta-analysis comparing the SRR, there was no significant difference between patients with a history of bilateral and unilateral orchiopexy (relative risk [RR]=1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.16; p=0.79). Orchiopexy performed under the age of 10 years showed significantly increased SRR compared to the age of over 10 years (RR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.47; p=0.008). Azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism treated by orchiopexy had significantly higher SRR than iNOA (RR=1.90; 95% CI, 1.40-2.58; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Men with azoospermia and a history of cryptorchidism treated by orchiopexy had significantly higher SRR than those with iNOA after testicular sperm extraction. Furthermore, patients who underwent orchiopexy before the age of ten years had significantly higher SRR than patients operated at an older than the age of ten years.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature

PURPOSE

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is associated with intrinsic testicular defects that severely impair sperm production. Although NOA invariably leads to infertility, focal sperm production may exist in the testicles of affected patients, which can be retrieved and used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to generate healthy offspring. However, geographic locations of testicular sperm producing-areas are uncertain, making microsurgical-guided sperm retrieval (microdissection testicular sperm extraction; micro-TESE) an attractive method to identify and retrieve sperm in patients with NOA due to spermatogenic failure. Given the widespread use of micro-TESE, its effectiveness in harvesting sperm and related potential complications need to be clarified.

METHODS

We queried PubMed/MEDLINE for studies published in English, from inception to May 2021, concerning the effect of micro-TESE on sperm retrieval rate (SRR), complication rate and ICSI pregnancy rate-using retrieved testicular sperm in subfertile couples where the male had NOA.

RESULTS

We found 116 articles, including 70 original papers, 32 review articles, and 14 systematic reviews. The evidence accounted for 4895 patients. Micro-TESE retrieved sperm in 46.6% of men with NOA, but SRRs varied considerably (18.4-70.8%) and were mainly related to the treated population characteristics. Concerning the general population of NOA patients who have not undergone previous sperm retrieval (naïve population), the SRR by micro-TESE was 46.8% (1833 of 3914 patients; range 20-70.8%; 28 studies). In studies reporting SR by micro-TESE for men who had failed percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration or non-microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, the SRR was 39.1% (127 of 325 patients; range 18.4-57.1%; 4 studies). Data on adverse events indicated that micro-TESE was associated with low (~ 3%) short-term postoperative complication rates. The fertilizing ability of testicular sperm retrieved by micro-TESE and used for ICSI was adequate (~ 57%), whereas clinical pregnancy and live birth were obtained in 39% and 24% of couples who had an embryo transfer, respectively. The health of the resulting children seems reassuring, but the evidence is limited. The procedure increases sperm retrieval success compared to non-microsurgical retrieval methods, particularly in men with Sertoli cell-only testicular histopathology.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that micro-TESE is an effective and safe method to retrieve sperm from men with NOA-related infertility, with potential advantages over non-microsurgical methods. Nevertheless, high-quality, head-to-head comparative randomized controlled trials by sperm retrieval method, focusing on SRR, live birth rate and assessing long-term adverse events and health of children conceived using testicular sperm from NOA patients are lacking. Therefore, further research is required to determine the full clinical implications of micro-TESE in male infertility treatment.

Fertility potential in adult men treated for uncorrected bilateral cryptorchidism: A systematic literature review and analysis of case reports

OBJECTIVE

Reports of adult orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testicles (bUDT) are sparse, and fertility outcomes are not well established. Our aim was to determine prognosis for restoration of spermatogenesis among adult men (≥18 years) undergoing orchidopexy for bUDT.

METHODS

A systematic literature review, conforming to the PRISMA statement, was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through March 2020 using search terms "adult" AND "bilateral orchidopexy" OR "bilateral cryptorchidism." Relevant referenced articles from non-indexed journal were identified by Google Scholar search and additionally included.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven publications including adult men with uncorrected bilateral UDTs were identified. Baseline semen analysis was reported in 157 men, all of whom demonstrated azoospermia. Testosterone values were reported in 82 cases and were normal in 89%. Germ cells could not be identified in 72.6% of histologic specimens from 62 testicles. Abdominal testicles more frequently lacked germ cells (90%, p = 0.038) on univariate analysis. Eleven cases identified ejaculated spermatozoa following adult bilateral orchidopexy (8 publications). Sperm extraction (TESE) during orchidopexy or orchiectomy was reported in 13 men without success. Delayed TESE (median 10 months) was performed in 22 persistently azoospermic men with success in 10 (45.5%), none of whom had abdominal testicles prior to orchidopexy. Six men experienced successful paternity via natural conception (3) or assisted reproduction (3).

CONCLUSION

Fertility is possible in adult men with inguinal bUDT following orchidopexy. Subsequent sperm retrieval may involve ejaculated specimens or delayed TESE. TESE performed prior to or at time of orchidopexy is unlikely to be of benefit.