High-Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Selecting the Appropriate Patient for Timely Cystectomy

Intravesical Therapy Compared to Radical Cystectomy Among Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Requiring Additional Treatment After Induction BCG

BACKGROUND

Many patients with recurrent high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after intravesical bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) face a difficult decision between radical cystectomy (RC) or salvage intravesical therapy (IVT). We sought to determine if there is a difference in overall survival RC and IVT after previous treatment with BCG.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with Ta, T1, and Tis bladder cancer treated with induction BCG in the SEER-Medicare dataset from 2000 to 2015. We used a proportional hazards regression model to compare differences in survival between patients having RC and IVT. We adjusted for confounding using a propensity score and stratified our analysis according to timing of treatment and stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 3940 patients who received either IVT (79%) or RC (21%) following induction BCG. Among patients treated within 12 months of BCG, there was no significant difference in survival between RC and IVT (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.04) and 17% of patients having early IVT ultimately required RC. Among patients treated at least 12 months after BCG, RC was associated with worse survival than IVT (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.35) and 10% of patients having late IVT ultimately required RC.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with bladder cancer who required additional treatments after induction BCG, we did not observe a difference in overall survival between IVT and RC within 12 months of starting BCG. While RC remains the gold-standard for high risk recurrent NMIBC after BCG, bladder preservation with IVT may be appropriate for well-selected patients.

European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel

BACKGROUND

The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s.

OBJECTIVE

To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004-2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule.