The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation

Evaluation of the 24-h pad weight test as continence rate assessment tool after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: A Swedish retrospective cohort study

AIM

Patient-reported pad-count as continence rate assessment tool after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is common. However, lack of standardized continence definition using this method results in heterogeneous published efficacy outcomes. Data on 24-h pad weight tests (PWT) after primary AUS implantation for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI) is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the 24-h PWT as an efficacy assessment tool and correlate it to qualitative outcomes using validated questionnaires.

METHODS

This retrospective, single center, follow-up cohort study, evaluated 180 patients who underwent primary AUS implantation for PPUI from 2005 to 2018. Voiding diaries, 24-h PWT, validated patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires were collected pre-operatively and at 3-6 months postactivation, using the institution's Electronic Medical Records.

RESULTS

The median preoperative and postoperative 24-h PWT values were 494 (interquartile range [IQR]: 304-780) and 7 (IQR: 0-25) g respectively with a significant improvement in urinary leakage of 489.5 g 99.1% (p < 0.001). Median preoperative and postoperative I-QoL results increased from 33.5 (IQR: 19.3-63.6) to 86.4 (IQR: 73.9-94.3) points, with a significant 52.9 points improvement in QoL (p < 0.001). Similarly, the median preoperative and postoperative ICIQ-SF values decreased from 20 (IQR: 17-21) to 5 (IQR: 3-9) points, showing a significant improvement of 15 points (p < 0.001). We also found a significant correlation between PWT and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The 24-h PWT provides a reliable and objective assessment of continence rates, with a strong correlation to qualitative outcomes, after primary AUS implantation for PPUI. Its use could help reduce reported outcome heterogeneity across studies.

Urinary Retention in a Patient With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Case Report of a Rare Cause of Urinary Retention

Urinary retention is the inability to spontaneously void with lower abdominal or suprapubic pain caused by infection, trauma, obstruction, medications, or neurological etiologies. Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a urological emergency often seen in males presenting to the emergency department (ED). AUR is frequently seen in men over the age of 60 and approximately one-third of men over the age of 80. A 61-year-old Spanish-speaking male, with a history of prostate cancer and prostatectomy with the recent insertion of an artificial urethral sphincter two months prior, presented to the ED with urinary retention, complaining of malfunction in his artificial sphincter with worsening abdominal pain, distention, urinary urgency, and nausea. A bladder scan demonstrated 450 ml of urine. Bedside ultrasound (US) showed moderate bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter. After consultation with urology, they revealed that the patient did not understand how to properly use his implanted device. Urology experts have recommended minimal urethral instrumentation in patients with artificial urinary sphincters due to the risk of complications. Although we present a rare cause of urinary retention, emergency physicians should avoid catheterization in these patients. Bedside renal ultrasound is useful for the diagnosis of hydronephrosis and hydroureter and confirmation of pump and balloon placement. We recommend a prompt urology consultation. This case is an important example of appropriate postoperative education and close-ended communication. Certified interpreters should be used to avoid communication barriers and complications.