A Novel Surgical Technique for Treatment of Renal Stones in Preschool-aged Patients: Initial Experience With Needle-perc

Miniaturizing the approach to upper tract renal calculi: Is smaller always better? A narrative review

Newer modalities for treating upper tract urinary stones focus on maintaining and improving outcomes, reducing complications, and optimizing patient care. This narrative review aims to outline novel miniaturized endourological innovations for managing upper tract calculi.

Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES) for patients with complicated solitary kidney stones: a prospective randomized study from a single center

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to compare traditional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES) in the treatment of complicated solitary kidney stones via a single-center randomized controlled prospective study.

METHODS

A total of patients with complex (Guy's score II-IV) solitary kidney stones between July 2019 to June 2022 were enrolled in the study. Participants were stratified into two groups: needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery group (group A) and traditional PCNL group (group B). All procedures were finished by X-ray free technique. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 90 (44 in Group A and 46 in Group B) patients were finally included in our study. There were no statistically differences in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), stone burden between two groups. The mean operative duration of Group A was significant higher than group B (95.1 ± 21.4 min vs 72.5 ± 29.5 min, p=0.02). The 1-month stone-free rate (SFR) was significant higher in Group A than B (90.9% vs 73.9%, p=0.03). A less hemoglobin drop (p=0.01), shorter postoperative in-hospital day (p=0.04), and lower severe complication (Clavien-Dindo III and above) rates (p=0.03) were observed in Group A.

CONCLUSION

For patients with solitary kidney stones, NAES technique provides a higher one-session SFR, a better renal function recovery and compared with traditional PCNL.

Needle-Perc-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery in Treatment with Renal Staghorn Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study from a Large-Volume Stone Center

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES) in the treatment of staghorn renal stones via a single-center prospective randomized controlled study.

METHODS

A total of 219 patients with partial or complete staghorn renal stones were prospectively randomized into two groups between January 2020 and April 2022. In group A (n = 112), patients were treated with traditional standard access, multiple if necessary, and in group B (n = 107), only one standard access was made, and needle-perc was assisted to remove the residual stones in the same stage. All procedures were guided under ultrasound totally. Stone size, operating time, blood loss, pain score, complications, and other related characteristics were monitored and analyzed.

RESULTS

Procedures were successful in all patients. The baseline characters were similar between the groups. The mean stone size was comparable (4.5 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.7, p = 0.35). The 1-month stone-free status was achieved in 85 patients (75.9%) in group A and 80 (74.8%) patients in group B (p = 0.72). The operation time was shorter in group A than B (75.1 ± 28.1 min vs. 97.2 ± 20.4 min, p = 0.02). A less blood loss (p = 0.01), shorter hospital stay (p = 0.04), lower pain score (p = 0.04), and lower severe complication rates (p = 0.03) were observed in group B.

CONCLUSION

NAES reveals better postoperative recurrence compared with traditional multiple tracts method for treating staghorn renal stones. The stone-free rate was comparable between the two groups.

Minimally invasive nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of Lower calyceal stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of minimally invasive nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) was assessed for lower calyceal (LC) stones.

METHODS

Our team conducted a systematic literature search up to December, 2022, using PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The study was registered in PROSPERO, CRD 42021247197. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of MPCNL versus RIRS for LC stones were collected. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using the χ 2 test based on the Q and I2 tests. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a fixed model if I2 is less than 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was chosen. The primary outcomes were the 3-month stone-free rate (3SFR) and total complications, while the secondary outcomes were the operating time, hospital stay, haemoglobin reduction, bleeding, postoperative fever and complications with the Clavien-Dindo system. A subgroup analysis of 10-20 mm LC stones was also designed.

RESULTS

A total of 7 peer-reviewed trials comprising 711 patients were identified. No statistical differences were observed in the heterogeneity results of the 3SFR or total complications ( P >0.1, I2 < 50%). Compared with RIRS, MPCNL had an unfavourable safety profile, resulting in total complications [odds ratio (OR): 1.87 (95% CI: 1.05, 3.33); P =0.03], haemoglobin reduction [OR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.15, 1.47); P =0.02] and complications with Grade I [OR: 5.52 (95% CI: 1.34, 22.83); P =0.02] but an improved efficacy and 3SFR [OR: 2.43 (95% CI: 1.48, 3.97); P =0.0004]. As for the 10-20 mm LC stones, compared with RIRS, MPCNL also had an unfavourable safety profile, resulting in total complications [OR: 2.47 (95% CI: 1.20, 5.07); P =0.01], complications with Grade I [OR: 4.97 (95% CI: 0.99, 25.01); P =0.05] and an increased hospital stay [OR: 2.46 (95% CI: 2.26, 2.66); P =0.00001] but an improved efficacy and 3SFR {OR: 3.10 (95% CI: 1.61, 5.99); P =0.0008]. The efficacy effect of MPCNL and safety effect of RIRS were nearly equal for both stones sized less than 20 mm (number needed to treat = 17, number needed to harm = 20) and stones sized 10-20 mm (number needed to treat = 20, number needed to harm = 13). No statistical difference was found between the MPCNL and RIRS groups for the rest of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Both MPCNL and RIRS are safe and effective management methods. Moreover, compared with RIRS, MPCNL had an unfavourable safety profile but improved efficacy for LC stones of ≤20 mm or 10-20 mm, and the differences were statistically significant. The relative profit of efficacy of MPCNL was similar to the relative profit of safety of RIRS.

Miniaturization in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new?

Objective

To summarize recent advancements in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in surgical technique, stone removal strategy, lithotripsy, and surgical model from the current literature.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of relevant English-language articles up to October 2022 using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The following keywords were used in the search: "percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy", "mini-PCNL", "mini-perc", "mPCNL", and "miniaturization".

Results

A series of new progress has been made in many aspects of mini-PCNL, such as further reduction of tract size-needle perc and further improvement of robotic-assisted PCNL-artificial intelligence-powered robotic devices.

Conclusion

Many studies and trials have been conducted to reduce morbidity and increase the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL. It is crucial to realize that miniaturization of PCNL requires not only a smaller percutaneous tract size, but also an adjustment strategically in renal access, stone removal, lithotripsy, and surgical model in general. More large-scale prospective research needs to be carried out to further validate and optimize the safety and effectiveness of mini-PCNL.

Effect of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined with Needle Nephrolithotomy on Renal Function and Complication Rate in Patients with Complex Renal Calculi

Objective

To investigate the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with needle nephrolithotomy on renal function and incidence of complications in patients with complex renal calculi.

Methods

From March 2020 to March 2022, 88 patients with complex renal calculi were enrolled and divided into two groups. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was performed in the control group, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with needle nephrolithotomy was performed in the study group. Perioperative conditions, renal function parameters such as blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), and cystatin C (CysC) levels, inflammatory factors such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels before surgery and 1 day after surgery were determined. The incidence of complications was statistically analyzed between two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in stone clearance rate between the two groups. The operation time and hospital stay in the study group were shorter than those in the control group. The intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the control group. The VAS score was lower than that in the control group. BUN, Scr, and CysC in the study group were not significantly different from those in the control group. CRP and PCT in the two groups at 1 d after surgery were higher than those before surgery, but CRP and PCT in the study group were lower than those in the control group. The incidence of complications in the study group was lower than that in the control group.

Conclusion

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with needle nephrolithotomy is effective and safe in the treatment of complex renal calculi.

Mini-track, mini-nephroscopy, mini-ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its initial clinical application

Background

To assess the outcome of the mini-track, mini-nephroscopy, mini ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper ureteral and kidney stones.

Methods

We collected data of 53 patients (55 kidney units) who underwent mini-track, mini-nephroscopy, mini-ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy between September 2020 and March 2021. The study included single and upper ureteral stones from 12 kidneys, multiple stones from 28 kidneys, and staghorn stones from 15 kidneys.

Results

The mean operative duration was 50.6 min, ranging from 15 to 200 min, whereas the mean lithotripsy and stone removal time was 17.2 min (3–45 min). Moreover, the mean postoperative length of stay was 4.0 days (1–7 days). Besides, the stone-free rate (SFR) of discharge was 89.1% (49/55). The mean hemoglobin drop was 15.3 mg/dL, ranging 1–32 mg/dL. Out of the total cases, only 4 of them displayed minor complications. The outcomes of < 40 mm versus ≥ 40 mm calculi were compared by performing subgroup analysis. The results demonstrated a longer operation duration (65.2 vs. 40.2 min), higher complication rate (13.0% vs. 3.3%), and lower SFR in the ≥ 40 mm calculi subgroup.

Conclusions

In summary, mini-track, mini-nephroscopy, mini-ultrasonic probe percutaneous nephrolithotomy is an effective and safe method to treat patients with upper ureteral and kidney calculi. This is especially significant for the stone size of 20–40 mm, demonstrating excellent SFR and a lower complication rate.

Needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery for patients with complex renal stones: technique and outcomes

Our aim was to investigate the safety and efficacy of needle-perc-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), namely, needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES), in a series of patients with large and/or complex renal stones. From May 2018 to August 2021, a total of 119 patients underwent NAES at our institute. Among them, 94 patients underwent needle-perc-assisted standard PCNL in prone position and 25 underwent needle-perc-assisted RIRS in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position or prone split-leg position. Clinical factors including age, sex, medical history, and stone characteristics were collected. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. The patients' mean age ± standard deviation was 50.3 ± 14.3 years. The mean stone size was 7.6 ± 3.7 and 1.7 ± 0.8 cm for needle-perc-assisted PCNL and RIRS, respectively. Of the 119 patients, 51 had staghorn stones, 16 had solitary kidneys, 17 had a history of ipsilateral renal surgery, and 6 had calyceal diverticular stones. The mean operative time was 83.4 ± 25.9 min for needle-perc-assisted PCNL and 66.3 ± 21.8 min for needle-perc-assisted RIRS. The stone-free rate (SFR) for needle-perc-assisted PCNL was 77.7% after the first treatment and 88.3% after auxiliary treatments. The SFR for needle-perc-assisted RIRS was 88.0% and no auxiliary treatments were carried out in this group. Eleven (11.7%) patients who underwent needle-perc-assisted standard PCNL developed Clavien-Dindo grade I or II complications. Three (12.0%) patients who underwent needle-perc-assisted RIRS developed a fever (grade I). The overall complication rate for NAES was 11.8%, with no urosepsis, angioembolization, or other grade III to V complications. In conclusion, NAES is a safe and effective procedure for one-step complete resolution of large and/or complex renal stones with no additional procedure-related complications.

From "feeling" to "seeing": modification of the percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with an optical puncture system

PURPOSE

Blind insertion limits the application of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement. In this study, we first described the use of an optical puncture system in the PD catheter insertion, and investigated the feasibility and advantages of this modified technique.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 65 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5) who received ultrasound-guided percutaneous PD catheter insertion with or without optical puncture system assistance between June 2018 and July 2019. The patients' characteristics as well as the surgical outcomes and complications were compared between the modified group and the routine percutaneous insertion group.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent optical puncture system assistant insertion, whereas 40 patients received routine percutaneous insertion. More patients had previous abdominal surgical histories in the modified group than those in the routine group (24.0% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.047). The time of accessing to the abdominal cavity was significantly shorter in the modified group (median [IQR]; 1.1 min [0.8-1.3] vs. 5.0 min [4.0-6.0]; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the time of the whole procedure was also significantly shorter in the modified group (median [IQR]; 26.0 min [25.0-29.0] vs. 33.0 min [29.0-35.0]; p < 0.001). None of the patient in the modified group, while two patients (5.0%) in the routine group converted to open procedure. There were no significant differences in the short and long postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The operation of ultrasound-guided PD catheter placement with the optical puncture system is easy, safe, fast and accurate, whereby the PD catheter can be implanted percutaneously and visually under local anesthesia with minimal procedure-related complications. The visible puncture of the optical puncture system may facilitate ultrasound-guided percutaneous PD catheter insertion in patients with obesity and previous abdominal surgeries.