Use of polymerase chain reaction analysis of urinary DNA to detect bladder carcinoma

Cell-free DNA: the role in pathophysiology and as a biomarker in kidney diseases

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is present in various body fluids and originates mostly from blood cells. In specific conditions, circulating cfDNA might be derived from tumours, donor organs after transplantation or from the foetus during pregnancy. The analysis of cfDNA is mainly used for genetic analyses of the source tissue -tumour, foetus or for the early detection of graft rejection. It might serve also as a nonspecific biomarker of tissue damage in critical care medicine. In kidney diseases, cfDNA increases during haemodialysis and indicates cell damage. In patients with renal cell carcinoma, cfDNA in plasma and its integrity is studied for monitoring of tumour growth, the effects of chemotherapy and for prognosis. Urinary cfDNA is highly fragmented, but the technical hurdles can now be overcome and urinary cfDNA is being evaluated as a potential biomarker of renal injury and urinary tract tumours. Beyond its diagnostic application, cfDNA might also be involved in the pathogenesis of diseases affecting the kidneys as shown for systemic lupus, sepsis and some pregnancy-related pathologies. Recent data suggest that increased cfDNA is associated with acute kidney injury. In this review, we discuss the biological characteristics, sources of cfDNA, its potential use as a biomarker as well as its role in the pathogenesis of renal and urinary diseases.

Detection of loss of heterozygosity in patients with urinary bladder carcinoma: neoplastic tissue vs. urine sediment cells

Introduction

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is frequently observed in urinary bladder neoplasms. In the reported study, an attempt was undertaken to determine the loss of heterozygosity of TP53(17p13), RB1(13q14), CDKN2A/ ARF(9p21) genes in DNA from neoplastic tissue, collected from patients with diagnosed urinary bladder carcinoma, and to compare the results with those of LOH evaluation in DNA isolated from urine sediment cells.

Material and methods

After isolation, DNA was amplified (PCR) by means of primers to five polymorphic microsatellite markers, the products being then separated on agarose gel. Following the method, a total of 125 DNA samples were obtained, isolated from neoplastic cells, together with 125 corresponding DNA samples, isolated from urine sediment cells.

Results

The loss of heterozygosity in at least one marker was identified in 39.2%. (49/125) of DNA from studied tumors and in 34.3% (43/125) of DNA samples, isolated from urine sediment cells. An analysis of LOH from the DNA, isolated from urine sediment cells, allowed for identification of 81.8% of neoplastic tumors with 99.7% specificity.

Conclusions

Our observations have demonstrated that LOH within 13q14, 17p13 and 9p21 loci is more often observed in clinically more advanced neoplasms. LOH in 17p13 locus is more frequently found in tumors at high histopathological stage, while in low-stage neoplasms, LOH is most often observed on chromosome 9. The high sensitivity (81.8%) and specificity (99.7%) of LOH studies in DNA, isolated from urine sediment cells, make this technique an advantageous, non-invasive method for detection and screening of bladder cancer.

Molecular markers for detection, surveillance and prognostication of bladder cancer

Many markers for the detection of bladder cancers have been tested and almost all urinary markers reported are better than cytology with regard to sensitivity, but they score lower in specificity. Currently molecular and genetic changes play an important role in the discovery of new molecular markers for detection, prognostication and surveillance. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most important urinary molecular biomarker developments that have been studied and reported recently. In the current review we have summarized the most recent and relevant published reports on molecular urinary markers. The results of this review show that the first generation of urinary markers did not add much to urinary cytology. The current generation of markers is better, but additional clinical trials are needed. Our knowledge of molecular pathways in bladder cancer is growing and new methods of marker development emerge, but the perfect marker is still to be found. Currently, there are not clinically usable molecular markers that can guide us in diagnosis or surveillance, nor guide us in lowering the frequency of urethrocystoscopy in bladder cancer.

Urinary markers in bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

Many markers for the detection of bladder cancers have been tested. Almost all urinary markers reported are better than cytology with regard to sensitivity, but they score lower in specificity. The purpose of this review is to highlight the most important urinary biomarkers studied and reported recently.

METHODS

Literature on bladder cancer markers has been reviewed regularly in the last few years. In the current review we have tried to summarise the most recent literature of urinary markers.

RESULTS

The results of this review show that the first-generation urinary markers did not add much to urinary cytology. The current generation of markers is promising but larger clinical trails are needed. The future of marker development is bright with new techniques emerging, but the perfect marker is still to be found.

CONCLUSION

Currently, no single marker can yet guide us in surveillance and lower the frequency of urethrocystoscopy.

Intérêt des marqueurs urinaires dans le diagnostic et le suivi des tumeurs urothéliales de vessie

Urothelial bladder tumours require regular surveillance: cystoscopy associated with urine cytology are reference examinations. Several new markers currently under evaluation or already validated have recently been proposed to replace cytology and potentially reduce or even replace unnecessary cystoscopies. The biological fluid studied for all of these markers is the same as that of urine cytology, i.e. urine. The authors review the results of recent studies on these new urinary markers. The results of these markers demonstrate a better global sensitivity than urine cytology, but often a lower specificity. In the majority of cases, these tests are performed during patient follow-up (NMP22, BTA, CYFRA 21-l., etc.), but do not replace cystoscopy, due to a large number of false-positives. Other techniques, such as FISH, uCyt+ or microsatellites appear to be more promising, especially for the diagnosis of low-grade tumours. The best solution in practice may consist of a combination of several markers to further improve sensitivity and to decrease the false-positive rate responsible for unnecessary cystoscopies.

Molecular Markers of Urothelial Cancer and Their Use in the Monitoring of Superficial Urothelial Cancer

Multiple molecular markers have been described for use in bladder cancer patients. Some of these have been studied more extensively than others, and it is difficult for the clinician to maintain a perspective over the myriad findings that have been made. We have reviewed a selection of markers used for surveillance with an emphasis on clinical utility. The best studied markers and those with the most promising preliminary results were selected. Only studies that included surveillance for recurrence in patients with a history of bladder cancer were considered. Each marker is briefly described and its performance in monitoring bladder cancer patients is summarized. Several promising markers are available, although only four have obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval. The clinical applications that have been studied include replacement or reduction in the number of cystoscopies performed in the surveillance of bladder cancer patients, substitution for or complementary use with urinary cytology in the same setting, predicting disease recurrence and progression, and predicting and monitoring treatment response. None of the markers have been proved sensitive and specific enough to replace cystoscopy. Others, such as nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) and UroVysion, appear to have some utility when used to complement or replace cytology. The other applications have not been adequately studied for any given marker. While multiple molecular markers exist for bladder cancer, their full clinical utility will not be realized until more multicenter prospective trials are conducted to verify their efficacy and safety in the monitoring of patients with superficial bladder cancer.