The best treatment for high-grade T1 bladder cancer is cystectomy

Survival Outcomes of Early versus Deferred Cystectomy for High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background

Studies report that survival outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are worse when cystectomy is delayed. However, no systematic evidence is available.

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to compare the long-term survival outcomes of patients with high-grade NMIBC (T1G3, including carcinoma in situ) who have early cystectomy compared to deferred radical cystectomy post-diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review was carried out by searching MEDLINE and related databases (Google Scholar, National Health Service Evidence) for all relevant studies published from 1946 to present. Additional studies were identified through following the references of relevant papers. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: inclusion of at least 30 patients having high-grade NMIBC, 2 groups treated with either early or deferred cystectomy with a clear temporal cut-off between groups and reported data on survival rate of at least 5 years.

Results

Literature was systematically reviewed, and 10 studies were included, totaling 1,516 patients who underwent either primary cystectomy or deferred cystectomy. It was found that patients who underwent early cystectomy show improved 5- to 10-year cancer-specific survival (relative risk = 0.81, p = 0.029) suggesting a significant survival benefit when compared to deferred cystectomy.

Conclusions

This study provides systematically gathered evidence showing benefit of early cystectomy. Despite this result, radical cystectomy greatly impairs quality of life and represents overtreatment for a significant minority. This result highlights the importance of a decisive treatment plan to minimize treatment delay.

Radical cystectomy for the treatment of T1 bladder cancer: the Canadian Bladder Cancer Network experience

BACKGROUND

Radical cystectomy may provide optimal survival outcomes in the management of clinical T1 bladder cancer. We present our data from a large, multi-institutional, contemporary Canadian series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy for clinical T1 bladder cancer in a single-payer health care system.

METHODS

We collected a pooled database of 2287 patients who underwent radical cystectomy between 1993 and 2008 in 8 different centres across Canada; 306 of these patients had clinical T1 bladder cancer. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 67 years with a mean follow-up time of 35 months. The 5-year overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival was 71%, 77% and 59%, respectively. The 10-year overall and disease-specific survival were 60% and 67%, respectively. Pathologic stage distribution was p0: 32 (11%), pT1: 78 (26%), pT2: 55 (19%), pT3: 60 (20%), pT4: 27 (9%), pTa: 16 (5%), pTis: 28 (10%), pN0: 215 (74%) and pN1-3: 78 (26%). Only 12% of patients were given adjuvant chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, only margin status and pN stage were independently associated with overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival.

INTERPRETATION

These results indicate that clinical T1 bladder cancer may be significantly understaged. Identifying factors associated with understaged and/or disease destined to progress (despite any prior intravesical or repeat transurethral therapies prior to radical cystectomy) will be critical to improve survival outcomes without over-treating clinical T1 disease that can be successfully managed with bladder preservation strategies.

Maximizing outcomes in genitourinary cancers across the treatment continuum

Key controversies concerning the management of genitourinary cancers across the treatment continua were discussed at the second annual Interactive Genitourinary Cancer Conference (IGUCC) held in February 2010 in Athens, Greece. Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer among western men and prevention strategies are needed. Trials evaluating 5α-reductase inhibitors have reported beneficial and clinically meaningful results, but uptake remains low for primary prostate cancer prevention. Prostate cancer detection programmes are also important as curative treatments for advanced disease are unavailable. Two large landmark randomized controlled trials reported conflicting results concerning screening efficacy and uncovered high levels of over-diagnosis and potential over-treatment. Tailored management strategies after diagnosis are important and predictive markers that distinguish between aggressive and indolent tumours are needed. The majority of newly diagnosed cases of prostate cancer are clinically localized. Active surveillance of favourable risk patients may be beneficial in the intermediate term, while an integrated approach of multi-modality therapy in patients with adverse features is recommended. The benefits of new technologies such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and robotic prostatectomy have not been established in prospective randomized trials vs current standards of care. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to evolving the management of advanced prostate cancer into a chronic disease paradigm. Docetaxel plus prednisone is the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but the optimal timing of chemotherapy initiation has not been addressed in randomized clinical trials. Retrospective analyses suggest that asymptomatic patients with adverse prognostic factors for survival may also benefit from receiving chemotherapy. Bladder cancer is a common malignancy and the most expensive cancer per patient. Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a heterogenous disease that requires dynamic multidisciplinary management. Aggressive early intervention may be beneficial in some cases. Platinum-based therapies represent the first-line standard of care for advanced bladder cancer, but the maximum benefit may have been reached for conventional chemotherapies and new strategies are needed. Several ongoing clinical trials are assessing combination chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Clusterin immunoreactivity as a predictive factor for progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for prognostic markers which can predict the subset of patients who will not respond sufficiently to conservative management in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. We analyzed the association of clusterin (CLU) with clinicopathological factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical CLU expression was investigated in paraffin-embedded archival tissues of initial transurethral resection specimens of 46 patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. The result was expressed as the proportion of the number of CLU-containing tumor cells to the total number of tumor cells detected in each slide and 'percent CLU expression' was calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

Of the 46 cases (35 male, 11 female), 18 were ≥ 65 years of age. CLU expression was significantly higher in male and elderly patients. Following the initial transurethral resection, 39 patients showed tumor recurrence, and progression was seen in 25 patients, of whom 17 progressed to muscle invasion during follow-up. Although there was no significant correlation between CLU expression and recurrence, significant correlation with overall progression and progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in this cohort of patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.014, respectively). Among the patients with progression to muscle invasion, 13 underwent radical cystectomy with pT2 tumor in 5 patients in the final pathology of surgical specimens and pT3 and higher in the remainder.

CONCLUSIONS

CLU immunoreactivity showed correlation with age, gender and progression, mainly progression to muscle invasion. Thus, CLU can be used as a molecular marker to predict the potential of progression to muscle-invasive disease in a particular tumor which in turn may prove useful in the decision-making process for early cystectomy without losing time with conservative management.

Robotic partial cystectomy for bladder cancer: a single-institutional pilot study

OBJECTIVE

Open partial cystectomy has been used as a curative option for select group of patients with bladder cancer. In recent years, the da Vinci Surgical Robotic System is being increasingly used to perform complex urologic cancer surgeries. We report first on a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing robotic partial cystectomy (RPC) for bladder cancer.

METHODS

Three consecutive patients underwent RPC, two with diagnosis of papillary neoplasm of bladder and one with urachal adenocarcinoma at our institution from July 2008 to January 2009. Perioperative parameters were prospectively collected and analyzed after Institutional Review Board approval.

RESULTS

All three patients in the study were men with a median age of 50 years (range, 24-70 years). The RPC was completed transperitoneally in all three patients without the need for open conversion. The operative time, estimated blood loss, and time to hospital discharge for the three patients undergoing RPC were 185, 135, and 165 minutes; 25, 20, and 20 mL; and 5, 2, and 2 days, respectively. The percentage change in hematocrit after surgery was within 5% in all patients. There were no postoperative complications before discharge; however, one patient was readmitted and underwent small bowel resection secondary to bowel obstruction. Final pathology demonstrated high-grade carcinoma pT2bNxMx and pTaNxMx papillary urothelial carcinoma in two patients and invasive adenocarcinoma of the bladder pT3aNxMx in the remaining patient. The median follow-up was 6 months (range, 3-10 months). All three patients were alive with no signs of recurrent or metastatic disease on cystoscopic, cytological, or radiological follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

RPC is technically feasible using the da Vinci Surgical Robotic System in select patients with bladder cancer without disease recurrence in the short term. A larger cohort with long-term follow-up is necessary to validate our results.