Post-radical prostatectomy management options for positive surgical margins: Argument for observation

Indications for postoperative radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer after surgery with positive surgical margins

AIM OF THE STUDY

Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among men in Poland. The main methods of radical treatment are radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy. In patients who have been correctly qualified for surgery, a positive surgical margin is always an unexpected and undesirable factor. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence of positive margins in more than 100 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 114 patients aged 44-78 years (mean 61.5 years) who underwent surgery for prostate cancer in stage cT1-3N0/M0 (according to the TNM staging system) in the years 2010-2011 in the Clinical Department of Oncological Urology in the Center of Oncology in Bydgoszcz.

RESULTS

The presence of positive surgical margins was found in 45 (39.47%) patients, and in 20 (17.54%) margins were assessed as close (1-2 mm). Among the patients with positive surgical margins about 22% had biochemical recurrence. Among patients with negative surgical margins 13% of pT2c and 12.5% of pT3a had biochemical recurrence. Patients with positive surgical margins, along with patients diagnosed with tumor extending beyond the prostate (pT3a) or invading seminal vesicles (pT3b), are at an increased risk of recurrence and progression, reaching up to 30-50% over 10 years. The risk is 2-4 times higher than in patients without positive operating margins.

Contemporary radical prostatectomy

Purpose. Patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer have more surgical treatment options than in the past. This paper focuses on the procedures' oncological or functional outcomes and perioperative morbidities of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods. A MEDLINE/PubMed search of the literature on radical prostatectomy and other new management options was performed. Results. Compared to the open procedures, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy has no confirmed significant difference in most literatures besides less blood loss and blood transfusion. Nerve sparing is a safe means of preserving potency on well-selected patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Positive surgical margin rates of radical prostatectomy affect the recurrence and survival of prostate cancer. The urinary and sexual function outcomes have been vastly improved. Neoadjuvant treatment only affects the rate of positive surgical margin. Adjuvant therapy can delay and reduce the risk of recurrence and improve the survival of the high risk prostate cancer. Conclusions. For the majority of patients with organ-confined prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy remains a most effective approach. Radical perineal prostatectomy remains a viable approach for patients with morbid obesity, prior pelvic surgery, or prior pelvic radiation. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become popular among surgeons but has not yet become the firmly established standard of care. Long-term data have confirmed the efficacy of radical retropubic prostatectomy with disease control rates and cancer-specific survival rates.

Stage-by-stage effects of surgical margin status on biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of pathological stage and surgical margin status on biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy (RP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 205 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) were evaluated. Known risk factors for biochemical failure (BF) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The effects of surgical margin status together with pathological stage on BF were evaluated. p values lower than 0.05 were accepted to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Pathological stage, positive surgical margin (PSM), seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node involvement, biopsy Gleason score and postoperative Gleason score were the factors associated with BF in univariate analysis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that pT3a patients with PSM had a significant BF rate when compared to pT2 patients with a negative surgical margin (NSM) (OR 7.46, p = 0.002). pT3a patients with a NSM had a similar BF rate to that of pT2 patients with PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

pT2 patients with PSM had a similar biochemical prognosis to that of pT3a patients without PSM, implicating that a PSM may have a negative effect on prognosis similar to that of extracapsular invasion.