New concepts of biobanks--strategic chance for uro-oncology

The biobank of barretos cancer hospital: 14 years of experience in cancer research

Despite the developments in cancer research over years, cancer is still one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In Brazil, the number of cancer cases for the several next years (2020-2022) is expected to increase up to 625,000. Thus, translational research has been vital to determine the potential risk, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in cancer. Therefore, Barretos Cancer Hospital implemented a biobank (BB-BCH) in 2006, which is responsible for processing, storage, and provision of biological materials from cancer and non-cancer participants. Hence, this article aimed to describe BB-BCH's history, experiences, and outcomes and explore its impact on Brazilian translational oncology research scenario. BB-BCH has a multidisciplinary team who are responsible for guaranteeing the quality of all processes as recommended by international guidelines for biobanks. Furthermore, BB-BCH has ample equipment to ensure the quality of all material requested by researchers as genetic material (DNA and RNA) and/or entire biospecimens. From 2006 to 2019, BB-BCH contained 252,069 samples from 44,933 participants, the whole collection is represented by 15 different types of biospecimens collected from them. According to our data, the most collected and stored topography in men is head and neck (29%); in women is breast (28%); and in children is torso and limb (27%) samples. Finally, we supported national and international consortia and projects such as The Cancer Genome Atlas. BB-BCH is a vital knowledge source for scientific community, enabling the development of high-quality studies, with a wide variety of tumor categories and high national representativeness of Brazilian population.

Aspects of Modern Biobank Activity - Comprehensive Review

Biobanks play an increasing role in contemporary research projects. These units meet all requirements to regard them as a one of the most innovative and up-to-date in the field of biomedical research. They enable conducting wide-scale research by the professional collection of biological specimens and correlated clinical data. Pathology units may be perceived roots of biobanking. The review aims at describing the concept of biobanks, their model of function and scientific potential. It comprises the division of biobanks, sample preservation methods and IT solutions as well as guidelines and recommendations for management of a vast number of biological samples and clinical data. Therefore, appropriate standard operating procedures and protocols are outlined. Constant individualization of diagnostic process and treatment procedures creates the niche for translational units. Thus, the role of biobanks in personalized medicine was also specified. The exceptionality of biobanks poses some new ethical-legal issues which have various solutions, in each legal system, amongst the world. Finally, distribution and activity of European biobanks are mentioned.

[Structure of biobanks for urological research]

Biomedical research plays an important role in the development of novel diagnostic procedures, drugs and treatment strategies with regard to cancerous and chronic inflammatory diseases. Biobanks are essential tools in this process. The complex structures and benefits of biobanks are presented in this article.

Models of biobanking and tissue preservation: RNA quality in archival samples in pathology laboratories and "in vivo biobanking" by tumor xenografts in nude mice-two models of quality assurance in pathology

Tissue banks represent essential resources and platforms for biomedical research serving basic, translational, and clinical research projects. In this article, we describe 2 models of biobanking and tissue preservation with different approaches and aims. Archive tissue biobanking is described here as a resource of residual pathology tissues for translational research, which represents the huge clinical heterogeneity. In this context, managing of tissues and RNA quality in archive tissue are discussed. The other model of tissue biobanking is referred to as xenograft tissue banking, which represents an alternative method for obtaining large amounts of tissue, over an indefinite period, in so far as the tumor can be transferred in vivo over generations, maintaining the histological and genetic particularities. A description of the method and examples of the application are given with particular emphasis on sarcomas (Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal sarcoma, synovial sarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas) and early stages of tumor angiogenesis in sarcomas.

Intravital biobank and personalized cancer therapy: the correlation with omics

Biobanks have played a decisive role in all aspects of the field of cancer, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. The significance of cancer biobanks is epitomized through the appropriate application of various "-omic" techniques (omics). The mutually motivated relationship between biobanks and omics has intensified the development of cancer research. Human cancer tissues that are maintained in intravital biobanks (or living tissue banks) retain native tumor microenvironment, tissue architecture, hormone responsiveness and cell-to-cell signalling properties. Intravital biobanks replicate the structural complexity and heterogeneity of human cancers, making them an ideal platform for preclinical studies. The application of omics with intravital biobanks renders them more active, which makes it possible for the cancer-related evaluations to be dynamically monitored on a real-time basis. Integrating intravital biobank and modern omics will provide a useful tool for the discovery and development of new drugs or novel therapeutic strategies. More importantly, intravital biobanks may play an essential role in the creation of meaningful patient-tailored therapies as for personalized medicine.

A primer on a hepatocellular carcinoma bioresource bank using the cancer genome atlas guidelines: practical issues and pitfalls

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of the human genome, the era of personalized genomic medicine is indisputably in progress.

METHODS

In an effort to contribute to the evolving knowledge of genomic medicine, we have aimed directly at building a bioresource bank for hepatocellular carcinoma. This tumor bank is based on the rigorous guidelines set forth by the National Cancer Institute, and it offers analytes to help elucidate the mechanisms of progression from cirrhosis to malignancy, risk factors for recurrence, and applicability of current treatment options to a diverse group of people.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons have a privileged position between patients (and their cancer) and the benches of basic science. Thus, we offer a primer based on our own experiences, from which surgeons may take elements to build their own bioresource bank for use in collaboration with others. We highlight some practicalities and pitfalls that could be overlooked, as well as a discussion of possible solutions.