Effect of reclassification of the IMDC model in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy in the first-line and second-line settings

Development of novel ACN (albumin, C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) prognostication model for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line molecular-targeted therapy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to develop a novel prognostication model in patients with treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

This study included 325 consecutive mRCC patients receiving first-line molecular-targeted therapy at 4 institutions. Potential parameters associated with overall survival (OS) in these patients were investigated to develop a novel stratification model.

RESULTS

Median OS of the 325 patients was 38 months. A multivariable analysis of several factors identified independent predictors associated with unfavorable OS as follows: no previous nephrectomy, Karnofsky performance status <80%, albumin (Alb) ≤3.5 g/dl, C-reactive protein (CRP) >0.5 mg/dl and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >3. Of these 5 independent OS predictors, 3 numeric factors were used to develop the ACN (Alb, CRP, and NLR) model by dividing patients into 3 groups according to the positive numbers of these 3 numeric risk factors. Median OS durations were 63, 37, and 11 months in the favorable (n = 105, 32.3%, without risk factors), intermediate (n = 88, 27.1%, with a single risk factor), and poor (n = 132, 40.6%, with multiple risk factors) risk groups, respectively. The ACN model as a prognostication tool was shown to be superior to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) models by both the concordance index and decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACN model could stratify the prognostic risk of mRCC patients receiving first-line targeted therapy more accurately than the MSKCC and IMDC models.

Survival prognoses of Heng intermediate-risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy: A real-world, single-center retrospective study

Purpose

This study aimed to compare progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in Heng intermediate-risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT).

Materials and Methods

From 2000 to 2017, a total of 186 intermediate-risk mRCC patients treated with first-line IT (n=64, 34.4%) or TT (n=122, 65.6%) were retrospectively evaluated for PFS, OS, and CSS using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models for their risk factors with a p-value for significance of <0.05.

Results

During a median 5.08-month of systemic treatment and 92.22 months of follow-up, the median PFS, OS, and CSS were 5.16, 18.44, and 19.04 months, respectively. The comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups showed a significantly higher rate of T3–4 stages, a lower rate of high nuclear grades, shorter follow-up, longer treatment durations, lesser rates of cytoreductive nephrectomy, a lower objective response rate, and no cases of complete response in the TT group compared with the IT group (p<0.05). The survival comparisons between the two groups showed that PFS was significantly different, whereas OS and CSS were not significantly different. The multivariate analyses showed that synchronous metastatic type(hazard ratio [HR], 2.285), IT (HR, 1.746), and treatment-free interval <1 year (HR, 1.926) were significant factors for PFS, whereas none of the risk factors were significant for OS or CSS.

Conclusions

TT significantly prolonged PFS compared with IT, whereas long-term survival was not significantly different in intermediate-risk mRCC patients.