1
|
Solyanik O, Chaloupka M, Clevert DA, Schmidt VF, Ingenerf M, Kazmierczak P, Stief CG, Ricke J, Apfelbeck M. Prospective close monitoring of the effect of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy and high intensity focused ultrasound of localized prostate cancer by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. World J Urol 2024; 42:462. [PMID: 39088086 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05143-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to describe the anatomical and functional changes observed in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) during follow-up after focal therapy (FT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study, we analyzed pre- and postoperatively acquired mpMRI of 10 patients after FT (7 days; 3, 6, 9, 12 months). 7/10 (70%) patients underwent vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP). 3/10 (30%) patients underwent high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). MpMR image analysis was performed using a semi-automatic software for segmentation of the prostate gland (PG) and tumor zones. Signal intensities (SI) of T2-weighted (T2w), T1-weighted (T1w),diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) images as well as volumes of the prostate gland (PGV) and tumor volumes (TV) were evaluated at each time point. RESULTS The results showed a significant increase of PGV 7 days after FT (p = 0.042) and a significant reduction of PGV between 7 days and 6, 9 and 12 months after FT (p < 0.001). The TV increased significantly 7 days after FT (p < 0.001) and decreased significantly between 7 days and 12 months after FT (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in SI of the ADC in the ablation zone after 6, 9 and 12 months after FT (p < 0.001). 1/9 patients (11%) had recurrent tumor on rebiopsy characterized as a a small focal lesion on mpMRI with strong diffusion restriction (low SI on ADC map and high SI on b-value DWI). CONCLUSION MpMRI is able to represent morphologic changes of the ablated zone after FT and might be helpful to detect recurrent tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Chaloupka
- Department of Urology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, Munich
| | - Vanessa F Schmidt
- Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, Munich
| | - Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, Munich
| | - Philipp Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, Munich
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany, Munich
| | - Maria Apfelbeck
- Department of Urology, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu C, Zhang Y, Jia N, Huang C, Fu Q, Chen Y, Lin C. Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating multi-parametric MRI and hematological indicators for discriminating benign from malignant central prostatic nodules: a retrospective analysis. Am J Transl Res 2024; 16:2921-2930. [PMID: 39114671 PMCID: PMC11301461 DOI: 10.62347/rbcm8913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer poses a significant risk to men's health. In this study, a model for differentiating benign and malignant nodules in the central region of the prostate was constructed by combining multi-parametric MRI and hematological lab values. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed the data acquired from Lianyungang First People's Hospital and The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College from January 2018 to December 2021. We included 310 MRI-confirmed prostatic nodule patients. The data were split into a training set (260 cases) and an external validation set (50 cases), with the latter exclusively from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College to test the model's generalizability. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified critical measurements for differentiating prostate cancer (PCa) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which were then integrated into a nomogram model. RESULTS The key indicators determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), standard deviation (StDev), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and prostate specific antigen (PSA). The nomogram's performance, as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC), was 0.844 (95% CI: 0.811-0.938) in the training set and 0.818 (95% CI: 0.644-0.980) in the external validation set. Calibration and decision curves demonstrated that the nomogram was well-calibrated and could serve as an effective tool in clinical practice. CONCLUSION The nomogram model based on ADC, StDev, NLR and PSA may be helpful to identify PCa and BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunling Xu
- Department of Imaging, Lianyungang First People’s HospitalLianyungang 570311, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yupeng Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| | - Nailong Jia
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| | - Chuizhi Huang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| | - Qimao Fu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| | - Changkun Lin
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical CollegeHaikou 570311, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ladjevardi S, Ebner A, Femic A, Huebner NA, Shariat SF, Kraler S, Kubik-Huch RA, Ahlman RC, Häggman M, Hefermehl LJ. Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer: An interim analysis of the multinational FASST study. Eur J Clin Invest 2024; 54:e14192. [PMID: 38445798 DOI: 10.1111/eci.14192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) emerged as a novel approach for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, prospective studies on HIFU-related outcomes and predictors of treatment failure (TF) remain scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a multinational prospective cohort study among patients undergoing HIFU therapy for localized, low- to intermediate-risk PCa. Follow-up data on serial prostate specific antigen (PSA), multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), targeted/systematic biopsies, adverse events and functional outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was TF, defined as histologically confirmed PCa requiring whole-gland salvage treatment. Uni- and multi-variable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS At baseline, mean (standard deviation) age was 64.14 (7.19) years, with the majority of patients showing T-stage 1 (73.9%) and International Society of Urological Pathology grading system Grade 2 (58.8%). PSA nadir (median, 1.70 ng/mL) was reached after 6 months. Of all patients recruited, 16% had clinically significant PCa, as confirmed by biopsy, of which 13.4% had TF. Notably, T-stage and number of positive cores at initial biopsy were independent predictors of TF during follow-up (HR [95% CI] 1.27 [1.02-1.59] and 5.02 [1.80-14.03], respectively). Adverse events were minimal (17% and 8% early and late adverse events, respectively), with stable or improved functional outcomes in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS This interim analysis of a multinational study on HIFU therapy for the management of low-to-intermediate-risk PCa reveals good functional outcomes, minimal adverse events and low incidence of TF over the short-term. Data on long-term outcomes, specifically as it relates to oncological outcomes, are awaited eagerly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Ladjevardi
- Department of Urology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Ebner
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria
- Department of urology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Simon Kraler
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Michael Häggman
- Department of Urology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Light A, Mayor N, Cullen E, Kirkham A, Padhani AR, Arya M, Bomers JGR, Dudderidge T, Ehdaie B, Freeman A, Guillaumier S, Hindley R, Lakhani A, Pendse D, Punwani S, Rastinehad AR, Rouvière O, Sanchez-Salas R, Schoots IG, Sokhi HK, Tam H, Tempany CM, Valerio M, Verma S, Villeirs G, van der Meulen J, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. The Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Focal Therapy (TARGET): A Systematic Review and International Consensus Recommendations. Eur Urol 2024; 85:466-482. [PMID: 38519280 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect recurrences after focal therapy for prostate cancer but there is no robust guidance regarding its use. Our objective was to produce consensus recommendations on MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting after focal therapy. METHODS A systematic review was performed in July 2022 to develop consensus statements. A two-round consensus exercise was then performed, with a consensus meeting in January 2023, during which 329 statements were scored by 23 panellists from Europe and North America spanning urology, radiology, and pathology with experience across eight focal therapy modalities. Using RAND Corporation/University of California-Los Angeles methodology, the Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET) were based on consensus for statements scored with agreement or disagreement. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 73 studies were included in the review. All 20 studies (100%) reporting suspicious imaging features cited focal contrast enhancement as suspicious for cancer recurrence. Of 31 studies reporting MRI assessment criteria, the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score was the scheme used most often (20 studies; 65%), followed by a 5-point Likert score (six studies; 19%). For the consensus exercise, consensus for statements scored with agreement or disagreement increased from 227 of 295 statements (76.9%) in round one to 270 of 329 statements (82.1%) in round two. Key recommendations include performing routine MRI at 12 mo using a multiparametric protocol compliant with PI-RADS version 2.1 standards. PI-RADS category scores for assessing recurrence within the ablation zone should be avoided. An alternative 5-point scoring system is presented that includes a major dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) sequence and joint minor diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted sequences. For the DCE sequence, focal nodular strong early enhancement was the most suspicious imaging finding. A structured minimum reporting data set and minimum reporting standards for studies detailing MRI data after focal therapy are presented. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The TARGET consensus recommendations may improve MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting after focal therapy for prostate cancer and provide minimum standards for study reporting. PATIENT SUMMARY Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can detect recurrent of prostate cancer after focal treatments, but there is a lack of guidance on MRI use for this purpose. We report new expert recommendations that may improve practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Light
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Nikhil Mayor
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Cullen
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Joyce G R Bomers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Richard Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Amish Lakhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas Pendse
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Vascular and Urinary Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heminder K Sokhi
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Department of Radiology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Henry Tam
- Department of Imaging, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Prostate, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pausch AM, Elsner C, Rupp NJ, Eberli D, Hötker AM. MRI-based monitoring of prostate cancer after HIFU: Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score. Eur J Radiol 2024; 175:111463. [PMID: 38615502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate inter-reader agreement, and diagnostic performance of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) score applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients who underwent focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS In this retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study, 73 men, who underwent focal HIFU treatment and received follow-up mpMRIs with subsequent prostate biopsies, were included. The PI-FAB score was applied to follow-up MRIs at 6, 12, and 36 months post-HIFU by two radiologists with different experience levels. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Gwet's AC1, and the diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score was assessed in relation to histopathologic results of subsequent prostate biopsies for each reader. RESULTS PI-FAB scores showed substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (AC1: 0.80-0.95) and demonstrated high specificity (Reader 1: 90-98 %, Reader 2: 87-98 %) and NPVs (Reader 1: 91-100 %, Reader 2: 88-97 %) in ruling out residual or recurrent in-field prostate cancer post-HIFU. Sensitivity (Reader 1: ≥43 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) and PPVs (Reader 1: ≥33 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) were mostly relatively lower, with notable disparities between the two readers, indicating the potential influence of radiologist experience. CONCLUSIONS The PI-FAB score provides a consistent and reliable tool for post-HIFU monitoring of prostate cancer using mpMRI. It demonstrates substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement and is particularly effective in excluding in-field residual or recurrent prostate cancer post-HIFU treatment. Its application can potentially enhance post-treatment patient care, emphasizing its value as a non-invasive MRI-based monitoring approach after focal ablative therapy of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia M Pausch
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Clara Elsner
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas M Hötker
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodríguez-Sánchez L, Emberton M, de Reijke T, Stricker P, Miñana B, Bianco F, Escrig JLD, Lantz A, Sanchez-Salas R. Revisiting Delphi to Create a Basis for the Future of Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer. World J Mens Health 2024; 42:245-255. [PMID: 37853538 PMCID: PMC10949031 DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theo de Reijke
- Department of Urology, UMC Amsterdam University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Phillip Stricker
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Private Hospital and Clinic, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bernardino Miñana
- Department of Urology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Bianco
- Urological Research Network, Nova Southeastern University, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | | | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaufmann B, Raess E, Schmid FA, Bieri U, Scherer TP, Elleisy M, Donati OF, Rupp NJ, Moch H, Gorin MA, Mortezavi A, Eberli D. Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: 3-year outcomes from a prospective trial. BJU Int 2024; 133:413-424. [PMID: 37897088 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the oncological and functional outcomes of focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in treating localised prostate cancer (PCa), a 3-year prospective study was undertaken using periodic post-ablation saturation biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with two or fewer lesions of grade group (GG) ≤3 PCa were eligible for participation. Additional criteria included a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of ≤15 ng/mL, clinical T1c-T2, and a life expectancy of ≥10 years. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS), defined as absence of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in- or out-of-field on protocol-mandated saturation biopsy, no whole-gland or systemic salvage treatment, PCa metastasis, or PCa-related death. Results are reported using two distinct definitions of csPCa: (i) the presence of any GG ≥2 and (ii) any GG ≥3 or core involvement of ≥6 mm. Secondary endpoints were functional patient-reported outcome measures addressing urinary, sexual, and bowel function. RESULTS A total of 91 patients were included: six (7%) with GG1 and 85 (93%) with GG ≥2. In all, 83 (91%) underwent at least one follow-up biopsy. Biopsy attendance at 6, 12, and 36 months was 84%, 67%, and 51%, respectively. The FFS at these time points for any GG ≥2 PCa was 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80-88%), 57% (95% CI 48-69%) and 44% (95% CI 34-56%), respectively. Using the second definition, FFS were 88% (95% CI 81-95%), 70% (95% CI 61-81%) and 65% (95% CI 55-77%), respectively. The 3-year cancer-specific survival was 100%, and freedom from metastasis was 99%. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (negative predictive value of up to 89%, 95% CI 84-93%) and relative decrease of PSA values (P = 0.4) performed poorly in detecting residual disease. Urinary and bowel assessment returned to baseline questionnaire scores within 3 months. In all, 17 (21%) patients reported meaningful worsening in erectile function. A significant decrease of PCa related anxiety was observed. CONCLUSIONS Focal HIFU treatment for localised PCa shows excellent functional outcomes with half of the patients remaining cancer-free after 3 years. Whole-gland treatment was avoided in 81%. Early follow-up biopsies are crucial to change or continue the treatment modality at the right time, while the use of MRI and PSA in detecting PCa recurrence is uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basil Kaufmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elisa Raess
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian A Schmid
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Bieri
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas P Scherer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Moustafa Elleisy
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivio F Donati
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Radiology Hirslanden Zurich, Octorad AG, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gelikman DG, Kenigsberg AP, Mee Law Y, Yilmaz EC, Harmon SA, Parikh SH, Hyman JA, Huth H, Koller CR, Nethala D, Hesswani C, Merino MJ, Gurram S, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Turkbey B. Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and Inter-reader Agreement of the Prostate Imaging After Focal Ablation Scoring System. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:74-80. [PMID: 38468864 PMCID: PMC10925932 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Focal therapy (FT) is increasingly recognized as a promising approach for managing localized prostate cancer (PCa), notably reducing treatment-related morbidities. However, post-treatment anatomical changes present significant challenges for surveillance using current imaging techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-reader agreement and efficacy of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on post-FT multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who underwent primary FT for localized csPCa between 2013 and 2023, followed by post-FT mpMRI and a prostate biopsy. Two expert genitourinary radiologists retrospectively evaluated post-FT mpMRI using PI-FAB. The key measures included inter-reader agreement of PI-FAB scores, assessed by quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa (κ), and the system's efficacy in predicting in-field recurrence of csPCa, with a PI-FAB score cutoff of 3. Additional diagnostic metrics including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were also evaluated. Key findings and limitations Scans from 38 patients were analyzed, revealing a moderate level of agreement in PI-FAB scoring (κ = 0.56). Both radiologists achieved sensitivity of 93% in detecting csPCa, although specificity, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracy varied. Conclusions and clinical implications The PI-FAB scoring system exhibited high sensitivity with moderate inter-reader agreement in detecting in-field recurrence of csPCa. Despite promising results, its low specificity and PPV necessitate further refinement. These findings underscore the need for larger studies to validate the clinical utility of PI-FAB, potentially aiding in standardizing post-treatment surveillance. Patient summary Focal therapy has emerged as a promising approach for managing localized prostate cancer, but limitations in current imaging techniques present significant challenges for post-treatment surveillance. The Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) scoring system showed high sensitivity for detecting in-field recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer. However, its low specificity and positive predictive value necessitate further refinement. Larger, more comprehensive studies are needed to fully validate its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Gelikman
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Alexander P. Kenigsberg
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Yan Mee Law
- Department of Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Enis C. Yilmaz
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie A. Harmon
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sahil H. Parikh
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason A. Hyman
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hannah Huth
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher R. Koller
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Daniel Nethala
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles Hesswani
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peretsman SJ, Emberton M, Fleshner N, Shoji S, Bahler CD, Miller LE. High-intensity focused ultrasound with visually directed power adjustment for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2024; 42:175. [PMID: 38507093 PMCID: PMC10954869 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04840-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize patient outcomes following visually directed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic review of cancer-control outcomes and complication rates among men with localized prostate cancer treated with visually directed focal HIFU. Study outcomes were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. RESULTS A total of 8 observational studies with 1,819 patients (median age 67 years; prostate-specific antigen 7.1 mg/ml; prostate volume 36 ml) followed over a median of 24 months were included. The mean prostate-specific antigen nadir following visually directed focal HIFU was 2.2 ng/ml (95% CI 0.9-3.5 ng/ml), achieved after a median of 6 months post-treatment. A clinically significant positive biopsy was identified in 19.8% (95% CI 12.4-28.3%) of cases. Salvage treatment rates were 16.2% (95% CI 9.7-23.8%) for focal- or whole-gland treatment, and 8.6% (95% CI 6.1-11.5%) for whole-gland treatment. Complication rates were 16.7% (95% CI 9.9-24.6%) for de novo erectile dysfunction, 6.2% (95% CI 0.0-19.0%) for urinary retention, 3.0% (95% CI 2.1-3.9%) for urinary tract infection, 1.9% (95% CI 0.1-5.3%) for urinary incontinence, and 0.1% (95% CI 0.0-1.4%) for bowel injury. CONCLUSION Limited evidence from eight observational studies demonstrated that visually directed HIFU for focal treatment of localized prostate cancer was associated with a relatively low risk of complications and acceptable cancer control over medium-term follow-up. Comparative, long-term safety and effectiveness results with visually directed focal HIFU are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Emberton
- Interventional Oncology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Fleshner
- Department of Surgical Oncology Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sunao Shoji
- Department of Urology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Clinton D Bahler
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Larry E Miller
- Miller Scientific, 3101 Browns Mill Road, Ste 6, #311, Johnson City, TN, 37604, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ghai S, Finelli A, Corr K, Lajkosz K, McCluskey S, Chan R, Gertner M, van der Kwast TH, Incze PF, Zlotta AR, Kucharczyk W, Perlis N. MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Focal Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Final Results from a 2-year Phase II Clinical Trial. Radiology 2024; 310:e231473. [PMID: 38441092 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Background MRI-guided focal therapy (FT) allows for accurate targeting of localized clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) while preserving healthy prostate tissue, but the long-term outcomes of this approach require more study. Purpose To assess the 2-year oncological and functional outcomes of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with targeted FT. Materials and Methods In this single-center prospective phase II trial, men with localized unifocal intermediate-risk PCa underwent transrectal MRI-guided focused ultrasound between July 2016 and July 2019. Planned ablation volumes included 10-mm margins when possible. Data regarding adverse events were collected and quality-of-life questionnaires were completed by participants at 6 weeks and at 5, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. Multiparametric MRI and targeted and systematic biopsies were performed at 24 months. Ablation volumes were determined by manual contouring of nonperfused volumes on immediate contrast-enhanced images. Generalized estimating equations were used to model trends in quality-of-life measures. Results Treatment was successfully completed in the 44 participants (median age, 67 years; IQR, 62-70 years; 36 patients with grade group [GG] 2; eight patients with GG 3). No major adverse events from treatment were recorded. One participant refused biopsy at 24 months. After 2 years, 39 of 43 participants (91%) had no csPCa at the treatment site and 36 of 43 (84%) had no cancer in the entire gland. No changes in International Index of Erectile Function-15 score or International Prostate Symptom Score were observed during 2-year follow-up (P = .73 and .39, respectively). Conclusion The majority of men treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound for intermediate risk PCa had negative results for csPCa at biopsy 2 years after treatment. Additionally, there was no significant decline in quality of life per the validated questionnaires. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02968784 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Woodrum in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeet Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Antonio Finelli
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Kateri Corr
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Rosanna Chan
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Mark Gertner
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Peter F Incze
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Walter Kucharczyk
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Nathan Perlis
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave, 1PMB-292, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (S.G., K.C., R.C., M.G., W.K.); Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., A.R.Z., N.P.), Department of Anesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (K.L.); and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alabousi M, Ghai S, Haider MA. MRI-guided Minimally Invasive Focal Therapies for Prostate Cancer. Radiology 2023; 309:e230431. [PMID: 38051187 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Two cases involving patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer and treated with MRI-guided focal therapies are presented. Patient selection procedures, techniques, outcomes, challenges, and future directions of MRI-guided focal therapies, as well as their role in the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer, are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Alabousi
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| | - Masoom A Haider
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1W7 (M.A., S.G., M.A.H.); and Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Peters I, Hensen B, Glandorf J, Gutberlet M, Dohna M, Struckmann S, Kuczyk MA, Wacker F, Hellms S. First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study. BMC Urol 2023; 23:142. [PMID: 37644453 PMCID: PMC10464407 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To share our experience using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) treatment for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 10/2019 and 06/2021 TULSA treatment for localized PCa was performed in 22 men (mean age: 67 ± 7 years, mean initial PSA: 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, ISUP 1 in n = 6, ISUP 2 in n = 14 and 2 patients with recurrence after previous radiotherapy). Patients were selected by an interdisciplinary team, taking clinical parameters, histopathology from targeted or systematic biopsies, mpMRI and patients preferences into consideration. Patients were thoroughly informed about alternative treatment options and that TULSA is an individual treatment approach. High-intensity ultrasound was applied using an ablation device placed in the prostatic urethra. Heat-development within the prostatic tissue was monitored using MR-thermometry. Challenges during the ablation procedure and follow-up of oncologic and functional outcome of at least 12 months after TULSA treatment were documented. RESULTS No major adverse events were documented. In the 12 month follow-up period, no significant changes of urinary continence, irritative/obstructive voiding symptoms, bowel irritation or hormonal symptoms were reported according to the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) score. Erectile function was significantly impaired 3-6 months (p < 0.01) and 9-12 months (p < 0.05) after TULSA. PSA values significantly decreased after therapy (2.1 ± 1.8 vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 ng/ml, p < 0.001). PCa recurrence rate was 23% (5/22 patients). CONCLUSION Establishment of TULSA in clinical routine was unproblematic, short-term outcome seems to be encouraging. The risk of erectile function impairment requires elaborate information of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Peters
- Clinic for Urology, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bennet Hensen
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julian Glandorf
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Marcel Gutberlet
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martha Dohna
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Steffen Struckmann
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Markus Antonius Kuczyk
- Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Susanne Hellms
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl- Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aker MN, Brisbane WG, Kwan L, Gonzalez S, Priester AM, Kinnaird A, Delfin MK, Felker E, Sisk AE, Kuppermann D, Marks LS. Cryotherapy for partial gland ablation of prostate cancer: Oncologic and safety outcomes. Cancer Med 2023; 12:9351-9362. [PMID: 36775929 PMCID: PMC10166973 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial gland ablation (PGA) is a new option for treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Cryotherapy, an early method of PGA, has had favorable evaluations, but few studies have employed a strict protocol using biopsy endpoints in men with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). METHODS 143 men with unilateral csPCa were enrolled in a prospective, observational trial of outpatient PGA-cryotherapy. Treatment was a 2-cycle freeze of the affected prostate part. Participants were evaluated with MRI-guided biopsy (MRGB) at baseline and at 6 months and 18 months after treatment. Absence of csPCa upon MRGB was the primary endpoint; quality-of-life at baseline and at 6 months after treatment was assessed by EPIC-CP questionnaires in the domains of urinary and sexual function. RESULTS Of the 143 participants, 136 (95%) completed MRGB at 6 months after treatment. In 103/136 (76%), the biopsy revealed no csPCa. Of the 103, 71 subsequently had an 18-month comprehensive biopsy; of the 71 with 18-month biopsies, 46 (65%) were found to have no csPCa. MRI lesions became undetectable in 96/130 (74%); declines in median serum PSA levels (6.9 to 2.5 ng/mL), PSA density (0.15 to 0.07), and prostate volume (42 to 34cc) were observed (all p < 0.01). Neither lesion disappearance on MRI nor PSA decline correlated with biopsy outcome. Urinary function was affected only slightly and sexual function moderately. CONCLUSION In the near to intermediate term, partial gland ablation with cryotherapy was found to be a safe and moderately effective treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eradication of cancer was better determined by MRI-guided biopsy than by MRI or PSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamdouh N Aker
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Wayne G Brisbane
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lorna Kwan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Samantha Gonzalez
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Adam Kinnaird
- Department of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, USA
| | - Merdie K Delfin
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ely Felker
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Anthony E Sisk
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Kuppermann
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Leonard S Marks
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alabousi M, Ghai S. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided ultrasound ablation for prostate cancer - A contemporary review of performance. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1069518. [PMID: 36686753 PMCID: PMC9846805 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1069518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men, but patient outcomes are varied depending on extent of disease. Radical, whole-gland therapies, such as prostatectomy or radiotherapy, are definitive treatments for PCa, but they are associated with significant morbidity, including erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. Focal therapies for PCa, whereby the part of gland harboring disease is selectively treated, spares the normal surrounding structures, and minimizes the morbidity associated with whole gland treatment. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance provides advantages over ultrasound guidance, such as better localization and targeting of clinically significant PCa (csPCa), as well as MRI thermometry which optimizes tissue ablation temperatures. This review will discuss two MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) techniques - transrectal MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) and TULSA (transurethral ultrasound ablation) ablation for localized PCa. Overall, recent major trials for MRgFUS and TULSA have shown promising oncological and functional results in the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk PCa. Recent Phase II MRgFUS trials have shown better oncologic outcomes than the published results for focal ultrasound guided HIFU and may justify the additional costs associated with MRI guidance. While initial studies on TULSA have focused on subtotal gland ablation, recent trials assessing oncological outcomes for focal treatment of angular sectors have shown promise.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ahn H, Hwang SI, Lee HJ, Kim SY, Cho JY, Lee H, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kim TM. Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Prediction of Recurrent Prostate Cancer after High-intensity Focused Ultrasound: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Prostate Int 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
16
|
Geboers B, Gondoputro W, Thompson JE, Reesink DJ, van Riel LAMJG, Zhang D, Blazevski A, Doan P, Agrawal S, Matthews J, Haynes AM, Liu Z, Delprado W, Shnier R, de Reijke TM, Lawrentschuk N, Stijns PEF, Yaxley JW, Scheltema MJ, Stricker PD. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Residual Prostate Cancer Following Irreversible Electroporation-A Multicenter Validation Study. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1591-1598. [PMID: 35577751 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate monitoring following focal treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is paramount for timely salvage treatment or retreatment. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to detect residual PCa in the short-term follow-up of focal treatment with irreversible electroporation (IRE) using transperineal or transrectal template ± targeted biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective international multicenter study of men with biopsy-proven PCa, treated with focal IRE, and followed by mpMRI (index-test) and template biopsies (reference-test) between February 2013 and January 2021, was conducted. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI were calculated for in- and outfield residual disease based on two definitions of significant PCa: University College London (UCL) 1-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥3 or ISUP ≥1 with maximum cancer core length (MCCL) ≥6 mm, and UCL2-ISUP ≥2 or ISUP ≥1 with MCCL ≥4 mm. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 303 patients from five focal therapy centers were treated with primary IRE. The final analysis was performed on 217 men (median age 67, median prostate-specific antigen 6.2, 81% ISUP 2/3) who underwent both mpMRI and template biopsies. Multiparametric MRI missed 38/57 (67%) positive biopsy locations (UCL1) in 22 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of mpMRI to detect whole gland residual disease (UCL1) were 43.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 28-59), 80.9% (95% CI: 75-86), 33.3% (95% CI: 21-47), and 86.7% (95% CI: 81-91), respectively. Based on UCL2, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 35.8% (95% CI: 25-48), 82.0% (95% CI: 75-88), 47.1% (95% CI: 34-61), and 74.1% (95% CI: 67-80), respectively. Limitations are the retrospective nature and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI to detect residual clinically significant PCa following IRE was low. Follow-up template biopsies should be performed, regardless of mpMRI results. PATIENT SUMMARY We investigated the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect residual prostate cancer after treatment with irreversible electroporation. The accuracy of MRI is insufficient, and we emphasize the importance of confirmatory prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Geboers
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - William Gondoputro
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James E Thompson
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daan J Reesink
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Luigi A M J G van Riel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Zhang
- Department of Urology, E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexandar Blazevski
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Doan
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shikha Agrawal
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jayne Matthews
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne-Maree Haynes
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Zhixin Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology, E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Pascal E F Stijns
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - John W Yaxley
- Department of Urology, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Matthijs J Scheltema
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Phillip D Stricker
- Department of Urology, St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khandwala YS, Morisetty S, Ghanouni P, Fan RE, Soerensen SJC, Rusu M, Sonn GA. Evaluation of post-ablation mpMRI as a predictor of residual prostate cancer after focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:489.e9-489.e17. [PMID: 36058811 PMCID: PMC10058305 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSA testing in follow-up after high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS A total of 73 men with localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled and underwent focal HIFU followed by per-protocol PSA and mpMRI with systematic plus targeted biopsies at 12 months after treatment. We evaluated the association between post-treatment mpMRI and PSA with disease persistence on the post-ablation biopsy. We also assessed post-treatment functional and oncological outcomes. RESULTS Median age was 69 years (Interquartile Range (IQR): 66-74) and median PSA was 6.9 ng/dL (IQR: 5.3-9.9). Of 19 men with persistent GG ≥ 2 disease, 58% (11 men) had no visible lesions on MRI. In the 14 men with PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions, 7 (50%) had either no cancer or GG 1 cancer at biopsy. Men with false negative mpMRI findings had higher PSA density (0.16 vs. 0.07 ng/mL2, P = 0.01). No change occurred in the mean Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) survey scores (17.0 at baseline vs. 17.7 post-treatment, P = 0.75) or International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (8.1 at baseline vs. 7.7 at 24 months, P = 0.81) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS Persistent GG ≥ 2 cancer may occur after focal HIFU. mpMRI alone without confirmatory biopsy may be insufficient to rule out residual cancer, especially in patients with higher PSA density. Our study also validates previously published studies demonstrating preservation of urinary and sexual function after HIFU treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash S Khandwala
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Shravan Morisetty
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Richard E Fan
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Mirabela Rusu
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Diagnostic value of multiparametric MRI in detecting residual or recurrent prostate cancer after high-intensity focused ultrasound. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00531-8. [DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00531-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
19
|
Peters I, Derlin K, Peperhove MJ, Hensen B, Pertschy S, Wolters M, von Klot CAJ, Wacker F, Hellms S. First experiences and results after cryoablation of prostate cancer with histopathological evaluation and imaging-based follow-up. Future Oncol 2022; 18:1705-1716. [PMID: 35255716 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To share our experience after 28 cryoablation treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) with histopathology, clinical data and MRI as the follow-up methods. Methods: Clinical follow-up comprised prostate specific antigen (PSA)-measurements, PSA-density and quality-of-life-parameters. multi-parametric (mp)MRI pre- and post-cryoablation were retrospectively re-analyzed in 23 cases using Likert scores. Follow-up-histopathology was performed via MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided and/or systematic biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Results: 17 PCa (61%) were diagnosed within 12-month post-cryotherapy (infield and out-of-field disease). PSA levels and PSA density were not significantly different between patients with or without PCa recurrence. mpMRI can characterize the decrease in prostate volume and necrosis. Area under the curve for the detection of PCa was 81% (global Likert scores), 74-87% (T2), 78% (diffusion weighted imaging) and 57-78% (dynamic contrast enhanced imaging; Youden-selected cutoff ≥3). Conclusion: Besides histopathological evaluation and control biopsy, MRI might have the potential to accurately detect PCa after cryotherapy. Clinical data and interdisciplinary communication are required for efficient monitoring after cryoablation treatments for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Peters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Katja Derlin
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Matti Joonas Peperhove
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Bennet Hensen
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Stefanie Pertschy
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Mathias Wolters
- Department of Urology & Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | | | - Frank Wacker
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| | - Susanne Hellms
- Institute for Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, Hannover, 30625, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bakavicius A, Marra G, Macek P, Robertson C, Abreu AL, George AK, Malavaud B, Coloby P, Rischmann P, Moschini M, Rastinehad AR, Sidana A, Stabile A, Tourinho-Barbosa R, de la Rosette J, Ahmed H, Polascik T, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R. Available evidence on HIFU for focal treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48:263-274. [PMID: 34003610 PMCID: PMC8932027 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common oncologic disease among men. Radical treatment with curative intent provides good oncological results for PCa survivors, although definitive therapy is associated with significant number of serious side-effects. In modern-era of medicine tissue-sparing techniques, such as focal HIFU, have been proposed for PCa patients in order to provide cancer control equivalent to the standard-of-care procedures while reducing morbidities and complications. The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the available evidence about focal HIFU therapy as a primary treatment for localized PCa. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a comprehensive literature review of focal HIFU therapy in the MEDLINE database (PROSPERO: CRD42021235581). Articles published in the English language between 2010 and 2020 with more than 50 patients were included. RESULTS Clinically significant in-field recurrence and out-of-field progression were detected to 22% and 29% PCa patients, respectively. Higher ISUP grade group, more positive cores at biopsy and bilateral disease were identified as the main risk factors for disease recurrence. The most common strategy for recurrence management was definitive therapy. Six months after focal HIFU therapy 98% of patients were totally continent and 80% of patients retained sufficient erections for sexual intercourse. The majority of complications presented in the early postoperative period and were classified as low-grade. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights that focal HIFU therapy appears to be a safe procedure, while short-term cancer control rate is encouraging. Though, second-line treatment or active surveillance seems to be necessary in a significant number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnas Bakavicius
- Vilnius UniversityFaculty of MedicineVilniusLithuaniaFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Institut Mutualiste MontsourisDepartment of UrologyParisFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Petr Macek
- Institut Mutualiste MontsourisDepartment of UrologyParisFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Cary Robertson
- Duke UniversityDepartment of UrologyDurhamNCUSADepartment of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Andre L. Abreu
- Keck School of Medicine and University of South CaliforniaDepartment of UrologyCAUSADepartment of Urology, Keck School of Medicine and University of South California, CA, USA
| | - Arvin K. George
- University of MichiganDepartment of UrologyAnn ArborMIUSADepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bernard Malavaud
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse OncopoleDepartment of UrologyToulouseFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrick Coloby
- Centre Hospitalier René-DubosDepartment of UrologyPontoiseFranceDepartment of Urology, Centre Hospitalier René-Dubos (Pontoise), France
| | - Pascal Rischmann
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse OncopoleDepartment of UrologyToulouseFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental OncologyMilanItalyDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Lucerne Kanton HospitalDepartment of UrologyLucerneSwitzerlandDepartment of Urology, Lucerne Kanton Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
- Lenox Hill UrologyDepartment of UrologyNYUSADepartment of Urology, Lenox Hill Urology, NY, USA
| | - Abhinav Sidana
- University of Cincinnati College of MedicineDivision of UrologyCincinnatiOHUSADivision of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Armando Stabile
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental OncologyMilanItalyDepartment of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa
- Faculdade de Medicina do ABCDepartamento de UrologiaSão PauloBrasilDepartamento de Urologia, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (Faculdade de Medicina do ABC), São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Jean de la Rosette
- Istanbul Medipol Mega University HospitalDepartment of UrologyIstanbulTurkeyDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hashim Ahmed
- Imperial College LondonFaculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & CancerLondonUnited KingdomFaculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Polascik
- Duke UniversityDepartment of UrologyDurhamNCUSADepartment of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Institut Mutualiste MontsourisDepartment of UrologyParisFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Institut Mutualiste MontsourisDepartment of UrologyParisFranceDepartment of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Paxton M, Barbalat E, Perlis N, Menezes RJ, Gertner M, Dragas D, Haider MA, Finelli A, Trachtenberg J, Ghai S. Role of multiparametric MRI in long-term surveillance following focal laser ablation of prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20210414. [PMID: 34324385 PMCID: PMC8978239 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Determine the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) appearance of the prostate following focal laser ablation (FLA) for PCa and to identify imaging characteristics associated with recurrent disease. METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent FLA for low-intermediate risk PCa between 2010 and 2014 was performed. Early (median 4 months) and late mpMRI (median 49 months) follow-up were qualitatively assessed for T2-weighted, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) appearances and also compared to corresponding PSA values and biopsy results. RESULTS 55 cancers were treated in 54 men (mean age 61.0 years). Early mpMRI was performed in 30 (54.5%) patients while late follow-up mpMRI in 42 (84%). Ill-defined scarring with and without atrophy at the treatment site were the most common appearances. In patients with paired MRI and biopsy, one of four patients with clinically significant PCa on biopsy (≥GG2 or≥6 mm GG1) showed hyperenhancement or restricted diffusion at early follow-up. At late follow-up, positive biopsies were seen in 5/8 (63%) cases with hyperenhancement and 5/6 (83%) cases with restricted diffusion at the treatment site. PSA change was not associated with biopsy results at either time point. CONCLUSION mpMRI is able to document the morphological and temporal changes following focal therapy. It has limited ability to detect recurrent disease in early months following treatment. Late-term mpMRI is sensitive at identifying patients with recurrent disease. Small sample size is, however, a limitation of the study. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Implementing MRI in follow-up after FT may be useful in predicting residual or recurrent PCa and therefore provide reliable outcome data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Paxton
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eitan Barbalat
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathan Perlis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ravi J Menezes
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Gertner
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Dragas
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Masoom A Haider
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Trachtenberg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Division of Urology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network – Mount Sinai Hospital – Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cancer Control Outcomes Following Focal Therapy Using High-intensity Focused Ultrasound in 1379 Men with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institute 15-year Experience. Eur Urol 2022; 81:407-413. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
23
|
Tamposis I, Tsougos I, Karatzas A, Vassiou K, Vlychou M, Tzortzis V. PCaGuard: A Software Platform to Support Optimal Management of Prostate Cancer. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13:91-99. [PMID: 35045583 PMCID: PMC8769808 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a severe public health issue and the most common cancer worldwide in men. Early diagnosis can lead to early treatment and long-term survival. The addition of the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in combination with ultrasound (mpMRI-U/S fusion) biopsy to the existing diagnostic tools improved prostate cancer detection. Use of both tools gradually increases in every day urological practice. Furthermore, advances in the area of information technology and artificial intelligence have led to the development of software platforms able to support clinical diagnosis and decision-making using patient data from personalized medicine.
Methods
We investigated the current aspects of implementation, architecture, and design of a health care information system able to handle and store a large number of clinical examination data along with medical images, and produce a risk calculator in a seamless and secure manner complying with data security/accuracy and personal data protection directives and standards simultaneously. Furthermore, we took into account interoperability support and connectivity to legacy and other information management systems. The platform was implemented using open source, modern frameworks, and development tools.
Results
The application showed that software platforms supporting patient follow-up monitoring can be effective, productive, and of extreme value, while at the same time, aiding toward the betterment medicine clinical workflows. Furthermore, it removes access barriers and restrictions to specialized care, especially for rural areas, providing the exchange of medical images and patient data, among hospitals and physicians.
Conclusion
This platform handles data to estimate the risk of prostate cancer detection using current state-of-the-art in eHealth systems and services while fusing emerging multidisciplinary and intersectoral approaches. This work offers the research community an open architecture framework that encourages the broader adoption of more robust and comprehensive systems in standard clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Tamposis
- Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tsougos
- Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Anastasios Karatzas
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Katerina Vassiou
- Radiology and Anatomy Department, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Marianna Vlychou
- Radiology Department, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| | - Vasileios Tzortzis
- Department of Urology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Avital Y, Fütterer JJ, Cherniavsky A, Bomers JGR. Minimally Invasive Procedures in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: an Interventional Radiologist's Perspective. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1433-1441. [PMID: 35670993 PMCID: PMC9606051 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01291-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Minimal invasive procedures, including targeted biopsy (TB) and focal therapy (FT), are increasingly used in diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. Here, we review the current role of these procedures, from a perspective of an interventional radiologist. RECENT FINDINGS TB is an established part of current guidelines for diagnosis of PCa. Several modalities of FT are gaining prevalence in recent years, as a tissue-preserving alternative for definitive treatment of localized PCa. FT is currently at early research stages, offered to selected patients in clinical trials settings. TB and FT are minimally invasive procedures used by multidisciplinary teams for diagnosis and treatment of localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaniv Avital
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Gelderland The Netherlands ,Department of Interventional Radiology, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), 70300 Zerifin, Israel
| | - Jurgen J. Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Gelderland The Netherlands
| | - Alexei Cherniavsky
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), 70300 Zerifin, Israel
| | - Joyce G. R. Bomers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Gelderland The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schaudinn A, Michaelis J, Franz T, Ho-Thi P, Horn LC, Blana A, Hadaschik B, Stumpp P, Stolzenburg JU, Schlemmer HP, Denecke T, Busse H, Ganzer R, Linder N. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation of the prostate: Late follow-up MRI findings in non-recurrent patients. Eur J Radiol 2021; 144:109957. [PMID: 34601322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging option for the treatment of prostate cancer and often followed up by MRI. Image assessment of treatment failure, however, requires proper knowledge about typical procedure-related changes in prostate MRI, which is sparse, in particular for unilateral HIFU treatment and late follow up (beyond 6 months). The goal of this study was therefore to compile the type and frequency of such MRI findings in selected patients without recurrent cancer 12 months after prostate hemiablation. METHODS Data from a prospective multicenter trial on HIFU hemiablation were reviewed retrospectively. Trial patients have had a late follow-up by MRI (at around 12 months) and either MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion or standard TRUS-guided biopsy. This work deliberately included patients with non-recurrent cancer in the treated prostate lobe in per-protocol biopsy leaving 30 men with initial International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group of 1 or 2. Six categories of potential HIFU-related MRI features were assessed by an expert committee and then evaluated by two readers in consensus: 1. shrinkage of the treated lobe, 2. residual prostate tissue, 3. fluid-filled cavity, 4. fibrosis, 5. hematoma residuals (in the prostate or seminal vesicles) and 6. contrast enhancement of the ablated area. RESULTS Shrinkage of the ablated lobe was seen in 93% of the cases with an average percent volume change of -37% (range: -70% to +108%). In the contralateral lobe, the volume remained practically the same (-2% on average, p = 0.804). In the ablated lobe, the frequency of fibrosis was 97%. Residual prostate tissue was seen in 93% of the cases. The frequency for fluid-filled cavities was 97%, with the wide majority (90%) contiguous with the urethra. Hematoma residuals in the prostate and in seminal vesicles were found in 47% and 10% of the patients, respectively. Contrast enhancement was both rim-like (50%) as well as diffuse (33%) within the ablated area. CONCLUSION In our case series of HIFU hemiablation in the prostate, shrinkage, residual prostate tissue, fluid-filled cavities contiguous with the urethra and fibrosis were very common late MRI findings of the ablated lobe in non-recurrent patients. Rim-like contrast enhancement or diffuse one within the ablated area were less frequent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schaudinn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jakob Michaelis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Toni Franz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Phuc Ho-Thi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Blana
- Department of Urology, Fürth Hospital, Fürth, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Stumpp
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Harald Busse
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Roman Ganzer
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Bad Tölz, Bad Tölz, Germany
| | - Nicolas Linder
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hopstaken JS, Bomers JGR, Sedelaar MJP, Valerio M, Fütterer JJ, Rovers MM. An Updated Systematic Review on Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: What Has Changed over the Past 5 Years? Eur Urol 2021; 81:5-33. [PMID: 34489140 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Focal therapy is a promising, minimally invasive strategy to selectively treat localized prostate cancer. A previous systematic review indicated that there is growing evidence for favorable functional outcomes, but that oncological effectiveness was yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of focal therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between October 2015 and December 31, 2020. In addition, the research stages were acquired according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) recommendations. Ongoing studies were identified through clinical trial registries. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Seventy-two studies were identified exploring eight different sources of energy to deliver focal therapy in 5827 patients. Twenty-seven studies reported on high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), nine studies on irreversible electroporation, 11 on cryoablation, eight on focal laser ablation and focal brachytherapy, seven on photodynamic therapy (PDT), two on radiofrequency ablation, and one on prostatic artery embolization. The majority of studies were prospective development stage 2a studies (n = 35). PDT and HIFU, both in stage 3, showed promising results. Overall, HIFU studies reported a median of 95% pad-free patients and a median of 85% patients with no clinically significant cancer (CSC) in the treated area. For PDT, no changes in continence were reported and a median of 90% of patients were without CSC. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Over the past 5 yr, focal therapy has been studied for eight different energy sources, mostly in single-arm stage 2 studies. Although a first randomized controlled trial in focal therapy has been performed, more high-quality evaluations are needed, preferably via multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up and predefined assessment of oncological and functional outcomes and health-related quality-of-life measures. PATIENT SUMMARY Focal treatment (FT) of prostate cancer has potential, considering that it has less impact on continence and potency than radical treatment. Our systematic review indicates that despite the method being studied extensively over the past half decade, the majority of studies remain in an early research stage. The techniques high-intensity focused ultrasound and photodynamic therapy have shown most progression toward advanced research stages and show favorable results. However, more high-quality evidence is required before FT can become available as a standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana S Hopstaken
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joyce G R Bomers
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel J P Sedelaar
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Deleuze C, Blanchet P, Gourtaud G, Sénéchal C, Roux V, Brureau L, Eyraud R. [High-intensity focused ultrasound for locally prostate cancer: An Afro-Caribbean single-center study]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:699-708. [PMID: 34154956 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has proved to be effective in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The aim of this prospective study is to assess their first oncological and functional results in an Afro-Caribbean population. METHODS From May 2018 to January 2020, 77 patients issued from French West Indies were included. Several treatments were carried out: whole-gland treatment hemi or focal ablation; in a primary setting (group I) or a salvage therapy (group II). PSA level was assessed at 2, 6, 9 and 12 months. MpMRI and post HIFU biopsy were performed between 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Continence, urinary end erectile functions were assessed by ICS, IPSS and IIEF scores. RESULTS Groupe I included 71.2% patients, group II, 28.8%. The median age was 75.4 years [IQR 69.6-79.4]. The median follow-up was 8.3 months [IQR 3.5-12.25]. At inclusion, PSA was 7.7ng/ml [IQR 5.5-11.2] in group I, and 5.9ng/ml [IQR 4.4-7.9] in group II. In the whole population, there was 73.5% negative biopsies; 14.7% of the biopsies were positive in treated zone and 11.8% in non-treated zone. Regarding morbidities, urinary incontinence appeared in 7.5% and erectile dysfunction rate was 13.2%. CONCLUSION Our study reveals the first experience of HIFU by Focal One® device in an Afro-Caribbean population. It seems to be a safe and reproducible treatment with acceptable oncological results and low genitourinary morbidity. Long term follow-up and a higher number of patients are necessary to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Deleuze
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - P Blanchet
- CHU de Guadeloupe, université des Antilles, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) MR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - G Gourtaud
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - C Sénéchal
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - V Roux
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - L Brureau
- CHU de Guadeloupe, université des Antilles, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) MR_S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - R Eyraud
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Guadeloupe, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lumiani A, Samun D, Sroka R, Muschter R. Single center retrospective analysis of fifty-two prostate cancer patients with customized MR-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA). Urol Oncol 2021; 39:830.e9-830.e16. [PMID: 34144892 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES MR-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) has primarily been investigated for whole-gland prostate ablation, even though the technology is also well-suited for partial gland treatment. The objectives were to perform a clinical service evaluation of partial to whole-gland TULSA for patients with localized prostate cancer (CaP). TULSA was also evaluated as a combined therapy for a subset of patients presenting with both cancer and concurrent benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). SUBJECTS AND METHODS This retrospective, consecutive clinical service evaluation included men with histopathologically-confirmed CaP who underwent TULSA either as primary or salvage treatment. The planned ablation was dependent on the individual tumor characteristics, concurrent BPH and patient preferences. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to record complications. Surgeon-assessed functional outcomes were reported. Early treatment success was defined by negative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and lack of prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence. RESULTS Fifty-two consecutive patients (47 treatment-naïve and 5 salvage) were included, with median follow-up of sixteen months and a max of thirty-six months. Baseline median (IQR) age and PSA were 67 years (63-76) and 8.0 ng/ml (5.2-13), respectively. Two Grade IIIa adverse events were observed, with no bowel-related complications. For urinary continence outcomes, 1 patient worsened to 1 pad per day. All patients who were previously potent maintained erectile potency. Of the patient subgroup also seeking treatment for BPH, 83% reported symptom improvement. Median (IQR) PSA nadir after primary treatment was 1.1 ng/ml (0.5-2.1). Early treatment success was 88%. Nine patients underwent a single repeat TULSA. CONCLUSION Customized prostate ablation with TULSA offers flexible ablation according to patients' disease characteristics and treatment expectations, providing favorable safety and promising early MRI and PSA results. TULSA is a feasible combination therapy for patients with both cancer and concurrent BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diyala Samun
- Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ronald Sroka
- Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rolf Muschter
- ALTA Klinik, Bielefeld, Germany; Laser-Forschungslabor, LIFE Center, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ghai S, Finelli A, Corr K, Chan R, Jokhu S, Li X, McCluskey S, Konukhova A, Hlasny E, van der Kwast TH, Incze PF, Zlotta AR, Hamilton RJ, Haider MA, Kucharczyk W, Perlis N. MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Early Results of a Phase II Trial. Radiology 2021; 298:695-703. [PMID: 33529137 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background To reduce adverse effects of whole-gland therapy, participants with localized clinically significant prostate cancer can undergo MRI-guided focal therapy. Purpose To explore safety and early oncologic and functional outcomes of targeted focal high-intensity focused ultrasound performed under MRI-guided focused ultrasound for intermediate-risk clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective phase II trial, between February 2016 and July 2019, men with unifocal clinically significant prostate cancer visible at MRI were treated with transrectal MRI-guided focused ultrasound. The primary end point was the 5-month biopsy (last recorded in December 2019) with continuation to the 24-month follow-up projected to December 2021. Real-time ablation monitoring was performed with MR thermography. Nonperfused volume was measured at treatment completion. Periprocedural complications were recorded. Follow-up included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) score at 6 weeks and 5 months, and multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy of the treated area at 5 months. The generalized estimating equation model was used for statistical analysis, and the Holm method was used to adjust P value. Results Treatment was successfully completed in all 44 men, 36 with grade group (GG) 2 and eight with GG 3 disease (median age, 67 years; interquartile range [IQR], 62-70 years). No major treatment-related adverse events occurred. Forty-one of 44 participants (93%; 95% CI: 82, 98) were free of clinically significant prostate cancer (≥6 mm GG 1 disease or any volume ≥GG 2 disease) at the treatment site at 5-month biopsy (median, seven cores). Median IIEF-15 and IPSS scores were similar at baseline and at 5 months (IIEF-15 score at baseline, 61 [IQR, 34-67] and at 5 months, 53 [IQR, 24-65.5], P = .18; IPSS score at baseline, 3.5 [IQR, 1.8-7] and at 5 months, 6 [IQR, 2-7.3], P = .43). Larger ablations (≥15 cm3) compared with smaller ones were associated with a decline in IIEF-15 scores at 6 weeks (adjusted P < .01) and at 5 months (adjusted P = .07). Conclusion Targeted focal therapy of intermediate-risk prostate cancer performed with MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation was safe and had encouraging early oncologic and functional outcomes. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article See also the editorial by Tempany-Afdhal in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeet Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Antonio Finelli
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Kateri Corr
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Rosanna Chan
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Sarah Jokhu
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Xuan Li
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Anna Konukhova
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Eugen Hlasny
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Theodorus H van der Kwast
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Peter F Incze
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Masoom A Haider
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Walter Kucharczyk
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| | - Nathan Perlis
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (S.G., R.C., E.H., M.A.H., W.K.), Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology (A.F., K.C., S.J., A.K., A.R.Z., R.J.H., N.P.), Biostatistics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (X.L.), Department of Anaesthesia (S.M.), and Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine Program (T.H.v.d.K.), University Health Network-Mount Sinai Hospital-Women's, College Hospital, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2; and Department of Urology, Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Toronto, Canada (P.F.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3882-3895. [PMID: 32447414 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02577-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
For clinically significant, locally confined prostate cancer, whole-gland radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy are established effective treatment strategies that, however, come at a cost of significant morbidity related to urinary and sexual side effects. The concept of risk stratification paired with a better understanding of prognostic factors has led to the development of alternative management options including active surveillance and focal therapy for appropriately selected patients with localized disease. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is one such minimally invasive, image-guided treatment option for prostate cancer. Due to the relative novelty of HIFU and the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer, many radiologists are not yet familiar with imaging findings related to HIFU, their temporal evolution as well as imaging appearance of recurrent disease after this type of focal therapy. HIFU induces sharply demarcated, localized coagulative necrosis of a tumor through thermal energy delivered via an endorectal or transurethral ultrasound transducer. In this pictorial review, we aim at providing relevant background information that will guide the reader through the general principles of HIFU in the prostate, as well as demonstrate the imaging appearance of expected post-HIFU changes versus recurrent tumor.
Collapse
|
31
|
Morozov A, Taratkin M, Barret E, Singla N, Bezrukov E, Chinenov D, Enikeev M, Gomez Rivas J, Shpikina A, Enikeev D. A systematic review of irreversible electroporation in localised prostate cancer treatment. Andrologia 2020; 52:e13789. [DOI: 10.1111/and.13789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrey Morozov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Mark Taratkin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Eric Barret
- Department of Urology Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Paris France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
| | - Evgeniy Bezrukov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Denis Chinenov
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Mikhail Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | | | - Anastasia Shpikina
- International School ‘Medicine of the Future’ Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Huber PM, Afzal N, Arya M, Boxler S, Dudderidge T, Emberton M, Guillaumier S, Hindley RG, Hosking-Jervis F, Leemann L, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nigam R, Odgen C, Persad R, Virdi J, Winkler M, Ahmed HU. Focal HIFU therapy for anterior compared to posterior prostate cancer lesions. World J Urol 2020; 39:1115-1119. [PMID: 32638084 PMCID: PMC8124043 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03297-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare cancer control in anterior compared to posterior prostate cancer lesions treated with a focal HIFU therapy approach. Materials and methods In a prospectively maintained national database, 598 patients underwent focal HIFU (Sonablate®500) (March/2007–November/2016). Follow-up occurred with 3-monthly clinic visits and PSA testing in the first year with PSA, every 6–12 months with mpMRI with biopsy for MRI-suspicion of recurrence. Treatment failure was any secondary treatment (ADT/chemotherapy, cryotherapy, EBRT, RRP, or re-HIFU), tumour recurrence with Gleason ≥ 3 + 4 on prostate biopsy without further treatment or metastases/prostate cancer-related mortality. Cases with anterior cancer were compared to those with posterior disease. Results 267 patients were analysed following eligibility criteria. 45 had an anterior focal-HIFU and 222 had a posterior focal-HIFU. Median age was 64 years and 66 years, respectively, with similar PSA level of 7.5 ng/ml and 6.92 ng/ml. 84% and 82%, respectively, had Gleason 3 + 4, 16% in both groups had Gleason 4 + 3, 0% and 2% had Gleason 4 + 4. Prostate volume was similar (33 ml vs. 36 ml, p = 0.315); median number of positive cores in biopsies was different in anterior and posterior tumours (7 vs. 5, p = 0.009), while medium cancer core length, and maximal cancer percentage of core were comparable. 17/45 (37.8%) anterior focal-HIFU patients compared to 45/222 (20.3%) posterior focal-HIFU patients required further treatment (p = 0.019). Conclusion Treating anterior prostate cancer lesions with focal HIFU may be less effective compared to posterior tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp M Huber
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Inselspital Berne, Bern, Switzerland.,Urologie St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Department of Urology, Dorset County Hospital NHS Trust, Dorchester, Dorset, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Silvan Boxler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Inselspital Berne, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephanie Guillaumier
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lucas Leemann
- Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Henry Lewi
- Springfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, UK
| | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Department of Urology, Royal County Surrey Hospital NHS Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Chris Odgen
- Department of Academic Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Early oncological control following partial gland cryo-ablation: a prospective experience specifying reflex MRI guided biopsy of the ablation zone. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 24:114-119. [PMID: 32636487 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0244-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several consensus statements recommend serial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), multi parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and prostate biopsy following partial gland ablation. We determined the rate of persistent in-field disease following primary partial gland cryo-ablation and whether PSA or mpMRI are reliable predictors of in-field disease persistence. METHODS Between March 2017 and July 2019, subjects meeting eligibility criteria for partial gland cryoablation were enrolled into an IRB approved outcomes registry. PSA, mpMRI, and prostate biopsy (four cores targeting the ablation zone + six ipsilateral systematic cores) were performed per protocol 6 months following intervention. Binary logistic regression was employed to calculate odds ratio (OR) of PSA decrease, and suspicious mpMRI effect on cancer persistence. The performance of mpMRI for predicting in-field persistence of PCa was evaluated by area under the receiver operation characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS Of the 83 eligible men undergoing partial gland cryoablation, 70 (84.3%) underwent 6-month protocol prostate biopsy. Five (7.1%) biopsies exhibited any in-field disease persistence. Only one (1.4%) of these cancers was Gleason grade > 1. Neither PSA decrease or suspicious mpMRI reliably predicted cancer persistence, with OR of 1.6 (0.25-8.6) and 1.5 (0.02-1.3), respectively. AUC of mpMRI for predicting in-field disease persistence was 0.554. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients undergoing partial gland cryo-ablation, the incidence of persistent disease was low. PSA and mpMRI were not reliable predictors of in-field disease persistence. Based on these data, consideration may be given to deferring early follow-up biopsy in appropriate patients.
Collapse
|
34
|
O'Connor LP, Lebastchi AH, Horuz R, Rastinehad AR, Siddiqui MM, Grummet J, Kastner C, Ahmed HU, Pinto PA, Turkbey B. Role of multiparametric prostate MRI in the management of prostate cancer. World J Urol 2020; 39:651-659. [PMID: 32583039 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03310-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer has traditionally been diagnosed by an elevation in PSA or abnormal exam leading to a systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. This diagnostic pathway underdiagnoses clinically significant disease while over diagnosing clinically insignificant disease. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the recent literature regarding the role of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the management of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed to identify articles discussing use of mpMRI of the prostate in management of prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The incorporation of mpMRI of the prostate addresses the shortcomings of the prostate biopsy while providing several other advantages. mpMRI allows some men to avoid an immediate biopsy and permits visualization of areas likely to harbor clinically significant cancer prior to biopsy to facilitate use of MR-targeted prostate biopsies. This allows for reduction in diagnosis of clinically insignificant disease as well as improved detection and better characterization of higher risk cancers, as well as the improved selection of patients for active surveillance. In addition, mpMRI can be used for selection and monitoring of patients for active surveillance and treatment planning during surgery and focal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke P O'Connor
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amir H Lebastchi
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rahim Horuz
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - M Minhaj Siddiqui
- Division of Urology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christof Kastner
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter A Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD, USA. .,, 10 Center Drive Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Connor MJ, Gorin MA, Ahmed HU, Nigam R. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2020; 23:232-243. [PMID: 32051551 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-0206-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer focal therapy aims to minimize the side-effects of whole gland treatments, such as radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy without compromising oncological efficacy. However, concerns exist regarding the multifocal nature of prostate cancer and the lack of long-term oncological data for this form of treatment. In recent years, the routine adoption of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has improved our ability to select candidates for focal therapy and to accurately deliver this form of prostate cancer treatment. METHODS We performed a review of the literature to provide a summary of the oncological and functional outcomes of men receiving primary prostate focal therapy. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of the routine implementation of mpMRI as part of the initial prostate cancer diagnostic pathway on the selection of candidates and delivery of focal therapy. Finally, we summarize knowledge gaps in the field and highlight active clinical trials in this arena. RESULTS Primary focal therapy involves the application of one of a number of energies that ablate tissue, such as cryotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Success is principally dependent on highly accurate patient selection and disease localization underpinned in large part by the routine integration of pre-biopsy mpMRI. Prospective medium-term follow-up data for primary HIFU and cryotherapy for men with intermediate-risk disease have shown acceptable cancer control with low risk of side effects and complications. Additional research is needed to clearly define an appropriate follow-up approach and to guide the management of in- and out-of-field recurrences. Multiple comparative trials with randomization against standard care are currently underway in men with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The widespread adoption of prostate mpMRI has led to improved disease localization, enabling the performance of focal therapy as a viable treatment strategy for men with low volume intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Connor
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK. .,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.
| | - M A Gorin
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - H U Ahmed
- Imperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.,Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK
| | - R Nigam
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK.,University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. A variety of treatment options is available for localized prostate cancer and may range from active surveillance to focal therapy or whole gland treatment, that is, surgery or radiotherapy. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels are an important tool to monitor treatment success after whole gland treatment, unfortunately prostate-specific antigen is unreliable after focal therapy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate is rapidly gaining field in the management of prostate cancer and may play a crucial role in the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. This article will focus on postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging after different forms of local therapy in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
37
|
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Margolis DJ, Gross MD, Natarajan S, Priester A, Hectors S, Ma X, Mosquera JM, Liao J, Hu JC. Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Following Partial Gland Cryoablation. Urology 2020; 138:98-105. [PMID: 31954170 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the qualitative and quantitative changes on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) following partial gland ablation (PGA) with cryotherapy and correlate with histopathology. METHODS We used 3D Slicer to generate prostate models and segment ipsilateral (treated) and contralateral peripheral and transition zones in 10 men who underwent MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided PGA during 2017-2018. Pre- and post-PGA volumes of prostate segments were compared. Post-PGA mpMRI were categorized according to PI-RADS v2 and treatment response on mpMRI was assessed in a manner similar to the radiology evaluation framework following liver lesion ablation. RESULTS Median volume of ipsilateral peripheral and transition zones decreased from 10.9 mL and 13.0 mL to 7.2 mL and 10.8 mL (P = .005), respectively. Median volume of contralateral peripheral and transition zones also decreased from 12.1 mL and 12.5 mL to 9.9 mL to 10.4 mL (P = .005), respectively. Five men had clinically significant disease (Grade group ≥2) on post-PGA biopsy (3 within treatment field and 2 outside). Of the men with clinically significant prostate cancer, mpMRI revealed PI-RADS 3 lesions in 2. However, the treatment response framework did not detect residual disease. CONCLUSION PGA results in asymmetrical and significant reductions in prostate volume. Our results highlight the need for a separate assessment framework to enable standardization of the interpretation and reporting of post-PGA surveillance mpMRI. Moreover, our findings have significant implications for MRI-targeted surveillance biopsy following PGA with cryotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel J Margolis
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Michael D Gross
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Shyam Natarajan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alan Priester
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stefanie Hectors
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Xilu Ma
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Juan Miguel Mosquera
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Liao
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Jim C Hu
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Herrera-Caceres JO, Nason GJ, Salgado-Sanmamed N, Goldberg H, Woon DTS, Chandrasekar T, Ajib K, Tan GH, Alhunaidi O, van der Kwast T, Finelli A, Zlotta AR, Hamilton RJ, Berlin A, Perlis N, Fleshner NE. Salvage radical prostatectomy following focal therapy: functional and oncological outcomes. BJU Int 2020; 125:525-530. [PMID: 31863617 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) after focal therapy (FT). PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of all patients who underwent sRP after FT was performed. Clinical and pathological outcomes focussed on surgical complications, oncological, and functional outcomes. RESULTS In all, 34 patients were identified. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 61 (8.25) years. FT modalities included high-intensity focussed ultrasound (19 patients), laser ablation (13), focal brachytherapy (one) and cryotherapy (one). The median (IQR) time from FT to recurrence was 10.9 (17.6) months. There were no rectal or ureteric injuries. Two (5.9%) patients had iatrogenic cystotomies and four (11.8%) developed bladder neck contractures. The mean (sd) hospital stay was 2.5 (2.1) days. The T-stage was pT2 in 14 (41.2%) patients, pT3a in 16 (47.1%), and pT3b in four (11.8%). In all, 13 (38%) patients had positive surgical margins (PSMs). Six (17.6%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, seven (20.6%) patients developed biochemical recurrence (BCR), and of these, six (17.6%) patients required salvage RT. PSMs were associated with worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio 6.624, 95% confidence interval 2.243-19.563; P < 0.001). The median (IQR) preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function score was 7 (4.5-9.5) and 23.5 (15.75-25) respectively, while in the final follow-up the median (IQR) values were 7 (3.5-11) and 6 (5-12.25), respectively (P = 0.088 and P < 0.001). At last follow-up, 31 (91.2%) patients were continent, two (5.9%) had moderate (>1 pad/day) incontinence, and one (2.9%) required an artificial urinary sphincter. CONCLUSIONS sRP should be considered as an option for patients who have persistent clinically significant prostate cancer or recurrence after FT. PSMs should be recognised as a risk for recurrent disease after sRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime O Herrera-Caceres
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gregory J Nason
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Noelia Salgado-Sanmamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hanan Goldberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dixon T S Woon
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenappen Chandrasekar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Khaled Ajib
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Guan Hee Tan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Omar Alhunaidi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Theodorus van der Kwast
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandre R Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nathan Perlis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Apfelbeck M, Chaloupka M, Schlenker B, Stief C, Clevert DA. Follow-up after focal therapy of the prostate with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in combination with MRI image fusion. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2019; 73:135-143. [DOI: 10.3233/ch-199222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Apfelbeck
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M. Chaloupka
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B. Schlenker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C.G. Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D.-A. Clevert
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Johnston MJ, Hindley RG. AUTHOR REPLY. Urology 2019; 133:179-180. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
41
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate focal therapy has the potential to preserve urinary and sexual function while eliminating clinically significant cancer in a subset of men with low-volume, organ-confined prostate cancer. This systematic review aims to examine current evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of focal therapy for standard clinical application. RECENT FINDINGS Focal therapy reduces the rate of cancer progression and conversion to radical therapy in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. As a strategy, success in focal therapy is heavily dependent on the use of imaging and targeted biopsies. Despite advances in these areas, there remains a small but significant risk of under-detecting clinically significant cancer. Similarly, under-estimation of tumor volume may contribute to infield recurrences and close attention must be paid to the ablation margin. Although long-term oncological outcomes remain lacking, focal therapy has a low complication rate, minimal impact on urinary continence and a moderate impact on erectile function. SUMMARY With the appropriate expertise in imaging, targeted biopsy and targeted ablation, focal therapy is a good option in men with low-intermediate risk cancer who are willing to maximize their urinary and sexual function. However, close posttreatment surveillance and the possibility of conversion to whole gland therapy must be accepted.
Collapse
|
42
|
Utility of Multiparametric MRI for Predicting Residual Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Focal Laser Ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:1253-1258. [PMID: 31361529 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare in a multireader manner the diagnostic accuracies of 3-T multiparametric MRI interpretation and serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement in predicting the presence of residual clinically significant prostate cancer after focal laser ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighteen men had undergone focal laser ablation for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer as part of two National Cancer Institute-funded phase 1 clinical trials. Multiparametric MRI was performed immediately after and 6 and 12 months after focal laser ablation. Serial PSA measurements after focal laser ablation were recorded, and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy was performed 6 and 12 months after ablation and served as the reference standard. Multiparametric MRI was performed at 3 T with pelvic phased-array coils. T2-weighted, DW, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images were retrospectively assessed by two blinded radiologists using a 3-point Likert scale (0-2). Inter-reader agreement was assessed with the Cohen kappa statistic. The diagnostic accuracies of multiparametric MRI and PSA measurement were compared. RESULTS. Residual clinically significant prostate cancer was identified in 11 of 18 (61%) men. Logistic regression analysis of serial PSA measurements yielded a correct classification rate of 61.1% (p > 0.05). Using a multiparametric MRI threshold score of 4 or greater, both radiologists made correct classifications for 16 of 18 men (89%) at 6 months and 15 of 17 men (88%) at 12 months. Interreader agreement was substantial to excellent for T2-weighted imaging, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and improved uniformly from 6 to 12 months. Logistic regression analysis of the retrospectively reviewed multiparametric MR images yielded AUCs greater than 0.90 for each radiologist 6 and 12 months after focal laser ablation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Multiparametric MRI 6 and 12 months after focal laser ablation significantly outperformed serial PSA measurements for predicting the presence of residual clinically significant prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
43
|
Shah TT, Peters M, Eldred-Evans D, Miah S, Yap T, Faure-Walker NA, Hosking-Jervis F, Thomas B, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, McCracken S, Greene D, Nigam R, Valerio M, Minhas S, Winkler M, Arya M, Ahmed HU. Early-Medium-Term Outcomes of Primary Focal Cryotherapy to Treat Nonmetastatic Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer from a Prospective Multicentre Registry. Eur Urol 2019; 76:98-105. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
44
|
de Castro Abreu AL, Ashrafi AN, Gill IS, Oishi M, Winter MW, Park D, Duddalwar V, Stern MC, Palmer SL, Aron M, Gulati M. Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound for Follow-up After Focal HIFU Ablation for Prostate Cancer. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2019; 38:811-819. [PMID: 30117172 PMCID: PMC9721530 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The optimal strategy for imaging after focal therapy for prostate cancer is evolving. This series is an initial report on the use of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in follow-up of patients after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation for prostate cancer. In 7 patients who underwent HIFU hemiablation, contrast-enhanced TRUS findings were as follows: (1) contrast-enhanced TRUS clearly showed the HIFU ablation defect as a sharply marginated nonenhancing zone in all patients; (2) contrast-enhanced TRUS identified suspicious foci of recurrent enhancement within the ablation zone in 2 patients, facilitating image-guided prostate biopsy, which showed prostate cancer; and (3) contrast-enhanced TRUS findings correlated with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy histologic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akbar N Ashrafi
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Inderbir S Gill
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Masakatsu Oishi
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew W Winter
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel Park
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Vinay Duddalwar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mariana C Stern
- USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Suzanne L Palmer
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Manju Aron
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mittul Gulati
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bawiec C, N'Djin W, Bouchoux G, Sénégond N, Guillen N, Chapelon JY. Preliminary Investigation of a 64-element Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer (CMUT) Annular Array Designed for High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). Ing Rech Biomed 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
46
|
von Hardenberg J, Westhoff N, Baumunk D, Hausmann D, Martini T, Marx A, Porubsky S, Schostak M, Michel MS, Ritter M. Prostate cancer treatment by the latest focal HIFU device with MRI/TRUS-fusion control biopsies: A prospective evaluation. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:401.e1-401.e9. [PMID: 30093211 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion-guided focal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy of the prostate has recently been developed as a selective HIFU-therapy technique to enable targeted ablation of prostate cancer. Here we report a series of patients treated with focal HIFU therapy, discuss its potential pitfalls, and address controversies concerning the indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center prospective study reports outcomes of patients treated from September 2014 to March 2016. Follow-up was a minimum of 12 months. MRI/TRUS-fusion-guided HIFU was performed under general anesthesia using the Focal One® device (EDAP, France). A control biopsy at 12 months was taken using the MRI/TRUS-fusion biopsy platform Artemis™ (Eigen, California) combining targeted and systematic cores. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes from baseline, patient-reported outcome measures, and complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system are also reported. RESULTS Twenty-four patients (PSA < 10 ng/ml, n = 17 Gleason 3+3, n = 7 Gleason 3+4) with either unifocal or bifocal prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) 3-5 lesions (n = 19) or without a PI-RADS lesion (n = 5) were treated. Nineteen patients underwent focal HIFU, five patients zonal HIFU. Of the 20 patients that had biopsies at 12 months, 8 patients had a positive biopsy within the ablation zone (overall cancer free rate: 60%). Using different definitions of clinically significant cancer, the cancer-free rate for the ablation zone varies between 75% and 95%. Four of the eight patients (all persistent Gleason 3+4 or upgrading to 4+3) underwent a radical whole gland salvage therapy. Patient-reported outcome measures showed no significant decrease in urinary continence (expanded prostate cancer index composite -26 urinary incontinence: P = 0.080), but there was a reduction in potency (International index of erectile function in preoperatively potent patients: median decrease of 2 points to a median of 19 points at 12 months; 95% confidence interval: 15.79-22.21; P = 0.044). Only one complication > grade II occurred. CONCLUSIONS Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided focal HIFU allows local tumor ablation, but is not free from limitations. The procedure has good functional outcomes and a quick recovery. Multicenter trials with more patients are required to determine the procedure´s role in the prostate cancer therapy algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jost von Hardenberg
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Niklas Westhoff
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Baumunk
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg Germany
| | - Daniel Hausmann
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Martini
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstraße 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany
| | - Alexander Marx
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Porubsky
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schostak
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg Germany
| | - Maurice Stephan Michel
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Manuel Ritter
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bernstein DE, Bernstein BS. Urological technology: where will we be in 20 years' time? Ther Adv Urol 2018; 10:235-242. [PMID: 30034542 PMCID: PMC6048627 DOI: 10.1177/1756287218782666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Since prehistoric times, our understanding of urology has rapidly expanded. Whilst primitive urologists began by using urine as a therapeutic substance, modern urologists may find themselves removing a kidney remotely by driving a robotic arm, with seven degrees of movement, while using image overlay-augmented reality. This review provides an insight into the potential status of urological technology in 20 years' time, assessed through an analysis of developments in imaging, diagnostics, robotics and further technologies. A particular emphasis is given to the promising fields of minimally invasive techniques, nanotechnology and tissue engineering, which likely hold the key to a new era for urology.
Collapse
|
48
|
Brizmohun Appayya M, Adshead J, Ahmed HU, Allen C, Bainbridge A, Barrett T, Giganti F, Graham J, Haslam P, Johnston EW, Kastner C, Kirkham AP, Lipton A, McNeill A, Moniz L, Moore CM, Nabi G, Padhani AR, Parker C, Patel A, Pursey J, Richenberg J, Staffurth J, van der Meulen J, Walls D, Punwani S. National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection - recommendations from a UK consensus meeting. BJU Int 2018; 122:13-25. [PMID: 29699001 PMCID: PMC6334741 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify areas of agreement and disagreement in the implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate in the diagnostic pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifteen UK experts in prostate mpMRI and/or prostate cancer management across the UK (involving nine NHS centres to provide for geographical spread) participated in a consensus meeting following the Research and Development Corporation and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA-RAND) Appropriateness Method, and were moderated by an independent chair. The experts considered 354 items pertaining to who can request an mpMRI, prostate mpMRI protocol, reporting guidelines, training, quality assurance (QA) and patient management based on mpMRI levels of suspicion for cancer. Each item was rated for agreement on a 9-point scale. A panel median score of ≥7 constituted 'agreement' for an item; for an item to reach 'consensus', a panel majority scoring was required. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 59% of items (208/354); these were used to provide recommendations for the implementation of prostate mpMRI in the UK. Key findings include prostate mpMRI requests should be made in consultation with the urological team; mpMRI scanners should undergo QA checks to guarantee consistently high diagnostic quality scans; scans should only be reported by trained and experienced radiologists to ensure that men with unsuspicious prostate mpMRI might consider avoiding an immediate biopsy. CONCLUSIONS Our consensus statements demonstrate a set of criteria that are required for the practical dissemination of consistently high-quality prostate mpMRI as a diagnostic test before biopsy in men at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jim Adshead
- Department of UrologyHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer CentreLister HospitalStevenageHertfordshireUK
| | - Hashim U. Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceFaculty of Medical SciencesUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Division of SurgeryDepartment of Surgery and CancerImperial College London and Imperial UrologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Clare Allen
- Department of RadiologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- Department of Medical PhysicsUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of RadiologyAddenbrooke's Hospital and University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Francesco Giganti
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceFaculty of Medical SciencesUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of RadiologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - John Graham
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Phil Haslam
- Department of RadiologyFreeman HospitalNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Edward W. Johnston
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of RadiologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christof Kastner
- Department of UrologyAddenbrooke's Hospital and University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Alexander P.S. Kirkham
- Department of RadiologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Alan McNeill
- Department of UrologyNHS LothianWestern General HospitalEdinburghUK
| | | | - Caroline M. Moore
- Division of SurgeryDepartment of Surgery and CancerImperial College London and Imperial UrologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ghulam Nabi
- Division of Cancer ResearchNinewells HospitalDundeeUK
| | - Anwar R. Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner CentreMount Vernon HospitalNorthwoodMiddlesexUK
| | - Chris Parker
- Department of Academic UrologyRoyal Marsden HospitalSuttonSurreyUK
| | - Amit Patel
- Department of RadiologyLister HospitalStevenageHertfordshireUK
| | | | - Jonathan Richenberg
- Department of RadiologyRoyal Sussex County Hospital Brighton and Brighton and Sussex Medical SchoolBrightonSussexUK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and GeneticsSchool of MedicineCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | | | - Darren Walls
- Division of Nuclear MedicineUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Centre for Medical ImagingUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of RadiologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guillaumier S, Peters M, Arya M, Afzal N, Charman S, Dudderidge T, Hosking-Jervis F, Hindley RG, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nigam R, Ogden C, Persad R, Shah K, van der Meulen J, Virdi J, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. A Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 74:422-429. [PMID: 29960750 PMCID: PMC6156573 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is currently treated using whole-gland therapy. This approach is effective but can have urinary, sexual, and rectal side effects. Objective To report on 5-yr PCa control following focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy to treat individual areas of cancer within the prostate. Design, setting, and participants This was a prospective study of 625 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic clinically significant PCa undergoing focal HIFU therapy (Sonablate) in secondary care centres between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. A minimum of 6-mo follow-up was available for599 patients. Intermediate- or high-risk PCa was found in 505 patients (84%). Intervention Disease was localised using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) combined with targeted and systematic biopsies, or transperineal mapping biopsies. Areas of significant disease were treated. Follow-up included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, mpMRI, and biopsies. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint, failure-free survival (FFS), was defined as freedom from radical or systemic therapy, metastases, and cancer-specific mortality. Results and limitations The median follow-up was 56 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 35–70). The median age was 65 yr (IQR 61–71) and median preoperative PSA was 7.2 ng/ml (IQR 5.2–10.0). FFS was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98–100%) at 1 yr, 92% (95% CI 90–95%) at 3 yr, and 88% (95% 85–91%) at 5 yr. For the whole patient cohort, metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival at 5 yr was 98% (95% CI 97–99%), 100%, and 99% (95% CI 97–100%), respectively. Among patients who returned validated questionnaires, 241/247 (98%) achieved complete pad-free urinary continence and none required more than 1 pad/d. Limitations include the lack of long-term follow-up. Conclusions Focal therapy for select patients with clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer is effective in the medium term and has a low probability of side effects. Patient summary In this multicentre study of 625 patients undergoing focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), failure-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were 88%, 98%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Urinary incontinence (any pad use) was 2%. Focal HIFU therapy for patients with clinically significant prostate cancer that has not spread has a low probability of side effects and is effective at 5 yr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Guillaumier
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manit Arya
- Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Department of Urology, Dorset County Hospital NHS Trust, Dorset, UK
| | - Susan Charman
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Department of Urology, Royal County Surrey Hospital NHS Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Chris Ogden
- Department of Academic Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Karishma Shah
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Jaspal Virdi
- Department of Urology, The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Imperial Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Surveillance after prostate focal therapy. World J Urol 2018; 37:397-407. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2363-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
|