1
|
Chan VWS, Ng HHL, Wah TM. Image-Guided Ablation of Renal Masses: Challenges to Produce High-Quality Evidence and Future Directions. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:144-153. [PMID: 38993603 PMCID: PMC11236450 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Image-guided ablation (IGA) is a rapidly developing field in interventional oncology. There is some evidence suggesting IGA's non-inferiority compared with partial or radical nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses (SRM). However, these are mostly limited to retrospective cohort studies. This review article outlines the evidence comparing IGA to partial nephrectomy by collating the different survival measures and evaluates the challenges of producing clinical trials and high-quality evidence. The main challenges are due to the heterogeneity of SRM, patient selection bias, unstandardized endpoint and outcomes, and the lack of global practice standards. Despite the evidence thus far demonstrating that IGA stands as a non-inferior treatment modality for SRMs, exhibiting favorable short- and long-term outcomes, further robust research is needed to integrate ablation techniques into routine clinical practice with a multidisciplinary approach. There is emerging evidence that suggests randomized controlled trial in SRMs is possible, and technologies such as histotripsy as well as artificial intelligence are used in IGA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinson Wai-Shun Chan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Hoi-Lam Ng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Tze Min Wah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiu J, Deng R, Zhao Z, Tian P, Zhou J. The long-term outcomes of local tumor destruction versus partial nephrectomy for cT1a non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and development of prognostic nomograms. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:122. [PMID: 38472549 PMCID: PMC10933168 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05571-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a lack of authoritative opinions on local tumor destruction (LTD) for clinical T1a (cT1a) non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). We aim to compare the outcomes of cT1a nccRCC after partial nephrectomy (PN) or LTD and explore prognostic factors. METHODS Patients diagnosed with cT1a nccRCC receiving LTD or PN between 2000 and 2020 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for patients receiving LTD and PN. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression analysis, competing risk regression models, and subgroup analysis were used to compare outcomes and identify prognostic factors. Prognostic nomograms were established and evaluated based on the multivariate models. RESULTS A total of 3664 cT1a nccRCC patients were included. The LTD group had poorer overall survival (OS) and similar cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared with the PN group before and after PSM (p < 0.05), while the other-cause mortality rate of the LTD group was higher than that of the PN group. Age, marital status, household income, prior tumor history, interval between diagnosis and treatment, treatments, and tumor size were identified as independent predictive factors for OS. Age, tumor size, prior tumor history, and histological type were identified as independent predictive factors for CSS. Then the nomograms predicting OS and CSS were constructed based on these prognostic factors, which showed excellent performance in risk stratification and accuracy. CONCLUSION LTD could achieve comparable cancer-control effects as PN among cT1a nccRCC patients. The OS and CSS nomograms worked effectively for prognosis assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhui Qiu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Ruiyi Deng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Zihou Zhao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Peidong Tian
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jingcheng Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
- National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sosa-Fajardo P, Blanco-Suarez JM, Pineda-Munguía Á, Rubí-Olea L, Peleteiro-Higuero P, Gajate P, Zafra-Martín J, Siva S, Bossi A, López-Campos F, Couñago F. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for kidney cancer. Where do we stand? Int J Urol 2023; 30:437-445. [PMID: 36746747 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
At present, surgery is still the gold standard for the local treatment of renal cancer. Nonetheless, in several clinical scenarios, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) also known as stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is emerging as a highly effective ablative technique in fragile patients and those with significant comorbidities, as well as in cases where percutaneous therapy (cryoablation or radiofrequency) is not viable. However, considering the intrinsic radioresistance of renal tumors, the optimal treatment schemes have not been established. In oligometastatic patients, it has been reported that the control of the oligometastases can be a potentially curable approach. Being a technique than can be administered exclusively or in combination with systemic therapy, treatment individualization based on patient characteristics is key. Another scenario under investigation is oligoprogression, where SBRT offers the possibility of delaying further lines of systemic therapy by eliminating subclones of resistant tumor with ablative doses, with the additional opportunity of stimulating the immune system (immunomodulatory role). In this review, we have conducted an analysis of recently published studies that test the role of this technique in different clinical scenarios of this disease. We have found promising results that make SBRT a potent therapeutic approach with low toxicity. We also comment on ongoing studies that will generate the necessary evidence needed for the implementation of this technique in our daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paloma Sosa-Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC/CIBERONC), University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Jesús M Blanco-Suarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC/CIBERONC), University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Luz Rubí-Olea
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Regional Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | - Paula Peleteiro-Higuero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Pablo Gajate
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Zafra-Martín
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy, Health and Medical Research Centre (CIMES), Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga (UMA), Malaga, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology Department, GenesisCare Madrid Clinical Director, San Francisco de Asis and La Milagrosa Hospitals, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li L, Zhu J, Shao H, Huang L, Wang X, Bao W, Sheng T, Chen D, He Y, Song B. Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation vs. partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Surg 2023; 9:1012897. [PMID: 36684152 PMCID: PMC9852310 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1012897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Partial nephrectomy (PN) is one of the most preferred nephron-sparing treatments for clinical T1 (cT1) renal cancer, while radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is usually used for patients who are poor surgical candidates. The long-term oncologic outcome of RFA vs. PN for cT1 renal cancer remains undetermined. This meta-analysis aims to compare the treatment efficacy and safety of RFA and PN for patients with cT1 renal cancer with long-term follow-up of at least 5 years. Method This meta-analysis was performed following the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Literature studies that had data on the comparison of the efficacy or safety of RFA vs. PN in treating cT1 renal cancer were searched in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January2000 to 1 May 2022. Only long-term studies with a median or mean follow-up of at least 5 years were included. The following measures of effect were pooled: odds ratio (OR) for recurrence and major complications; hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Additional analyses, including sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and publication bias analysis, were also performed. Results A total of seven studies with 1,635 patients were finally included. The treatment efficacy of RFA was not different with PN in terms of cancer recurrence (OR = 1.22, 95% CI, 0.45-3.28), PFS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI, 0.75-2.11), and CSS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI, 0.41-3.95) as well as major complications (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.14) (P > 0.05 for all). RFA was a potential significant risk factor for OS (HR = 1.76, 95% CI, 1.32-2.34, P < 0.001). No significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed. Conclusion This is the first meta-analysis that focuses on the long-term oncological outcomes of cT1 renal cancer, and the results suggest that RFA has comparable therapeutic efficacy with PN. RFA is a nephron-sparing technique with favorable oncologic efficacy and safety and a good treatment alternative for cT1 renal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linjin Li
- Department of Urology, the Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jianlong Zhu
- Department of Urology, the Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Huan Shao
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China
| | - Laijian Huang
- Department of Urology, the Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xiaoting Wang
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China
| | - Wenshuo Bao
- Department of Urology, the Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Tao Sheng
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China
| | - Dake Chen
- Department of Urology, the Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yanmei He
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China
| | - Baolin Song
- Department of Urology, Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiaxing, China,Correspondence: Baolin Song
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang J, Wang K, Yang Z. Treatment strategies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Past, present and future. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1133832. [PMID: 37025584 PMCID: PMC10070676 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1133832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent histological subtype of kidney cancer, which is prone to metastasis, recurrence, and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The burden it places on human health due to its refractory nature and rising incidence rate is substantial. Researchers have recently determined the ccRCC risk factors and optimized the clinical therapy based on the disease's underlying molecular mechanisms. In this paper, we review the established clinical therapies and novel potential therapeutic approaches for ccRCC, and we support the importance of investigating novel therapeutic options in the context of combining established therapies as a research hotspot, with the goal of providing diversified therapeutic options that promise to address the issue of drug resistance, with a view to the early realization of precision medicine and individualized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junwei Yang
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Kuansong Wang
- Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhichun Yang
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- *Correspondence: Zhichun Yang,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yanagisawa T, Mori K, Kawada T, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Miki J, Kimura T, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Differential efficacy of ablation therapy versus partial nephrectomy between clinical T1a and T1b renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:315-330. [PMID: 35562311 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the differential clinical outcomes of patients treated with partial nephrectomy (PN) vs. those treated with ablation therapy (AT) such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and microwave ablation for cT1b compared to cT1a renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiple databases were searched for articles published before August 2021. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared clinical outcomes in patients who underwent PN with those who underwent AT for cT1a and/or cT1b renal tumors. RESULTS Overall, 27 studies comprising 13,996 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. In both cT1a and cT1b renal tumors, there was no significant difference in the percent decline of estimated glomerular filtration rates or in the overall/severe complication rates between PN and AT. Compared to AT, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence in both patients with cT1a and cT1b tumors (cT1a: pooled risk ratio [RR]; 0.43, 95% confidence intervals [CI]; 0.28-0.66, cT1b: pooled RR; 0.41, 95%CI; 0.23-0.75). Subgroup analyses regarding the technical approach revealed no statistical difference in local recurrence rates between percutaneous AT and PN in patients with cT1a tumors (pooled RR; 0.61, 95%CI; 0.32-1.15). In cT1b, however, PN was associated with a lower risk of local recurrence (pooled RR; 0.45, 95%CI; 0.23-0.88). There was no difference in distant metastasis or cancer mortality rates between PN and AT in patients with cT1a, or cT1b tumors. CONCLUSIONS AT has a substantially relevant disadvantage with regards to local recurrence compared to PN, particularly in cT1b renal tumors. Despite the limitations inherent to the nature of retrospective and unmatched primary cohorts, percutaneous AT could be used as a reasonable alternative treatment for well-selected patients with cT1a renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Where Do We Stand? Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:99-111. [PMID: 35507213 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01093-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present an overview of the current evidence-based studies covering diagnostic and management of SRM. RECENT FINDINGS Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of the cancers. Nowadays, partial nephrectomy (PN) represents gold standard treatment. New nephron-sparing approaches such as active surveillance and ablative therapies have been increasingly used as an alternative to surgical intervention. Due to novel comprehension of RCC and widespread use of imaging techniques, diagnosis at early stage in elderly patients has increased. Treatment decision-making should be based on patient and tumour characteristics. With expanding treatment options, the management of SRMs has become a debate and should be adjusted to patient and tumour characteristics. In a shared decision manner, both active surveillance with possible delayed intervention and focal therapy should be discussed with the patient as an alternative to partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Laquet P, Pradère B, Francois M, Ravel A, Lambert C, Guy L. Résultats périopératoires de la radiofréquence sur les petites tumeurs du rein : complications, impact sur la fonction rénale et résultats oncologiques. Prog Urol 2022; 32:551-557. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
9
|
Numakura K, Nakai Y, Kojima T, Osawa T, Narita S, Nakayama M, Kitamura H, Nishiyama H, Shinohara N. Overview of clinical management for older patients with renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:665-681. [PMID: 35397166 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The rapidly increasing pool of older patients being diagnosed with and surviving their cancer is creating many challenges. Regarding localized renal cell carcinoma, surgery is considered as gold standard treatment options even in older men, whereas active surveillance and ablation therapy are alternative options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) and immune check point inhibitor are standard treatment modalities, although treatment choice from multiple regimens and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Better assessment techniques, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment to meet the unique needs of older patients, are a central focus in the delivery of high-quality geriatric oncology care. Through this process, shared decision-making should be adopted in clinical care to achieve optimal goals of care that reflect patient and caregiver hopes, needs and preferences. It is necessary to continue investigating oncological outcomes and complications associated with treatment in this population to ensure appropriate cancer care. In this narrative review, we completed a literature review of the various treatments for renal cell carcinoma in older patients that aimed to identify the current evidence related to the full range of the treatments including active surveillance, surgery, ablation therapy and systemic therapy. Prospectively designed studies and studies regarding geriatric assessment were preferentially added as references. Our goals were to summarize the real-world evidence and provide a decision framework that guides better cancer practices for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasutomo Nakai
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chan VWS, Abul A, Osman FH, Ng HHL, Wang K, Yuan Y, Cartledge J, Wah TM. Ablative therapies versus partial nephrectomy for small renal masses - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022; 97:106194. [PMID: 34958968 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High quality studies and reviews on the management of small renal masses (SRM) are lacking. This review aims to compare oncological outcomes in patients undergoing ablative therapies (AT) or partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1a or T1b SRM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and conference proceedings were searched on the 15th July 2020 for comparative studies respective to our research question. The ROBINS-I tool and the GRADE approach were used to assess any risk of biases and certainty of evidence in the included studies. The review is registered on PROSPERO. RESULTS 1,748 records were retrieved. 32 observational studies and 1 RCT integrating 74,946 patients were included. Patients undergoing AT patients are significantly older than PN patients (MD 5.70, 95%CI 3.83-7.58). In T1a patients, AT patients have significantly worse overall survival (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.39-1.95). Local recurrence-free survival is similar with PN in patients with longer than five-years follow up (HR 1.54, 95%CI 0.88-2.71). AT patients also have similar cancer-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, significantly fewer post-operative complications (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.55-0.94), and a smaller decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate post-operatively (MD: -7.42, 95%CI -13.1 to -1.70) compared to those undergoing PN. Evidence contradicts in T1b patients for oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AT have similar long-term oncological durability; lower rates of complications and superior kidney function preservation compared to PN. Given the low quality of evidence, AT is a reasonable alternative to PN in frail and co-morbid patients. Long-term high-quality studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of AT, especially in T1b patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020199099.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinson Wai-Shun Chan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Department of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Semenas E, Lönnemark M, Dahlman P, Hultström M, Eriksson M. Analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on periprocedural pain during percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma. Ups J Med Sci 2020; 125:52-57. [PMID: 32067572 PMCID: PMC7054959 DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1720047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma is frequently a favourable treatment alternative, especially in elderly patients suffering from co-morbidities. Also, it is less resource-demanding than conventional surgery of renal carcinoma, and one may, therefore, assume that the incidence of this procedure may increase. Analgesia is necessary during this intervention. The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of analgosedation and its relation to patient comfort and safety during percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma.Methods: Forty-six patients, sedated with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, supplemented with infiltration anaesthesia (lidocaine 1%), underwent percutaneous (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation of renal carcinoma in this prospective study.Results: The patients expected pain intensity around the numerical rating score (NRS) 4.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5-5.5), which was slightly lower than pain experienced during the procedure NRS 5 (IQR 2-7; p = 0.49). Eight percent of the patients needed supplementary morphine during the ablation procedure. Sedation score did not differ during ablation, at arrival to or discharge from the recovery ward. Median periprocedural treatment time was 12 minutes (IQR 12-16). Treatment time did not correlate with experienced pain (R2=0.000074, p = 0.96). The median length of stay in the recovery room was 120 minutes (IQR 84-154). There were seven serious adverse events.Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study has shown that analgosedation during percutaneous ablation of renal carcinoma can be performed with a generally tolerable degree of patient satisfaction. However, pain occurs and should be managed adequately. Patient safety must be a major concern for the anaesthetic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Egidijus Semenas
- Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Lönnemark
- Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pär Dahlman
- Section of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Michael Hultström
- Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Section for Integrative Physiology, Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mats Eriksson
- Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- CONTACT Mats Eriksson Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marshall HR, Shakeri S, Hosseiny M, Sisk A, Sayre J, Lu DS, Pantuck A, Raman S. Long-Term Survival after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma in 100 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 31:15-24. [PMID: 31767409 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the long-term survival of patients treated with percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with 125 RCCs (100 clear-cell, 19 papillary, and 6 chromophobe) 0.8-8 cm in size treated with RF ablation were evaluated at a single large tertiary-care center between 2004 and 2015. Technical success, primary and secondary technique efficacy, and pre- and postprocedural estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3-6 months and 2-3 years were recorded. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and local tumor progression-free survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Complications were classified per the Clavien-Dindo system. Statistical testing was done via χ2 tests for proportions and paired t test for changes in eGFR. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. RESULTS Overall technical success rate was 100%, and primary and secondary technique efficacy rates were 90% and 100%, respectively. Median follow-up was 62.8 months, ranging from 1 to 120 months. The 10-year overall, cancer-specific, and local progression-free survival rates were 32%, 86%, and 92%, respectively. The number of ablation probes used was predictive of residual unablated tumor (P < .001). There were no significant changes in preprocedure vs 2-3-years postprocedure eGFR (65.2 vs 62.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .443). There was a 9% overall incidence of complications, the majority of which were grade I. CONCLUSIONS Image-guided percutaneous RF ablation of RCCs is effective at achieving local control and preventing cancer-specific death within 10 years from initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry R Marshall
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sepideh Shakeri
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095.
| | - Melina Hosseiny
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Anthony Sisk
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - James Sayre
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - David S Lu
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Allan Pantuck
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| | - Steven Raman
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, BL-428 CHS, Room B2-187, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hu X, Shao YX, Wang Y, Yang ZQ, Yang WX, Li X. Partial nephrectomy versus ablative therapies for cT1a renal masses: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1527-1535. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
|
14
|
Deep learning and radiomics: the utility of Google TensorFlow™ Inception in classifying clear cell renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma on multiphasic CT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:2009-2020. [PMID: 30778739 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01929-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, all solid enhancing renal masses without microscopic fat are considered malignant until proven otherwise and there is substantial overlap in the imaging findings of benign and malignant renal masses, particularly between clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and benign oncocytoma (ONC). Radiomics has attracted increased attention for its utility in pre-operative work-up on routine clinical images. Radiomics based approaches have converted medical images into mineable data and identified prognostic imaging signatures that machine learning algorithms can use to construct predictive models by learning the decision boundaries of the underlying data distribution. The TensorFlow™ framework from Google is a state-of-the-art open-source software library that can be used for training deep learning neural networks for performing machine learning tasks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value and feasibility of a deep learning-based renal lesion classifier using open-source Google TensorFlow™ Inception in differentiating ccRCC from ONC on routine four-phase MDCT in patients with pathologically confirmed renal masses. METHODS With institutional review board approval for this 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant retrospective study and a waiver of informed consent, we queried our institution's pathology, clinical, and radiology databases for histologically proven cases of ccRCC and ONC obtained between January 2000 and January 2016 scanned with a an intravenous contrast-enhanced four-phase renal mass protocol (unenhanced (UN), corticomedullary (CM), nephrographic (NP), and excretory (EX) phases). To extract features to be used for the machine learning model, the entire renal mass was contoured in the axial plane in each of the four phases, resulting in a 3D volume of interest (VOI) representative of the entire renal mass. We investigated thirteen different approaches to convert the acquired VOI data into a set of images that adequately represented each tumor which was used to train the final layer of the neural network model. Training was performed over 4000 iterations. In each iteration, 90% of the data were designated as training data and the remaining 10% served as validation data and a leave-one-out cross-validation scheme was implemented. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values, and CIs were calculated for the classification of the thirteen processing modes. RESULTS We analyzed 179 consecutive patients with 179 lesions (128 ccRCC and 51 ONC). The ccRCC cohort had a mean size of 3.8 cm (range 0.8-14.6 cm) and the ONC cohort had a mean lesion size of 3.9 cm (range 1.0-13.1 cm). The highest specificity and PPV (52.9% and 80.3%, respectively) were achieved in the EX phase when we analyzed the single mid-slice of the tumor in the axial, coronal and sagittal plane, and when we increased the number of mid-slices of the tumor to three, with an accuracy of 75.4%, which also increased the sensitivity to 88.3% and the PPV to 79.6%. Using the entire tumor volume also showed that classification performance was best in the EX phase with an accuracy of 74.4%, a sensitivity of 85.8% and a PPV of 80.1%. When the entire tumor volume, plus mid-slices from all phases and all planes presented as tiled images, were submitted to the final layer of the neural network we achieved a PPV of 82.5%. CONCLUSIONS The best classification result was obtained in the EX phase among the thirteen classification methods tested. Our proof of concept study is the first step towards understanding the utility of machine learning in the differentiation of ccRCC from ONC on routine CT images. We hope this could lead to future investigation into the development of a multivariate machine learning model which may augment our ability to accurately predict renal lesion histology on imaging.
Collapse
|
15
|
The uremic toxin p-cresyl sulfate induces proliferation and migration of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via microRNA-21/ HIF-1α axis signals. Sci Rep 2019; 9:3207. [PMID: 30824757 PMCID: PMC6397167 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39646-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
p-Cresyl sulfate (pCS), a uremic toxin, can cause renal damage and dysfunction. Studies suggest that renal dysfunction increases the prevalence of renal cancer. However, the effect of pCS on the proliferation and migration of renal cancer is unclear. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) expresses mutant von Hippel-Lindau gene and is difficult to treat. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and 2-α (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) as well as microRNA-21 (miR-21) can regulate the proliferation and migration of ccRCC cells. However, the association between HIF-α and miR-21 in ccRCC remains unclear. Therefore, the effects of pCS on ccRCC cells were investigated for HIF-α and miR-21 signals. Our results showed that pCS induced overexpression of HIF-1α and promoted the proliferation and regulated epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related proteins, including E-cadherin, fibronectin, twist and vimentin in ccRCC cells. pCS treatment increased miR-21 expression. Specifically, inhibition of miR-21 blocked pCS-induced proliferation and migration. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that pCS directly induced the proliferation and migration of ccRCC cells through mechanisms involving miR-21/HIF-1α signaling pathways.
Collapse
|
16
|
Gunn AJ, Mullenbach BJ, Poundstone MM, Gordetsky JB, Underwood ES, Rais-Bahrami S. Transarterial embolization of renal cell carcinoma as an adjunctive therapy prior to cryoablation: a propensity score matching analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 24:357-363. [PMID: 30373723 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.18090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of transarterial embolization (TAE) prior to percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared with PCA alone using a propensity score matching analysis to minimize confounding factors. METHODS A retrospective review of all PCAs performed for renal masses identified 9 patients who underwent TAE prior to PCA. These patients were matched in a 2:1 ratio with patients who underwent PCA only using age, gender, and tumor size to create the propensity score model for matching. Other demographic, clinical, and outcomes data were collected. RESULTS The TAE+PCA group included 5 males and 4 females with a mean age of 67.9 years and mean tumor diameter of 51.7 mm. The PCA only group included 11 males and 7 females with a mean age of 66.8 years and mean tumor diameter of 46.2 mm. No significant differences in these propensity score matched characteristics were identified. Further, the groups had no significant differences in tumor geometry (P = 0.831), R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores (P = 0.144), or comorbidity indices (P = 0.392). TAE was technically successful and without complication in all cases. PCA was technically successful in 8 of 9 patients in the TAE+PCA group and in 14 of 18 patients in the PCA only group (P = 0.483). No significant differences in the rate of complications (P = 0.483), change in eGFR (P = 0.691), or change in hematocrit (P = 0.152) were identified between the two groups. CONCLUSION TAE of RCC prior to PCA is safe and technically feasible; however, no objective benefits over PCA alone were identified by propensity score matching analysis. Due to small sample size and limitations of the study, no definite conclusions should be drawn. Larger, prospective studies of this therapeutic approach are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Gunn
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Benjamin J Mullenbach
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - May M Poundstone
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Edgar S Underwood
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:377-393. [PMID: 30623290 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-02070-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for the kidney and adrenals has emerged as the need for preservation of function is paramount in patients with poor functional reserve. As reports increasingly showed that oncological outcomes were equivalent to radical excision, elective OSS became a viable alternative in patients with otherwise normal reserve. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of OSS for adrenal and renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library Central Search were searched for recently published articles up to December 2017. The following keywords were used; "partial adrenalectomy", "adrenal sparing", "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing", "kidney/renal cancer". RESULTS Partial adrenalectomy became an attractive alternative to total adrenalectomy avoiding adrenal insufficiency. Both minimally invasive surgery and ablative techniques were increasingly reported for adrenal OSS with adequate residual adrenal function and excellent oncological outcome. Radical nephrectomy remained for many years as the gold standard of treatment for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma. As the need to reduce the impact on renal function, more conservative approaches were utilized. Soon, the non-inferiority of nephron-sparing surgery to that of radical excision became evident and elective partial nephrectomy was gaining ground as the standard of care for small renal masses in patients with normal contralateral kidneys. CONCLUSIONS Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current status of OSS in renal and adrenal tumors.
Collapse
|
18
|
Uhlig J, Strauss A, Rücker G, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Lotz J, Trojan L, Kim HS, Uhlig A. Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:1293-1307. [PMID: 30255245 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5660-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding oncologic, perioperative and functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE libraries were searched for studies comparing PN, RFA, CRA or MWA and reporting on any-cause or cancer-specific mortality, local recurrence, complications or renal function. Network meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS Forty-seven studies with 24,077 patients were included. Patients receiving RFA, CRA or MWA were older and had more comorbidities compared with PN. All-cause mortality was higher for CRA and RFA compared with PN (incidence rate ratio IRR = 2.58, IRR = 2.58, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in cancer-specific mortality were evident. Local recurrence was higher for CRA, RFA and MWA compared with PN (IRR = 4.13, IRR = 1.79, IRR = 2.52, p < 0.05 respectively). A decline in renal function was less pronounced after RFA versus PN, CRA and MWA (mean difference in GFR MD = 6.49; MD = 5.82; MD = 10.89, p < 0.05 respectively). CONCLUSION Higher overall survival and local control of PN compared with ablative therapies did not translate into significantly better cancer-specific mortality. Most studies carried a high risk of bias by selecting younger and healthier patients for PN, which may drive superior survival and local control. Physicians should be aware of the lack of high-quality evidence and the potential benefits of ablative techniques for certain patients, including a superior complication profile and renal function preservation. KEY POINTS • Patients selected for ablation of small renal masses are older and have more comorbidities compared with those undergoing partial nephrectomy. • Partial nephrectomy yields lower all-cause mortality, which is probably biased by patient selection and does not translate into prolonged cancer-free survival. • The decline of renal function is smallest after radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Uhlig
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arne Strauss
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Gerta Rücker
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Lotz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partnersite Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Hyun S Kim
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Annemarie Uhlig
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gunn AJ, Mullenbach BJ, Poundstone MM, Gordetsky JB, Underwood ES, Rais-Bahrami S. Trans-Arterial Embolization of Renal Cell Carcinoma prior to Percutaneous Ablation: Technical Aspects, Institutional Experience, and Brief Review of the Literature. Curr Urol 2018; 12:43-49. [PMID: 30374280 DOI: 10.1159/000447230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This report describes the technical aspects of trans-arterial embolization (TAE) of renal cell carcinoma prior to percutaneous ablation. All patients (n = 11) had a single renal mass (mean tumor diameter = 50.2 mm; range: 28-84 mm). Selective TAE was performed via the common femoral artery. Embolic materials included: particles alone (n = 4), coils alone (n = 1), particles + ethiodized oil (n = 2), particles + coils (n = 1), ethiodized oil + ethanol (n = 2), and particles + ethanol (n = 1). All embolizations were technically successful and no complications have been reported. After embolization, 10 patients underwent cryoablation while 1 patient underwent microwave ablation. Ablations were technically successful in 10 of the 11 patients. Only 3 minor complications were identified but none required treatment. No adverse effect on the patient's glomerular filtration rate was seen from the additional procedure (p = 0.84). TAE of renal cell carcinoma prior to percutaneous ablation is safe and technically-feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Gunn
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - May M Poundstone
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jennifer B Gordetsky
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Edgar S Underwood
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ren W, Xue B, Qu J, Liu L, Li C, Zu X. Localized chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: preoperative imaging judgment and laparoscopic simple enucleation for treatment. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 44:922-932. [PMID: 29757571 PMCID: PMC6237513 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the preoperative imaging manifestation and therapeutic effect of laparoscopic simple enucleation (SE) for localized chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Materials and Methods: Clinical data of 36 patients who underwent laparoscopic SE of localized chRCC at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent preoperative renal protocol CT (unenhanced, arterial, venous, and delayed images). CT scan characteristics were evaluated. After intraoperative occlusion of the renal artery, the tumor was free bluntly along the pseudocapsule and enucleated totally. The patients were followed up regularly after the operation. Results: Mean tumor diameter was 3.9±1.0 cm, 80% of tumors were homogeneous and all the tumors had complete pseudocapsule. The attenuation values were slightly lower than normal renal cortex and degree of enhancement of the tumors were significantly lower than normal renal cortex. Mean operation time was 104.3±18.2 min. Mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 21.3±3.5 min. Mean blood loss was 78.6±25.4 mL. No positive surgical margin was identified. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.3±1.5 d. Hematuria occurred in 3 patients and all disappeared within 3 days. After a mean follow-up of 32.1±20.6 months, no patient had local recurrence or metastatic progression. Conclusion: Localized chRCCs have a great propensity for homogeneity and complete pseudocapsule. The attenuation values were slightly lower than normal renal cortex and small degree of enhancement. Laparoscopic SE is a safe and effective treatment for localized chRCC. The oncological results were satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbiao Ren
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bichen Xue
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiandong Qu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Longfei Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiongbing Zu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1b-2N0M0 renal tumors: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193530. [PMID: 29489911 PMCID: PMC5830994 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Controversy continues on the tailored therapy for patients with larger renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated whether partial nephrectomy (PN) can improve patient prognosis compared to radical nephrectomy (RN) and the indications for each approach in patients with T1b-2N0M0 RCC. Materials and methods A total of 9907 patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2012. Propensity scores were used to balance the selection bias of undergoing PN. Overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients undergoing PN and RN were compared. Cases were subdivided to investigate the advantages of each procedure. Results Overall, 1418 (14.3%) patients underwent PN. Before matching, PN led to better OS and CSS than RN in both Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression (each p<0.01). For 1412 matched cohorts, PN was no longer associated with significantly better OS (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.98–1.44), but still with a better CSS (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18–2.27) compared with RN. Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients, who were male, single living, old than 65 years, with T1b stage or clear-cell histologic type, may obtained more oncologic benefit from PN compared to RN. Conclusions When tumor localization and technical feasibility have been taken into account, similar long-term survival was achieved in overall among two nephrectomy modalities, but patients, who were male, old than 65 years, with T1b stage or clear-cell histologic type, got a better survival after receiving PN compared to RN.
Collapse
|