Randomized phase 2 therapeutic equivalence study of abiraterone acetate fine particle formulation vs. originator abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The STAAR study

Is Low-Dose Abiraterone for Prostate Cancer An Attractive Strategy for Limited Resource Settings?

Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone is approved for locally advanced as well as metastatic (hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant) prostate cancer, with overall or disease-free survival gains in suitable patients. Long-term use poses a significant financial strain on the self-paying patients as well as the national health insurance schemes. Abiraterone is known to be a drug with a high “food effect” with increased bioavailability following high fat diet. Some retrospective series and phase 1 and 2 clinical studies have explored the use of low-dose abiraterone (at 25% of standard dose) with high fat meal with similar bioavailability and biochemical response to the standard drug dose. We review and report the available literature for this approach and discuss the financial and scientific implications of the same.

Recent Development and Future Prospects of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) is a rapidly increasing ailment worldwide. The previous decade has observed a rapid advancement in PC therapies that was evident from the number of FDA approvals during this phase. Androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) have traditionally remained a mainstay for the management of PCs, but the past decade has experienced the emergence of newer classes of drugs that can be used with or without the administration of ADT. FDA approved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), such as olaparib and rucaparib, after successful clinical trials against gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Furthermore, drugs like apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide with an androgen-targeted mechanism of action have manifested superior results in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), respectively, with or without previously administered docetaxel. Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, and a combination of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone were also approved by FDA after a successful trial in advanced PC and mCRPC, respectively. This review aims to analyze the FDA-approved agents in PC during the last decade and provide a summary of their clinical trials. It also presents an overview of the ongoing progress of prospective molecules still under trial.

An up-to-date evaluation of abiraterone for the treatment of prostate cancer

Introduction: Abiraterone acetate, an oral 17-alpha-hydroxylase inhibitor, effectively prevents the synthesis of androgens from steroid precursors. Abiraterone has become a standard of care in patients with metastatic prostate cancer due to its efficacy in both castrate-sensitive and castrate-resistant disease when given in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Abiraterone may have a role in additional aspects of prostate cancer treatment in the future.Areas covered: The present article focuses on the development and establishment of abiraterone among the available treatment options for prostate cancer. A literature search was performed in PubMed/Medline for prior studies and reviews of the drug. Current clinical trials were examined in the Clinicaltrials.gov database.Expert opinion: Abiraterone has shown efficacy in castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer, providing an additional degree of hormonal sensitivity for tumors resistant to ADT. Impressively, abiraterone in conjunction with ADT as a first-line treatment for castrate-sensitive prostate cancer also confers a significant overall survival benefit compared to ADT alone. With minimal additional toxicity, abiraterone has established itself as a well-tolerated, convenient, and effective treatment option. Ongoing studies are expected to broaden the drug's indications as well as its preference among other prostate cancer therapies.

Initial Management of Noncastrate Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

Update all preceding ASCO guidelines on initial hormonal management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

The Expert Panel based recommendations on a systematic literature review. Recommendations were approved by the Expert Panel and the ASCO Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee.

RESULTS

Four clinical practice guidelines, one clinical practice guidelines endorsement, 19 systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, 47 phase III randomized controlled trials, nine cohort studies, and two review papers informed the guideline update.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide, each when administered with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), represent four separate standards of care for noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer. Currently, the use of any of these agents in any particular combination or series cannot be recommended. ADT plus docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide should be offered to men with metastatic noncastrate prostate cancer, including those who received prior therapies, but have not yet progressed. The combination of ADT plus abiraterone and prednisolone should be considered for men with noncastrate locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer who have undergone radiotherapy, rather than castration monotherapy. Immediate ADT may be offered to men who initially present with noncastrate locally advanced nonmetastatic disease who have not undergone previous local treatment and are unwilling or unable to undergo radiotherapy. Intermittent ADT may be offered to men with high-risk biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Active surveillance may be offered to men with low-risk biochemically recurrent nonmetastatic prostate cancer. The panel does not support use of either micronized abiraterone acetate or the 250 mg dose of abiraterone with a low-fat breakfast in the noncastrate setting at this time.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.

Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations regarding diagnosis, risk stratification and workup, treatment options for localized disease, and management of recurrent and advanced disease for clinicians who treat patients with prostate cancer. The portions of the guidelines included herein focus on the roles of germline and somatic genetic testing, risk stratification with nomograms and tumor multigene molecular testing, androgen deprivation therapy, secondary hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy in patients with prostate cancer.

Enhancement of abiraterone acetate oral bioavailability by supersaturated-silica lipid hybrids

Abiraterone acetate (AbA) has an oral bioavailability of <10% due to its poor water solubility. Here we investigate the performance of silica-lipid hybrids (SLH) and supersaturated SLH (super-SLH) in improving oral bioavailability of AbA. Specifically, we investigate the influence of lipid type and AbA saturation level of the equilibrium solubility in the lipid (S_eq), and explore in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC). An oral pharmacokinetic study was conducted in fasted Sprague-Dawley rats. Suspensions of the formulations were administered via oral gavage at an AbA dose of 25 mg/kg. Plasma samples were collected and analyzed for drug content. SLH with a saturation level of 90% S_eq enhanced the oral bioavailability of unformulated AbA by 31-fold, and super-SLH with saturation levels of 150, 200 and 250% S_eq, enhanced the bioavailability by 11, 10 and 7-fold, respectively. In comparison with the commercial product Zytiga, SLH (90% S_eq) increased the oral bioavailability 1.43-fold whereas super-SLH showed no improvement. A reasonable IVIVC existed between the performance of unformulated AbA, SLH and super-SLH, in the in vitro lipolysis and in vivo oral pharmacokinetic studies. SLH and super-SLH significantly enhanced the oral bioavailability of AbA. Additionally, supersaturation of SLH improved drug loading but did not correlate with enhanced AbA bioavailability.

Improved Dissolution and Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone through KinetiSol® Enabled Amorphous Solid Dispersions

Abiraterone is a poorly water-soluble drug. It has a high melting point and limited solubility in organic solvents, making it difficult to formulate as an amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) with conventional technologies. KinetiSol^® is a high-energy, fusion-based, solvent-free technology that can produce ASDs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of KinetiSol to make abiraterone ASDs. We developed binary KinetiSol ASDs (KSDs) using both polymers and oligomers. For the first time, we reported that KinetiSol can process hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPBCD), a low molecular-weight oligomer. Upon X-ray diffractometry and modulated differential scanning calorimetry analysis, we found the KSDs to be amorphous. In vitro dissolution analysis revealed that maximum abiraterone dissolution enhancement was achieved using a HPBCD binary KSD. However, the KSD showed significant abiraterone precipitation in fasted state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF) media. Hence, hypromellose acetate succinate (HPMCAS126G) was selected as an abiraterone precipitation inhibitor and an optimized ternary KSD was developed. A pharmacokinetic study revealed that HPBCD based binary and ternary KSDs enhanced abiraterone bioavailability by 12.4-fold and 13.8-fold, respectively, compared to a generic abiraterone acetate tablet. Thus, this study is the first to demonstrate the successful production of an abiraterone ASD that exhibited enhanced dissolution and bioavailability.

Supersaturated-Silica Lipid Hybrids Improve in Vitro Solubilization of Abiraterone Acetate

PURPOSE

Abiraterone acetate (AbA) is a poorly water-soluble drug with an oral bioavailability of <10% and a significant pharmaceutical food effect. We aimed to develop a more efficient oral solid-state lipid-based formulation for AbA using a supersaturated silica-lipid hybrid (super-SLH) approach to achieve high drug loading, improve in vitro solubilization and mitigate the food effect, while gaining a mechanistic insight into how super-SLH are digested and release drug.

METHODS

The influence of super-SLH saturation level and lipid type on the physicochemical properties and in vitro solubilization during lipolysis of the formulations was investigated and compared to the commercial product, Zytiga.

RESULTS

Super-SLH achieved significantly greater levels of AbA solubilization compared to Zytiga. Solubilization was influenced by the AbA saturation level, which determined the solid state of AbA and the relative amount of lipid, and the lipid utilized, which determined its degree of digestion and the affinity of the lipid and digestion products to the silica. A fine balance existed between achieving high drug loads using supersaturation and improving performance using the lipid-based formulation approach. The non-supersaturated SLH prepared with Capmul PG8 mitigated the 3-fold in vitro food effect.

CONCLUSION

SLH and super-SLH improve in vitro solubilization of AbA, remove the food effect and demonstrate potential to improve oral bioavailability in vivo. Graphical Abstract Abiraterone acetate was formulated as silica-lipid hybrids and demonstrated enhanced in vitro solubilization in comparison to pure abiraterone acetate and commercial product, Zytiga.

Oral formulation strategies to improve the bioavailability and mitigate the food effect of abiraterone acetate

Abiraterone acetate, marketed as Zytiga®, is an antiandrogen medication used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Abiraterone acetate is a BCS Class IV compound associated with several oral delivery challenges. Its low solubility and high lipophilicity lead to poor oral bioavailability (<10%) and a dramatic positive food effect (5-10-fold). Hence, a large dose of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg per day) is prescribed to patients who must fast for at least 1 h before and 2 h after administration. The recent expiry of Zytiga®s' patent has led to the emergence of publications describing improved oral formulation strategies for abiraterone acetate. This review aims to discuss the characteristics of abiraterone acetate that lead to its unfavorable oral delivery, examine the oral formulation strategies that have been applied, and to describe potential alternative oral formulation strategies that have been used for other BCS Class IV drugs, to determine the most valuable strategies to develop novel and improved alternatives to the current commercial product. Specific emphasis of this review is placed on enabling oral formulation strategies that can improve solubilization and bioavailability, reduce the clinical dose and remove the pharmaceutical food effect to ultimately provide prostate cancer patients with a more efficient formulation with greater patient compliance.

Impact of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide on fatigue and cognition in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: initial results from the observational AQUARiUS study

Introduction

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are commonly prescribed for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Data comparing their effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from routine clinical practice are limited.

Methods

AQUARiUS (NCT02813408) is an ongoing, two-cohort, prospective, observational, non-randomised, multicentre, phase IV European study assessing the effects of AAP and ENZ on PROs in 211 patients with mCRPC over 12 months. Patients receive AAP or ENZ per routine clinical practice. Data on cognition, fatigue, pain and health-related quality of life are measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function, Brief Fatigue Inventory-Short Form, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-C30 questionnaires, respectively.

Results

This 3-month analysis was conducted in 105 patients; 46 received AAP and 59 received ENZ. There were statistically significant differences in mean change from baseline favouring AAP over ENZ at months 1, 2 and 3 for perceived cognitive impairments and cognitive functioning. At each time-point, ENZ-treated patients had a significantly higher risk of experiencing clinically meaningful worsening in perceived cognitive impairments versus those receiving AAP.

Statistically significant differences in mean change from baseline favouring AAP over ENZ were seen for usual level of fatigue and fatigue interference at months 2 and 3 and for current fatigue and worse level of fatigue at month 3. Differences favouring AAP versus ENZ were seen for the fatigue scale of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire (months 1 and 3). There was a significantly higher risk of clinically meaningful worsening in usual level of fatigue with ENZ versus AAP at month 3.

No significant differences between cohorts were observed for pain (BPI-SF) at any time-point.

Conclusion

This analysis suggests more favourable outcomes with AAP versus ENZ for cognition and fatigue in the first 3 months of treatment initiation for mCRPC. These findings require confirmation from future analyses of data from AQUARiUS from a larger number of patients with a longer follow-up period.