1
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Régnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Compérat E, Shariat SF. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giuseppe Rosiello, Giorgio Gandaglia, Andrea Salonia, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: David D'Andrea, Francesco Soria, Rodolfo Hurle, et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2023;6:508-15. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:639-640. [PMID: 37978025 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Kotov
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sophie Régnier
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsius Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chao Cai
- Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nicola Frego
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mark Taraktin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, von Deimling M, Bekku K, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Chlosta M, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Moschini M, Karakiewicz PI, Teoh JYC, Miki J, Kimura T, Shariat SF. Repeat Transurethral Resection for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in the Contemporary Era. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:41-56. [PMID: 37495458 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) is a guideline-recommended treatment strategy in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT); however, the impact of recent procedural/technological developments on reTUR outcomes has not been assessed yet. OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of reTUR for NMIBC in the contemporary era, focusing on whether temporal differences and technical advancement, specifically, photodynamic diagnosis and en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT), affect the outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Multiple databases were queried in February 2023 for studies investigating reTUR outcomes, such as residual tumor and/or upstaging rates, its predictive factors, and oncologic outcomes, including recurrence-free (RFS), progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival. We synthesized comparative outcomes adjusting for the effect of possible confounders. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 81 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. In T1 patients initially treated with conventional TURBT (cTURBT) in the 2010s, the pooled rates of any residual tumors and upstaging on reTUR were 31.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.0-37.2%) and 2.8% (95% CI: 2.0-3.8%), respectively. Despite a potential publication bias, these rates were significantly lower than those in patients treated in the 1990-2000s (both p < 0.001). ERBT and visual enhancement-guided cTURBT significantly improved any residual tumor rates on reTUR compared with cTURBT based on both matched-cohort and multivariable analyses. Among studies adjusting for the effect of possible confounders, patients who underwent reTUR had better RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.97) and OS (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.93) than those who did not, while it did not lead to superior PFS (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.47-1.15) and CSS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). CONCLUSIONS reTUR is currently recommended for high-risk NMIBC based on the persistent high rates of residual tumors after primary resection. Improvement of resection quality based on checklist applications and recent technical/procedural advancements hold the promise to omit reTUR. PATIENT SUMMARY Recent endoscopic/procedural developments improve the outcomes of repeat resection for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Further investigations are urgently needed to clarify the potential impact of the use of these techniques on the need for repeat transurethral resection in the contemporary era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Marcin Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Clinic of Urology and Urological Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yanagisawa T, Sato S, Hayashida Y, Okada Y, Fukuokaya W, Iwatani K, Matsukawa A, Shimoda M, Takahashi H, Kimura T, Shariat SF, Miki J. Clinical impact of detrusor muscle in en bloc resection for T1 bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:484.e7-484.e15. [PMID: 37714725 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Detrusor muscle (DM) in the resected specimen of patients with pT1 bladder cancer (BCa) is a quality-of-care criteria. We aimed to assess whether obtaining adequate DM is dependent on surgeon's experience, whether is a surrogate for resection quality, and whether the degree of DM thickness is related to postoperative outcomes in en bloc resection for bladder tumors (ERBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the records of 106 pT1 high-grade BCa patients who underwent ERBT at several institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist who assessed the presence or absence of DM and its thickness measured by a micrometer, when present. Early recurrence, defined as pathologically confirmed BCa on repeat resection or tumor recurrence at the first follow-up cystoscopy (within 3 months), was the endpoint reflective of the resection quality. RESULTS Of 106 patients, DM was detected in 99 (93%), and the median DM thickness was 1.8 mm. Large tumor size (>30 mm) was associated with adequate DM sampling (>1.8mm) (odds ratio [OR]: 6.10, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 2.08-17.9, P = 0.001), while surgeon's experience was not. DM presence and DM thickness were both not associated with early recurrence, while positive surgical margin was an independent prognosticator for early recurrence (OR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.12-10.2, P = 0.031). Excessive DM sampling (>2.1 mm) was associated with prolonged urethral catheterization (OR: 28.8, 95% CI: 3.36-248, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS In ERBT, surgeon's experience seems irrelevant to obtain DM. Resection quality relies on surgical margin status, not the degree of DM. Obtaining excessive DM incurs adverse events/unnecessary medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hayashida
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
| | - Yohei Okada
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Shimoda
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soria F, Rosazza M, Livoti S, Dutto D, Colucci F, Sylvester RJ, Shariat SF, Babjuk M, Palou J, Gontero P. Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00236-5. [PMID: 37923633 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG. CONCLUSIONS The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases. PATIENT SUMMARY We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.
| | - Matteo Rosazza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Livoti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Daniele Dutto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Fulvia Colucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Richard J Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundaciò Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Régnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Compérat E, Shariat SF. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:508-515. [PMID: 37543464 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND En bloc transurethral resection of the bladder (eTURB) might improve the surgical management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in comparison to conventional TURB (cTURB). OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether eTURB is superior to cTURB in resection of NMIBC and specimen retrieval. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a randomized, multicenter trial in patients with up to three cTa-T1 NMIBC tumors of 1-3 cm in size, who were enrolled from January 2019 to January 2022. INTERVENTION Participants were randomized 1:1 to undergo eTURB (n = 192) or cTURB (n = 192). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was the prevalence of detrusor muscle (DM) in the specimen retrieved. Secondary endpoints included bladder perforation, persistent disease at second-look TURB, positive lateral resection margin, positive deep resection margin, operation time, perforation rate, obturator reflex, conversion from eTURB to cTURB, recurrence-free survival, and disease recurrence at 3 mo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 384 patients were randomized to undergo eTURB or cTURB. A total of 452 tumors were resected and analyzed for the primary outcome. eTURB was superior to cTURB in retrieval of DM (80.7% vs 71.1%; mixed-model p = 0.01). Bladder perforation (5.6% vs 12%; difference -6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.2% to -0.6%) and obturator reflex (8.4% vs 16%; difference -7.6%; 95% CI -14.3% to -0.9%) were less frequent in the eTURB arm than in the cTURB arm. Operation time did not differ between the two techniques (26 min, interquartile range [IQR] 20-38 for eTURB vs 25 min, IQR 17-35 for cTURB; difference 1 min, 95% CI -25.9 to 4.99). Second-look TURB was performed in 24 patients in the eTURB arm and 34 in the cTURB arm, with no difference in the rate of residual papillary disease (pTa/pT1: 56% vs 55.9%; difference 0.1%, 95% CI -25.5% to 25.7%). At median follow-up of 13 mo (IQR 7-20), 18.4% of the patients in the eTURB arm and 16.7% in the cTURB arm had experienced bladder cancer recurrence (Cox hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.49-1.52; p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS In patients with clinical NMIBC with up to three tumors of 1-3 cm in size, tumor removal via eTURB resulted in a higher rate of DM in the pathologic specimen in comparison to cTURB. Moreover, eTURB was associated with lower frequency of obturator reflex and bladder perforation than cTURB was. While improving on the quality indicators for NMIBC, the long-term differential oncologic benefits of eTURB remain uncertain. PATIENT SUMMARY We compared two techniques for removal of bladder tumors and found that tumor removal in a single piece, called en bloc resection, provides a better-quality specimen for pathology analysis and fewer complications in comparison to the conventional method. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03718754.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergey Kotov
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sophie Régnier
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsius Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Chao Cai
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nicola Frego
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Mark Taraktin
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guler Y. Clinical and pathological risk factors for tumour recurrence and upstaging in second TURBT for patients with NMIBC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aktuelle Urol 2023. [PMID: 37263278 DOI: 10.1055/a-2063-3144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
ZIEL: Offenlegung signifikanter Risikofaktoren durch Identifizierung gepoolter Effektschätzungsstatistiken in einer systemischen Überprüfung und Metaanalyse klinischer und pathologischer Risikofaktoren, die ein Tumorrezidiv und ein Upstaging auf eine zweite TURBT bei Patienten mit hochgradigem NMIBC vorhersagen. MATERIAL-METHODE Alle Datenquellen wurden umfassend bis Oktober 2022 untersucht. Die Daten wurden aus den relevanten Studien extrahiert und mit der Software RevMan analysiert. In einem inversen Varianzmodell mit zufälligen und festen Effekten werden Odds Ratio (OR)-Werte mit 95%-Konfidenzintervallen [95%-KI] angegeben. ERGEBNISSE Der Review umfasste insgesamt 18 Studien und 4548 Patienten. Gemäß den gepoolten Effektschätzern waren Carcinoma in situ (CIS), Tumorgrad, Multiplizität und Chirurgenfaktoren signifikante Risikofaktoren. Die gepoolten Effektschätzungen für das Tumorstadium und die Tumormorphologie waren sehr nahe an der Signifikanz. Für CIS, Grad, Multiplizität und Chirurgenfaktor, OR, IVR oder IVF [95%-KI] waren die p- und I2-Werte 1,8 [1,1, 3,0], 0,03, 75%; 2 [1,1, 3,4], 0,02, 53%; 1,3 [1,2, 1,6], <0,01, 40%; und 2 [1,4, 3], <0,01, 66%. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN Als Ergebnis der ersten TURBT; Eine zweite TURBT sollte in den 2-6 Wochen der postoperativen Phase für Patienten mit hochgradigem, begleitendem CIS, multipler, solider Morphologie, DM(-) im pathologischen Präparat und NMIBC, das von Trainern/Juniorchirurgen operiert wird, geplant werden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Guler
- Department of Urology, TC Istanbul Rumeli University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tonin E, Shariat SF, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, D'Andrea D. En-bloc resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: does it really make a difference? Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:147-151. [PMID: 36710595 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) followed by pathology investigation of the obtained specimens is the initial step in the management of urinary bladder cancer (UBC). By following the basic principles of oncological surgery, en-bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) aims to overcome the limitations associated with conventional transurethral resection, and to improve the quality of pathological specimens for a better decision making. The current bulk of evidence provides controversial results regarding the superiority of one technique over the other. The aim of this article is to summarize the recent data and provide evidence on this unanswered question. RECENT FINDINGS Despite heterogeneous and controversial data, ERBT seems to have a better safety profile and deliver higher quality pathologic specimens. However, the recent evidence failed to support the hypothesized oncological potential benefits of ERBT in the initial surgical treatment of patients with UBC. SUMMARY ERBT has gained increasing interest globally in the past decade. It continues to represent a promising strategy with a variety of features intended to solve the inherent limitations of TURBT. However, the current quality of evidence does not allow solid conclusions to be drawn about its presumed superiority compared with the conventional technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Tonin
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yanagisawa T, Sato S, Hayashida Y, Okada Y, Iwatani K, Matsukawa A, Kimura T, Takahashi H, Egawa S, Shariat SF, Miki J. Do we need repeat transurethral resection after en bloc resection for pathological T1 bladder cancer? BJU Int 2023; 131:190-197. [PMID: 35488409 PMCID: PMC10084154 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical significance of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) and surgical margin status after en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) for pathological T1 (pT1) bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analysed the record of 106 patients with pT1 high-grade bladder cancer who underwent ERBT between April 2013 and February 2021 at multiple institutions. All specimens were reviewed by a genitourinary pathologist. The primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with and those without reTUR. We also analysed the predictive value of surgical margin on the likelihood of residual tumour on reTUR. RESULTS A reTUR was performed in 50 of the 106 patients. The 2-year RFS and 3-year PFS were comparable between patients who underwent reTUR and those who did not (55.1% vs 59.9%, P = 0.6, 80.6% vs 82.6%, P = 0.6, respectively). No patient was upstaged to pT2 on reTUR. Regarding the surgical margin status, there were no recurrences at the original site in 51 patients with negative horizontal margins. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a positive vertical margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse PFS. On reTUR, six pTa/is residues were detected in patients with a positive horizontal margin, and three pT1 residues were detected in one patient with a positive vertical margin or other adverse pathological features. CONCLUSIONS A reTUR after ERBT for pT1 bladder cancer appears not to improve either recurrence or progression. Surgical margin status affects prognosis and reTUR outcomes. A reTUR can be omitted after ERBT in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and negative margins; for those with positive horizontal or vertical margins, reTUR should remain the standard until proven otherwise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hayashida
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
| | - Yohei Okada
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takahashi
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang Y, Wang C, Li Z, Lu Q, Li Y. Precise diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer - A clinical perspective. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1042552. [PMID: 36798814 PMCID: PMC9927396 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1042552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
According to the guidelines, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by intravesical therapy remains the standard strategy for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, even if patients receive standard strategy, the risk of postoperative recurrence and progression is high. From the clinical perspective, the standard strategy needs to be optimized and improved. Compared to conventional TURBT, the technique of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) removes the tumor tissue in one piece, thus following the principles of cancer surgery. Meanwhile, the integrity and spatial orientation of tumor tissue is protected during the operation, which is helpful for pathologists to make accurate histopathological analysis. Then, urologists can make a postoperative individualized treatment plan based on the patient's clinical characteristics and histopathological results. To date, there is no strong evidence that NMIBC patients treated with ERBT achieve better oncological prognosis, which indicates that ERBT alone does not yet improve patient outcomes. With the development of enhanced imaging technology and proteogenomics technology, en bloc resection combined with these technologies will make it possible to achieve precise diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. In this review, the authors analyze the current existing shortcomings of en bloc resection and points out its future direction, in order to promote continuous optimization of the management strategy of bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Qiang Lu
- *Correspondence: Qiang Lu, ; Yuanwei Li,
| | - Yuanwei Li
- *Correspondence: Qiang Lu, ; Yuanwei Li,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martínez-Piñeiro L. Checklist for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT): A Step Forward in the Standardization for TURBT Reporting. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 48:22-23. [PMID: 36588774 PMCID: PMC9795513 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital and La Paz Hospital Research Institute, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xu J, Xu Z, Yin H, Zang J. Can a reresection be avoided after initial en bloc resection for high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:849929. [PMID: 36189399 PMCID: PMC9515398 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.849929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of en bloc resection for patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and explore whether a reresection can be avoided after initial en bloc resection.Material and methodsWe conducted research in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to October 12, 2021, to identify studies on the second resection after initial en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT). R software and the double arcsine method were used for data conversion and combined calculation of the incidence rate.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 414 participants were included. The rate of detrusor muscle in the ERBT specimens was 100% (95%CI: 100%–100%), the rate of tumor residual in reresection specimens was 3.2% (95%CI: 1.4%–5.5%), and the rate of tumor upstaging was 0.3% (95%CI: 0%–1.5%). Two articles compared the prognostic data of the reresection and non-reresection groups after the initial ERBT. We found no significant difference in the 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (OR = 1.44, 95%CI: 0.67–3.09, P = 0.35) between the two groups nor in the rate of tumor recurrence (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.44–1.18, P = 0.2) or progression (OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.33–2.89, P = 0.97) at the final follow-up.ConclusionsERBT can almost completely remove the detrusor muscle of the tumor bed with a very low postoperative tumor residue and upstaging rate. For high-risk NMIBC patients, an attempt to appropriately reduce the use of reresection after ERBT seems to be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangnan Xu
- Department of Urology, Yancheng First Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Yancheng, China
- Department of Urology, The First People’s Hospital of Yancheng, Yancheng, China
| | - Zhenyu Xu
- Department of Urology, Kunshan Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - HuMin Yin
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jin Zang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Correspondence: Jin Zang
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Culpan M, Kazan O, Acar HC, Iplikci A, Atis G, Yildirim A. The probability of residual tumor detection in the second transurethral resection of pT1 urothelial bladder cancer according to the risk factors. Actas Urol Esp 2022; 46:423-430. [PMID: 35725972 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the predictive factors for residual tumors in the second resection after the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT) in patients with pT1 tumors and to develop a simple method to predict the probability of residual tumor detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with pT1 bladder cancer who underwent a second resection within two to six weeks after the initial TUR-BT were included in our retrospective study. The patients' demographics and the tumor characteristics of the initial and second resections were recorded. RESULTS A total of 144 patients were included in our analysis with a 53-month follow-up. In the univariate logistic regression analysis, tumor grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), macroscopic appearance of the tumor (solid vs papillary), and presence of a variant histology, were significant risk factors for residual tumor. In the multivariate analysis, tumor grade was the only independent predictor of residual tumor at second TUR (OR: 5.62, 95% CI: 1.228-25.708, p = 0.026). According to our findings, the patients with the highest risk have a 90.9% residual tumor detection probability at the second resection, and the patients with the lowest risk have 25.4%. CONCLUSIONS Tumor grade, macroscopic appearance of the tumor (solid vs papillary), and concomitant CIS, were important predictors of residual tumors at second resection of primary pT1 NMIBC patients. We were able to calculate the probability of residual tumor which helped us determine risk adapted strategies according to these probabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Culpan
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - O Kazan
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - H Cansu Acar
- Department of Public Health, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Iplikci
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - G Atis
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Yildirim
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Symeonidis EN, Lo KL, Chui KL, Vakalopoulos I, Sountoulides P. En bloc resection of bladder tumors: challenges and unmet needs in 2021. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2545-2558. [PMID: 35642479 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer accounts for the majority of new bladder cancer diagnoses, and endoscopic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) represents the standard-of-care. Although a relatively safe and common procedure, TURBT is often hampered by the questionable quality of resection. The evolution of surgical techniques has brought en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) to the forefront. ERBT has emerged as an alternative to conventional TURBT, incorporating a more delicate en bloc sculpting and tumor excision, in contrast to 'piecemeal' resection by conventional TURBT. ERBT appears safe, feasible and effective with demonstrably higher rates of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, all while providing better staging and obviating the need for a re-TURBT in selected patients. However, the method's adoption in the field is still limited. This review summarizes the recent evidence relevant to ERBT while further highlighting the technique's limitations and unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos N Symeonidis
- First Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, "G Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, 54635, Greece
| | - Ka-Lun Lo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, The People's Republic of China
| | - Ka-Lun Chui
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, The People's Republic of China
| | - Ioannis Vakalopoulos
- First Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, "G Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, 54635, Greece
| | - Petros Sountoulides
- First Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, "G Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, 54635, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
La probabilidad de detección de tumor residual en la segunda resección transuretral del cáncer de vejiga urotelial PT1 según los factores de riesgo. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
15
|
Musat MG, Kwon CS, Masters E, Sikirica S, Pijush DB, Forsythe A. Treatment Outcomes of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) in Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studies: Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 14:35-48. [PMID: 35046678 PMCID: PMC8759992 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s341896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background To date, there has been limited synthesis of RWE studies in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC). The objective of this research was to conduct a systematic review of published real-world evidence to better understand the real-world burden and treatment patterns in HR-NMIBC. Methods An SLR was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with the scope defined by the Population, Intervention Comparators, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) criteria. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases (Jan 2015–Jul 2020) were searched, and relevant congress abstracts (Jan 2018–Jul 2020) identified. The final analysis only included studies that enrolled ≥100 patients with HR-NMIBC from the US, Europe, Canada, and Australia. Results The SLR identified 634 RWE publications in NMIBC, of which 160 studies reported data in HR-NMIBC. The average age of patients in the studies was 71 years, and 79% were males. The rates of BCG intravesical instillations ranged from 3% to 86% (29–95% for induction and 8–83% for maintenance treatment). Five-year outcomes were 17–89% recurrence-free survival (longest survival in patients completing BCG maintenance), 58–89% progression-free survival, 71–96% cancer-specific survival (lowest survival in BCG-unresponsive patients), and 28–90% overall survival (lowest survival in patients who did not receive BCG or instillation therapy). Conclusion BCG treatment rates and survival outcomes in patients with HR-NMIBC vary in the real world, with better survival seen in patients completing maintenance BCG, responding to treatment, and not progressing to muscle-invasive disease. There is a need to better understand the factors associated with BCG use and discontinuation and for an effective treatment that improves outcomes in HR-NMIBC. Generalization of these results is limited by variations in data collection, reporting, and methodologies used across RWE studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Georgiana Musat
- Evidence Generation, Purple Squirrel Economics, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Cytel, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Christina Soeun Kwon
- Evidence Generation, Purple Squirrel Economics, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Cytel, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | - Slaven Sikirica
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debduth B Pijush
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anna Forsythe
- Value and Access, Purple Squirrel Economics, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Cytel, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sari Motlagh R, Rajwa P, Mori K, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, Katayama S, Yanagisawa T, König F, Grossmann NC, Pradere B, Mostafai H, Quhal F, Karakiewicz PI, Babjuk M, Shariat SF. Comparison of Clinicopathologic and Oncological Outcomes Between Transurethral En Bloc Resection and Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis with Focus on Different Energy Sources. J Endourol 2021; 36:535-547. [PMID: 34693740 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: It has been hypothesized that transurethral en bloc (TUEB) of bladder tumor offers benefits over conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT). This study aimed to compare disease outcomes of TUEB and cTURBT with focus on the different energy sources. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases in June 2021. Studies that compared the pathological (detrusor muscle presence), oncological (recurrence rates) efficacy, and safety (serious adverse events [SAEs]) of TUEB and cTURBT were included. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analytic models and Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis was used. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and seven non-RCTs (NRCT), with a total of 2092 patients. The pooled 3- and 12-month recurrence risk ratios (RR) of five and four NRCTs were 0.46 (95% CI 0.29-0.73) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.96), respectively. The pooled 3- and 12-month recurrence RRs of four and seven RCTs were 0.57 (95% CI 0.25-1.27) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.69-1.15), respectively. The pooled RR for SAEs such as prolonged hematuria and bladder perforation of seven RCTs was 0.16 (95% CI 0.06-0.41) in benefit of TUEB. Seven RCTs (n = 1077) met our eligibility criteria for network meta-analysis. There was no difference in 12-month recurrence rates between hybridknife, laser, and bipolar TUEB compared with cTURBT. Contrary, laser TUEB was significantly associated with lower SAEs compared with cTURBT. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking analyses showed with high certainty that laser TUEB was the best treatment option to access all endpoints. Conclusion: While NRCTs suggested a recurrence-free benefit to TUEB compared with cTURBT, RCTs failed to confirm this. Conversely, SAEs were consistently and clinically significantly better for TUEB. Network meta-analyses suggested laser TUEB has the best performance compared with other energy sources. These early findings need to be confirmed and expanded upon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafai
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Motol University Hospital, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nielsen NK, Jakobsen JK, Kingo PS, Jensen JB. Potential candidates for en bloc resection among patients with primary and recurrent bladder tumours. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:366-371. [PMID: 34279178 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1954686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transurethral resection (TURB) is the gold standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, conventional TURB is possibly part of the mechanism leading to the high recurrence rate in NMIBC and the need for repeated procedures, as the method with piecemeal resection of the tumour violates basic oncological principles and compromises pathological examination. En bloc resection (EBR) could potentially overcome these flaws by improving pathological quality and thereby reducing the need for re-resections and could potentially also lower the risk of tumour seeding leading to early recurrences. With this study, we aimed to evaluate tumour characteristics in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing conventional TURB in order to estimate the proportion of procedures eligible for EBR, findings at re-resection, and early recurrence rate. METHODS All TURBs performed at a single large University Hospital in a 12 month period were manually reviewed. Based on tumour size and appearance, patients were registered as candidates or non-candidate for EBR. RESULTS A total of 600 TURBs were reviewed. Overall, 25% of procedures were found to be eligible for EBR. The most frequent reason for not being a candidate was tumour diameter <1 cm. Re-resections were done after 10.5% of the procedures, where the residual tumour was found in 28.6% of these. Within 6 months, 21.2% had a recurrence. CONCLUSION We found approximately 25% of all TURBs to be eligible for EBR. Based on a relatively low recurrence rate, we conclude that future studies on EBR with recurrence rate as the primary endpoint will require large patient cohorts.
Collapse
|
18
|
Paciotti M, Casale P, Colombo P, Fasulo V, Saita A, Lughezzani G, Contieri R, Buffi NM, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Hurle R. Long-term Follow-up After En Bloc Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results from a Single-center Experience. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 26:64-71. [PMID: 34337509 PMCID: PMC8317892 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND En bloc resection (ERBT) is a valid alternative to piecemeal resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), guaranteeing pathological outcomes. However, very few studies investigated long-term oncological outcomes of ERBT. OBJECTIVE To report long-term oncological outcome of ERBT. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included patients who underwent ERBT from June 2010 to February 2014, and were diagnosed with NMIBC at pathology evaluation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary study endpoint was recurrence-free survival at 5 yr. Secondary outcomes were presence of detrusor muscle, recurrence rate at the first follow-up cystoscopy, progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) at 5 yr, and factors associated with long-term oncological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe recurrence-free survival time. A univariate analysis was used to investigate factors associated with recurrence. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 74 patients were included in this study. The median age was 71 (66-76) yr. Most of the patients presented with only one bladder tumor, and the median tumor diameter was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-2.5) cm. After histopathological examination, eight, 35, and 31 patients were diagnosed with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. All the en bloc resected tumors showed the presence of detrusor muscle. The median follow-up was 72 (IQR 66-90) mo. The recurrence rate at the first follow-up cystoscopy was 5.4% (four out of 74 patients). Overall, 57 (77%) patients were free of recurrence at 5 yr. No progression to MIBC was observed: progression-free survival was 100%. Limitations include retrospective design and small size. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that ERBT for NMIBC presents an optimal long-term oncological outcome. Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary for confirming our preliminary results and for a direct comparison with the traditional piecemeal resection. PATIENT SUMMARY In case of superficial bladder tumors, transurethral resection of the entire tumor and its base in one piece seems to provide good long-term results in terms of recurrence and progression rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Piergiuseppe Colombo
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Vittorio Fasulo
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Saita
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Nicolò Maria Buffi
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Massimo Lazzeri
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Giorgio Guazzoni
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yang Y, Liu C, Yan X, Li J, Yang X. En Bloc Tumor Resection, Optical Molecular Imaging, and the Potential Synergy of the Combination of the Two Techniques in Bladder Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:638083. [PMID: 33796465 PMCID: PMC8008058 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.638083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Although transurethral resection of bladder tumor is the golden standard for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, this surgical procedure still has some serious drawbacks. For example, piecemeal resection of tumor tissue results in exfoliated tumor cells dissemination and implantation, and fragmented tumor specimens make it difficult for pathologists to accurately assess the pathological stage and histologic grade. En bloc tumor resection follows the basic principle of oncological surgery and provides an intact tumor specimen containing detrusor muscle for pathologists to make accurate histopathological assessment. However, there is no robust clinical evidence that en bloc tumor resection is superior to conventional resection in terms of oncological outcomes. Considering the high recurrence rate, small or occult tumor lesions may be overlooked and incomplete tumor resection may occur during white light cystoscopy-assisted transurethral resection. Molecular fluorescent tracers have the ability to bind tumor cells with high sensitivity and specificity. Optical molecular imaging mediated by it can detect small or occult malignant lesions while minimizing the occurrence of false-positive results. Meanwhile, optical molecular imaging can provide dynamic and real-time image guidance in the surgical procedure, which helps urologists to accurately determine the boundary and depth of tumor invasion, so as to perform complete and high-quality transurethral tumor resection. Integrating the advantages of these two technologies, optical molecular imaging-assisted en bloc tumor resection shows the potential to improve the positive detection rate of small or occult tumor lesions and the quality of transurethral resection, resulting in high recurrence-free and progression-free survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjun Yang
- First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Chao Liu
- First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaoting Yan
- First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jiawei Li
- First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- First Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
- Department of Urology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Grotenhuis AJ, Cha EK, Malats N, Di Stasi S, Joniau S, Cai T, van Rhijn BWG, Irani J, Karnes J, Varkarakis J, Baniel J, Palou J, Babjuk M, Spahn M, Ardelt P, Colombo R, Serretta V, Dalbagni G, Gontero P, Bartoletti R, Larré S, Malmstrom PU, Sylvester R, Shariat SF. Association of patients' sex with treatment outcomes after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin immunotherapy for T1G3/HG bladder cancer. World J Urol 2021; 39:3337-3344. [PMID: 33713162 PMCID: PMC8510956 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03653-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the association of patients’ sex with recurrence and disease progression in patients treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) for T1G3/HG urinary bladder cancer (UBC). Materials and methods We analyzed the data of 2635 patients treated with adjuvant intravesical BCG for T1 UBC between 1984 and 2019. We accounted for missing data using multiple imputations and adjusted for covariate imbalance between males and females using inverse probability weighting (IPW). Crude and IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of patients’ sex with HG-recurrence and disease progression. Results A total of 2170 (82%) males and 465 (18%) females were available for analysis. Overall, 1090 (50%) males and 244 (52%) females experienced recurrence, and 391 (18%) males and 104 (22%) females experienced disease progression. On IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses, female sex was associated with disease progression (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.01–1.56, p = 0.04) but not with recurrence (HR 1.06, 95%CI 0.92–1.22, p = 0.41). A total of 1056 patients were treated with adequate BCG. In these patients, on IPW-adjusted Cox regression analyses, patients’ sex was not associated with recurrence (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.80–1.24, p = 0.96), HG-recurrence (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.78–1.29, p = 0.99) or disease progression (HR 1.12, 95%CI 0.78–1.60, p = 0.55). Conclusion Our analysis generates the hypothesis of a differential response to BCG between males and females if not adequately treated. Further studies should focus on sex-based differences in innate and adaptive immune system and their association with BCG response. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-021-03653-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, University of the Studies of Turin, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Turin, Italy
| | - Anne J Grotenhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eugene K Cha
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell, University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nuria Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Savino Di Stasi
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Tor Vergata-University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Steven Joniau
- Oncologic and Reconstructive Urology, Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tommaso Cai
- Department of Urology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaques Irani
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Milétrie, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | - John Varkarakis
- Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jack Baniel
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Motol Hospital, University of Praha, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Spahn
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Wuertzburg, Germany
| | - Peter Ardelt
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Renzo Colombo
- Departement of Urology, Università Vita Salute, Ospedale S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Serretta
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, University of the Studies of Turin, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Presidio Molinette, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Per-Uno Malmstrom
- Department of Urology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Richard Sylvester
- European Association of Urology Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell, University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
D'Andrea D, Matin S, Black PC, Petros FG, Zargar H, Dinney CP, Cookson MS, Kassouf W, Dall'Era MA, McGrath JS, Wright JL, Thorpe AC, Morgan TM, Holzbeierlein JM, Bivalacqua TJ, Sridhar SS, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Stephenson AJ, van Rhijn BW, Spiess PE, Daneshmand S, Shariat SF. Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder and upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 127:528-537. [PMID: 32981193 PMCID: PMC8246716 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the differential response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) compared to upper tract urothelial carcioma (UTUC) treated with radical surgery. Patients and Methods Data from 1299 patients with UCB and 276 with UTUC were obtained from multicentric collaborations. The association of disease location (UCB vs UTUC) with pathological complete response (pCR, defined as a post‐treatment pathological stage ypT0N0) and pathological objective response (pOR, defined as ypT0‐Ta‐Tis‐T1N0) after NAC was evaluated using logistic regression analyses. The association with overall (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results A pCR was found in 250 (19.2%) patients with UCB and in 23 (8.3%) with UTUC (P < 0.01). A pOR was found in 523 (40.3%) patients with UCB and in 133 (48.2%) with UTUC (P = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with UTUC were less likely to have a pCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.70; P < 0.01) and more likely to have a pOR (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.89–2.08; P < 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04) and CSS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.83; P < 0.01). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, UTUC remained associated with CSS (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.82; P < 0.01), but not with OS. Conclusions Our present findings suggest that the benefit of NAC in UTUC is similar to that found in UCB. These data can be used as a benchmark to contextualise survival outcomes and plan future trial design with NAC in urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Surena Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, The University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Colin P Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael S Cookson
- Department of Urology, Center and The Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A Dall'Era
- Department of Urology, Davis Medical Center, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - John S McGrath
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Andrew C Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott North
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Stephenson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bas W van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|