Combined clinical characteristics and multiparametric MRI parameters for prediction of cribriform morphology in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

Comparison of Multiparametric MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsies for Detection of Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma Prostate Cancer

Background Intraductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive cribriform (Cr) subtypes of prostate cancer (PCa) are an indication of aggressiveness, but the evidence regarding whether MRI can be used to detect Cr/IDC-pattern PCa is contradictory. Purpose To compare the detection of Cr/IDC-pattern PCa at multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive men at risk for PCa. Materials and Methods This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial that recruited participants with a clinical suspicion of PCa between April 2017 and November 2019 at five centers. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the MRI arm or the systematic biopsy arm. Targeted biopsy was performed in participants with a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score of at least 3. MRI features were recorded, and biopsy slides and prostatectomy specimens were reviewed for the presence or absence of Cr/IDC histologic patterns. Comparison of Cr/IDC patterns was performed using generalized linear mixed modeling. Results A total of 453 participants were enrolled, with 226 in the systematic biopsy arm (median age, 65 years [IQR, 59-70 years]; 196 biopsies available for assessment) and 227 in the mpMRI-targeted biopsy arm (median age, 67 years [IQR, 60-72 years]; 132 biopsies available for assessment). Identification of Cr/IDC PCa was lower in the systematic biopsy arm compared with the mpMRI arm (31 of 196 biopsies [16%] vs 33 of 132 biopsies [25%]; P = .01). No evidence of a difference in mean cancer core length (CCL) (11.3 mm ± 4.4 vs 9.7 mm ± 4.5; P = .09), apparent diffusion coefficient (685 µm2/sec ± 178 vs 746 µm2/sec ± 245; P = .52), or dynamic contrast-enhanced positivity (27 [82%] vs 37 [90%]; P = .33) for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was observed between participants with or without Cr/IDC disease in the MRI arm. Cr/IDC-positive histologic patterns overall had a higher mean CCL compared with Cr/IDC-negative csPCa (11.1 mm ± 4.4 vs 9.2 mm ± 4.1; P = .009). Conclusion MRI-targeted biopsy showed increased detection of Cr/IDC histologic patterns compared with systematic biopsy. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02936258 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Scialpi and Martorana in this issue.

Association of quantifiable prostate MRI parameters with any and large cribriform pattern in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Cribriform pattern has recently been recognized as an important independent risk factor for prostate cancer (PCa) outcome. This study aimed to identify the association of quantifiable prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with any and large cribriform pattern at radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

METHODS

Preoperative prostate MRI's from 188 men undergoing RP between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively acquired. RP specimens of the patients were revised for Gleason score (GS), and presence of any and large cribriform pattern. MRI parameters such as MRI visibility, PI-RADS score, lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, lesion size, and radiologic extra-prostatic extension (EPE) were reviewed. The association of prostate MRI parameters for presence of any and large cribriform pattern at RP was analysed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

116/188 (61.7%) PCa patients had any cribriform and 36/188 (19.1%) large cribriform pattern at RP. 171/188 (91.0%) men had MRI-visible lesions; 111/116 (95.7%) tumours with any and 36/36 (100%) with large cribriform pattern were visible at MRI. PCa with any and large cribriform pattern both had lower ADC values than those without (p < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, lowest ADC value was as an independent predictor for any cribriform (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.1-0.8; p = 0.01) and large cribriform pattern (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.7; p = 0.01), while other parameters were not.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of PCa with cribriform pattern at RP were visible at MRI, and lowest ADC value was an independent predictor for both any and large cribriform pattern.

Is cribriform pattern in prostate biopsy a risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT?

INTRODUCTION

Cribriform growth pattern (CP) in prostate cancer (PCa) has been associated with different unfavourable oncological outcomes. This study addresses if CP in prostate biopsies is an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on PSMA PET/CT.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with ISUP GG ≥ 2 staged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT diagnosed from 2020 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. To test if CP in biopsies was an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, regression analyses were performed. Secondary analyses were performed in different subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 401 patients were included. CP was reported in 252 (63%) patients. CP in biopsies was not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (p = 0.14). ISUP grade group (GG) 4 (p = 0.006), GG 5 (p = 0.003), higher PSA level groups per 10 ng/ml until > 50 (p-value between 0.02 and > 0.001) and clinical EPE (p > 0.001) were all independent risk factors. In the subgroups with GG 2 (n = 99), GG 3 (n = 110), intermediate-risk group (n = 129) or the high-risk group (n = 272), CP in biopsies was also not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. If the EAU guideline recommendation for performing metastatic screening was applied as threshold for PSMA PET/CT imaging, in 9(2%) patients, metastatic disease was missed, and 18% fewer PSMA PET/CT would have been performed.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study found that CP in biopsies was not an independent risk factor for metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.

Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer-A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing?

This case-based discussion describes a 65-year-old man newly diagnosed with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 prostate cancer (PCa). According to the European Association of Urology classification system, the patient harbors an intermediate-risk cancer. In step-by step discussion, we elaborate guideline-based treatment modalities for intermediate-risk PCa focused on debating active surveillance versus active treatment. Thereby, we discuss the importance of patient characteristics, including age, hereditary factors, life expectancy and comorbidity status, findings of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, as well as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density and PSA kinetics, in predicting the clinical course of the disease. In addition, we focus on cribriform pathology as a predictor of adverse outcomes and critically discuss its relevance in patient management. Lastly, we outline genomic stratification in ISUP 2 cancer as a future tool to predict PCa aggressiveness. PATIENT SUMMARY: Based on current guidelines, patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer are treated actively or can alternatively undergo an active surveillance approach when favorable risk factors are present. One major issue is to discriminate between patients who benefit from an active therapy approach and those who benefit from a deferred treatment. Therefore, reliable biomarkers and early predictors of disease progression are needed urgently.

Diagnosis and Pathologic Reporting of Prostate Cancer in the Era of MRI-Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Historically, the detection of prostate cancer relied upon a systematic yet random sampling of the prostate by transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. This approach was a nontargeted technique that led to the under detection of cancers at biopsy and the upgrading of cancers at radical prostatectomy. Multiparametric MRI-targeted prostate biopsy allows for an image-directed approach to the identification of prostate cancer. MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate is superior for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. As this technique has become more prevalent among urologists, pathologists need to recognize how this development impacts cancer diagnosis and reporting.

The impact of multiparametric MRI features to identify the presence of prevalent cribriform pattern in the peripheral zone tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the role of the multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in predicting the cribriform pattern in both the peripheral and transition zones (PZ and TZ) clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCas).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 150 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for csPCa and preoperative mpMRI. Patients with negative (n = 25) and positive (n = 125) mpMRI, stratified according to the presence of prevalent cribriform pattern (PCP, ≥ 50%) and non-PCP (< 50%) at specimen, were included. Difference between the two groups were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PCP among mpMRI parameters. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and ADC ratio in detecting lesions harboring PCP.

RESULTS

Considering 135 positive lesions at the mpMRI, 30 (22.2%) and 105 (77.8%) harbored PCP and non-PCP PCa. The PCP lesions had more frequently nodular morphology (83.3% vs 62.9%; p = 0.04) and significantly lower mean ADC value (0.87 ± 0.16 vs 0.95 ± 0.18; p = 0.03) and ADC ratio (0.52 ± 0.09 vs 0.60 ± 0.14; p = 0.003) when compared with non-PCP lesions. At univariate and multivariate analyses, mean ADC and ADC ratio resulted as independent predictors of the presence of the PCP of the PZ tumors(OR: 0.025; p = 0.03 and OR: 0.001; p = 0.004, respectively). At the ROC analysis, the AUC of mean ADC and ADC ratio to predict the presence of PCP in patients with PZ suspicious lesion at the mpMRI were 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.81P, p = 0.003) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.82P, p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mpMRI may correctly identify PCP tumors of the PZ and the mean ADC value and ADC ratio can predict the presence of the cribriform pattern in the PCa.

Cribriform Prostate Cancer: Clinical Pathologic and Molecular Considerations

Intraductal cribriform (IDC) and invasive cribriform morphologies are associated with worse prostate cancer outcomes. Limited retrospective studies have associated IDC and cribriform morphology with germline mutations in DNA repair genes, particularly BRCA2. These findings, which prompted the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for Prostate Cancer and Genetic/Familial High- Risk Assessment to consider germline testing for individuals with IDC/cribriform histology, have been questioned in a recent prospective study. A deepened understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving disease aggressiveness in cribriform morphology is critical to provide more clarity in clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current understanding of IDC and cribriform prostate cancer, with an emphasis on clinical outcomes and molecular alterations.

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to correlate cribriform pattern (CP) with other parameters in a large prospective series of Gleason score ≥7/ISUP grade ≥2 prostate cancer (PC) cases undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

This is a prospective single-center study on 210 consecutive patients. Gleason pattern 4 and individual tumor growth patterns determination were performed either in biopsy or in surgical specimens for all patients.

RESULTS

At multiparametric magnetic resonance, a higher percentage of PI-RADS 5 was associated to CP (53.3% vs 17.7%, P = .038). CP was significantly and inversely (r = -0.261; P = .001) correlated with perineural invasion (PNI) but not with other pathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that mean biochemical (Bp) and radiological (Rp) progression-free survival were similar (Bp = χ 0.906; P = .341; Rp = χ 1.880; P = .170) independently to CP. In PNI positive cases, Bp-free survival was higher (χ = 3.617; P = .057) in cases without CP.

CONCLUSIONS

In a homogeneous population excluding ISUP 1 cases, CP showed limited prognostic value. We first described an association with PNI and a prognostic value influenced by PNI status.

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading

The Gleason grading system is one of the most important factors in clinical decision‐making for prostate cancer patients, and is entirely based on the classification of tumour growth patterns. In recent years it has become clear that some individual growth patterns themselves have independent prognostic value, and could be used for better personalised risk stratification. In this review we summarise recent literature on the clinicopathological value and molecular characteristics of individual prostate cancer growth patterns, and show how these, most particularly cribriform architecture, could alter treatment decisions for prostate cancer patients.

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: key considerations for pathologists

We discuss the role of the pathologist for MRI-targeted prostate biopsy with a focus on specimen processing, reporting of pathological findings and quality assurance in establishing a successful MRI-targeted biopsy programme. The authors discuss the current issues relevant to pathologists regarding MRI-targeted prostate biopsy. In addition, a brief review of the recently published literature was performed using an English literature search on PubMed with a focus on original investigations related to MRI-targeted prostate biopsy. Our search terms included the following: 'prostate cancer', 'pathology', 'histology', 'reporting', 'cores', 'imaging', 'MRI' and 'mpMRI'. Prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy has been shown to improve the diagnosis of clinically significant prostatic adenocarcinoma and can affect the management of patients with prostate cancer. The current active surveillance guidelines were based on data from TRUS biopsies and not MRI-targeted biopsies. MRI-targeted biopsy acquires multiple cores of tissue from one or more suspicious lesions found on mp-MRI. The way in which multiple targeted core biopsies obtained from a single image-directed region of interest are analysed and reported can potentially alter the Gleason score and tumour burden as reported on biopsy, which could undoubtedly alter patient management. Pathologists play an important role in the reporting of MRI-targeted prostate biopsies. How we report prostate cancer grade and extent on these biopsies can influence patient management. In addition, the pathologist should be involved in the quality assurance for patients undergoing MRI-targeted prostate biopsy.