1
|
Croghan SM, Malak JW, Rohan P, Byrne C, McGrath A, Cullen IM, Davis NF. Diagnosis and management of indeterminate testicular lesions. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:7-21. [PMID: 37414958 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00786-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
The sophistication and accessibility of modern-day imaging result in frequent detection of small or equivocal lesions of the testes. Traditionally, diagnosis of a testicular lesion with any possibility of malignancy would usually prompt radical orchidectomy. However, awareness is growing that a substantial proportion of these lesions might be benign and that universal application of radical orchidectomy risks frequent overtreatment. Given the potentially profound effects of radical orchidectomy on fertility, endocrine function and psychosexual well-being, particularly in scenarios of an abnormal contralateral testis or bilateral lesions, organ-preserving strategies for equivocal lesions should be considered. Image-based active surveillance can be applied for indeterminate lesions measuring ≤15 mm with a low conversion rate to surgical treatment. However, these outcomes are early and from relatively small, selected cohorts, and concerns prevail regarding the metastatic potential of even small undiagnosed germ cell tumours. No consensus exists on optimal surveillance (short interval (<3 months) ultrasonography is generally adopted); histological sampling is a widespread alternative, involving inguinal delivery of the testis and excisional biopsy of the lesion, with preoperative marking or intraoperative ultrasonographic localization when necessary. Frozen section analysis in this context demonstrates excellent diagnostic accuracy. Histological results support that approximately two-thirds of marker-negative indeterminate solitary testicular lesions measuring ≤25 mm overall are benign. In summary, modern imaging detects many small indeterminate testicular lesions, of which the majority are benign. Awareness is growing of surveillance and organ-sparing diagnostic and treatment strategies with the aim of minimizing rates of overtreatment with radical orchidectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Croghan
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Jamil W Malak
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Pat Rohan
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Byrne
- Department of Radiology, Mater Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andrew McGrath
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ivor M Cullen
- Department of Urology & Andrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Urology & Andrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Z, Xie J, Gao X, Lin Y, Sun M, Sun Y, Peng D, Xie H, Li X, Li Z, Cai T, Chen P, Wu Z, Guo S, Li Y, Zhang Z, Qin Z, Han H, He Z, Liu J, Fu W, Li S, Xia D, Wang X, Deng C, Xu Z, Zhou F, Yao K, Yu W, Ye Y, Liu Z. SAVE Testis-sparing score: a multicenter retrospective study of a novel predictive tool for quantifying testicular tumors. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4185-4198. [PMID: 37738014 PMCID: PMC10720877 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is a safe treatment for patients with benign testicular tumors. Presently, assessments for evaluating the suitability of TSS are poorly standardized, partially because testicular anatomical elements cannot be quantitatively described. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors developed a scoring method known as the SAVE testis-sparing score based on four critical and accessible anatomical features of a testicular tumor. The SAVE score ranges from 0 to 8 and is divided into four risk classes ( low , medium , high , and extremely high ) to evaluate the feasibility of TSS, wherein low-risk indicates high feasibility and vice versa. This study included 444 testicular tumor patients from eight centers. Among them, 216 patients (model group: 151 patients, validation group: 65 patients) were included in the modeling analysis, and the other 228 patients from children's centers were included in the proportion analysis. Using retrospective data, patient characteristics associated with surgical methods were identified. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression model was built quantify the associations between these characteristics and the surgery method. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the classification efficiency of SAVE. RESULTS The SAVE testis-sparing score includes size (tumor size as maximal diameter), available testicular tissue volume, volume ratio of the tumor to the testis, and the exophytic / endophytic properties of the tumor. The SAVE scoring system accurately classified the suitability of TSS based on the complexity of benign testicular tumors. CONCLUSION The SAVE score is a reproducible and robust tool for quantitatively describing the anatomical characteristics of benign testicular tumors and guide the preoperative evaluation of TSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Junyi Xie
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Xiaofeng Gao
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health
| | - Yuan Lin
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou
| | - Mengkui Sun
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Yubo Sun
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai
| | - Ding Peng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
| | - Haibiao Xie
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou
| | - Xiangdong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Taonong Cai
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Pengyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Zhiming Wu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Yonghong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhilin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zike Qin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhisong He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Jiumin Liu
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou
| | - Wen Fu
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health
| | - Shoulin Li
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province
| | - Dan Xia
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai
| | | | - Zhe Xu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Kai Yao
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; The Institution of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing
| | - Yunlin Ye
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Gansu Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akgül M, Arslan Aİ, Yazıcı CM. The Safe Surgical Margin for the Testis Sparing Surgery in Testicular Cancer. Niger J Clin Pract 2023; 26:1728-1733. [PMID: 38044780 DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_348_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Testis sparing surgery (TSS) has an important role in preserving the functional capacity of testicular cancer (TC). Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) lesions in the remaining testis have a significant risk for local recurrence. AIM We aimed to evaluate the presence of satellite GCNIS lesions around the primary tumor and to measure the distance of the furthest GCNIS lesion to the primary tumor. SUBJECT AND METHODS The radical orchiectomy specimens of patients (n = 37) with a tumor size of ≤3 cm were reevaluated by the same pathologist. The satellite GCNIS lesions located around the primary tumor were detected, and the furthest GCNIS lesion distance to the primary tumor was measured under light microscopy. RESULTS The mean tumor size was 1,9 ± 0,6 cm. The mean furthest GCNIS distance to the primary tumor was 5,08 ± 2,77 mm. A total of 19 (51,4%) patients had the furthest GCNIS lesions <5 mm, and 28 (75,6%) patients had the furthest GCNIS lesions <7 mm away from the primary lesion. CONCLUSIONS Leaving a 5 mm safety margin during TSS would lead to excise the satellite GCNIS lesions in half of the patients. Increasing the safety margin to 7 mm would lead to excise the satellite GCNIS lesions at 75% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Akgül
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| | - A İ Arslan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| | - C M Yazıcı
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patrikidou A, Cazzaniga W, Berney D, Boormans J, de Angst I, Di Nardo D, Fankhauser C, Fischer S, Gravina C, Gremmels H, Heidenreich A, Janisch F, Leão R, Nicolai N, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Shepherd R, Tandstad T, Nicol D. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Testicular Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:289-301. [PMID: 37183161 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Each year the European Association of Urology (EAU) produce a document based on the most recent evidence on the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of testicular cancer (TC). OBJECTIVE To represent a summarised version of the EAU guidelines on TC for 2023 with a focus on key changes in the 2023 update. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A multidisciplinary panel of TC experts, comprising urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists, reviewed the results from a structured literature search to compile the guidelines document. Each recommendation in the guidelines was assigned a strength rating. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For the 2023 EAU guidelines on TC, a review and restructure were undertaken. The key changes incorporated in the 2023 update include: new supporting text regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in males with metastatic germ cell tumours receiving chemotherapy; quality of life after treatment; an update of the histological classifications and inclusion of the World Health Organization 2022 pathological classification; inclusion of the revalidation of the 1997 International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group prognostic risk factors; and a new section covering oncology treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS The 2023 version of the EAU guidelines on TC include the highest available scientific evidence to standardise the management of TC. Better stratification and optimisation of treatment modalities will continue to improve the high survival rates for patients with TC. PATIENT SUMMARY This article presents a summary of the European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer published in 2023 and includes the latest recommendations for management of this disease. The guidelines are a valuable resource that may help patients in understanding treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Patrikidou
- Department of Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Walter Cazzaniga
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Berney
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Joost Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel de Angst
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Di Nardo
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Gravina
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital-Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Hendrik Gremmels
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Oing
- Department of Oncology, Freeman Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Robert Shepherd
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- Department of Oncology, The Cancer Clinic, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - David Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keske M, Canda AE, Karadag MA, Çiftçi H, Erturhan S, Kactan C, Soytas M, Özkaya F, Ozbey I, Ordek E, Atmaca AF, Yildirim A, Sahin S, Colakoglu Y, Boylu U, Erol B, Caskurlu T, Kiremit MC, Cakici OU, Sonmez G, Kılıçarslan H, Akbulut Z, Kaygısız O, Bedir S, Vuruskan H, Bozkurt YE, Aydin HR, Oguz U, Basok EK, Gumus BH, Tuncel A, Aslan Y, Hamidi N, Müslümanoğlu AY, Dinçer M, Balbay D, Albayrak S, Laguna MP. A Retrospective Analysis of 83 Patients with Testicular Mass Who Underwent Testis-Sparing Surgery: The Eurasian Uro-oncology Association Multicenter Study. Urol Int 2023; 107:857-865. [PMID: 37591208 DOI: 10.1159/000531645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Herein, we analyzed the histopathological, oncological and functional outcomes of testis-sparing surgery (TSS) in patients with distinct risk for testicular cancer. METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective study on consecutive patients who underwent TSS. Patients were categorized in high- or low-risk testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) according to the presence/absence of features compatible with testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Histology was categorized per size and risk groups. RESULTS TSS was performed in 83 patients (86 tumors) of them, 27 in the high-risk group. Fifty-nine patients had a non-tumoral contralateral testis present. Sixty masses and 26 masses were benign and TGCTs, respectively. No statistical differences were observed in mean age (30.9 ± 10.32 years), pathological tumor size (14.67 ± 6.7 mm) between risk groups or between benign and malignant tumors (p = 0.608). When categorized per risk groups, 22 (73.3%) and 4 (7.1%) of the TSS specimens were malignant in the high- and low-risk patient groups, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the only independent variable significantly related to malignant outcome was previous history of TGCT. During a mean follow-up of 25.5 ± 22.7 months, no patient developed systemic disease. Local recurrence was detected in 5 patients and received radical orchiectomy. Postoperative testosterone levels remained normal in 88% of those patients with normal preoperative level. No erectile dysfunction was reported in patients with benign lesions. CONCLUSION TSS is a safe and feasible approach with adequate cancer control, and preservation of sexual function is possible in 2/3 of patients harboring malignancy. Incidence of TGCT varies extremely between patients at high and low risk for TGCT requiring a careful consideration and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Keske
- University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| | | | - Mert Ali Karadag
- University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Halil Çiftçi
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Sakip Erturhan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Cagri Kactan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Soytas
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fatih Özkaya
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Isa Ozbey
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Eser Ordek
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Ali Fuat Atmaca
- Department of Urology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Asif Yildirim
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Sahin
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Affiliated with Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yunus Colakoglu
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Affiliated with Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ugur Boylu
- Department of Urology, İstinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bulent Erol
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Turhan Caskurlu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Can Kiremit
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozer Ural Cakici
- Department of Urology, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Sonmez
- Department of Urology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Hakan Kılıçarslan
- Department of Urology, Uludag University, School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ziya Akbulut
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Onur Kaygısız
- Department of Urology, Uludag University, School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Selahattin Bedir
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Affiliated with Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Vuruskan
- Department of Urology, Uludag University, School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Yunus Erol Bozkurt
- Department of Urology, Celal Bayar University, School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Hasan Riza Aydin
- Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Affiliated with Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Ural Oguz
- Department of Urology, Giresun University, School of Medicine, Giresun, Turkey
| | - Erem Kaan Basok
- Department of Urology, Medical Park Izmir Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Bilal Habes Gumus
- Department of Urology, Celal Bayar University, School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Altug Tuncel
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yilmaz Aslan
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nurullah Hamidi
- Department of Urology, Ankara Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Dinçer
- Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Derya Balbay
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selami Albayrak
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Pilar Laguna
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chavarriaga J, Hamilton R. Small Testicular Masses: Contemporary Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies, Future Directions, and Knowledge Gaps. Urol Oncol 2023:S1078-1439(23)00081-9. [PMID: 36990940 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
The incidental discovery of small masses in the testicles of young men is becoming an increasing clinical dilemma. We are learning that the malignancy rate in masses ≤ 2 cm is much lower than traditionally thought and could be as low as 13% to 21%. The challenge remains in identifying which of these patients harbor malignant tumors that need to be treated, and benign lesions that could be safely surveilled. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the current scientific evidence, diagnostic work-up, and treatment strategies for small testicular masses. We also discuss selection criteria, follow-up schedules and triggers for intervention for the surveillance of these small testis masses. Furthermore, we give a set of recommendations for assessing and treating these patients, based on the available literature and our experience at a dedicated testicular cancer clinic.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ager M, Donegan S, Boeri L, de Castro JM, Donaldson JF, Omar MI, Dimitropoulos K, Tharakan T, Janisch F, Muilwijk T, Yuan C, Tudur-Smith C, Nijman RJM, Radmayr C, Salonia A, Laguna Pes MP, Minhas S. Radiological features characterising indeterminate testes masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2023; 131:288-300. [PMID: 35980855 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The use of scrotal ultrasonography (SUS) has increased the detection rate of indeterminate testicular masses. Defining radiological characteristics that identify malignancy may reduce the number of men undergoing unnecessary radical orchidectomy. OBJECTIVE To define which SUS or scrotal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics can predict benign or malignant disease in pre- or post-pubertal males with indeterminate testicular masses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidance. Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials and systematic reviews databases were searched from (1970 to 26 March 2021). Benign and malignant masses were classified using the reported reference test: i.e., histopathology, or 12 months progression-free radiological surveillance. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 32 studies were identified, including 1692 masses of which 28 studies and 1550 masses reported SUS features, four studies and 142 masses reported MRI features. Meta-analysis of different SUS (B-mode) values in post-pubertal men demonstrated that a size of ≤0.5 cm had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of malignancy compared to masses of >0.5 cm (P < 0.001). Comparison of masses of 0.6-1.0 cm and masses of >1.5 cm also demonstrated a significantly lower OR of malignancy (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference between masses of 0.6-1.0 and 1.1-1.5 cm. SUS in post-pubertal men also had a statistically significantly lower OR of malignancy for heterogenous masses vs homogenous masses (P = 0.04), hyperechogenic vs hypoechogenic masses (P < 0.01), normal vs increased enhancement (P < 0.01), and peripheral vs central vascularity (P < 0.01), respectively. There were limited data on pre-pubertal SUS, pre-pubertal MRI and post-pubertal MRI. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis identifies radiological characteristics that have a lower OR of malignancy and may be of value in the management of the indeterminate testis mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ager
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Donegan
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - James F Donaldson
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.,Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.,Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Tharu Tharakan
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Florian Janisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cathy Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Catrin Tudur-Smith
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rien J M Nijman
- Department of Urology, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Radmayr
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Suks Minhas
- Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wardak S, Pang KH, Castiglione F, Lindsay J, Walkden M, Ho DH, Kirkham A, Hadway P, Nigam R, Rees R, Alifrangis C, Alnajjar HM, Muneer A. Management of small testicular masses: outcomes from a single-centre specialist multidisciplinary team. BJU Int 2023; 131:73-81. [PMID: 35986901 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the management outcomes of men with ≤20-mm small testicular masses (STMs) and to identify clinical and histopathological factors associated with malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of men managed at a single centre between January 2010 and December 2020 with a STM ≤20 mm in size was performed. RESULTS Overall, 307 men with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 36 (30-44) years were included. Of these, 161 (52.4%), 82 (26.7%), 62 (20.2%) and 2 men (0.7%) underwent surveillance with interval ultrasonography (USS), primary excisional testicular biopsy (TBx) or primary radical orchidectomy (RO), or were discharged, respectively. The median (IQR) surveillance duration was 6 (3-18) months. The majority of men who underwent surveillance had lesions <5 mm (59.0%) and no lesion vascularity (67.1%) on USS. Thirty-three (20.5%) men undergoing surveillance had a TBx based on changes on interval USS or patient choice; seven (21.2%) were found to be malignant. The overall rate of malignancy in the surveillance cohort was 4.3%. The majority of men who underwent primary RO had lesions ≥10 mm (85.5%) and the presence of vascularity (61.7%) on USS. Nineteen men (23.2%) who underwent primary TBx (median lesion size 6 mm) had a malignancy confirmed on biopsy and underwent RO. A total of 88 men (28.7%) underwent RO, and malignancy was confirmed in 73 (83.0%) of them. The overall malignancy rate in the whole STM cohort was 23.8%. Malignant RO specimens had significantly larger lesion sizes (median [IQR] 11 [8-15] mm, vs benign: median [IQR] 8 [5-10] mm; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Small testicular masses can be stratified and managed based on lesion size and USS features. The overall malignancy rate in men with an STM was 23.8% (4.3% in the surveillance group). Surveillance should be considered in lesions <10 mm in size, with a TBx or frozen-section examination offered prior to RO in order to preserve testicular function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafi Wardak
- Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.,Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karl H Pang
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabio Castiglione
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jamie Lindsay
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Miles Walkden
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Dan Heffernan Ho
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alex Kirkham
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Hadway
- Department of Urology, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.,Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Rowland Rees
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Constantine Alifrangis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hussain M Alnajjar
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Asif Muneer
- Male Genital Cancer Centre, Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dieckmann KP, Isbarn H, Grobelny F, Dumlupinar C, Utschig J, Wülfing C, Pichlmeier U, Belge G. Testicular Neoplasms: Primary Tumour Size Is Closely Interrelated with Histology, Clinical Staging, and Tumour Marker Expression Rates-A Comprehensive Statistical Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5447. [PMID: 36358866 PMCID: PMC9653836 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of primary tumour size (TS) in the clinical course of testicular tumours is incompletely understood. We retrospectively evaluated 641 consecutive patients with testicular neoplasms with regard to TS, histology, clinical stage (CS), serum tumour marker (STM) expression and patient age using descriptive statistical methods. TS ≤ 10 mm was encountered in 13.6% of cases. Median TS of 10 mm, 30 mm, 35 mm, and 53 mm were found in benign tumours, seminomas, nonseminomas, and other malignant tumours, respectively. In cases with TS ≤ 10 mm, 50.6% had benign tumours. Upon receiver operating characteristics analysis, TS of > 16 mm revealed 81.5% sensitivity and 81.0% specificity for detecting malignancy. In subcentimeter germ cell tumours (GCTs), 97.7% of cases had CS1, and CS1 frequency dropped with increasing TS. Expression rates of all STMs significantly increased with TS. MicroRNA-371a-3p (M371) serum levels had higher expression rates than classical STMs, with a rate of 44.1% in subcentimeter GCTs. In all, TS is a biologically relevant factor owing to its significant associations with CS, STM expression rates and histology. Importantly, 50% of subcentimeter testicular neoplasms are of benign nature, and M371 outperforms the classical markers even in subcentimeter tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesca Grobelny
- Tumour Genetics Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, Tumour Genetics, University of Bremen, Leobener Strasse 2/FVG, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Cansu Dumlupinar
- Tumour Genetics Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, Tumour Genetics, University of Bremen, Leobener Strasse 2/FVG, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Julia Utschig
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, D-22763 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, D-22763 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Pichlmeier
- Institute of Medical Biometry und Epidemiology, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gazanfer Belge
- Tumour Genetics Department, Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, Tumour Genetics, University of Bremen, Leobener Strasse 2/FVG, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grogg JB, Dursun ZH, Beyer J, Eberli D, Poyet C, Hermanns T, Fankhauser CD. Oncological and functional outcomes after testis-sparing surgery in patients with germ cell tumors: a systematic review of 285 cases. World J Urol 2022; 40:2293-2303. [PMID: 35821265 PMCID: PMC9427883 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04048-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In several urogenital cancers, organ-preserving surgery represents the preferred treatment approach, but in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (tGCTs), radical orchiectomy represents the standard of care. This study aimed to summarize published case series assessing oncological and functional outcomes after testis-sparing surgery (TSS) in patients with tGCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature review and individual patient data meta-analysis were conducted of published cases with tGCT treated with TSS. RESULTS Of 2,333 reports, we included 32 reports providing data on 285 patients, including 306 testicles treated with TSS. Adjacent germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) was described in 43%. Hypogonadism and infertility after TSS were diagnosed in 27% and 18%. In patients undergoing adjuvant testicular radiotherapy, hypogonadism was diagnosed in 40%. Patients treated with adjuvant testicular radiotherapy after TSS exhibited a significantly lower incidence of local recurrence (2% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). Distant metastases after TSS were observed in 2%. CONCLUSION The current data questions the benefits of TSS in tGCT patients. If at all, TSS should only be offered to well-informed patients with a singular testicle, excellent compliance, a singular tumor less than 2 cm located at the lower pole of the testicle, and normal preoperative endocrine function. Unless patients plan to father a child within a short time frame, adjuvant testicular radiotherapy should be recommended after TSS. Radical orchiectomy remains the standard of care, but future studies may support the use of TSS in selected men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joerg Beyer
- Department of Oncology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tsili AC, Sofikitis N, Pappa O, Bougia CK, Argyropoulou MI. An Overview of the Role of Multiparametric MRI in the Investigation of Testicular Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163912. [PMID: 36010905 PMCID: PMC9405843 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Although conventional ultrasonography remains the primary imaging modality for the assessment of testicular tumors, multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, which combines morphologic and functional data, serves as a powerful adjunct. Based on the recommendations issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, scrotal MRI is strongly recommended after equivocal US findings. In cases of testicular masses, the main clinical indications are as follows: lesion characterization when sonographic findings are non-diagnostic, discrimination between germ-cell and non-germ-cell testicular tumors, local staging of testicular tumors in patients who are candidates for testis-sparing surgery, and preoperative histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors in selected cases. This article aims to provide an overview of the role of multiparametric MRI in the investigation of testicular tumors. Abstract Conventional ultrasonography represents the mainstay of testis imaging. In cases in which ultrasonography is inconclusive, scrotal MRI using a multiparametric protocol may be used as a useful problem-solving tool. MRI of the scrotum is primarily recommended for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular masses when sonographic findings are ambiguous. This technique is also accurate in the preoperative local staging of testicular tumors and, therefore, is recommended in patients scheduled for testis-sparing surgery. In addition, MRI may provide valuable information regarding the histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors, in selected cases. Scrotal MRI may also help in the differentiation between testicular germ-cell neoplasms and non-germ-cell neoplasms. Axial T1-weighted imaging, axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging, axial diffusion-weighted imaging, and coronal subtracted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging are the minimum requirements for scrotal MRI. A variety of MRI techniques—including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis, and MRI-based radiomics—are being investigated for testicular mass characterization, providing valuable supplementary diagnostic information. In the present review, we aim to discuss clinical indications for scrotal MRI in cases of testicular tumors, along with MRI findings of common testicular malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina C. Tsili
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
- Correspondence: or
| | - Nikolaos Sofikitis
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Ourania Pappa
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christina K. Bougia
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Maria I. Argyropoulou
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Czétány P, Gitta S, Balló A, Sulc A, Máté G, Szántó Á, Márk L. Application of Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Uro-Oncology: Discovering Potential Biomarkers. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12030366. [PMID: 35330118 PMCID: PMC8954359 DOI: 10.3390/life12030366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing need is emerging worldwide for new molecular markers which could enhance the accuracy of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for detecting urogenital cancers. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a very promising tool in this regard. In this review, we attempt to provide a subjective summary of the latest publications on potential biomarkers of renal, bladder, prostate, and testicular malignancies detected with MSI through the eyes of a clinical urologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Péter Czétány
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Urology Clinic, University of Pécs Clinical Centre, 7621 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Stefánia Gitta
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, University of Pécs Medical School, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - András Balló
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Urology Clinic, University of Pécs Clinical Centre, 7621 Pécs, Hungary
- Pannon Reproduction Institute, 8300 Tapolca, Hungary
| | - Alexandra Sulc
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, University of Pécs Medical School, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
| | - Gábor Máté
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Pannon Reproduction Institute, 8300 Tapolca, Hungary
| | - Árpád Szántó
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Urology Clinic, University of Pécs Clinical Centre, 7621 Pécs, Hungary
| | - László Márk
- National Human Reproduction Laboratory, 7624 Pécs, Hungary; (P.C.); (S.G.); (A.B.); (A.S.); (G.M.); (Á.S.)
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, University of Pécs Medical School, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
- MTA-PTE Human Reproduction Research Group, 7624 Pécs, Hungary
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +36-304-734-714
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhao J, Li Q, Feng ZX, Zhang J, Wu S, Jin L, Gallie BL. Tylectomy Safety in Salvage of Eyes with Retinoblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225862. [PMID: 34831013 PMCID: PMC8616183 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of organ-conserving surgery has not been explored in retinoblastoma as it has been in other cancers, such as breast cancer lumpectomy, partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer, and partial orchiectomy for testis cancer. This is largely accounted for by the high mortality of extraocular retinoblastoma compared to intraocular retinoblastoma, and fear of iatrogenic tumor spread with intraocular surgery. We propose the little-known word “tylectomy” (“tulos”, Greek for “lump”) to describe the surgical resection of retinoblastoma. Through review of consecutive patients treated by our team between 2012–2014, we compared survival of patients with eye salvage, including tylectomy, to those who had eye salvage without tylectomy or primary enucleation. We found that patients who had tylectomy had superior survival compared to those who had eye salvage without tylectomy (96% vs. 90%), and comparable survival to those with primary enucleation (96% vs. 95%). Our study supports tylectomy as a safe contribution to retinoblastoma management. Abstract Intraocular surgery is tabooed in retinoblastoma management, due to the concern of lethal extraocular spread. We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive children with intraocular retinoblastoma diagnosed at 29 Chinese centers between 2012–2014. We compared the outcomes of three categories of treatment: eye salvage including tylectomy (Group I), eye salvage without tylectomy (Group II), and primary enucleation (Group III). A total of 960 patients (1243 eyes) were diagnosed: 256 in Group I, 370 in Group II, and 293 in Group III; 41 patients abandoned treatment upfront. The estimated 5-year overall survivals (OS) were, for Group I, 94%, for Group II 89%, and for Group III 95%. The estimated 5-year disease-specific survivals (DSS) were, for Group I, 96%, for Group II 90%, and for Group III 95%. Patients in Group I had a significantly higher 5-year DSS than patients in Group II (p = 0.003) and not significantly different than patients in Group III (p = 0.367). Overall survival was not compromised by the inclusion of tylectomy in eye salvage therapy compared to eye salvage without tylectomy or primary enucleation. Disease-specific survival was better when tylectomy was included in eye salvage treatments. Tylectomy as part of multimodal treatment may contribute to the care of retinoblastoma patients with chemotherapy-resistant tumor, eyes with concomitant ocular complications, or at the risk of treatment abandonment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyang Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liuzhou 545001, China; (J.Z.); (J.Z.)
- Pediatric Oncology Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Qiyan Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing 100730, China;
| | - Zhao Xun Feng
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1L 8L6, Canada;
| | - Jianping Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liuzhou 545001, China; (J.Z.); (J.Z.)
| | - Songyi Wu
- Quanzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Quanzhou 362017, China; (S.W.); (L.J.)
| | - Liwen Jin
- Quanzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Quanzhou 362017, China; (S.W.); (L.J.)
| | - Brenda L. Gallie
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute and Techna Institutes, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Molecular Genetics, and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3A9, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-416-294-9729
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Symeonidis EN, Tsifountoudis I, Anastasiadis A, Mutomba WF, Kotakidou R, Hatzichristou D, Dimitriadis F. Synchronous bilateral testicular cancer with discordant histopathology occurring in a 20-year-old patient: A case report and review of the literature. Urologia 2021:3915603211028556. [PMID: 34219574 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211028556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bilateral testicular tumors are very rare, accounting for 1%-5% of all testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCTs). The vast majority of primary bilateral TGCTs are metachronous, with synchronous tumors comprising approximately 0.5%-1% of all cases. Those occurring synchronously share mostly the same histological pattern, predominantly seminoma, with synchronous bilateral TGCTs (SBTGCTs) with discordant subtypes being extremely rare. CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a 20-year-old male complaining of a palpable painless right testicular mass incidentally noticed during sexual intercourse. Ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the scrotum demonstrated bilateral testicular lesions, while staging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) exhibited normal findings. Right radical orchiectomy and left testis-sparing surgery (TSS) with concomitant onco-testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) were initially performed. Histology of the right testis revealed a mixed germ-cell tumor, consisting of seminoma and embryonal carcinoma, while that from the left testis disclosed embryonal carcinoma and intratubular germ-cell neoplasia unclassified (IGCNU) infiltrating the surgical margins. Hence, left orchiectomy was subsequently scheduled with histology unveiling IGCNU in the greatest part of the remaining testicular parenchyma. Following adjuvant chemotherapy, with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP), the patient received testosterone replacement therapy and remained free of recurrence at an 18-month follow-up. CONCLUSION This case highlights both the rarity of a bilateral testicular tumor's synchronous appearance and its extremely infrequent discordant histopathology. A comprehensive review of the major series of SBTGCTs with discordant histology cited in the literature is additionally presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos N Symeonidis
- Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ioannis Tsifountoudis
- Department of Radiology, 424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Anastasios Anastasiadis
- Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Wilbert F Mutomba
- Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Rodoula Kotakidou
- Department of Pathology, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Hatzichristou
- Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Fotios Dimitriadis
- Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|