|
1
|
Zarba M, Fujiwara R, Yuasa T, Koga F, Heng DYC, Takemura K. Multidisciplinary systemic and local therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:693-703. [PMID: 38813778 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2362192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systemic and local therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often challenging despite the evolution of multimodal cancer therapies in the last decade. In this review, we will focus on recent multidisciplinary approaches for patients with mRCC. AREAS COVERED Systemic therapies for patients with mRCC have been garnering attention particularly after the approval of immuno-oncology (IO) agents, including anti-programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1. IO combinations have significantly prolonged overall survival in patients with mRCC in the first-line setting. Regarding local therapies, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has become less common in the post-Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial era, even though CN may still benefit selected patients with mRCC. In addition, metastasis-directed local therapies, namely metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy, particularly for oligo-metastatic lesions or brain metastases, may have a prognostic impact. Several ablative techniques are also evolving while maintaining high local control rates with acceptable safety. EXPERT OPINION Multimodal cancer therapies are essential for conquering complex cases of mRCC. Modern systemic therapies including IO-based combination therapy as well as local therapies including CN, metastasectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and ablative techniques appear to improve oncologic outcomes of patients with mRCC, although appropriate patient selection is indispensable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Zarba
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ryo Fujiwara
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kosuke Takemura
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ishiyama Y, Kondo T, Yoshida K, Iizuka J, Takagi T. Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index on Recurrence after Radical Surgery for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:776. [PMID: 38398167 PMCID: PMC10886798 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
With emerging options in immediate postoperative settings for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC), further risk stratification may be relevant for informed decision making. Balancing the benefits and drawbacks of adjuvant immunotherapy is recommended. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in this setting. This bi-institutional retrospective study recruited 235 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC between 2004 and 2021. LIPI scores were calculated based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. The association between LIPI scores and local or distant recurrence was analyzed, along with other possible clinical factors. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) period was 36.4 months. Based on the LIPI scores, 119, 91, and 25 patients were allocated to the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. The RFS was significantly correlated with the LIPI scores, and the 36 month survival rates were 67.3, 36.2, and 11.0% in the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. In the multivariate model, the LIPI independently predicted the RFS, along with symptoms at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT status, pN status, and tumor grade. The C-index of the LIPI in predicting RFS was 0.63, and prediction accuracy improved with the addition of the LIPI to both GRade, Age, Nodes, Tumor, and the UCLA Integrated Staging System. Conclusively, the LIPI can be a significant prognostic biomarker for predicting hrRCC recurrence, particularly for identifying the highest-risk cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Ishiyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
- Department of Urology and Transplant Surgery, Toda Chuo General Hospital, 1-19-3 Honmachi, Toda-shi, Saitama 335-0023, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 4-33-1 Kouhoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo 123-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-0054, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Bekku K, Kawada T, Sekito T, Yoshinaga K, Maruyama Y, Yamanoi T, Tominaga Y, Sadahira T, Katayama S, Iwata T, Nishimura S, Edamura K, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi Y, Araki M, Niibe Y. The Diagnosis and Treatment Approach for Oligo-Recurrent and Oligo-Progressive Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5873. [PMID: 38136417 PMCID: PMC10741872 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
One-third of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) without metastases develop metastatic disease after extirpative surgery for the primary tumors. The majority of metastatic RCC cases, along with treated primary lesions, involve limited lesions termed "oligo-recurrent" disease. The role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and metastasectomy, in the treatment of oligo-recurrent RCC has evolved. Although the surgical resection of all lesions alone can have a curative intent, SBRT is a valuable treatment option, especially for patients concurrently receiving systemic therapy. Contemporary immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies remain central to the management of metastatic RCC. However, one objective of MDT is to delay the initiation of systemic therapies, thereby sparing patients from potentially unnecessary burdens. Undertaking MDT for cases showing progression under systemic therapies, known as "oligo-progression", can be complex in considering the treatment approach. Its efficacy may be diminished compared to patients with stable disease. SBRT combined with ICI can be a promising treatment for these cases because radiation therapy has been shown to affect the tumor microenvironment and areas beyond the irradiated sites. This may enhance the efficacy of ICIs, although their efficacy has only been demonstrated in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Takanori Sekito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Kasumi Yoshinaga
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Yuki Maruyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Tomoaki Yamanoi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Yusuke Tominaga
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Takuya Sadahira
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Takehiro Iwata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Shingo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Kohei Edamura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Tomoko Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Yasuyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (K.Y.); (Y.M.); (T.Y.); (Y.T.); (T.S.); (S.K.); (T.I.); (S.N.); (K.E.); (T.K.); (Y.K.); (M.A.)
| | - Yuzuru Niibe
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Nolazco JI, Chang SL. Role of Surgery in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:893-905. [PMID: 37330346 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Surgery has historically been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but recent clinical trials demonstrated that contemporary systemic therapies alone are non-inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). Thus, the current role of surgery is not precisely defined. CN remains an appropriate upfront treatment for the palliation of severe symptoms, select cases of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, for consolidation following systemic therapy, and in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Metastasectomy is ideally utilized to achieve a disease-free state when there is minimal morbidity associated with surgery. Given the heterogenous nature of mRCC, the decision for systemic therapy and surgery should be made through a multidisciplinary approach tailored to each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Ignacio Nolazco
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Austral, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | - Steven Lee Chang
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Mikhail M, Chua KJ, Khizir L, Tabakin A, Singer EA. Role of metastasectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Front Surg 2022; 9:943604. [PMID: 35965871 PMCID: PMC9372304 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.943604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved with the development of a variety of systemic agents; however, these therapies alone rarely lead to a complete response. Complete consolidative surgery with surgical metastasectomy has been associated with improved survival outcomes in well-selected patients in previous reports. No randomized control trial exists to determine the effectiveness of metastasectomy. Therefore, reviewing observational studies is important to best determine which patients are most appropriate for metastasectomy for mRCC and if such treatment continues to be effective with the development of new systemic therapies such as immunotherapy. In this narrative review, we discuss the indications for metastasectomies, outcomes, factors associated with improved survival, and special considerations such as location of metastasis, number of metastases, synchronous metastases, and use of systemic therapy. Additionally, alternative treatment options and trials involving metastasectomy will be reviewed.
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Cao H, Sun Z, Wu J, Hao C, Wang W. Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma to Pancreas and Distant Organs 24 Years After Radical Nephrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front Surg 2022; 9:894272. [PMID: 35865042 PMCID: PMC9294444 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.894272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is a common urological neoplasm, and even though surgical resection is effective for localized CCRCC, the prognosis of metastatic CCRCC is poor. Currently, there is a paucity of recognized effective therapeutic protocols for metastatic CCRCC. Case presentation A 76-year-old Asian man underwent radical left nephrectomy for CCRCC 26 years ago; this patient visited our hospital with abdominal pain due to multiple abdominal metastases 24 years after the nephrectomy. After metastasectomy, he underwent targeted therapy combined with a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and the current imaging results indicate remarkable tumor remission. Conclusions Metachronous pancreatic metastasis from CCRCC after nephrectomy is rare, but clinicians and patients should not ignore this possibility. The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy can result in satisfactory outcomes in cases where metastatic CCRCC continues to progress despite metastasectomy and targeted therapy. The combination of local and systemic therapy can be an effective therapeutic protocol for metastatic CCRCC, but there is no consensus on suitable therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huawei Cao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zejia Sun
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyue Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Changzhen Hao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Wei Wang
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Ishihara H, Nemoto Y, Nakamura K, Tachibana H, Fukuda H, Yoshida K, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Shimmura H, Hashimoto Y, Tanabe K, Kondo T, Takagi T. Changes in Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from the Molecular-Targeted Therapy Era to the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Era. Target Oncol 2022; 17:307-319. [PMID: 35460475 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00879-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of changes in the outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma from the molecular-targeted therapy era to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) era remains limited in the real-world setting. OBJECTIVES We aimed to clarify outcome changes from the previous molecular-targeted therapy era to the current ICI era in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using multi-institution real-world data. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 415 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line systemic therapy at five Japanese institutions between January 2008 and August 2021. We divided the patients into two groups based on the treatment era: molecular-targeted therapy era (January 2008-August 2018) and ICI era (September 2018-August 2021). According to the era, progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate from first-line systemic therapy were compared. RESULTS Overall, 304 (73.3%) and 111 (26.7%) patients were categorized into the molecular-targeted therapy and ICI eras, respectively. The proportion of patients without prior nephrectomy (p = 0.0030) or those with low Karnofsky Performance Status scores [≤ 70] (p = 0.0258) were significantly higher in the ICI era group. The patients in the ICI era group had significantly longer overall survival (median: not reached vs 23.2 months, p = 0.0001) and a higher objective response rate (47.8% vs 24.7%, p < 0.0001) than those in the molecular-targeted therapy era group, and progression-free survival tended to be longer in the ICI era group (median: 13.3 vs 8.75 months, p = 0.0579). Multivariate analysis further showed that the treatment era (ICI vs molecular-targeted therapy) was an independent factor for overall survival and objective response (both, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS The present multi-institution real-world data showed the improved outcome of previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the ICI era group compared with that in the molecular-targeted therapy era group. These findings strongly encourage the use of ICI-based treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the real-world setting. Further studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-8567, Japan.
| | - Yuki Nemoto
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
| | | | - Hidekazu Tachibana
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kurihashi Hospital, Kuki, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hironori Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohito Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-8567, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yasunobu Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, 2-1-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, 116-8567, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Reshaping Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Patients and Improving Patient Management : Optimal Management for Renal Cell Cancer Patients. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:609-629. [PMID: 35316480 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00966-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the great success stories in the field of oncology, which was revolutionized with the development of therapies aimed at disrupting crucial pathways. Tumor biology of RCC has provided insight into the disease through elucidation of the role of vascular endothelial growth-factor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Targeted agents against VEGF and mTOR, as well as agents targeting relevant immunomodulatory pathways, have shown clinical benefit for advanced disease. The targeted agents are highly effective in achieving a response and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. These include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) axitinib and cabozantinib, and programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is a wealth of evidence investigating different therapeutic options and combinations for first-line treatment of advanced RCC including the CheckMate 214 study, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and CheckMate 9ER. Dual ICI and combination agents targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and VEGF, began to demonstrate superiority over previously accepted standards in advanced clear-cell RCC. Data from a number of clinical studies are available to help physicians with evidence-based decisions for the sequence of second-line and future treatments for patients with progressive RCC. In this review, we focus on essentials for clinicians treating patients with clear-cell RCC.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Ishiyama Y, Kondo T, Ishihara H, Yoshida K, Iizuka J, Tanabe K, Takagi T. C-reactive protein kinetics to predict recurrence of high-risk renal cell carcinoma after radical surgery. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:969-976. [PMID: 35150349 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02136-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With new options in adjuvant settings, clinical biomarkers to predict recurrence after radical surgery for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC) are in need but are scarcely investigated. We aimed to verify the predictive value of perioperative C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics on hrRCC recurrence. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 154 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC (≥ pT3 and/or N1-2 and M0) at two institutions. Patients were classified into Normal (< 0.5) and High (≥ 0.5) according to their preoperative serum CRP (mg/dL). The High group were further classified into Normalized (< 0.5 at post) or Non-normalized (≥ 0.5 at post), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between groups. Factors for RFS were further analysed, and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) for the accuracy of predicting RFS was compared with and without the addition of CRP-related variables to pre-existing models. RESULTS The RFS was significantly shorter in the High (n = 72, 46.8%) compared to the Normal (n = 82, 53.2%) group (9.7 vs. 66.7 months, p < 0.001). Within the High group, Non-normalized (n = 27, 17.5%) patients showed a significantly shorter RFS compared to the Normalized (n = 45, 29.2%) group (6.2 vs. 20.3, p = 0.009). In the multivariable stepwise analysis, CRP kinetics (hazard ratio 2.15, p = 0.029) effectively predicted RFS while baseline CRP fell short of significance. Higher C-index improvement was observed with CRP non-normalization than the baseline value when added to factors in the Karakiewicz and University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System models. CONCLUSIONS CRP kinetics effectively predicted RCC recurrence after surgery and may aid in decision-making for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Ishiyama
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 4-33-1 Kouhoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-8558, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 4-33-1 Kouhoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-8558, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, 4-33-1 Kouhoku, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, 123-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0054, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Surgical Treatment for Metastatic Kidney Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
|
11
|
Prunty M, Bukavina L, Psutka SP. Metastasectomy in kidney cancer: current indications and treatment approaches. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2021; 15:266-275. [PMID: 34610626 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although systemic agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have improved survival, remission and cure for mRCC remains rare with systemic therapy alone. However, there is a body of observational evidence supporting a survival benefit in mRCC among patients who undergo complete surgical consolidation including resection of the primary tumor and all metastatic deposits. In this review, we aim to synthesize recent evidence regarding metastasectomy (MTS), with or without concurrent systemic therapy, in mRCC. RECENT FINDINGS MTS is a critical component of mRCC patient care, alongside modern systemic therapy. Presently, there is a robust body of observational data supporting the association between surgical MTS and improved oncologic outcomes, especially when complete MTS is feasible. SUMMARY Among a retrospective, observational body of literature, MTS is associated with improved oncologic outcomes. However, it is impossible to discern to what degree these findings are biased by favorable tumor biology and patient selection, as opposed to being related to surgical MTS itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Prunty
- Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Laura Bukavina
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Ishihara H, Takagi T, Yoshida K, Hashimoto Y, Kondo T, Tanabe K. Tumor response in primary kidney lesions and metastatic lesions in nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy: Preliminary results of a multi-institutional study. Int J Urol 2021; 28:1075-1076. [PMID: 34218475 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tanabe
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Kato S, Demura S, Murakami H, Yoshioka K, Shinmura K, Yokogawa N, Shimizu T, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following the surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases. Cancer Sci 2021; 112:2416-2425. [PMID: 33780597 PMCID: PMC8177761 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of surgical resection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is an active and important research field in the postcytokine era. Bone metastases, especially in the spine, compromise patient performance status. Metastasectomy is indicated, if feasible, because it helps to achieve the best clinical outcomes possible compared with other treatments. This study examined the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients who underwent metastasectomy of spinal lesions. The retrospective study included 65 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas who were operated on by spinal metastasectomy between 1995 and 2017 at our institution. The cancer‐specific survival times from the first spinal metastasectomy to death or the last follow‐up (≥3 years) were determined using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Potential factors influencing survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Planned surgical resection of all the spine tumors was achieved in all patients. Of these, 38 had complete metastasectomy of all visible metastases, including extraspinal lesions. In all patients, the estimated median cancer‐specific survival time was 100 months. The 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year cancer‐specific survival rates were 77%, 62%, and 48%, respectively. The survival times after spinal metastasectomy were similar in both cytokine and postcytokine groups. In multivariate analyses, postoperative disability, the coexistence of liver metastases, multiple spinal metastases, and incomplete metastasectomy were significant risk factors associated with short‐term survival. Complete metastasectomy, including extraspinal metastases, was associated with improved cancer‐specific survival. Proper patient selection and complete metastasectomy provide a better prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Kato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Satoru Demura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Katsuhito Yoshioka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kazuya Shinmura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Noriaki Yokogawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Takaki Shimizu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Norio Kawahara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Hsieh PY, Hung SC, Li JR, Wang SS, Yang CK, Chen CS, Lu K, Cheng CL, Chiu KY. The effect of metastasectomy on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:422-430. [PMID: 33934963 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastasectomy (MTS) is a treatment option for patients diagnosed with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Nevertheless, the benefits of MTS as they pertain to survival remain controversial. This systematic review aims to compare the survival outcomes of patients who underwent MTS, as well as discover which clinical factors were related to the results. METHODS From their inception up to August 2020, a systematic review of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of science databases was performed. Studies which reported outcomes on patients who underwent MTS for the treatment of mRCC were included. The sites, times, amount, histology types of metastasis, and prior nephrectomy were also analyzed. The primary efficacy end point was Overall Survival (OS). A meta-analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and I2 values. Forest plots were constructed for each analysis group. RESULTS The systematic review and reference list search identified 294 articles, with 17 meeting studies as inclusion criteria. The MTS group showed a competitive advantage in OS, in that the non-MTS group was negatively associated with an overall survival rate (HR [non-MTS vs. MTS] = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.59-2.92, P< 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with the most recently available target therapy without MTS showed a significantly increased risk compared with the MTS group (HR = 1.82, 95% CI:1.23-2.70, P= 0.003). Additionally, meta-analysis revealed HR elevating in patients with nonlung only metastasis (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.55-2.26, P< 0.001), synchronous metastasis (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.10-1.49, P= 0.001), and multiple metastases (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64-2.59, P< 0.001). Clear-cell type mRCC (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, P= 0.0006) and prior nephrectomy (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.91, P= 0.03) were positively associated with a better overall survival rate. CONCLUSIONS MTS is a treatment option for mRCC patients with prolonged overall survival time. The operation has additional advantages, particularly in patients with lung only metastasis, asynchronous metastasis, fewer metastasis sites, clear-cell type mRCC, and the patients who had received nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yen Hsieh
- Department of Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
| | - Sheng-Chun Hung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kevin Lu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Cheng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Schmidt AL, Tabakin AL, Singer EA, Choueiri TK, McKay RR. Next Steps: Sequencing Therapies in Metastatic Kidney Cancer in the Contemporary Era. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-11. [PMID: 33793313 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Systemic therapy for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma has evolved toward immune checkpoint blockade combinations incorporating a PD-1/L1 inhibitor along with CTLA-4 inhibition or VEGF-targeted therapy. The new treatment paradigm that integrates immunotherapy for treatment-naïve advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma creates a new therapeutic challenge for clinicians including the optimal way to integrate multidisciplinary care involving surgery, radiotherapy, and application of contemporaneous systemic treatment in subsequent lines of therapy following discontinuation of combination therapy. We outline the available data for the multidisciplinary management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, systemic therapy options in the post-immune checkpoint blockade setting, and novel therapies in development for advanced renal cell carcinoma. We provide practical considerations to assist clinicians in treatment choice and map future directions for progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L Schmidt
- Lank Centre for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Alexandra L Tabakin
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Eric A Singer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Centre for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Van Praet C, Slots C, Vasdev N, Rottey S, Fonteyne V, Andras I, Albersen M, De Meerleer G, Bex A, Decaestecker K. Current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Turk J Urol 2021; 47:S79-S84. [PMID: 35929921 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2021.21006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Historically, immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was considered the standard of care in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who were fit enough to undergo surgery. Recently, 2 randomized controlled trials, SURTIME and CARMENA, have questioned the role of immediate CN and initiated an ongoing debate on the proper indications and timing of CN. Although some patients still benefit from immediate CN, other patients require immediate systemic treatment, and some of them might benefit from deferred CN in the absence of disease progression. This study provides an overview of the history of CN, an in-depth analysis of SURTIME and CARMENA, and highlights the current indications for performing immediate or deferred CN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Van Praet
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Slots
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital Stevenage, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, the UK
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, the UK
| | - Karel Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN accredited centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|