1
|
Sletten R, Berger Christiansen O, Oldervoll LM, Åstrøm L, Kjesbu Skjellegrind H, Šaltytė Benth J, Kirkevold Ø, Bergh S, Grønberg BH, Rostoft S, Bye A, Mork PJ, Slaaen M. The association between age and long-term quality of life after curative treatment for prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Urol 2024; 59:31-38. [PMID: 38379397 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.18616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the associations between age at radical prostate cancer treatment and long-term global quality of life (QoL), physical function (PF), and treatment-related side effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS This single-center, cross-sectional study included men treated for localized prostate cancer with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 2014-2018. Global QoL and PF were assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30), side effects by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Adjusted linear regression models were estimated to assess associations between age (continuous variable) at treatment and outcomes. QLQ-C30 scores were compared to normative data after dividing the cohort in two groups, <70 years and ≥70 years at treatment. RESULTS Of 654 men included, 516 (79%) had undergone RARP, and 138 (21%) had undergone EBRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy for 93%. Mean time since treatment was 57 months. Median age at treatment was 68 (min-max 44-84) years. We found no statistically significant independent association between age at treatment and global QoL, PF or side effects, except for sexual function (regression coefficient [RC] -0.77; p < 0.001) and hormonal/vitality (RC 0.30; p = 0.006) function. Mean QLQ-C30 scores were slightly poorer than age-adjusted normative scores, for men <70 years (n = 411) as well as for men ≥70 years (n = 243) at treatment, but the differences were not beyond clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of prostate cancer survivors, age at treatment had little impact on long-term QoL and function. Due to the cross-sectional design, short term impact or variation over time cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reidun Sletten
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik/Lillehammer, Norway; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Ola Berger Christiansen
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; Department of Urology, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Hamar, Norway
| | - Line Merethe Oldervoll
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Centre for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lennart Åstrøm
- Section of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Håvard Kjesbu Skjellegrind
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Levanger, Norway; Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Ahus, University of Oslo, Norway; Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Øyvind Kirkevold
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; Faculty of Health, Care and Nursing, NTNU Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway; The Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Sverre Bergh
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; The Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Asta Bye
- Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paul Jarle Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marit Slaaen
- The Research Center for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xia Z, Fu X, Li J, Yuan X, Wu J, Tang L. Application of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men over 75 years: an analysis of comparative outcomes. Aging Male 2023; 26:2166919. [PMID: 36988199 DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2023.2166919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men aged over 75 years. METHOD A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify eligible comparative studies as of April 2022. Parameters, including perioperative results and oncological and functional outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS Seven articles with 7575 patients undergoing RARP were included in this study. Patients with prostate cancer were grouped by age ≥ 75 years versus < 75 years. Our results demonstrated that compared with the older group, the younger group had better potency (p < .00001). However, there were no significant differences in operation time (p = .29), estimated blood loss (p = .13), length of hospital stay (p = .48), complications (p = .22), continence (p = .21), positive surgical margin (p = .28), and biochemical recurrence (p = .74) between the groups. CONCLUSION Our study revealed that the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes in men aged over 75 years undergoing RARP were not significantly different from those of their younger counterparts. RARP is feasible in men aged over 75 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongyou Xia
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Xueqin Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| | - Jinze Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xinzhu Yuan
- Blood Purification Center of Department of Nephrology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Ji Wu
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Lingtong Tang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The People's Hospital of Gao County, Yibin, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Bianchi A, Cerrato C, Gallina S, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D’Aietti D, Orlando R, Brusa D, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Pagliarulo V, Cerruto MA, Tafuri A, Antonelli A. Normal preoperative endogenous testosterone levels predict prostate cancer progression in elderly patients after radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872231154150. [PMID: 36846295 PMCID: PMC9950604 DOI: 10.1177/17562872231154150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of senior age on prostate cancer (PCa) oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) is controversial, and further clinical factors could help stratifying risk categories in these patients. Objective We tested the association between endogenous testosterone (ET) and risk of PCa progression in elderly patients treated with RP. Design Data from PCa patients treated with RP at a single tertiary referral center, between November 2014 and December 2019 with available follow-up, were retrospectively evaluated. Methods Preoperative ET (classified as normal if >350 ng/dl) was measured for each patient. Patients were divided according to a cut-off age of 70 years. Unfavorable pathology consisted of International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grade group >2, seminal vesicle, and pelvic lymph node invasion. Cox regression models tested the association between clinical/pathological tumor features and risk of PCa progression in each age subgroup. Results Of 651 included patients, 190 (29.2%) were elderly. Abnormal ET levels were detected in 195 (30.0%) cases. Compared with their younger counterparts, elderly patients were more likely to have pathological ISUP grade group >2 (49.0% versus 63.2%). Disease progression occurred in 108 (16.6%) cases with no statistically significant difference between age subgroups. Among the elderly, clinically progressing patients were more likely to have normal ET levels (77.4% versus 67.9%) and unfavorable tumor grades (90.3% versus 57.9%) than patients who did not progress. In multivariable Cox regression models, normal ET [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.27-8.55; p = 0.014] and pathological ISUP grade group >2 (HR = 5.62; 95% CI = 1.60-19.79; p = 0.007) were independent predictors of PCa progression. On clinical multivariable models, elderly patients were more likely to progress for normal ET levels (HR = 3.42; 95% CI = 1.34-8.70; p = 0.010), independently by belonging to high-risk category. Elderly patients with normal ET progressed more rapidly than those with abnormal ET. Conclusion In elderly patients, normal preoperative ET independently predicted PCa progression. Elderly patients with normal ET progressed more rapidly than controls, suggesting that longer exposure time to high-grade tumors could adversely impact sequential cancer mutations, where normal ET is not anymore protective on disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D’Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona and
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona
and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, University of Verona
and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona,
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental
Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona
and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona
and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamada Y, Taguchi S, Kume H. Surgical Tolerability and Frailty in Elderly Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205061. [PMID: 36291845 PMCID: PMC9599577 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Life expectancy in Western countries and East Asian countries has incremented over the past decades, resulting in a rapidly aging world, while in general, radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended in elderly men aged ≥75 years. Together with the evolving technique of robotic surgeries, surgical indications for RP should be reconsidered in ‘elderly’ and ‘frail’ men, since this procedure has now become one of the safest and most effective cancer treatments for prostate cancer. One important element to determine surgical indications is surgical tolerability. However, evidence is scarce regarding the surgical tolerability in elderly men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this review, we focused on the surgical tolerability in ‘elderly’ and/or ‘frail’ men undergoing RARP, with the intent to provide up-to-date information on this matter and to support the decision making of therapeutic options in this spectrum of patients. Abstract Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has now become the gold standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. There are multiple elements in decision making for the treatment of prostate cancer. One of the important elements is life expectancy, which the current guidelines recommend as an indicator for choosing treatment options. However, determination of life expectancy can be complicated and difficult in some cases. In addition, surgical tolerability is also an important issue. Since frailty may be a major concern, it may be logical to use geriatric assessment tools to discriminate ‘surgically fit’ patients from unfit patients. Landmark studies show two valid models such as the phenotype model and the cumulative deficit model that allow for the diagnosis of frailty. Many studies have also developed geriatric screening tools such as VES-13 and G8. These tools may have the potential to directly sort out unfit patients for surgery preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Yamada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-3-5800-8662; Fax: +81-5800-8917
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcaro AB, Bianchi A, Gallina S, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D’Aietti D, Rizzetto R, Tafuri A, Cerrato C, Panunzio A, Orlando R, Brusa D, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A. Advanced age portends poorer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a single center experience. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:2857-2863. [PMID: 35976572 PMCID: PMC9675672 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02213-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Although advanced age doesn't seem to impair oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), elderly patients have increased rates of prostate cancer (PCa) related deaths due to a higher incidence of high-risk disease. The potential unfavorable impact of advanced age on oncological outcomes following RARP remains an unsettled issue. We aimed to evaluate the oncological outcome of PCa patients > 69 years old in a single tertiary center. MATERIALS AND METHODS 1143 patients with clinically localized PCa underwent RARP from January 2013 to October 2020. Analysis was performed on 901 patients with available follow-up. Patients ≥ 70 years old were considered elderly. Unfavorable pathology included ISUP grade group > 2, seminal vesicle, and pelvic lymph node invasion. Disease progression was defined as biochemical and/or local recurrence and/or distant metastases. RESULTS 243 cases (27%) were classified as elderly patients (median age 72 years). Median (IQR) follow-up was 40.4 (38.7-42.2) months. Disease progression occurred in 159 cases (17.6%). Elderly patients were more likely to belong to EAU high-risk class, have unfavorable pathology, and experience disease progression after surgery (HR = 5.300; 95% CI 1.844-15.237; p = 0.002) compared to the younger patients. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients eligible for RARP are more likely to belong to the EAU high-risk category and to have unfavorable pathology that are independent predictors of disease progression. Advanced age adversely impacts on oncological outcomes when evaluated inside these unfavorable categories. Accordingly, elderly patients belonging to the EAU high-risk should be counseled about the increased risk of disease progression after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D’Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy ,Department of Urology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Davide Brusa
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The past, present and future: bespoke surgery for older patients with prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:257-258. [PMID: 33782582 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00458-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|