1
|
Miki J, Fukuokaya W, Taoka R, Saito R, Matsui Y, Hatakeyama S, Kawahara T, Matsuda A, Kawai T, Kato M, Sazuka T, Sano T, Urabe F, Kashima S, Naito H, Murakami Y, Nishiyama N, Nishiyama H, Kitamura H, Kimura T. Oncological outcomes of prophylactic urethrectomy at the time of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A nationwide multi-institutional study. Int J Urol 2024. [PMID: 38822533 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of prophylactic urethrectomy (PU) on oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with bladder cancer (BC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). METHODS This retrospective study analyzed data on 1976 evaluable patients with BC who underwent RC. Patients were drawn from 36 institutions within the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. Oncological outcomes were compared using restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) based on inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves for non-urinary tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Interaction terms within IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were examined to assess the heterogeneity of treatment effect based on the risk of urethral recurrence (UR). The association between PU, estimated blood loss (EBL), and the incidence of severe postoperative surgical complications (SPSCs) (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher) was analyzed. RESULTS Of 1976 patients, 1448 (73.3%) received PU. IPTW adjustment was used to balance baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. Within the 107-month window of patient monitoring, PU showed no survival benefits (NUTRFS difference: 0.2 months [95% confidence interval: -6.8 to 7.3]; CSS, 1.2 [-4.9 to 7.3]; OS, 0 [-6.5 to 6.5]). No significant interactions were observed with factors associated with UR, and PU was associated with unfavorable perioperative outcomes (EBL, 1179 mL vs. 983 mL; SPSC, 14.6% vs. 7.0%). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that (1) PU was not associated with survival in patients with BC undergoing RC, regardless of UR-associated factors, and (2) PU was associated with unfavorable perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rikiya Taoka
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawahara
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ayumu Matsuda
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Kato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soki Kashima
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Hirohito Naito
- Department of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoji Murakami
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Life Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Naotaka Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Truong TTH, Nguyen DKH, Dinh KN, Thai MS. Urethral Recurrence After Cystectomy and Orthotopic Bladder Reconstruction: A Rare Case of Recurrent Bladder Cancer After 12 Years and Review of the Literature. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CASE REPORTS 2024; 17:11795476231224188. [PMID: 38269148 PMCID: PMC10804922 DOI: 10.1177/11795476231224188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Radical cystectomy combined with orthotopic urinary diversion is a chosen approach for treating invasive bladder cancer. However, urothelial cell carcinoma is characterized by its potential for recurrence and the development of multiple tumors in the urinary tracts. In the natural progression of transitional cell carcinoma, the remaining ureteral stump is considered a predicted site for possible recurrence after radical cystectomy. Currently, there is no specific recommendation for the diagnosis and management of this condition. Objective We report a rare case in a 74-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with anterior urethral carcinoma following a history of radical cystectomy and Hautmann ileal neobladder reconstruction. Additionally, we summarize some novel findings regarding risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in patients with recurrent bladder cancer in the urethra after radical cystectomy. Methods A case report and mini review. Results The patient was diagnosed with recurrent bladder cancer in the urethral after radical cystectomy using magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis, cystoscopy, and biopsy. Complete urethrectomy and creation of a permanent percutaneous urinary diversion were performed. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The patient was discharged 3 days after the surgery. Conclusion Urethral cancer following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer treatment is a rare condition. Risk factors for this occurrence include male gender, non-use of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction technique, invasive tumors in the prostatic urethra, and multifocal tumors. The treatment of these tumors can be determined based on the extent of invasion and histological characteristics, leading to the choice between radical urethrectomy or alternative conservative treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ky Nam Dinh
- Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Minh Sam Thai
- Urology Department of Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- The University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alfred Witjes J, Max Bruins H, Carrión A, Cathomas R, Compérat E, Efstathiou JA, Fietkau R, Gakis G, Lorch A, Martini A, Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Milowsky MI, Neuzillet Y, Panebianco V, Redlef J, Rink M, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Sæbjørnsen S, Veskimäe E, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines. Eur Urol 2024; 85:17-31. [PMID: 37858453 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT We present an overview of the updated 2023 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer (MMIBC). OBJECTIVE To provide practical evidence-based recommendations and consensus statements on the clinical management of MMIBC with a focus on diagnosis and treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of the MMIBC guidelines has been performed annually since 2017. Searches cover the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries databases for yearly guideline updates. A level of evidence and strength of recommendation are assigned. The evidence cutoff date for the 2023 MIBC guidelines was May 4, 2022. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Patients should be counselled regarding risk factors for bladder cancer. Pathologists should describe tumour and lymph nodes in detail, including the presence of histological subtypes. The importance of the presence or absence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the prostatic urethra is emphasised. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bladder is superior to computed tomography (CT) for disease staging, specifically in differentiating T1 from T2 disease, and may lead to a change in treatment approach in patients at high risk of an invasive tumour. Imaging of the upper urinary tract, lymph nodes, and distant metastasis is performed with CT or MRI; the additional value of flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT still needs to be determined. Frail and comorbid patients should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative histology remains the most important prognostic variable, while circulating tumour DNA appears to be an interesting predictive marker. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy remains cisplatin-based. In motivated and selected women and men, sexual organ-preserving cystectomy results in better functional outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes. Robotic and open cystectomy have comparable outcomes and should be combined with (extended) lymph node dissection. The diversion type is an individual choice after taking patient and tumour characteristics into account. Radical cystectomy remains a highly complex procedure with considerable morbidity and risk of mortality, although lower rates are observed for higher hospital volumes (>20 cases/yr). With proper patient selection, trimodal therapy (chemoradiation) has comparable outcomes to radical cystectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery improves disease-specific survival and overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk disease who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment, and is strongly recommended. There is a weak recommendation for adjuvant nivolumab, as OS data are not yet available. Health-related quality of life should be assessed using validated questionnaires at baseline and after treatment. Surveillance is needed to monitor for recurrent cancer and functional outcomes. Recurrences detected on follow-up seem to have better prognosis than symptomatic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS This summary of the 2023 EAU guidelines provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of MMIBC for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology guidelines panel on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer has released an updated version of the guideline containing information on diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Recommendations are based on studies published up to May 4, 2022. Surgical removal of the bladder and bladder preservation are discussed, as well as updates on the use of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in localised and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Harman Max Bruins
- Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Sittard/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Carrión
- Department of Urology, Vall Hebron Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard P Meijer
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - John Redlef
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Rouanne
- Department of Urology, Foch Hospital, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sæbjørn Sæbjørnsen
- Patient Representative, European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Navriya SC, Singh V, Choudhary GR, Tripathi S. Postradical cystectomy delayed urethral recurrence: a rare presentation posing diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:e256700. [PMID: 38086572 PMCID: PMC10728915 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy is 1% to 8%, with most cases occurring within the first 2 years of surgery. Prophylactic urethrectomy is rarely performed nowadays due to no known survival benefit and increased morbidity due to the procedure. However, we encountered a rare case of delayed urethral recurrence presenting as recurrent urethral collection 4 years after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion, posing a diagnostic dilemma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vikram Singh
- Urology, All india Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Shashank Tripathi
- Urology, All india Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang SS, Zhai GQ, Chen G, Huang ZG, Zhang Y, Zhang LJ, Dang YW, Li SH, Yan HB. Metadherin Promotes the Development of Bladder Cancer by Enhancing Cell Division. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2023; 38:650-662. [PMID: 35704039 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2021.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer (BLCA) is a malignant tumor occurring in bladder mucosa. Metadherin (MTDH) has been implicated in tumor progression; however, its molecular biological mechanisms in BLCA remain unclear. Materials and Methods: Cell functions were tested after BLCA cells were transfected by both short hairpin RNAs and small interfering RNAs to silence MTDH. Furthermore, in-house RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed with T24 cells after the knockdown of MTDH. In addition, MTDH-related pathways were explored. Finally, MTDH mRNA and protein expression levels were examined using multiple detection methods in BLCA tissues. Results: MTDH knockdown could largely inhibit cell proliferation, viability, and migration and induce apoptosis of BLCA cells. In-house RNA-seq showed that MTDH knockdown led to extracellular matrix organization and cell division. The integrated analysis showed that the comprehensive expression of MTDH at the mRNA level was 0.47 and that at the protein level was 0.54, based on 11 platforms, including 1485 BLCA and 180 non-BLCA samples. Conclusions: MTDH promotes the growth of BLCA cells through the pathway of cell division. This study provides new directions and biomarkers for future treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Shuo Wang
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Gao-Qiang Zhai
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Guang Huang
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Li-Jie Zhang
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Wu Dang
- Department of Pathology and First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Sheng-Hua Li
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Hai-Biao Yan
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
18 F-FDG PET/CT in Urethral Metastases From Bladder Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2022; 47:e713-e714. [PMID: 35961619 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Urethral metastasis of bladder cancer after surgery is rare. We present a 63-year-old man who had surgery for invasive bladder carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma 4 years ago and referred for urethral hemorrhage. 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed for restaging and showed intense linear 18 F-FDG activity in the proximal urethra. The patient underwent urethrectomy, and histopathology determined urethral metastasis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Laukhtina E, Boehm A, Peyronnet B, Bravi CA, Batista Da Costa J, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Yanagisawa T, König F, Mostafaei H, Enikeev D, Ingels A, Verhoest G, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Joniau S, Van Poppel H, de la Taille A, Bensalah K, Bruyère F, Shariat SF, Pradere B. Urethrectomy at the time of radical cystectomy for non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a collaborative multicenter study. World J Urol 2022; 40:1689-1696. [PMID: 35596017 PMCID: PMC9236994 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04025-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The optimal management of the urethra in patients planned for radical cystectomy (RC) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the impact of urethrectomy on perioperative and oncological outcomes in patients treated with RC for non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed the retrospective data from patients treated with RC for UCB of five European University Hospitals. Associations of urethrectomy with progression-free (PFS), cancer-free (CSS), and overall (OS) survivals were assessed in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients at high risk for urethral recurrence (UR) (urethral invasion and/or bladder neck invasion and/or multifocality and/or prostatic urethra involvement). RESULTS A total of 887 non-metastatic UCB patients were included. Among them, 146 patients underwent urethrectomy at the time of RC. Urethrectomy was performed more often in patients with urethral invasion, T3/4 tumor stage, CIS, positive frozen section analysis of the urethra, and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent robotic RC, and/or received an ileal conduit urinary diversion (all p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss and the postoperative complication rate were comparable between patients who received an urethrectomy and those who did not. Urethrectomy during RC was not associated with PFS (HR 0.83, p = 0.17), CSS (HR 0.93, p = 0.67), or OS (HR 1.08, p = 0.58). In the subgroup of 276 patients at high risk for UR, urethrectomy at the time of RC decreased the risk of progression (HR 0.58, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION In our study, urethrectomy at the time of RC seems to benefit only patients at high risk for UR. Adequate risk assessment of UCB patients' history may allow for better clinical decision-making and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Axelle Boehm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Jose Batista Da Costa
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Frederiek D'Hondt
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.,ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alexandre de la Taille
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, UPEC, AP-HP, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 95010, Créteil Cedex, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Franck Bruyère
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
| |
Collapse
|