Couples coping with advanced prostate cancer: An explorative study on treatment decision making, mental deterioration, partnership, and psychological burden

Qualitative evaluation of the life experiences of spouses of prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to qualitatively evaluate the life experiences of women whose spouses had been receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

The purposive sample of the research, in which a descriptive phenomenological design was used, consisted of 15 women. The data were evaluated according to Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis steps.

RESULTS

The views of the participants were classified into 7 themes: loss and grief, physical difficulties, socioeconomic difficulties, psychological difficulties, relational changes, strengths, and benefits.

CONCLUSION

It was determined that women whose husbands had been receiving ADT experienced grief responses and physical, socioeconomic, and psychological difficulties. Psychological difficulties were found to include care burden, hospital stress, sexuality, and burnout. It was observed that the patients and their spouses experienced some positive and negative relational changes. Satisfaction with health services and resilience were facilitating factors for female spouses to adapt to the treatment process. It was determined that during the adaptation to the disease and treatment process, the participants had some needs such as family support, economic support, reduction of negative representations in the media, and enhancement of communication skills of health professionals. Moreover, they were found to have some benefits related to post-traumatic growth. Uro-oncology nurses can develop services intended to improve the well-being of the wives of men receiving ADT and use the knowledge and experience of uro-oncology nursing for the benefit of both patients and caregivers.

Marital status and perceived stress in men with advanced prostate cancer: A randomized-controlled trial of cognitive behavioral stress management

OBJECTIVE

Relationship status predicts numerous outcomes among medical populations. Few interventions evaluate the role of marital status on response to psychosocial treatment, and no such studies exist within advanced prostate cancer (APC). This study examined whether marital status modified the effect of a cognitive behavioral stress management (CBSM) intervention on perceived stress.

METHODS

Men with APC (N = 190) were randomized to 10-week CBSM or a health promotion (HP) intervention (#NCT03149185). The Perceived Stress Scale assessed perceived stress at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Medical status and sociodemographics were captured at enrollment.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly White (59.5%), non-Hispanic (97.4%), heterosexual (97.4%) men, 66.8% of whom were partnered. Neither condition nor marital status predicted perceived stress change at follow-up. However, a significant interaction was found between condition and marital status (p = 0.014; Cohen's f = 0.07), such that partnered men who received CBSM and unpartnered men who received HP reported greater reductions in perceived stress.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to assess the impact of marital status on psychosocial intervention effects among men with APC. Partnered men derived greater benefit from a cognitive-behavioral intervention and unpartnered men equally benefitted from a HP intervention. Further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying these relationships.

"Partner", "Caregiver", or "Co-Survivor"-Might the Label We Give the Partners of Cancer Patients Affect the Health Outcome of the Patients and Their Partners?

Having a life partner significantly extends survival for most cancer patients. The label given to the partners of cancer patients may, however, influence the health of not just the patients but their partners. "Caregiver" is an increasingly common label for the partners of patients, but it carries an implicit burden. Referring to partners as "caregivers" may be detrimental to the partnerships, as it implies that the individuals are no longer able to be co-supportive. Recognizing this, there has been some effort to relabel cancer dyads as "co-survivors". However, many cancer patients are not comfortable being called a "survivor", and the same may apply to their partners. Cancer survivorship, we argue, could be enhanced by helping keep the bond between patients and their partners strong. This includes educating patients and partners about diverse coping strategies that individuals use when facing challenges to their health and wellbeing. We suggest that preemptive couples' counselling in cancer centers may benefit both patients and their partners.