The absence of spermatogenesis in radical orchiectomy specimen is associated with advanced-stage nonseminomatous testicular cancer

The Status of Spermatogenesis in Germ Cell Tumor Bearing Testis and Its Association with Metastatic Disease

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the status of spermatogenesis detected by histological examination of non-tumoral testicular tissues in tumor bearing testis and its association with advanced stage disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) that undergone radical orchiectomy. All non-tumoral areas of the orchiectomy specimens were examined for the status of spermatogenesis. Patients were divided into two groups as localized (stage I) and metastatic (stage II-III) disease and analyzed separately for seminomatous (SGCT) and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT).

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-four patients were included in our final analysis. Of those, 195 patients had SGCT, and 259 patients had NSGCT. Three hundred and six patients had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. Median (Q1-Q3) age was 31 (26 - 38) years and 102 (22.5%) patients had normal spermatogenesis, 177 (39.0%) patients had hypospermatogenesis and 175 (38.5%) patients had no mature spermatozoa. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, embryonal carcinoma >50% (1.944, 95 %CI 1.054-3.585, P = .033) and spermatogenesis status (2.796 95% CI 1.251-6.250, P = .012 for hypospermatogenesis, and 3.907, 95% CI 1.692-9.021, P = .001 for absence of mature spermatozoa) were independently associated with metastatic NSGCT. However, there was not any variables significantly associated with metastatic SGCT on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that only 22.5% of patients with TGCTs had normal spermatogenesis in tumor bearing testis. Impaired spermatogenesis (hypospermatogenesis or no mature spermatozoa) and predominant embryonal carcinoma are associated with advanced stage NSGCT.

Semen parameters in testicular tumor patients before orchiectomy: What is the impact of testicular tumor stage and histology?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of testicular cancer histology and stage on sperm parameters in cryopreserved samples collected prior to orchiectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of tumor histology, stage and sperm parameters of patients who underwent pre-orchiectomy sperm cryopreservation for testicular cancer between March 2010 and March 2023. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 sperm reference values were used to identify patients with subnormal semen parameters and to further categorize patients by sperm alteration. Localized disease was classified as Stage I, while metastatic disease encompassed Stages II and III. Continuous variables were compared using t-test or Mann Whitney U test, and categorical variables using Chi-square and Fishers exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients was identified, 48 (75%) classified as stage I and 16 (25%) classified as stage II/III. No difference was found in semen parameters between patients with seminoma and patients with non-seminoma germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Patients with stage II/III disease had significantly lower percentages of progressive motility (36% vs 53%, p=0.021) and total motility (60% vs 69%, p=0.015) than stage I patients. When categorizing by sperm alterations according to WHO 2010 reference values, patients with stage II/III disease had significantly higher proportions of asthenozoospermia (38% vs 15%, p=0.048) and teratozoospermia (63% vs 31%, p=0.027) than stage I patients. Elevated tumor markers were not associated with sperm abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic testicular cancer present with worse sperm quality than patients with localized disease. Sperm cryopreservation should be offered to all patients with testicular cancer, and especially emphasized in patients with metastatic disease.