High Rates of Inadequate Urine Volume Cause Failure of Clinic Based Uroflowmetry in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

The Role of Remote Diagnostics to Better Assess Uroflow Variability: Insights From Combining at Home Uroflows and Frequency Volume Charts From 19,868 Voids Using a Novel, Hand Held, Cellular Embedded Device

OBJECTIVE

To examine how representative 24-hour data collection is of the overall patient experience utilizing a home uroflow device in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Home uroflow data were collected with the iO Urology CarePath device from men at a single urology clinic and retrospectively analyzed. Void characteristics were summarized for data collected over 24 hours compared to data collected over several days or weeks with the device (overall study excludes the 24-hour data). A linear mixed-effects model was used to evaluate differences in average Qmax from voids collected during a single 24-hour period compared to the overall study.

RESULTS

A total of 486 men (mean age 67.4) used the device resulting in 465 included in the analysis with a total of 15,521 voids in the overall study and 4347 voids in the single-day analysis. Average Qmax from the model was 11.2 mL/s (95% CI: 10.80, 11.65) and 11.2 mL/s (95% CI: 10.81, 11.64) in the 24-hour and overall study groups, respectively. Both groups had similar between (20.3% vs 20.4%) and within-subject (12.0% vs 11.9%) variance. The difference in Qmax was not significantly different (P = .970). A subgroup analysis including voids >150 mL yielded similar results.

CONCLUSION

Data show variability in voiding parameters, but similar average Qmax collected in 24 hours as compared to several days/weeks. The combination of home uroflowmetry with frequency-volume chart information can provide objective data and a unique perspective on uroflow variability (UFV) for clinician review to support the development of individualized patient treatment plans.