Trends in Insurance Status during Initial Presentation of Testicular Carcinoma: Examining Health Outcomes and Implications of Health Reform for Young Adults in the United States

Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection Versus Surveillance for Adult Early Stage Pure Testicular Teratoma: A Nationwide Analysis

PURPOSE

Following radical orchiectomy, surveillance and primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) are acceptable options for the management of early stage pure testicular teratoma in adult patients; however, there is no uniform consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate survival outcomes of adults with early stage pure testicular teratoma based on management strategy.

METHODS

Data was extracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from testicular cancer patients diagnosed with clinical stage (CS) I pure teratoma (pT1-4N0M0S0) between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess clinical outcomes based on management strategy.

RESULTS

Of the 61,167 patients diagnosed with testicular cancer, 692 (1.1%) had pure teratoma. Only individuals with CS I disease were considered (n = 237). The median age was 28 (23-35) years. Overall, 43 (18%) patients underwent RPLND and 194 (82%) patients were managed with surveillance. There was an increase in surveillance for CS I teratoma during the study period. Increasing distance from residence to treatment facility was an unadjusted predictor for undergoing primary RPLND (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 54 months and there was no significant difference in overall survival between CS I teratoma patients managed with RPLND and those managed with surveillance (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a trend toward increasing adoption of surveillance for the management of early stage pure testicular teratoma in adults. Our findings suggest that surveillance provides comparable survival outcomes to primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in this setting.

Optimal Management of High-risk Stage I Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumor: Active Intervention is the Preferred Option

While there is still debate and uncertainty regarding the best management strategy for clinical stage IB nonseminoma germ cell tumor, adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or surgery is associated with a markedly lower risk of recurrence for men with high-risk features and provides more definitive disease control and lower overall exposure to chemotherapy for patients who do experience recurrence.