Dexmedetomidine-methadone-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-methadone-alfaxalone for cats undergoing ovariectomy

Sedative effects of alfaxalone and hydromorphone with or without midazolam in cats: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the quality of sedation and ease of intravenous (IV) catheter placement following sedation using two intramuscular (IM) sedation protocols in cats: hydromorphone, alfaxalone and midazolam vs hydromorphone and alfaxalone.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized and blinded study. Cats were randomly assigned to receive an IM injection of hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg), alfaxalone (1.5 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg; HAM group), or hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg) and alfaxalone (1.5 mg/kg; HA group). Sedation scoring (0-9, where 9 indicated maximum sedation) was performed at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mins from the time of injection. At 20 mins, an IV catheter placement score (0-10, where 10 indicated least resistance) was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one client-owned adult cats were included in this study. Sedation and IV catheter placement scores were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Peak sedation was significantly higher (P = 0.002) in the HAM group (median 9; range 7-9) than in the HA group (median 7; range 3-9), and IV catheter placement scores were significantly higher (P = 0.001) in the HAM group (median 9.5; range 7-10) compared with the HA group (median 7; range 4-9). Spearman correlations were calculated between IV catheter placement score and sedation scores. There was a significant positive correlation of average sedation over time (correlation 0.83; P <0.001) and sedation at 20 mins (correlation 0.76; P <0.001) with a higher, more favorable IV catheter placement score.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These preliminary results suggest that the addition of midazolam to IM alfaxalone and hydromorphone produced more profound sedation and greater ease of IV catheter placement than IM alfaxalone and hydromorphone alone.

Comparison of the effects of buprenorphine and methadone in combination with medetomidine followed by intramuscular alfaxalone for anaesthesia of cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of anaesthesia and analgesia between methadone and buprenorphine in combination with medetomidine after induction with intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

METHODS

Fifty-one female cats (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-II), with a median age of 12 months (range 2-60 months), weighing a mean ± SD of 2.5 ± 0.5 kg, were recruited to the study. Cats were randomly allocated to receive medetomidine (600 µg/m2) and buprenorphine (180 µg/m2) (group MB) or medetomidine (500 µg/m2) and methadone (5 mg/m2) (group MM) IM. Anaesthesia was induced 15 mins later using alfaxalone (3 mg/kg) IM. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. All cats received meloxicam preoperatively. Quality of premedication and induction and intraoperative physiological parameters were recorded. Atipamezole (50% of medetomidine dose) was administered at the end of surgery. Cats were assessed postoperatively by the same blinded observer using a simple descriptive scale, numeric rating scale, dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS) and UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scales, at 10, 20 and 30 mins post-extubation. Parametric and non-parametric data were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one cats completed the study. No significant differences were detected between groups before or during anaesthesia. No cats required rescue analgesia. DIVAS scores at 10 mins were significantly less in the MM group compared with the MB. No differences between groups at any other time points were detected using the four metrology instruments.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Both protocols provided good anaesthesia conditions for ovariohysterectomy in the cat.

Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine Versus Ketamine-Fentanyl-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Anesthesia and Analgesia in Rats

Ketamine (KET), a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, is most frequently used as an anesthetic, analgesic, and sedative drug in pediatric clinical practices. However, the adverse effects of KET administration such as psychotic episodes limited the use of KET. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the addition of small doses of fentanyl (FENT) and dexmedetomidine would reduce the overall KET consumption without concession on the safety and efficacy of anesthesia and analgesia in rats. We compared the effects of KET (50 mg/kg) administration alone and KET (25 mg/kg) combined with FENT (0.005 mg/kg) and dexmedetomidine (0.05 mg/kg) (KFD) on the times of onset and duration of anesthesia and analgesia. Compared with the KET group, the KFD group provides similar onset time of anesthesia, but longer duration of anesthesia, and better analgesic effect. Unlike the KET group, the KFD group had a lower heart rate and higher respiratory rate. Meanwhile, KFD induced markedly changes in the electroencephalography (EEG) spectral power when compared with control and KET. Furthermore, combination of FENT and dexmedetomidine alleviated the liver toxicity of KET. These results indicated that, when compared with KET alone, the administration of KFD combination offered safer and more efficient anesthesia.