A systematic review of the effects of injectable sedative and anesthetic drugs and inhalant anesthetics on intraocular pressure in the dog

Effects of propofol alone or in combination with ketamine on intraocular pressure in unpremedicated dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of propofol (P) alone and in combination with ketamine (KP) at ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 on intraocular pressure (IOP) in unpremedicated dogs.

ANIMALS STUDIED

A total of 28 cross-bred healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

Dogs were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 7 per group) to receive intravenous P or KP at 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 ratios, respectively. The infusion was administered at 0.6 mg/kg/min for 60 min. IOP, cardiorespiratory variables, rectal temperature (RT), and pedal reflex were recorded every 5 min for 60 min, starting from baseline (BL).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant increase in IOP in all groups: P (p = .011), KP 1:1 (p = .003), KP 1:2 (p = .023), and KP 1:3 (p = .008). The IOP increase was less pronounced in the KP 1:2 group and was only significant (p = .023) at T45 compared with BL. A significant correlation was observed between IOP and SpO2 in P (r = -.215, p = .02), KP 1:2 (r = -.579, p < .01), and KP 1:3 (r = -.402, p < .01) groups. IOP significantly increased due to decreased SpO2 below 86.5% (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol alone and in combination with ketamine may increase preexisting IOP in unpremedicated dogs. SpO2 levels below 86.5% may trigger an increase in IOP. Administering KP in a 1:2 ratio at an infusion rate of 0.6 mg/kg/min does not significantly alter IOP for under 45 min in unpremedicated dogs with sufficient oxygenation.

Effect of anesthetic induction with propofol, alfaxalone or ketamine on intraocular pressure in cats: a randomized masked clinical investigation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of propofol, alfaxalone and ketamine on intraocular pressure (IOP) in cats.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, masked, randomized clinical trial.

ANIMALS

A total of 43 ophthalmologically normal cats scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for various procedures.

METHODS

Following baseline IOP measurements using applanation tonometry, anesthesia was induced with propofol (n = 15), alfaxalone (n = 14) or ketamine (n = 14) administered intravenously to effect. Then, midazolam (0.3 mg kg^-1) was administered intravenously and endotracheal intubation was performed without application of topical anesthesia. The IOP was measured following each intervention. Data was analyzed using one-way anova and repeated-measures mixed design with post hoc analysis. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean ± standard error IOP at baseline was not different among groups (propofol, 18 ± 0.6; alfaxalone, 18 ± 0.7; ketamine, 17 ± 0.5 mmHg). Following induction of anesthesia, IOP increased significantly compared with baseline in the propofol (20 ± 0.7 mmHg), but not in the alfaxalone (19 ± 0.8 mmHg) or ketamine (16 ± 0.7 mmHg) groups. Midazolam administration resulted in significant decrease from the previous measurement in the alfaxalone group (16 ± 0.7 mmHg), but not in the propofol group (19 ± 0.7 mmHg) or the ketamine (16 ± 0.8 mmHg) group. A further decrease was measured after intubation in the alfaxalone group (15 ± 0.9 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Propofol should be used with caution in cats predisposed to perforation or glaucoma, as any increase in IOP should be avoided.

Effects of tiletamine-zolazepam vs. propofol on peri-induction intraocular pressure in dogs: A randomized, masked crossover study

Introduction

Anesthesia induction agents have the potential to cause severe ocular side effects, resulting in lasting damage to the eye.

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of tiletamine-zolazepam on IOP compared to propofol when they are used as an induction agent in normal healthy dogs.

Methods

Twenty healthy adult client owned dogs weighing 22.2 ± 7.6 kg were selected for the study. In a randomized order, all dogs received tiletamine-zolazepam 5 mg/kg IV or propofol 8 mg/kg IV titrated to effect without premedication. Washout between each treatment was at least seven days. IOP measurements were obtained at four time points: baseline, post-induction, post-intubation, and after recovery using applanation tonometry. No additional procedures were performed. After normality of the data was determined, a linear mixed model was built with time, eye, treatment and all interactions of those variables as fixed effects and subject as a random effect.

Results

There was no significant difference for age, body weight, drug dose, baseline IOP, and recovery IOP between treatments. Average IOP measurements remained within the normal range of 15-25 mmHg at these time points. However, IOP was significantly less elevated by the tiletamine-zolazepam treatment vs. propofol at the post-induction (mean difference: -4.7 ± 4.6 [95%CI -6.8 to -2.5]) and the post-intubation (mean difference: -4.4 ± 4.6 [95%CI -6.5 to -2.2]) time points.

Clinical significance

Dogs receiving tiletamine-zolazepam for anesthetic induction had a significantly less elevated IOP at induction and intubation compared to dogs receiving propofol.

Changes in Intraocular Pressure following Narcosis With Medetomidine, Midazolam, and Fentanyl in Association With Initial Intraocular Pressure in Mice

PURPOSE

This article describes the development of decreased intraocular pressure (IOP) under general anesthesia with medetomidine, midazolam, and fentanyl in mice with normal and elevated IOP.

METHODS

IOP was measured using the iCare Tonolab rebound tonometer. Twelve 3-4 months-old male and female C57BL/6J mice were randomized to a control group with physiological IOP and a high IOP group with experimentally induced ocular hypertension using tarsal injections of dexamethasone-21-acetate. For anesthesia, medetomidine and midazolam were used, subgroups additionally received fentanyl. IOP was measured every 2.5 min for 30 min.

RESULTS

Control group differed with 14.89 mmHg (SEM: 0.58) significantly (p = 0.0002) from the high IOP group with initial 20.44 mmHg (SEM: 0.75). All groups showed a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in IOP under general anesthesia. There was no significant difference in IOP development and decrease between the group additionally receiving fentanyl and the group without fentanyl. The decrease in IOP was highly dependent on the initial value, with the high IOP group showing a greater decrease. After 10 min, no significant difference in IOP could be detected between the high IOP and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In mice, general anesthesia with medetomidine and midazolam leads to a declining IOP over time. Adding fentanyl to the anesthesia did not alter these effects. The decline is time-dependent and IOP-dependent.

Influence of fentanyl, ketamine or lidocaine infusion on the intraocular pressure and pupil size in conscious dogs

Fifty-five healthy conscious dogs were included in a prospective randomised double-blinded clinical study. The dogs allocated to one of four groups received intravenous bolus followed by infusion of fentanyl (FEN-group), or ketamine (KET-group), or lidocaine (LID-group), or saline (SAL-group). The intraocular pressure (IOP), pupil size (PS), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured prior to and at 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min after initiation of the drug administration. The data were analysed using an analysis of variance and the Steel-Dwass test. No significant difference in the IOP within or between the groups was detected. In the FEN-group, the PS decreased significantly at all the measured times. In the KET-group, the PS increased significantly at 2, 5 and 10 minutes. The PS was significantly smaller in the FEN-group compared to the KET-group at 2, 5, 10 and 20 min, compared to the SAL-group at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes. In the FEN-group the HR significantly decreased compared to the baseline and was significantly lower compared to the KET-group and LID-group. Fentanyl, ketamine or lidocaine administered at the doses studied as a bolus followed by a 30-min infusion seem to cause no effect on the IOP in healthy conscious non-painful dogs without ocular abnormalities. Fentanyl decreased and ketamine transiently increased the PS.