1
|
Gomez J, Velázquez FR, Guzman-Holst A, Cervantes Apolinar MY, Van Bellinghen LA, Van Vlaenderen I, van Oorschot D. Cost-effectiveness analysis measuring the total costs against the health benefits of three different rotavirus vaccines for Mexico. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023:2219189. [PMID: 37339232 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2219189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Rotavirus (RV) infection causes acute rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) in infants. Safe and effective RV vaccines are available, of which Mexico has included one in its national immunization program (NIP) since 2007. Health outcome gains, expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost improvements are important additional factors for the selection of a NIP vaccine. These two factors were analyzed here for Mexico over one year implementing three RV vaccines: 2-dose Rotarix (HRV), versus 3-dose RotaTeq (HBRV), and 3-dose Rotasiil (BRV-PV), presented in a 1-dose or 2-dose vial). HRV would annually result in discounted QALY gains of 263 extra years compared with the other vaccines by averting an extra 24,022 homecare cases, 10779 medical visits, 392 hospitalizations, and 12 deaths. From a payer's perspective and compared with HRV, BRV-PV 2-dose vial and BRV-PV 1-dose vial would annually result in $13.5 million and $4.6 million net savings, respectively, while HBRV would result in $3.4 million extra costs. The societal perspective may also show savings compared with HRV for BRV-PV 2-dose vial of $4.9 million, while BRV-PV 1-dose vial and HBRV may show extra costs of $4.0 million and $12.1 million respectively. HRV and HBRV were both approved in Mexico, with HRV requiring less investment than HBRV with higher QALY gains and cost savings. The HRV vaccine produced those higher health gains due to its earlier protection and greater coverage achieved after its schedule completion with two doses only, providing full protection at four months of age instead of longer periods for the other vaccines.
Collapse
|
2
|
Guzman-Holst A, Ortega-Barria E, Flores ÁA, Carreño-Manjarrez R, Constenla D, Cervantes-Apolinar MY. 15-year experience with rotavirus vaccination in Mexico: a systematic literature review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:3623-3637. [PMID: 34187326 PMCID: PMC8437458 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1936859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
A systematic review was conducted in Mexico to consolidate and evaluate evidence after 15 years of rotavirus vaccination, according to the National Immunization Program. Five databases were screened to identify published articles (January 2000-February 2020) with evidence on all clinical and epidemiological endpoints (e.g. immunogenicity, safety, efficacy, impact/effectiveness) of rotavirus vaccination in Mexico. Twenty-two articles were identified (observational studies including health-economic models: 17; randomized controlled trials: 5). Fourteen studies evaluated a human attenuated vaccine (HRV), four studies evaluated both vaccines, and only two evaluated a bovine-human reassortant vaccine, with local efficacy data only for HRV. Local evidence shows vaccines are safe, immunogenic, efficacious, and provide an acceptable risk-benefit profile. The benefits of both vaccines in alleviating the burden of all-cause diarrhea mortality and morbidity are documented in several local post-licensure studies. Findings signify overall benefits of rotavirus vaccination and support the continued use of rotavirus vaccine in Mexico.
Collapse
|
3
|
Park J, Goldstein J, Haran M, Ferrari M. An ensemble approach to predicting the impact of vaccination on rotavirus disease in Niger. Vaccine 2017; 35:5835-5841. [PMID: 28941619 PMCID: PMC7185385 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Recently developed vaccines provide a new way of controlling rotavirus in sub-Saharan Africa. Models for the transmission dynamics of rotavirus are critical both for estimating current burden from imperfect surveillance and for assessing potential effects of vaccine intervention strategies. We examine rotavirus infection in the Maradi area in southern Niger using hospital surveillance data provided by Epicentre collected over two years. Additionally, a cluster survey of households in the region allows us to estimate the proportion of children with diarrhea who consulted at a health structure. Model fit and future projections are necessarily particular to a given model; thus, where there are competing models for the underlying epidemiology an ensemble approach can account for that uncertainty. We compare our results across several variants of Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) compartmental models to quantify the impact of modeling assumptions on our estimates. Model-specific parameters are estimated by Bayesian inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo. We then use Bayesian model averaging to generate ensemble estimates of the current dynamics, including estimates of R0, the burden of infection in the region, as well as the impact of vaccination on both the short-term dynamics and the long-term reduction of rotavirus incidence under varying levels of coverage. The ensemble of models predicts that the current burden of severe rotavirus disease is 2.6–3.7% of the population each year and that a 2-dose vaccine schedule achieving 70% coverage could reduce burden by 39–42%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaewoo Park
- Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
| | - Joshua Goldstein
- Social and Data Analytics Laboratory, 900 N Glebe Rd, Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.
| | - Murali Haran
- Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
| | - Matthew Ferrari
- Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hungerford D, Smith K, Tucker A, Iturriza-Gómara M, Vivancos R, McLeonard C, A Cunliffe N, French N. Population effectiveness of the pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:569. [PMID: 28810833 PMCID: PMC5556361 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2613-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rotavirus was the leading cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in infants and young children prior to the introduction of routine vaccination. Since 2006 there have been two licensed vaccines available; with successful clinical trials leading the World Health Organization to recommend rotavirus vaccination for all children worldwide. In order to inform immunisation policy we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observation studies to assess population effectiveness against acute gastroenteritis. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Cinhal and Academic Search Premier and grey literature sources for studies published between January 2006 and April 2014. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were observational measuring population effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination against health care attendances for rotavirus gastroenteritis or AGE. To evaluate study quality we use used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies, categorising studies by risk of bias. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots. If two or more studies reported a measure of vaccine effectiveness (VE), we conducted a random effects meta-analysis. We stratified analyses by World Bank country income level and used study quality in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS We identified 30 studies, 19 were from high-income countries and 11 from middle-income countries. Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for laboratory confirmed rotavirus gastroenteritis was highest in high-income countries (89% VE; 95% CI 84-92%) compared to middle-income countries (74% VE; 95% CI 67-80%). Vaccine effectiveness was higher for those receiving the complete vaccine schedule (81% VE; 95% CI 75-86%) compared to partial schedule (62% VE; 95% CI 55-69%). Two studies from high-income countries measured VE against community consultations for AGE with a pooled estimate of 40% (95% CI 13-58%; 2 studies). CONCLUSIONS We found strong evidence to further support the continued use of rotavirus vaccines. Vaccine effectiveness was similar to that reported in clinical trials for both high and middle-income countries. There is limited data from Low income settings at present. There was lower effectiveness against milder disease. Further studies, should continue to report effectiveness against AGE and less-severe rotavirus disease because as evidenced by pre-vaccine introduction studies this is likely to contribute the greatest burden on healthcare resources, particularly in high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hungerford
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. .,Field Epidemiology Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Liverpool, L1 1JF, UK. .,The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.
| | - Katie Smith
- Health Education North West, Liverpool, L3 4BL, UK
| | | | - Miren Iturriza-Gómara
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roberto Vivancos
- Field Epidemiology Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Liverpool, L1 1JF, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, Liverpool, UK.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catherine McLeonard
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK
| | - Nigel A Cunliffe
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Neil French
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,The Centre for Global Vaccine Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK.,Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Undurraga EA, Betancourt-Cravioto M, Ramos-Castañeda J, Martínez-Vega R, Méndez-Galván J, Gubler DJ, Guzmán MG, Halstead SB, Harris E, Kuri-Morales P, Tapia-Conyer R, Shepard DS. Economic and disease burden of dengue in Mexico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9:e0003547. [PMID: 25786225 PMCID: PMC4364886 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 01/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dengue imposes a substantial economic and disease burden in most tropical and subtropical countries. Dengue incidence and severity have dramatically increased in Mexico during the past decades. Having objective and comparable estimates of the economic burden of dengue is essential to inform health policy, increase disease awareness, and assess the impact of dengue prevention and control technologies. METHODS AND FINDINGS We estimated the annual economic and disease burden of dengue in Mexico for the years 2010-2011. We merged multiple data sources, including a prospective cohort study; patient interviews and macro-costing from major hospitals; surveillance, budget, and health data from the Ministry of Health; WHO cost estimates; and available literature. We conducted a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations to derive 95% certainty levels (CL) for our estimates. Results suggest that Mexico had about 139,000 (95%CL: 128,000-253,000) symptomatic and 119 (95%CL: 75-171) fatal dengue episodes annually on average (2010-2011), compared to an average of 30,941 symptomatic and 59 fatal dengue episodes reported. The annual cost, including surveillance and vector control, was US$170 (95%CL: 151-292) million, or $1.56 (95%CL: 1.38-2.68) per capita, comparable to other countries in the region. Of this, $87 (95%CL: 87-209) million or $0.80 per capita (95%CL: 0.62-1.12) corresponds to illness. Annual disease burden averaged 65 (95%CL: 36-99) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per million population. Inclusion of long-term sequelae, co-morbidities, impact on tourism, and health system disruption during outbreaks would further increase estimated economic and disease burden. CONCLUSION With this study, Mexico joins Panama, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, and Thailand as the only countries or areas worldwide with comprehensive (illness and preventive) empirical estimates of dengue burden. Burden varies annually; during an outbreak, dengue burden may be significantly higher than that of the pre-vaccine level of rotavirus diarrhea. In sum, Mexico's potential economic benefits from dengue control would be substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo A. Undurraga
- Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | | | - José Ramos-Castañeda
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Center for Tropical Diseases, University of Texas-Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ruth Martínez-Vega
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Organización Latinoamericana para el Fomento de la Investigación en Salud, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Scott B. Halstead
- Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Eva Harris
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | | | | | - Donald S. Shepard
- Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takemoto MLS, Bahia L, Toscano CM, Araujo DV. Systematic review of studies on rotavirus disease cost-of-illness and productivity loss in Latin America and the Caribbean. Vaccine 2014; 31 Suppl 3:C45-57. [PMID: 23777691 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2012] [Revised: 04/12/2013] [Accepted: 05/08/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe acute diarrhea among children in both developed and developing countries. Vaccination can reduce the disease burden and its incorporation into health care systems should consider future costs and benefits. OBJECTIVES To systematically review studies on costs due to rotavirus infection in Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region, considering their methods and results. METHODS A search of relevant databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS), and the Brazilian Thesis Databank was performed. Inclusion criteria for studies were: (a) economic evaluation or cost-of-illness studies; (b) conducted in the LAC region; (c) assess economic burden of rotavirus disease or the economic impact of rotavirus vaccination programs. Two authors independently screened the studies for eligibility. RESULTS Of 444 studies initially retrieved, 21 met the eligibility criteria and were included (14 cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccination programs and 7 cost-of-illness studies). Direct medical costs were assessed in all 21 studies, but only 10 also investigated indirect and non-medical direct costs. The most commonly observed methods for cost estimation were retrospective database analysis and hospital-based surveillance study. Only one study was a household-based survey.A wide cost range was identified (e.g., inpatient care US$79.91 to US$858.40 and outpatient care US$13.06 to US$64.10), depending on the methods, study perspective, and type of costs included. CONCLUSION Rotavirus-associated costs were assessed in 21 studies across the Latin America and Caribbean region. The majority of studies were made alongside economic evaluations of vaccination programs. Methods are broadly different among studies but administrative databases seem to be the most employed source of data.
Collapse
|