1
|
Nakabembe E, Cooper J, Amaral K, Tusubira V, Hsia Y, Abu-Raya B, Sekikubo M, Nakimuli A, Sadarangani M, Le Doare K. The safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to pregnant women living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 69:102448. [PMID: 38333366 PMCID: PMC10850112 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants have a higher burden of infectious diseases related morbidity and mortality compared with HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU). Immunization of pregnant women living with HIV (PWLWH) could reduce the severity and burden of infectious diseases for HEU in early infancy. Methods We conducted a systematic review of safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to PWLWH and meta-analyses to test the overall effect of immunogenicity comparing pregnant women without HIV (PWWH) to PWLWH. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Review articles, case series, conference abstracts, and animal studies were excluded. Studies were included from inception to 6th September 2023, with no language restrictions. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for immunogenicity using Review manager (RevMan) analysis software version 5.4.1, Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) values were transformed to obtain the mean and standard deviation within RevMan, the effect size was computed and reported as mean difference with respective 95% confidence intervals. The review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42021289081. Findings We included 12 articles, comprising 3744 pregnant women, 1714 were PWLWH given either influenza, pneumococcal or an investigational Group B streptococcal (GBS) vaccine. Five studies described safety outcomes, and no increase in adverse events was reported in PWLWH compared to PWWH. The GMT increase from baseline to 28-35 weeks post vaccination in HA units ranged from 12.4 (95% CI: 9.84-14.9) to 238.8 (95% CI: 0.35-477.9). Meta-analyses of influenza vaccines showed the pooled geometric mean difference in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) titers post vaccination was 56.01 (95% CI: 45.01-67.01), p < 0.001. The increase was less in PWLWH when compared with PWWH: -141.76 (95% CI: -194.96, -88.55), p < 0.001. Interpretation There are limited data on the safety and immunogenicity of vaccines given to PWLWH making policy consideration in this group difficult when new vaccines are introduced. With new vaccines on the horizon, PWLWH need to be included in studies to promote vaccine confidence for this special population. Funding This work was funded by Medical Research Council Joint Clinical Trials Round 9 [MR/T004983/1].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Nakabembe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Cooper
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle Amaral
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Valerie Tusubira
- Makerere University-Johns Hopkins Research Collaboration, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 23491, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Yingfen Hsia
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
| | - Musa Sekikubo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Annettee Nakimuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
- Makerere University-Johns Hopkins Research Collaboration, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 23491, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cutland CL, Sawry S, Fairlie L, Barnabas S, Frajzyngier V, Roux JL, Izu A, Kekane-Mochwari KE, Vika C, De Jager J, Munson S, Jongihlati B, Stark JH, Absalon J. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in South Africa. Vaccine 2024; 42:1352-1362. [PMID: 38310014 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Background epidemiologic population data from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), on maternal, foetal and neonatal adverse outcomes are limited. We aimed to estimate the incidence of maternal, foetal and neonatal adverse outcomes at South African maternal vaccine trial sites as reported directly in the clinical notes as well as using the 'Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy' case definitions (GAIA-CDs). GAIA-CDs were utilized as a tool to standardise data collection and outcome assessment, and the applicability and utility of the GAIA-CDs was evaluated in a LMIC observational study. METHODS We conducted a retrospective record review of maternity and neonatal case records for births that occurred in Soweto, Inner City- Johannesburg and Metro-East Cape Town, South Africa, between 1st July 2017 and 30th June 2018. Study staff abstracted data from randomly selected medical charts onto standardized study-specific forms. Incidence (per 100,000 population) was calculated for adverse maternal, foetal and neonatal outcomes, which were identified as priority outcomes in vaccine safety studies by the Brighton Collaboration and World Health Organization. Outcomes reported directly in the clinical notes and outcomes which fulfilled GAIA-CDs were compared. Incidence of outcomes was calculated by combining cases which were either reported in clinical notes by attending physicians and/ or fulfilled GAIA-CDs. FINDINGS Of 9371 pregnant women enrolled, 27·6% were HIV-infected, 19·9% attended antenatal clinic in the 1st trimester of pregnancy and 55·3% had ≥1 ultrasound examination. Fourteen percent of women had hypertensive disease of pregnancy, 1·3% had gestational diabetes mellitus and 16% experienced preterm labour. There were 150 stillbirths (1·6%), 26·8% of infants were preterm and five percent had microcephaly. Data available in clinical notes for some adverse outcomes, including maternal- & neonatal death, severe pre-eclampsia/ eclampsia, were able to fulfil GAIA-CDs criteria for all of the clinically-reported cases, however, missing data required to fulfil other GAIA-CD criteria (including stillbirth, gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational hypertension) led to poor correlation between clinically-reported adverse outcomes and outcomes fulfilling GAIA-CDs. Challenges were also encountered in accurately ascertaining gestational age. INTERPRETATION This study contributes to the expanding body of data on background rates of adverse maternal and foetal/ neonatal outcomes in LMICs. Utilization of GAIA-CDs assists with alignment of data, however, some GAIA-CDs require amendment to improve the applicability in LMICs. FUNDING This study was funded by Pfizer (Inc).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare L Cutland
- Wits African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Wits-Alive), School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science/ National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Shobna Sawry
- Wits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Lee Fairlie
- Wits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Shaun Barnabas
- Family Centre for Research with Ubuntu, Department of Paediatrics, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | | | - Jean Le Roux
- Wits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Alane Izu
- South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science/ National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Kebonethebe Emmanuel Kekane-Mochwari
- South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Caroline Vika
- Wits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Jeanne De Jager
- Family Centre for Research with Ubuntu, Department of Paediatrics, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Samantha Munson
- Pfizer Vaccines Clinical Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
| | - Babalwa Jongihlati
- Pfizer Vaccines Clinical Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
| | - James H Stark
- Vaccines, Antivirals, and Evidence Generation, Pfizer Biopharma Group, 1 Portland St, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Judith Absalon
- Pfizer Vaccines Clinical Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Deus N, Chissaque A, Bauhofer A, Barata A, Jani IV, Lopez Cavestany R, Jeyaseelan V, Mach O. Safety of incidental exposure to the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 in pregnancy: A longitudinal observational study in Mozambique, 2022-2023. Vaccine 2024; 42:1326-1331. [PMID: 38307745 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To minimize the risk of vaccine-derived poliovirus emergences, the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), was bioengineered to have increased genetic stability compared to Sabin OPV and recommended for outbreak response Emergency Use Listing by WHO. Although pregnant women are not a target population for this vaccine, a theoretical risk of incidental exposure exists via pharyngeal or faecal shedding from vaccinated children in the household or close community. METHODS This was an observational study of pregnant women conducted in Nampula (exposed cohort) and Maputo (non-exposed cohort) in Mozambique from August 2022 to June 2023. Two nOPV2 campaigns were conducted in Nampula and none in Maputo. Women were followed-up during routine prenatal consultation, delivery, and 28-day neonate visits for obstetric anomalies and pregnancy outcomes. Sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric history was captured. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-six pregnant women were enrolled from Nampula and 940 from Maputo City. Stillbirth prevalence (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·438), low birth weight (8·9% vs 8·2%, p = 0·989), congenital anomalies (1 % vs 0·5%, p = 0·454), neonatal death (2·3% vs 1·6%, p = 0·08), and maternal death (0 % vs 0·2%, p = 0·978) did not differ amongst exposed and non-exposed cohorts. There was an increased rate of pre-term delivery in the exposed cohort (18·4% vs 11·0%, p = 0·011). CONCLUSION We did not observe an increased frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to passive nOPV2 exposure. A higher frequency of preterm delivery needs to be further investigated. The data reported herein support the continued use of nOPV2 for poliovirus outbreak response and full licensure of the vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilsa de Deus
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo Province, Mozambique; Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Assucênio Chissaque
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo Province, Mozambique; Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Adilson Bauhofer
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Maputo Province, Mozambique; Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Américo Barata
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde Delegação de Nampula, Cidade de Nampula, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | - Ondrej Mach
- Polio Eradication, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kochhar S, Okomo U, Nkereuwem O, Shaum A, Gidudu JF, Bittaye M, Fofana S, Marena M, Kaira MJ, Kampmann B, Longley AT. Establishing vaccine pregnancy registries and active surveillance studies in low-and middle-income countries: Experience from an observational cohort surveillance project in The Gambia. Vaccine 2023; 41:6453-6455. [PMID: 37777453 PMCID: PMC11311207 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sonali Kochhar
- University of Washington, Seattle, USA; Global Healthcare Consulting, New Delhi, India
| | - Uduak Okomo
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia
| | - Oluwatosin Nkereuwem
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia
| | - Anna Shaum
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jane F Gidudu
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Sidat Fofana
- Expanded Programme on Immunization, Ministry of Health, Kotu, The Gambia
| | - Musa Marena
- Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn Child and Adolescent Health Programme, Ministry of Health, Kanifing, The Gambia
| | | | - Beate Kampmann
- Vaccines & Immunity Theme, Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia; Charité Centre for Global Health and Institute for International Health, Charité Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ashley T Longley
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Izulla P, Wagai JN, Akelo V, Ombeva A, Okeri E, Onyango D, Omore R, Fuller S, Khagayi S, Were J, Anderson SA, Wong HL, Tippett Barr BA. Vaccine safety surveillance in Kenya using GAIA standards: A feasibility assessment of existing national and subnational research and program systems. Vaccine 2023; 41:5722-5729. [PMID: 37550143 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance systems for monitoring vaccine safety among pregnant women address some of the limitations of a current passive surveillance approach utilized in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, few active surveillance systems in LMIC exist. Our study assessed the feasibility of utilizing three existing data collection systems in Kenya for active surveillance of maternal immunization and to assess the applicability of Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in pregnancy (GAIA) case definitions that were initially developed for clinical trials within these systems. METHODS We assessed applicability of GAIA case definition for maternal Tetanus Toxoid exposure, stillbirth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, Neonatal Invasive Blood Stream Infection (NIBSI), prematurity and neonatal death in two routine web-based health information systems (Kenya EMR and DHIS-2), and a web-based population-based pregnancy research platform (ANCOV1) in Kenya. RESULTS All three HIS were capable of reporting selected outcomes to varying degrees of GAIA certainty. The ANCOV platform was the most robust in collecting and collating clinical data for effective maternal pharmacovigilance. The utilization of facility- and district-aggregated data limits the usefulness of DHIS-2 in pharmacovigilance as currently operationalized. While the Kenya EMR contained individual level data and meets the key considerations for effective pharmacovigilance, it was used primarily for HIV care and treatment records in a small proportion of health facilities and would require additional resources to expand to all antenatal care facilities and to link maternal and infant records. DISCUSSION Population-based research studies may offer a responsive short-term option for implementing maternal vaccine pharmacovigilance in LMICs. However, the foundation exists for long-term capacity building within the national health electronic data systems to provide this critical service as well as ensure participation of the country in international studies on maternal vaccine safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Izulla
- Adroitz Consultants, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | | | - V Akelo
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - A Ombeva
- Adroitz Consultants, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - E Okeri
- Adroitz Consultants, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - D Onyango
- Kisumu County Department of Health, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - R Omore
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - S Fuller
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - S Khagayi
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - J Were
- Kenya Medical Research Institute Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
| | - S A Anderson
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA
| | - H L Wong
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA
| | - B A Tippett Barr
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya; Nyanja Health Research Institute, Salima, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davies HG, Bowman C, Watson G, Dodd C, Jones CE, Munoz FM, Heath PT, Cutland CL, Le Doare K. Standardizing case definitions for monitoring the safety of maternal vaccines globally: GAIA definitions, a review of progress to date. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 162:29-38. [PMID: 37194339 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
In 2014, the Global Alignment on Immunization safety Assessment in pregnancy consortium (GAIA) was formed, with the goal of developing a harmonized, globally-concerted approach to actively monitor the safety of vaccines in pregnancy. A total of 26 standardized definitions for the classification of adverse events have been developed. The aim of this review was to identify and describe studies undertaken to assess the performance of these definitions. A literature search was undertaken to identify published studies assessing the performance of the definitions, and reference lists were snowballed. Data were abstracted by two investigators and a narrative review of the results is presented. Four studies that have evaluated 13 GAIA case definitions (50%) were identified. Five case definitions have been assessed in high-income settings only. Recommendations have been made by the investigators to improve the performance of the definitions. These include ensuring consistency across definitions, removal of the potential for ambiguity or variations in interpretation and ensuring that higher-level criteria are acceptable at lower levels of confidence. Future research should prioritize the key case definitions that have not been assessed in low- and middle-income settings, as well as the 13 that have not undergone any validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah G Davies
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Makerere University Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Conor Bowman
- Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gabriella Watson
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Caitlin Dodd
- Julius Global Health, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Christine E Jones
- Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton and NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Flor M Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul T Heath
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Clare L Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Paediatric and Neonatal Infection, Institute of Infection & Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Makerere University Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
AbuShweimeh R, Knudson S, Chaabane S, Pal SN, Skidmore B, Stergachis A, Bhat N. Pregnancy exposure registries for drugs and vaccines in low-income and middle-income countries: scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070543. [PMID: 37156596 PMCID: PMC10174003 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data regarding the safety of drugs and vaccines in pregnant women are typically unavailable before licensure. Pregnancy exposure registries (PERs) are an important source of postmarketing safety information. PERs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) are uncommon but can provide valuable safety data regarding their distinct contexts and will become more relevant as the introduction and use of new drugs and vaccines in pregnancy increase worldwide. Strategies to support PERs in LMICs must be based on a better understanding of their current status. We developed a scoping review protocol to assess the landscape of PERs that operate in LMICs and characterise their strengths and challenges. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute manual for scoping reviews. The search strategy will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. We will search PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and WHO's Global Index Medicus, as well as the reference lists of retrieved full-text records, for articles published between 2000 and 2022 that describe PERs or other resources that systematically record exposures to medical products during pregnancy and maternal and infant outcomes in LMICs. Title and abstracts will be screened by two authors and data extracted using a standardised form. We will undertake a grey literature search using Google Scholar and targeted websites. We will distribute an online survey to selected experts and conduct semistructured interviews with key informants. Identified PERs will be summarised in tables and analysed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required for this activity, as it was determined not to involve human subjects research. Findings will be submitted to an open access peer-reviewed journal and may be presented at conferences, with underlying data and other materials made publicly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahmeh AbuShweimeh
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sophie Knudson
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sonia Chaabane
- Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Shanthi Narayan Pal
- Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Independent Information Specialist, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andy Stergachis
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Niranjan Bhat
- Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharan A, Stuurman AL, Jahagirdar S, Elango V, Riera-Montes M, Kashyap NK, Biccler J, Poluru R, Arora NK, Mathai M, Mangtani P, Devlieger H, Anderson S, Whitaker B, Wong HL, Moran A, Maure CG. Estimating baseline rates of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes using a facility-based surveillance approach: A prospective observational study from the WHO Global Vaccine Safety Multi-Country Collaboration on safety in pregnancy. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 50:101506. [PMID: 35770255 PMCID: PMC9234094 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most perinatal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet, quality data on burden of adverse outcomes of pregnancy is limited in such countries. METHODS A network of 21 maternity units, across seven countries, undertook surveillance for low birthweight, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirths, congenital microcephaly, in-hospital neonatal deaths, and neonatal infections in a cohort of over 85,000 births from May 2019 - August 2020. For each outcome, site-specific rates per 1,000 livebirths (or per 1,000 total births for stillbirth) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Descriptive sensitivity analysis was conducted to gain insight regarding underreporting of four outcomes at 16 sites. FINDINGS Estimated rates varied across countries and sites, ranging between 43·3-329·5 and 21·4-276·6/1000 livebirths for low birthweight and preterm birth respectively and 11·8-81/1,000 livebirths for SGA. No cases of congenital microcephaly were reported by three sites while the highest estimated rate was 13/1,000 livebirths. Neonatal infection and neonatal death rates varied between 1·8-73 and 0-59·9/1000 livebirths respectively while stillbirth rates ranged between 0-57·1/1000 total births across study sites. Results from the sensitivity analysis confirmed the underreporting of congenital microcephaly and SGA in our study. INTERPRETATION Our study establishes site-specific baseline rates for important adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes and addresses a critical evidence gap towards improved monitoring of benefits and risks of emerging pregnancy and neonatal interventions. FUNDING The study was sponsored by the World Health Organization with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorva Sharan
- The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jorne Biccler
- P95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Mathews Mathai
- Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Punam Mangtani
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Anderson
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Barbee Whitaker
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Allisyn Moran
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Guillard Maure
- Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Corresponding author at: World Health Organization (WHO), Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sharan A, Jahagirdar S, Stuurman AL, Elango V, Riera-Montes M, Kumar Kashyap N, Kumar Arora N, Mathai M, Mangtani P, Devlieger H, Anderson S, Whitaker B, Wong HL, Cutland CL, Guillard Maure C. Operational lessons learned in conducting an international study on pharmacovigilance in pregnancy in resource-constrained settings: The WHO Global Vaccine safety Multi-Country collaboration project. Vaccine X 2022; 11:100160. [PMID: 35434599 PMCID: PMC8993756 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The WHO Global Vaccine Safety Multi-Country Collaboration study on safety in pregnancy aims to estimate the minimum detectable risk for selected perinatal and neonatal outcomes and assess the applicability of standardized case definitions for study outcomes and maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper documents the operational lessons learned from the study. A prospective observational study was conducted across 21 hospitals in seven countries. All births occurring at sites were screened to identify select perinatal and neonatal outcomes from May 2019 to August 2020. Up to 100 cases per outcome were recruited to assess the applicability of standardized case definitions. A multi-pronged study quality assurance plan was implemented. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site functioning and project implementation was also assessed. Multi-layered ethics and administrative approvals, limited clinical documentation, difficulty in identifying outcomes requiring in-hospital follow-up, and poor quality internet connectivity emerged as important barriers to study implementation. Use of electronic platforms, application of a rigorous quality assurance plan with frequent interaction between the central and site teams helped improve data quality. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted data collection for up to 6 weeks in some sites. Our study succeeded in establishing an international hospital-based surveillance network for evaluating perinatal and neonatal outcomes using common study protocol and procedures in geographically diverse sites with differing levels of infrastructure, clinical and health-utilization practices. The enhanced surveillance capacity of participating sites shall help support future pharmacovigilance efforts for pregnancy interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorva Sharan
- The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mathews Mathai
- Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Punam Mangtani
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Anderson
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Barbee Whitaker
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Clare L Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Risk Measurement of Perinatal and Neonatal Morbidity Characteristics and Applicability of GAIA Case Definitions: Results and Lessons Learnt of a Hospital-Based Prospective Cohort Study in the Valencia Region (2019-2020). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19127132. [PMID: 35742384 PMCID: PMC9223180 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Post-marketing safety surveillance of new vaccines aimed to be administered during pregnancy is crucial to orchestrate efficient adverse events evaluation. This is of special relevance in the current landscape of new vaccines being introduced in the pregnant women population, and particularly due to the recent administration of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women. This multi-center prospective cohort study, nested within the WHO-Global Vaccine Safety-MCC study, involved two hospitals in the Valencia region. Hereby, the incidence rates of seven perinatal and neonatal outcomes in the Valencia region are presented. The pooled data analysis of the two Valencian hospitals allowed the estimation of incidence rates in the Valencia Region (per 1000 live births): 86.7 for low birth weight, 78.2 for preterm birth, 58.8 for small for gestational age, 13 for congenital microcephaly, 0.4 for stillbirth, 1.2 for neonatal death and 6.5 for neonatal infection. These figures are in line with what is expected from a high-income country and the previously reported rates for Spain and Europe, except for the significantly increased rate for congenital microcephaly. Regarding the data for maternal immunization, the vaccination status was collected for 94.4% of the screened pregnant women, highlighting the high quality of the Valencian Vaccine Registry. The study also assessed the Valencian hospitals’ capacity for identifying and collecting data on maternal immunization status, as well as the applicability of the GAIA definitions to the identified outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gadoth A, Mukadi Nkamba D, Arena PJ, Hoff NA, Dzogang C, Kampilu D, Beya M, Wong HL, Anderson SA, Kaba D, Rimoin AW. Assessing the feasibility of passive surveillance for maternal immunization safety utilizing archival medical records in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Vaccine 2022; 40:3605-3613. [PMID: 35570074 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the establishment of the Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in pregnancy (GAIA) case definitions in 2015, there has been an urgent need for field validation of pharmacovigilance feasibility in low- and middle-income countries. In this study, we assess the availability and quality of archival medical records at ten randomly selected high-traffic maternity wards in Kinshasa province, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). METHODS A retrospective cohort of mother-child pairs was established from all recorded births taking place at study sites between July 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020 through digitization of medical records. Adverse birth outcomes and maternal vaccination status, where available and linkable, were defined according to GAIA. Basic demographic information on mothers and newborns was also tabulated; birth outcomes were assessed for both intra-site prevalence and a pooled prevalence. RESULTS A total of 7,697 mother-newborn pair records were extracted, with 37% of infants screening positive as cases of adverse outcomes. Maternal vaccination information was linkable to 67% of those cases. In total, 51% of stillbirths, 98% of preterm births, 100% of low birthweight infants, 90% of small for gestational age infants, 100% of microcephalic infants, and 0% of neonatal bloodstream infections were classifiable according to GAIA standards following initial screening. Forty percent of case mothers had some indication of tetanus vaccination prior to delivery in their medical records, but only 26% of case mothers met some level of GAIA definition for maternal vaccination during the pregnancy of interest. CONCLUSIONS Archival birth records from delivery centers can be feasibly utilized to screen for stillbirth and maternal tetanus vaccination, and to accurately classify preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age, and congenital microcephaly. Assessment of other neonatal outcomes were limited by inconsistent postpartum infant follow-up and records keeping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adva Gadoth
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Dalau Mukadi Nkamba
- Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Patrick J Arena
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicole A Hoff
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Camille Dzogang
- UCLA-DRC Health Research and Training Program, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - David Kampilu
- UCLA-DRC Health Research and Training Program, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Michael Beya
- UCLA-DRC Health Research and Training Program, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Steven A Anderson
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Didine Kaba
- Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Anne W Rimoin
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Voss G, Jacquet JM, Tornieporth N, Kampmann B, Karron R, Meulen AST, Chen R, Gruber M, Lurie N, Weller C, Cramer JP, Saville M, Darko M. Meeting report: CEPI consultation on accelerating access to novel vaccines against emerging infectious diseases for pregnant and lactating women, London, 12-13 February 2020. Vaccine 2021; 39:7357-7362. [PMID: 34799142 PMCID: PMC8595925 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Infectious diseases may cause serious morbidity and mortality in pregnant women, their foetuses, and infants; the risk associated with any newly emerging infectious disease (EID) is likely unknown at the time of its emergence. While the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic shows that the development of vaccines against new pathogens can be considerably accelerated, the immunization of pregnant women generally lags behind the general population. Guided by the priority pathogen list for WHO's R&D Blueprint for Action to Prevent Epidemics, this workshop sought to define the evidence needed for use of vaccines against EIDs in pregnant and lactating women, using Lassa fever as a model. Close to 60 maternal immunization (MI) and vaccine safety experts, regulators, vaccine developers, Lassa fever experts, and investigators from Lassa-affected countries examined the critical steps for vaccine development and immunization decisions for pregnant and lactating women. This paper reports on key themes and recommendations from the workshop. Current practice still assumes the exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials. A shift in paradigm is needed to progress towards initial inclusion of pregnant women in Phase 2 and 3 trials. Several practical avenues were delineated. Participants agreed that vaccine platforms should be assessed early for their suitability for maternal immunization. It was noted that, in some cases, nonclinical data derived from assessing a given platform using other antigens may be adequate evidence to proceed to a first clinical evaluation and that concurrence from regulators may be sought with supporting rationale. For clinical trials, essential prerequisites such as documenting the disease burden in pregnant women, study site infrastructure, capabilities, and staff experience were noted. Early and sustained communication with the local community was considered paramount in any program for the conduct of MI trials and planned vaccine introduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald Voss
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Beate Kampmann
- The Vaccine Centre, Faculty of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ruth Karron
- Center for Immunization Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Robert Chen
- Brighton Collaboration, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, GA, USA
| | - Marion Gruber
- Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Lurie
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK
| | | | - Jakob P Cramer
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK
| | - Melanie Saville
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, London, UK
| | - Mimi Darko
- Food and Drugs Authority, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stuurman AL, Sharan A, Jahagirdar S, Elango V, Riera-Montes M, Kashyap N, Biccler J, Poluru R, Arora N, Mathai M, Mangtani P, DeVlieger H, Anderson S, Whitaker B, Wong HL, Cutland C, Guillard Maure C. WHO global vaccine safety multi-country collaboration project on safety in pregnancy: Assessing the level of diagnostic certainty using standardized case definitions for perinatal and neonatal outcomes and maternal immunization. Vaccine X 2021; 9:100123. [PMID: 34825164 PMCID: PMC8605263 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Standardized case definitions strengthen post-marketing safety surveillance of new vaccines by improving generated data, interpretation and comparability across surveillance systems. The Global Alignment of Immunization Safety Assessment in Pregnancy (GAIA) project developed standardized case definitions for 21 key obstetric and neonatal terms following the Brighton Collaboration (BC) methodology. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed the applicability of GAIA definitions for maternal immunization exposure and for low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), stillbirth, neonatal death, neonatal infection, and congenital microcephaly. We identified the missing data elements that prevented identified cases and exposures from meeting the case definition (level 1-3 of BC diagnostic certainty). Over a one-year period (2019-2020), all births occurring in 21 sites (mostly secondary and tertiary hospitals) in 6 Low Middle Income Countries and 1 High Income Country were recorded and the 7 perinatal and neonatal outcome cases were identified from routine medical records. Up to 100 cases per outcome were recruited sequentially from each site. Most cases recruited for LBW, preterm birth and neonatal death met the GAIA case definitions. Birth weight, a key parameter for all three outcomes, was routinely recorded at all sites. The definitions for SGA, stillbirth, neonatal infection (particularly meningitis and respiratory infection) and congenital microcephaly were found to be less applicable. The main barrier to obtaining higher levels of diagnostic certainty was the lack of sonographic documentation of gestational age in first or second trimester. The definition for maternal immunization exposure was applicable, however, the highest level of diagnostic certainty was only reached at two sites. Improved documentation of maternal immunization will be important for vaccine safety studies. Following the field-testing of these 8 GAIA definitions, several improvements are suggested that may lead to their easier implementation, increased standardization and hence comparison across studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Apoorva Sharan
- INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Jorne Biccler
- P95 Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Matthews Mathai
- Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Punam Mangtani
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Anderson
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Barbee Whitaker
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Clare Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Christine Guillard Maure
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mantel C, Cherian T, Ko M, Malvoti S, Mason E, Giles M, Lambach P. Stakeholder perceptions about Group B Streptococcus disease and potential for maternal vaccination in low and middle-income countries. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:S80-S87. [PMID: 34558611 PMCID: PMC8776310 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To inform the World Health Organization’s full value of vaccine assessment for group B Streptococcus (GBS) vaccines, a rapid literature appraisal was conducted to inform the operationalization of maternal GBS vaccination. We found limited published information on stakeholder perceptions of the public health importance of GBS disease and vaccination, and we therefore undertook a multicountry survey. Methods An online survey was conducted in late 2019 to collect information on stakeholders’ awareness of GBS disease and the priority accorded to vaccination. The survey was distributed by email to 395 representatives of national pediatric, gynecology, and obstetrics associations, national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs), national regulatory agencies, academia, and United Nations organizations. Results Among 101 survey respondents from 66 countries, 36% were pediatricians, 25% obstetricians/gynecologists, 21% immunization specialists, and 18% other public health specialists. More than half (58%) of respondents reported being familiar with GBS disease as a public health problem; familiarity decreased by country income level. Knowledge of GBS disease was greatest in the Americas (68%) and Europe (66%) and lowest in Asia (13%–38%). Perception of GBS disease as a public health problem was highest among pediatricians (71%) and lowest among public health policy makers and NITAG members (30%) across country groupings. Approximately half of respondents (49%) considered the introduction of a GBS vaccine as a priority. Conclusions The information obtained will inform the appropriate packaging and presentation of information to address stakeholder perceptions and promote evidence-based decision making on GBS vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Melissa Ko
- MMGH Consulting GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Elizabeth Mason
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Michelle Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philipp Lambach
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pingray V, Belizán M, Matthews S, Zaraa S, Berrueta M, Noguchi LM, Xiong X, Gurtman A, Absalon J, Nelson JC, Panagiotakopoulos L, Sevene E, Munoz FM, Althabe F, Mwamwitwa KW, Rodriguez Cairoli F, Anderson SA, McClure EM, Guillard C, Nakimuli A, Stergachis A, Buekens P. Using maternal and neonatal data collection systems for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines active safety surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: an international modified Delphi study. Gates Open Res 2021; 5:99. [PMID: 39049963 PMCID: PMC11266593 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13305.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Given that pregnant women are now included among those for receipt coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, it is important to ensure that information systems can be used (or available) for active safety surveillance, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this study was to build consensus about the use of existing maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs for COVID-19 vaccines active safety surveillance, a basic set of variables, and the suitability and feasibility of including pregnant women and LMIC research networks in COVID-19 vaccines pre-licensure activities. Methods: A three-stage modified Delphi study was conducted over three months in 2020. An international multidisciplinary panel of 16 experts participated. Ratings distributions and consensus were assessed, and ratings' rationale was analyzed. Results: The panel recommended using maternal and neonatal data collection systems for active safety surveillance in LMICs (median 9; disagreement index [DI] -0.92), but there was no consensus (median 6; DI 1.79) on the feasibility of adapting these systems. A basic set of 14 maternal, neonatal, and vaccination-related variables. Out of 16 experts, 11 supported a basic set of 14 maternal, neonatal, and vaccination-related variables for active safety surveillance. Seven experts agreed on a broader set of 26 variables. The inclusion of pregnant women for COVID-19 vaccines research (median 8; DI -0.61) was found appropriate, although there was uncertainty on its feasibility in terms of decision-makers' acceptability (median 7; DI 10.00) and regulatory requirements (median 6; DI 0.51). There was no consensus (median 6; DI 2.35) on the feasibility of including research networks in LMICs for conducting clinical trials amongst pregnant women. Conclusions: Although there was some uncertainty regarding feasibility, experts recommended using maternal and neonatal data collection systems and agreed on a common set of variables for COVID-19 vaccines active safety surveillance in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Pingray
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
| | - María Belizán
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
| | - Sarah Matthews
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, USA
| | - Sabra Zaraa
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
| | - Lisa M. Noguchi
- Jhpiego, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, USA
| | - Xu Xiong
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, USA
| | - Alejandra Gurtman
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, 10965, USA
| | - Judith Absalon
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, 10965, USA
| | - Jennifer C. Nelson
- Kaiser Permanente, Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, 98101, USA
| | | | - Esperanca Sevene
- Department of Physiological Science, Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine , Maputo, Mozambique, Eduardo Mondlane University/Manhiça Health Research Centre, Maputo, Maputo, 1102, Mozambique
| | - Flor M. Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics, Molecular Virology and Microbiology,, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, 77004, USA
| | - Fernando Althabe
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland
| | - Kissa W. Mwamwitwa
- Tanzania Medicines and Medical Devices Authority, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 11000, Tanzania
| | - Federico Rodriguez Cairoli
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina
| | | | - Elizabeth M. McClure
- Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina, 27709, USA
| | | | - Annettee Nakimuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Kampala, 0000, Uganda
| | - Andy Stergachis
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA
| | - Pierre Buekens
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Macias Saint-Gerons D, Solà Arnau I, De Mucio B, Arévalo-Rodríguez I, Alemán A, Castro JL, Ropero Álvarez AM. Adverse events associated with the use of recommended vaccines during pregnancy: An overview of systematic reviews. Vaccine 2020; 39 Suppl 2:B12-B26. [PMID: 32972737 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal immunization is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and their newborns. Updated evidence synthesis of maternal-fetal outcomes is constantly needed to ensure that the risk-benefit of vaccination during pregnancy remains positive. METHODS An overview of systematic reviews (OoSRs) was performed. We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for SRs including recommended vaccines for maternal immunization reporting the following: abortion, stillbirth, chorioamnionitis, congenital anomalies, microcephaly, neonatal death, neonatal infection, preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), maternal death and small for gestational age (SGA) from 2010 to April 2019. Quality and overlap of SRs was assessed. RESULTS Seventeen SRs were identified, eight of them included meta-analysis; quality was high in three SRs, moderate in six SRs, low in two SRs, and critically low in six SRs. Stillbirth and PTB were the most frequently reported outcomes by 15 and 13 SRs, respectively, followed by abortion (9 SRs), congenital anomalies (9 SRs), SGA (8 SRs), neonatal death (8 SRs), LBW (4 SRs), chorioamnionitis (3 SRs), maternal death (1 SR). SRs included mainly observational evidence for influenza and Tdap vaccines (11 SRs and 4 SRs, respectively); limited evidence was found for hepatitis (1 SR), yellow fever (1 SR), and meningococcal (1 SR) vaccines. Most of the SRs found no effect. Eight SRs found benefit/protection of influenza vaccine (for stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, LBW), or Tdap vaccine (for preterm birth and SGA); one found a probable risk (chorioamnionitis/Tdap). The SRs for Hepatitis B, meningococcal and yellow fever vaccines were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Definite risks were not identified for any vaccine and outcome; however better evidence is needed for all outcomes and vaccines. The available evidence in the SRs to support vaccine safety was based mainly on observational data. More RCTs with adequate reporting of maternal-fetal outcomes and larger high-quality observational studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Macias Saint-Gerons
- Department of Medicine, University of Valencia/INCLIVA Health Research Institute and CIBERSAM, Valencia, Spain; Department of Health Systems and Services (HSS)/Unit of Medicines and Health Technologies (MT), Pan American Health Organization PAHO/WHO, Washington DC, USA
| | - Iván Solà Arnau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, Spain
| | - Bremen De Mucio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Ingrid Arévalo-Rodríguez
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Alemán
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - José Luis Castro
- Department of Health Systems and Services (HSS)/Unit of Medicines and Health Technologies (MT), Pan American Health Organization PAHO/WHO, Washington DC, USA
| | - Alba María Ropero Álvarez
- Department of Family, Gender and Life Course, Immunization Unit, Pan American Health Organization PAHO/WHO, Washington DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Berrueta M, Bardach A, Ciaponni A, Xiong X, Stergachis A, Zaraa S, Buekens P. Maternal and neonatal data collection systems in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review protocol. Gates Open Res 2020; 4:18. [PMID: 32420540 PMCID: PMC7199220 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13106.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Pregnant women and neonates represent one of the most vulnerable groups, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A recent analysis reported that most vaccine pharmacovigilance systems in LMICs consist of spontaneous (passive) adverse event reporting. Thus, LMICs need effective active surveillance approaches, such as pregnancy registries. We intend to identify currently active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs, with the potential to inform active safety electronic surveillance for novel vaccines using standardized definitions. Methods: A scoping review will be conducted based on established methodology. Multiple databases of indexed and grey literature will be searched with a specific focus on existing electronic and paper-electronic systems in LMICs that collect continuous, prospective, and individual-level data from antenatal care, delivery, neonatal care (up to 28 days), and postpartum (up to 42 days) at the facility and community level, at the national and district level, and at large hospitals. Also, experts will be contacted to identify unpublished information on relevant data collection systems. General and specific descriptions of Health Information Systems (HIS) extracted from the different sources will be combined and duplicated HIS will be removed, producing a list of unique statements. We will present a final list of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health systems considered flexible enough to be updated with necessary improvements to detect, assess and respond to safety concerns during the introduction of vaccines and other maternal health interventions. Selected experts will participate in an in-person consultation meeting to select up to three systems to be further explored in situ. Results and knowledge gaps will be synthesized after expert consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel Berrueta
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Agustin Ciaponni
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Xu Xiong
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
| | | | - Sabra Zaraa
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7631, USA
| | - Pierre Buekens
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
| | - Scoping Review Collaboration Group
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7631, USA
| |
Collapse
|