Concomitant administration of a fully liquid ready-to-use DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T hexavalent vaccine with a meningococcal ACWY conjugate vaccine in toddlers

A worldwide overview for hexavalent vaccines and a glimpse into Turkiye's perspective

The surge in recommended vaccinations for child's has spurred the development of combination vaccines, notably hexavalent vaccines, which provide multiple immunizations in a single dose. These vaccines offer various advantages, such as streamlining vaccination schedules, minimizing injection-related pain and exposure to preservatives, expanding vaccine coverage, and reducing administration costs. However, the intricate and expensive development of these vaccines presents substantial challenges, requiring increased investment and healthcare provider education to optimize their utilization and sustain high vaccination rates. Turkey, known for its robust vaccine coverage, strategic geographic location, and the influx of refugees, is at a critical juncture for integrating hexavalent vaccines into national programs. This transition is especially relevant given the rising vaccine hesitancy and the potential resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases. This review assesses the deployment of hexavalent vaccines, examining their benefits and challenges through clinical trials and global experiences, with a specific emphasis on Turkiye's public health context.

Immunogenicity of a liquid hexavalent DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine after primary and booster vaccination of term and preterm infants born to women vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Vaccination during pregnancy with tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (aP) (Tdap) antigens is important for early protection of newborn infants against pertussis, particularly for preterm infants. This study evaluated the effect of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy on the immunogenicity of a diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), aP, inactivated poliovirus (IPV), hepatitis B (HB), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP ∼ T) vaccine in term and preterm populations.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study (NCT02511327) recruited women and their infants based on delivery (term or preterm) and vaccination status (vaccinated with a Tdap vaccine [Boostrix™, GlaxoSmithKline] during pregnancy or not vaccinated in the last 5 years). All infants received licensed DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T (Hexyon™, Sanofi) (8, 12, 16 week primary series and booster at 13 months of age [preterm infants] or 15 months of age [term infants]). Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays. Data were pooled into term (N = 127) and preterm infants (N = 105), and infants of women who received a Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (N = 199) or not (N = 33).

RESULTS

Before primary vaccination, antibody levels were higher for term than preterm infants for anti-D, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP, and similar for anti-HBs and anti-T. At this time, infants of Tdap-vaccinated women had higher anti-D, anti-T, anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRP antibody levels than infants of Tdap-unvaccinated women; anti-HBs and anti-polio antibody levels were similar in both groups. Post-primary, pre-booster, and post-booster, there were only small differences in seroprotection rates (anti-D, anti-T, anti-polio 1, 2, 3, anti-HBs, anti-PRP) and seroconversion rates (anti-PT, anti-FHA), except for anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL and anti-PRP ≥ 0.15 µg/mL post-primary vaccination (higher for term [98.31 % and 90.91 %, respectively] versus preterm infants [89.80 % and 79.41 %, respectively]).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP ∼ T vaccine for primary and booster vaccination in term and preterm born infants and in infants born to Tdap-vaccinated or Tdap-unvaccinated women.

DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine (Hexaxim): an update 10 years after first licensure

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim® is fully liquid, hexavalent, combination vaccine that provides immunization against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, hepatitis B, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. Combination vaccines such as Hexaxim reduce the number of injections needed, improving both vaccination compliance and operational efficiency.

AREAS COVERED

Safety and immunogenicity data were reviewed from >25 clinical trials involving approximately 7200 infants/toddlers, identified using PubMed searches to April 2023. These trials have evaluated a diverse range of primary series and booster schedules, including antibody persistence, co-administration of Hexaxim with other routine pediatric vaccines, and specific populations (born to Tdap-vaccinated women, preterm, and immunocompromised infants). Lastly, post-marketing surveillance and real-world effectiveness data were assessed.

EXPERT OPINION

An extensive program of clinical development prior to licensure demonstrated favorable vaccine safety and good immunogenicity of each antigen, and Hexaxim was first approved for use in 2012. In the 10 years since licensure, Hexaxim has been adopted widely, with more than 180 million doses distributed worldwide. The widespread use of this hexavalent vaccine is a crucial tool in the ongoing and future control of six pediatric infectious diseases globally.

A review of the DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T Hexavalent vaccine in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Hexaxim is a hexavalent vaccine approved as primary and booster vaccination in infants 6 weeks and older, protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b.

AREAS COVERED

To evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity (safety) of Hexaxim (Hexyon, Hexacima) in primary and booster vaccine schedules; long-term antibody persistence; concomitant use with other childhood vaccines and use in immunocompromised infants. Hexaxim was found to be noninferior to other licensed hexavalent vaccines, being highly immunogenic for all toxoids/antigens and with an acceptable safety profile. It can be administered concomitantly with other childhood vaccines. Hexaxim can be given as a booster for infants primed with Infanrix Hexa and given in a pentavalent-hexavalent-pentavalent series. Hexaxim elicits a similar immune response and safety profile in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive infants. It has the benefit of being a ready-to-use liquid formulation, minimizing dosage errors and preparation time.

EXPERT OPINION

Hexaxim has an acceptable safety profile and provides immunity against all six targeted diseases. It is an acceptable alternative to other hexavalent vaccines on the market. Further studies are required on the use of immunocompromised patients as well as the antibody persistence of each of the vaccine components.

A combined DTaP-IPV vaccine (Tetraxim®/Tetravac®) used as school-entry booster: a review of more than 20 years of clinical and post-marketing experience

INTRODUCTION

Routine infant primary series and toddler booster vaccination are associated with waning of antibody levels over time, which can lead to an increased incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases. A diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) booster vaccination at school-entry (aged 4-7 years) allows continued protection against these diseases and is included in many national immunization programs.

AREAS COVERED

The available immunogenicity and safety data from 6 clinical studies of a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DTaP-IPV [Tetraxim®]) used as a school-entry booster vaccination were identified using a PubMed search or on file at Sanofi. The studies spanned a 15-year period (1995-2010) and were performed in different populations using different study designs, so all data were reviewed descriptively (no meta-analyses were conducted). Additionally, post-marketing experience was reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Each vaccine antigen is highly immunogenic, and the safety profile of the vaccine is satisfactory. Post-marketing evaluations have shown the effectiveness of a school-age booster, particularly against increased pertussis disease incidence around the time of school entry and the associated risk of spreading the disease through contact with younger vulnerable infants. School-entry provides an ideal opportunity to implement DTaP-IPV vaccination to close the gap between waning immunity from the previous infant/toddler vaccination and future adolescent vaccination.

Health care professionals' preference for a fully liquid, ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine in Spain

•

Biosafety devices are needed to safely administer vaccines.

•

Use of “ready-to-use” vaccines can avoid biological accidents.

•

Majority of nurses showed concerns about using lyophilized vaccines.

Vaccination is an effective health intervention for the prevention of infectious diseases. This study aims to evaluate the response provided by nurses toward the use of ready-to-use (RTU) formulations of hexavalent vaccines and measures to prevent errors during the vaccination process. This observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study took place from March to May 2018. It included 201 interviews with nurses from health centers in Madrid (70), Murcia (59), and Andalusia (72), who had administered RTU vaccines in the last 12 months. Approximately 91.6% of nurses provided a positive feedback for the use of RTU vaccines. The most significant concerns experienced by nurses were during the preparation and administration of vaccines; 84.1% versus 18.9% of nurses felt that the risk of making mistakes was lower while using RTU vaccines compared with non-reconstituted (lyophilized) vaccines, and 74.1% versus 22.4% of nurses felt ease at preparing RTU vaccines compared with lyophilized vaccines. A total of 66.7% of nurses believed that there were risks associated with the preparation of lyophilized vaccines (administration risk [42.8%] and risk of needle injury [42.3%]). Risk percentages reduced to 4% and 9.5%, respectively, with the use of the RTU vaccines. Therefore, nurses adopted an average of seven steps to reduce the risk of errors. The average time saved during the administration of the vaccines was 1.1 min. In summary, nurses highlighted the need for administering vaccines using RTU formulations for ensuring the safety of the recipients, preventing errors, and saving time during the vaccination process.

Safety of Co-Administration Versus Separate Administration of the Same Vaccines in Children: A Systematic Literature Review

The growing number of available vaccines that can be potentially co-administered makes the assessment of the safety of vaccine co-administration increasingly relevant but complex. We aimed to synthesize the available scientific evidence on the safety of vaccine co-administrations in children by performing a systematic literature review of studies assessing the safety of vaccine co-administrations in children between 1999 and 2019, in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Fifty studies compared co-administered vaccines versus the same vaccines administered separately. The most frequently studied vaccines included quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) vaccine, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) or tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines, diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis adsorbed, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate (DTaP-HepB-IPV/Hib) vaccine, measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, and pneumococcal conjugate 7-valent (PCV7) or 13-valent (PCV13) vaccines. Of this, 16% (n = 8) of the studies reported significantly more adverse events following immunization (AEFI) while in 10% (n = 5) significantly fewer adverse events were found in the co-administration groups. Statistically significant differences between co-administration and separate administration were found for 16 adverse events, for 11 different vaccine co-administrations. In general, studies briefly described safety and one-third of studies lacked any statistical assessment of AEFI. Overall, the evidence on the safety of vaccine co-administrations compared to separate vaccine administrations is inconclusive and there is a paucity of large post-licensure studies addressing this issue.

DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib pediatric hexavalent combination vaccine for use in children from 6 weeks through to 4 years of age

Introduction: Combination vaccines reduce the number of injections received by children, hence improving timeliness and coverage, and general acceptability among caregivers and health-care providers. The most recent hexavalent vaccine, DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib, has been also approved by the FDA.Areas covered: DTaP5-HBV-IPV-Hib has demonstrated good immunogenic and safety profiles, not inferior to other hexavalent vaccines already in use in the European market. Either (2p+1/3p+1) immunization schedules can be used with no significant differences. A low incidence of severe adverse events has been shown, similar to other combination vaccines. No issues have arisen when concomitantly administered with other vaccines.Expert opinion: The inclusion of two additional acellular pertussis components (FIM2 and FIM3) might yield better protection against the disease, but this remains to be clinically proven. The new vaccine uses Hib with unique protein carrier (PRP-OMPC) which elicits higher earlier immune response without compromising safety. Compliance with the immunization schedules is expected to increase by decreasing the number of injections needed in combined vaccines for a single visit. In addition, the improvements on the ease-of-use by its liquid-formulation, makes the vaccine preparation more acceptable for use in clinics and may reduce the odds of administration errors.

DTaP-IPV-HepB-Hib Vaccine (Hexyon®): An Updated Review of its Use in Primary and Booster Vaccination

Hexyon^® is a fully-liquid, ready-to-use, hexavalent vaccine approved in the EU since 2013 for primary and booster vaccination in infants and toddlers from age 6 weeks against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B (HB), poliomyelitis, and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). While the source of HB antigen in Hexyon^® is different from other vaccines, the rest of its valences have been extensively used in other approved vaccines. Hexyon^® is highly immunogenic for all its component toxoids/antigens when used as primary and booster vaccine in infants and toddlers, irrespective of vaccination schedule. It provides durable protection against hepatitis B. Hexyon^® can be used for a mixed primary series of hexavalent-pentavalent-hexavalent vaccines or as a booster in infants primed with Infanrix hexa™ or pentavalent (whole-cell or acellular pertussis) vaccines. Coadministration of Hexyon^® with other common childhood vaccines did not affect immune response to any vaccines. Hexyon^® has a good reactogenicity/safety profile. The immunogenicity and safety profile of Hexyon^® was similar to that of several approved vaccines, including Infanrix hexa™. However, Hexyon^® offers the convenience of full-liquid, ready-to-use formulation, which may minimize vaccination errors and preparation time. Thus, Hexyon^® is a convenient, useful option for vaccination against childhood diseases caused by six major pathogens.